Sella Turcica Morphology Phenotyping in Malay Subjects with Down’s Syndrome

Sella turcica morphometrics in subjects with down syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Since the number of patients diagnosed with Down syndrome seeking orthodontic treatment is increasing, clinicians could contribute by applying diagnostic modalities used frequently in the orthodontic field for research purposes. Thus, The aim of the present study is to implement morphometric methods to investigate the size and shape of sella turcica in subjects with Down syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, archive records of 24 individuals with Down syndrome were compared to 48 healthy controls matched for age and gender. Parameters such as sella anterior, midpoint, and posterior height were measured, as well as sella width, area, and length were calculated. Independent sample t-tests were applied for the comparison of differences in sella turcica dimensions. Geometric morphometric analysis of the sella was performed with, implementing methods such as Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found for sella anterior height, sella midpoint height, sella posterior height, sella maximum height, sella length, and sella area. All the aforementioned values were significantly increased in the Down syndrome subjects (p<0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) depicted a statistically significant difference in sella shape between patients with Down syndrome and healthy controls (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with Down syndrome presented significantly increased sella turcica dimensions as well statistically significant differences in shape compared to healthy controls.

Morphology of the Sella Turcica: A Meta-Analysis Based on the Results of 18,364 Patients

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to present data on the sella turcica (ST) morphology and variations. Furthermore, a detailed morphometric analysis of the ST was conducted.

METHODS

Major online databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched through. The overall search process was conducted in three stages.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis was based on the results of 18,364 patients and demonstrates the most up-to-date and relevant data regarding the morphology of the ST in the available literature. Four classification methods of the ST shape can be distinguished, in which the most commonly occurring variants are the normal ST (55.56%), the U-shaped ST (73.58%), the circular type of ST (42.29%), and non-bridging ST (55.64%). The overall midpoint height of the ST was 6.59 mm (SE = 0.13). The overall length of the ST was 9.06 mm (SE = 0.15). The overall volume of the ST was 845.80 mm3 (SE = 288.92). Four main classification methods of ST morphology can be distinguished in the available literature. Various morphometric characteristics of the ST may be applied in clinical practice to evaluate its shape, dimensions, and normal or pathological variants.

Sella turcica morphology in patients with genetic syndromes: A systematic review

The sella turcica is an important anatomical reference used in orthodontics for the evaluation of craniofacial growth. Studies have found variations in the sella turcica morphology in patients with syndromes affecting the craniofacial complex. This review aims to determine whether genetic syndromes involving the craniofacial complex are associated with abnormal radiographic sella turcica morphology and whether there is a pattern of malformation which is consistent within each syndrome. An electronic database search was conducted to identify relevant studies. We included primary studies describing the morphology of the sella turcica on lateral radiographs in human subjects with genetic syndromes involving the craniofacial complex. No restrictions were placed on language or timeframe. PROSPERO registration CRD42019148060. Thirty-eight studies were included in this review. A 'J'-shaped sella was found in patients with Hutchinson-Gilford-Progeria syndrome and other syndromes. A bulbous dorsum sellae was highly prevalent Cleidocranial dysplasia, and a bulbous dorsum sellae and uneven contours of the clivus was found in Cri du chat syndrome. A steep clivus was described in patients with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. An oblique anterior wall was the most frequent malformation found in Down's syndrome. Genetic syndromes affecting the craniofacial complex are associated with abnormal morphology of the radiographic sella turcica. Clinicians should be observant of abnormal sella turcica morphology which can be a sign of undiagnosed or subclinical syndromes. More high-quality studies are needed which use standardized and objective methods of determining the morphology of the sella turcica.

Evaluation of Sella Turcica Bridging and Morphology in Different Types of Cleft Patients

Objectives

To evaluate sella turcica (ST) bridging, associated anomalies, and morphology, in subjects with four different types of clefts, and compare them with non-cleft (NC) subjects.

Materials and Methods

A total of 123 (31 NC and 92 cleft) Saudi subjects who had their lateral cephalogram (Late. Ceph.), orthopantomogram (OPG), and clinical details for ordinary diagnosis were included in the study. Among 92 cleft subjects, 29 had bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), 41 had unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), nine had unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (UCLA), and 13 with unilateral cleft lip (UCL). ST bridging and seven parameters related to ST morphology and skeletal malocclusion were analyzed using Late. Ceph. Associated dental anomalies in ST bridging subjects were investigated using OPG. The images were investigated using artificial intelligence driven Webceph software. Multiple statistical tests were applied to see the differences between gender and among cleft vs NC subjects.

Results

ST bridging was found to be higher in cleft subjects (22.82%). Most of the cleft subjects had severe skeletal Class III malocclusion associated with multiple types of dental anomalies (impacted canines, congenital missing, and presence of supernumerary teeth). No significant gender disparities in all seven parameters of ST morphology were found between NC and cleft groups. However, there were significant differences when compared among four different types of cleft individuals vs NC subjects.

Conclusion

ST bridging is more prevalent in cleft subjects along with Class III malocclusion and associated dental anomalies. ST morphometry differs significantly between cleft vs NC subjects. BCLP exhibits smaller values of all seven parameters as compared to all other groups.