Crystalloids vs. colloids for fluid optimization in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery

The Effect of Colloids versus Crystalloids for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) contributes to improvements in intraoperative fluid infusion based on objective parameters and has been widely recommended in clinical practice. In addition, increasing evidence reveals that GDFT can improve the prognosis of surgical patients. However, considering the individual characteristics of colloids and crystalloids in clinical use, it is uncertain as to which type of fluids administered is associated with better outcomes in the condition of GDFT.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of colloids versus crystalloids under GDFT on prognosis in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Data Sources. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, CNKI, Cochrane library, and reference lists of relevant articles.

Methods

Two investigators independently screened and reviewed studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. Our primary outcome was a composite of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were (1) mortality at the follow-up duration; (2) postoperative complications of several organ systems, including cardiac, pulmonary, digestive, urinary, nervous system, and postoperative infection events; and (3) hospital and ICU length of stay. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I 2 and chi-square tests. The odds ratio (OR) of the dichotomous data, mean difference (MD) of continuous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the pooled data.

Results

Of 332 articles retrieved, 15 RCTs (involving 2,956 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery) were included in the final analysis. When the data were pooled, patients in the colloids and crystalloids group revealed no difference in postoperative composite complications (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38, P=0.49) under GDFT. Regarding the secondary outcomes, patients in the colloids group were associated with fewer digestive system complications (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41-0.98, P=0.04). However, no difference was found in mortality (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.72-2.58, P=0.34), complications of the cardiac system (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.66-3.37, P=0.34), pulmonary system (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.62-1.28, P=0.53), urinary system (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.61-1.80, P=0.87), nervous system (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.55-1.98, P=0.90), postoperative infection events (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.75-1.07, P=0.22), length of hospital stay (difference in mean = -0.71, 95% CI = -1.49-0.07, P=0.07), and ICU stay (difference in mean = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.20-0.18, P=0.95) between patients receiving GDFT with colloids or crystalloids.

Conclusion

There is no evidence of a benefit in using colloids over crystalloids under GDFT in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, despite its use resulting in lower digestive system complications.

Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluid management is a crucial aspect of cancer surgery, including colorectal surgery and pancreatoduodenectomy. The study tests if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and duration of hospitalisation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery treated by the same anaesthetic protocols with epidural analgesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 2 parallel groups. High-risk surgical patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly selected in the control group (CG), where standard monitoring was applied (44 patients), and the protocol group (PG), where cerebral oxygenation and extended hemodynamic monitoring were used with the protocol for intraoperative interventions (44 patients).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the median length of hospital stay, CG 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 8 days), PG 9 (5.5), p = 0.851. There was no difference in postoperative renal of cardiac impairment. Procalcitonin was significantly higher (highest postoperative value in the first 3 days) in CG, 0.75 mcg/L (IQR 3.19 mcg/L), than in PG, 0.3 mcg/L (0.88 mcg/L), p = 0.001. PG patients received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid; median intraoperative fluid balance +1300 ml (IQR 1063 ml) than CG; +375 ml (IQR 438 ml), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in intraoperative fluid management and vasopressor use. The median postoperative value of procalcitonin was significantly higher in CG, suggesting differences in immune response to tissue trauma in different intraoperative fluid status, but there was no difference in postoperative morbidity or hospital stay.