Nasal deposition of ciclesonide nasal aerosol and mometasone aqueous nasal spray in allergic rhinitis patients

Drug Release and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Novel Implantable Mometasone Furoate Matrices in Rabbit Maxillary Sinuses

BACKGROUND

Intranasal corticosteroid sprays (INCSs) used to treat chronic rhinosinusitis are suboptimal due to limited penetration into the middle meatus, rapid clearance, and poor patient compliance. A bioresorbable drug matrix, developed with the XTreo^TM drug delivery platform, may overcome the limitations of INCS by providing continuous dosing over several months.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the in vitro drug release and in vivo pharmacokinetics of novel mometasone furoate (MF) matrices in a rabbit dorsal maxillary osteotomy model.

METHODS

XTreo^TM matrices were formulated to consistently elute MF for up to 6 months. Matrices were surgically placed bilaterally into the maxillary sinuses of New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits. Tissue and plasma MF concentrations were measured to assess the in vivo drug delivery. The in vivo and in vitro drug release kinetics of the matrices were quantified and compared to those of rabbits receiving daily Nasonex^® MF nasal sprays.

RESULTS

XTreo^TM matrices self-expanded upon deployment to conform to the irregular geometry of the maxillary sinus cavities in the NZW rabbits. Sustained release of MF was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo for 2 MF matrices of distinct release durations and an in vitro-in vivo correlation was established. Therapeutic levels of MF in local tissues were measured throughout the intended dosing durations. In contrast to the variable peaks and troughs of daily nasal sprays, sustained dosing via a single administration of MF matrices was confirmed by quantifiable plasma MF concentrations over the intended dosing duration.

CONCLUSION

The XTreo^TM MF matrices provided targeted and efficient dosing to local sinus tissues that was superior to INCS. Sustained drug release was confirmed both in vitro and in vivo. The novel XTreo^TM technology may provide precisely tuned, long-lasting drug delivery to sinus tissues with a single treatment.

Steroids and Olfactory Training for Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

Background: Postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) is a clinical challenge due to limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Both steroids and olfactory training have been proved to be effective for olfactory dysfunction with varied etiologies. We sought to perform a systematic review to summarize the evidence of steroids or olfactory training for patients with PVOD.

Methods: A systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies assessing olfactory change in patients with PVOD receiving steroid or olfactory training.

Results: Of the initial 273 abstracts reviewed, 20 articles with data from 2,415 patients with PVOD were included. Treatments including topical steroids, systemic steroids, classical olfactory training (COT), modified olfactory training (MOT), and olfactory training with steroid were analyzed. Both psychophysical olfactory testing and subjective symptom scores were utilized to assess the olfactory function. The routine use of nasal steroid spray alone during the management of PVOD seems to have no positive effect on olfactory dysfunction. Direct injection of steroid or nasal steroid spray into the olfactory cleft significantly improved the olfactory function in patients with PVOD. Olfactory improvement is greater than that of the natural course of the disease with short-term COT. Patients with PVOD would benefit more from long-term COT (>12 weeks). Treatment duration, various odorants, olfactory training devices, changing the types of odors periodically, different molecular odorants, and different concentrations of odorants tended to increase the efficiency of MOT. Clinically significant improvement after olfactory training was defined as an increase of threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) score ≥6. From week 24 to week 36, both COT and MOT groups reached the maximum therapeutic effect regarding the number of participants achieving clinically significant improvement. A combination of local or oral steroids with olfactory training is more efficient than COT only.

Conclusion: Olfactory function in patients with PVOD was effectively improved through direct steroid administration in the olfactory cleft, COT, or modification of COT. The addition of topical steroids to COT therapy showed a tendency for greater olfactory improvement in patients with PVOD.

Effects of Fluticasone Exhalation Delivery System in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Nasal sprays with corticosteroids deliver medication to the restricted areas including anterior and inferior parts of the nasal cavity. The fluticasone exhalation delivery system (EDS-FLU) has recently been proved to improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of EDS-FLU in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

METHODOLOGY

A systematic literature review using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of EDS-FLU on outcomes in patients with CRSwNP.

