Trends and Disparities in Quality of Diabetes Care in the US: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2016

Achieving Health Equity in the Care of Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the prevailing racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure (HF) care by identifying barriers to equitable care and proposing solutions for achieving equitable outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Throughout the entire spectrum of HF care, from prevention to implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy and advanced interventions, racial and ethnic disparities exist. Factors such as differential distribution of risk factors, poor access to care, inadequate representation in clinical trials, and discrimination from healthcare clinicians, among others, contribute to these disparities. Recent data suggests that despite improvements, disparities prevail in several aspects of HF care, hindering our progress towards equity in HF care. This review highlights the urgent need to address racial and ethnic disparities in HF care, emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted approach involving policy changes, quality improvement strategies, targeted interventions, and intentional community engagement. Our proposed framework was derived from existing research and emphasizes integrating equity into routine quality improvement efforts, tailoring interventions to specific populations, and advocating for policy transformation. By acknowledging these disparities, implementing evidence-based strategies, and fostering collaborative efforts, the HF community can strive to reduce disparities and achieve equity in HF care.

Achievement of treatment goals among adults with diabetes in Colombia, 2015-2019: Results from a national registry

AIMS

To assess the achievement of essential treatment goals among patients with diabetes in Colombia.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a nationwide registry of all individuals with diagnosed diabetes, hypertension or CKD assisted by the health system. We explored the prevalence of treatment goals (HbA1c < 7% [<53 mmol/mol], systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg and LDLc < 100 mg/dL), and their variations by race and type of health insurance, between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019.

RESULTS

We studied 1 352 846 patients with diagnosed diabetes. The prevalence of HbA1c < 7% (<53 mmol/mol) remained steady at 52%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg was also stable at 80-82%. Meanwhile, the prevalence of both LDLc < 100 mg/dL and non-HDLc < 130 mg/dL increased by 6 percentage points. Achievement of the triple HbA1c + SBP + LDLc goal was only 21.4% in 2015, increasing to 24.4% by 2019. Goal achievement was consistently lower among patients of black race, especially for HbA1c (5% lower than other races), but also for the SBP, LDLc and joint goals. Patients under third-party insurance reached better HbA1c, SBP, and LDLc control.

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of treatment goals of patients with diabetes in Colombia remains substantially low, despite improvements in LDLc control.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Background

Insight in sex disparities in the detection of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes-related complications may improve diabetes care. The aim of this systematic review is to study whether sex disparities exist in the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications.

Methods

PubMed was systematically searched up to April 2020, followed by manual reference screening and citations checks (snowballing) using Google Scholar. Observational studies were included if they reported on the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors (HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, smoking status, or BMI) and/or screening for nephropathy, retinopathy, or performance of feet examinations, in men and women with diabetes separately. Studies adjusting their analyses for at least age, or when age was considered as a covariable but left out from the final analyses for various reasons (i.e. backward selection), were included for qualitative analyses. No meta-analyses were planned because substantial heterogeneity between studies was expected. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies was used to assess risk of bias.

Results

Overall, 81 studies were included. The majority of the included studies were from Europe or North America (84%).The number of individuals per study ranged from 200 to 3,135,019 and data were extracted from various data sources in a variety of settings. Screening rates varied considerably across studies. For example, screening rates for retinopathy ranged from 13% to 90%, with half the studies reporting screening rates less than 50%. Mixed findings were found regarding the presence, magnitude, and direction of sex disparities with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, with some evidence suggesting that women, compared with men, may be more likely to receive retinopathy screening and less likely to receive foot exams.

Conclusion

Overall, no consistent pattern favoring men or women was found with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, and screening rates can be improved for both sexes.