RESULTS

Of the initial 108 abstracts reviewed, 4 full-text articles were included. The 22-item sinonasal outcome test scores were significantly decreased in patients with CRSwNP after receiving EDS-FLU twice a day (93, 186, or 372 μg) for 16 weeks when compared with exhalation delivery system (EDS)-placebo (all P < .001). Patients with CRSwNP reported significant improvement of smell after receiving twice daily EDS-FLU twice a day (93, or 372 μg) for 4 weeks when compared with EDS-placebo (all P < .05). The proportions of patients achieving ≥1-point improvement in total polyp grade were significantly higher in EDS-FLU group and dose dependent, with the highest rates in the 372 μg group. The proportions of patients achieving polyp elimination were significantly higher in EDS-FLU group with the highest rates in the 372 μg group.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the clinical outcomes in patients with CRSwNP treated with EDS-FLU. EDS-FLU produced significant improvements regarding the quality of life, smell, and endoscopic assessment of polyp grade.

In vitro - in vivo correlation of intranasal drug deposition

In vitro - in vivo correlation (IVIVC) allows prediction of in vivo drug deposition from a nasally inhaled drug based on in vitro drug measurements. In vitro measurements include physical particle characterization and, more recently, deposition studies using anatomical models. Currently, there is a lack of IVIVC for deposition measurements in anatomical models, especially for deposition patterns in various nasal cavity regions. Therefore, improvement of in vitro and in vivo measurement methods and knowledge about nasal deposition mechanisms should help IVIVC in the future.

Role of nasal casts for in vitro evaluation of nasal drug delivery and quantitative evaluation of various nasal casts

Background: Nasal casts may characterize intranasal drug deposition. Methodology: The Koken cast, described as 'anatomically correct', and the Optinose cast, derived from MRI of a healthy male during velum closure, were dimensionally compared and assessed for deposition assessment suitability. Results: Smallest vertical cross-sectional areas (valve region) for Koken and Optinose right/left: 2.55/2.75 and 1.18/1.18 cm², respectively, versus a 'normative' mean (range) of 0.85 cm² (0.2-1.6 cm²). Intranasal volumes differed (computed tomography/water fill): Koken, 35.8/38.6 cm³ and Optinose, 24.1/25.0 cm³, versus a 'normative' mean (range) of 26.4 cm³ (20.9-31.1 cm³). Conclusion: Koken cast dimensions are larger than the normal range and the Optinose cast. The validity of casts for regulatory drug deposition studies is suspect.

A Randomized Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fluticasone Propionate Delivered via Xhance Exhalation Delivery System Versus Flonase Nasal Spray and Flovent HFA Inhalational Aerosol

PURPOSE

The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone propionate (Xhance®) has been shown to deliver drug substantially more broadly in the nasal cavity (particularly into superior/posterior regions), with less off-target loss of drug to drip-out and swallowing, than conventional nasal sprays. This open-label study evaluated the systemic bioavailability of Xhance® by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single dose of fluticasone from 3 products administering the drug using 3 different devices: Xhance®, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate inhalational nasal spray), and Flovent® HFA (fluticasone propionate inhalational aerosol).

METHODS

This open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. Study part 1 compared systemic exposure with a single dose of Xhance® 186 or 372 μg versus Flonase® 400 μg (3-way, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, randomized crossover in healthy subjects; n = 90). A separate study, part 2, under the same umbrella protocol, compared systemic exposure with Xhance® 372 μg versus Flovent® HFA 440 μg (2-way, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, randomized crossover in patients with mild to moderate asthma; n = 30).

FINDINGS

With Xhance® 186 μg, the geometric least squares mean (LSM) C_max was higher than with Flonase® 400 μg (16.02 vs 11.66 pg/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio [GMR], 137.42%) and the geometric LSM AUC_0-∞ values were similar (97.30 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL; GMR, 97.78%). With Xhance® 372 μg, the geometric LSM C_max and AUC_0-∞ were higher than with Flonase® 400 μg (C_max, 23.50 vs 11.66 pg/mL [GMR, 201.53%]; AUC_0-∞, 146.61 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL [GMR, 147.19%]). In part 2, the geometric LSM C_max and AUC_0-∞ values were lower with Xhance® 372 μg than with Flovent® HFA 440 μg (C_max, 25.28 vs 40.02 pg/mL [GMR, 63.18%]; AUC_0-∞, 205.78 vs 415.16 pg · h/mL [GMR, 49.57%]).

IMPLICATIONS

Similar intranasal doses of Xhance® (372 μg) and Flonase® (400 μg) are clearly not bioequivalent. Systemic exposure is very low with all products. Systemic exposure is higher with Xhance® than with Flonase® and substantially lower than with Flovent® HFA 440 μg and, based on dose normalization, Flovent® HFA 220 μg. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02266927.

Effect of Intranasal Corticosteroids on Secondary Sinonasal Symptoms: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Background

Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) sprays are indicated for use in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and include aqueous and nonaqueous formulations. Secondary symptoms of rhinitis include postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, headache, cough, and ear fullness. The effectiveness of INCS on these specific symptoms, as well as the comparative effectiveness of aqueous and nonaqueous formulations, is poorly defined.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of aqueous versus nonaqueous INCS formulations on less common sinonasal symptoms.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of English-language, randomized controlled trials, with adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) standard. Studies that did not provide quantitative data on relief of postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, headache, cough, and ear fullness were excluded. An itemized assessment of the risk of bias was conducted for each included study.

Results

Of the 118 studies identified, 9 met the criteria for qualitative analysis. An effect on postnasal drip was reported in 5 studies, facial pain/pressure in 2 studies, and cough in 2 studies. A reduction in a specific symptom was reported in about half of these studies, with heterogenous outcome measures. Only 1 study reported the effect of a nonaqueous formulation on a specific symptom. No studies reported an effect on aural fullness.

Conclusions

Limited data are available regarding the effectiveness of aqueous or nonaqueous INCS on secondary symptoms in adult patients with rhinitis. Further study is needed using homogenous outcome measures and direct comparison of INCS formulations.

Studies of Radioaerosol Deposition in the Respiratory Tract

Deposition of aerosols in the respiratory tract can be quantitatively and qualitatively studied by scintigraphy. The most commonly used radionuclide for this purpose is technetium-99m. The effects of various factors on particle deposition have been investigated by using radiolabeled aerosols in the past decade. Most of these studies were in vivo but some were in vitro or ex vivo. The factors examined include particle size, formulation, inhaler design, inhalation flowrate, body posture, and gravity. They have been shown to influence pulmonary deposition, nasal high flow nebulization, and intranasal delivery. A thorough understanding of the various factors is required for the advancement of respiratory-drug delivery. Scintigraphy is a powerful technique that can assist in this regard.

Epistaxis Risk Associated with Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are widely utilized for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Epistaxis is a known adverse effect of INCSs, but it is not known if the risk of epistaxis differs among INCSs.

Data Sources

Systematic review of primary studies identified through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed Central, and Cochrane databases.

Review Methods

Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA standard. English-language studies were queried through February 1, 2018. The search identified randomized controlled trials of INCSs for treatment of allergic rhinitis that reported incidence of epistaxis. An itemized assessment of the risk of bias was conducted for each included study, and meta-analysis was performed of the relative risk of epistaxis for each INCS.

Results

Of 949 identified studies, 72 met the criteria for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall relative risk of epistaxis of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32-1.67) for all INCSs. The INCSs associated with the highest risk of epistaxis were beclomethasone hydrofluoroalkane, fluticasone furoate, mometasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate. Beclomethasone aqueous, ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane, and ciclesonide aqueous were associated with the lowest risk of epistaxis. Conclusions about epistaxis with use of budesonide, triamcinolone, and flunisolide are limited due to the low number of studies and high heterogeneity.

Conclusions

While a differential effect on epistaxis among INCS agents is not clearly demonstrated, this meta-analysis does confirm an increased risk of epistaxis for patients using INCSs as compared with placebo for treatment of allergic rhinitis.

NAVIGATE I: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common, high-morbidity chronic inflammatory disease, and patients often experience suboptimal outcomes with current medical treatment. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) may improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with nasal polyps (NP). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion and polyp grade. Key secondary end points were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised (MOS Sleep-R). Other prespecified end points included all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and key indicators for surgical intervention.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, EDS-placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-three subjects with NP and moderate-severe congestion/obstruction, most with history of corticosteroid use (94.4%) and/or prior surgery (60.4%), were randomized to EDS-FLU 93 µg, 186 µg, or 372 µg or EDS-placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (16 double-blind + 8 single-arm extension with EDS-FLU 372 µg BID).

RESULTS

All EDS-FLU doses produced significant improvement in both coprimary end points ( P < .05) and in SNOT-22 total score ( P ≤ .005). EDS-FLU significantly improved all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP ( P < .05), including congestion/obstruction, facial pain/pressure, rhinorrhea/post-nasal drip, and hyposmia/anosmia. Approximately 80% of subjects reported improvement with EDS-FLU, with 65% reporting "much" or "very much" improvement by week 16. Adverse events were generally local in nature and similar to other intranasal steroids studied for similar durations in similar populations, with the most common being epistaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) who were symptomatic despite high rates of prior intranasal steroid use and/or surgery, EDS-FLU produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes (symptoms, SNOT-22, RSDI, SF-36, PGIC, and NP grade), including all 4 cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP.

NAVIGATE II: Randomized, double-blind trial of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is common and sometimes complicated by nasal polyps (NPs). Corticosteroid nasal sprays are often unsatisfactory because they are ineffective at delivering medication to high/deep sites of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess whether an exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) capable of high/deep drug deposition improves outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (n = 323) 18 years and older with moderate-to-severe congestion and NPs were randomized to twice-daily EDS-FLU (93, 186, or 372 μg) or exhalation delivery system (EDS)-placebo for 24 weeks (16 double-blind plus 8 open-label when all received 372 μg). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion/obstruction at 4 weeks and summed bilateral polyp grade at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included symptoms, polyp elimination, and functioning.

RESULTS

EDS-FLU was superior on both coprimary end points (P < .001 vs EDS-placebo, all doses). Mean polyp grade improved continuously through week 24 (P < .009, all comparisons), with polyps eliminated on at least 1 side in approximately 25% of patients at week 24 versus 8.7% with EDS-placebo (P ≤ .014, all comparisons). Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test scores also improved significantly versus those in patients receiving EDS-placebo (-21.1 to -21.4 vs -11.7 at week 16, P < .05 all doses). At the end of the double-blind period, EDS-FLU (all doses) significantly improved all 4 defining disease symptoms. In most patients (68%), those receiving EDS-FLU reported "much" or "very much" improvement. The number of patients eligible for surgery decreased by 62%-67%. The safety profile was similar to that reported in prior trials evaluating conventional corticosteroid nasal sprays in comparable populations.

CONCLUSION

EDS-FLU produces clinically and statistically significant improvement in all 4 diagnostically defining disease symptoms, polyp grade, and quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NPs.

Looking to the future of nasal drug delivery - an interview with Per Gisle Djupesland

Per G Djupesland, MD, PhD speaks to Hannah Makin, Commissioning Editor: Dr Djupesland is the inventor of OptiNose^®'s patented, bi-directional nasal drug-delivery technology and is a Co-Founder of OptiNose AS. Dr. Djupesland is a lead inventor on all 38 OptiNose patent families/patent applications, and serves as Chief Scientific Officer of OptiNose AS, with primary responsibility for device discovery and early development efforts. These early development efforts include identifying new product opportunities that use bi-directional technology, advancing the design of devices using the bi-directional technology to treat a variety of medical conditions and conducting Phase I and IIa trials with new 'nose-to-brain' applications for the technology. Dr Djupesland is an otolaryngologist (ENT) with a specialization in rhinology and more than 25 years of clinical experience. Among other positions prior to OptiNose, he served as a Clinical Research Fellow at the Hospital for Sick Children and Toronto General in Toronto, Canada, primarily studying the role of nitric oxide in the upper airways. Dr Djupesland has authored more than 60 peer reviewed articles in international medical journals and has lectured at numerous international scientific conferences. He earned medical and doctorate degrees in the field of nasal physiology and aerodynamics from the University of Oslo.