A comparison of radiographic evidence of frontal sinusitis in middle-turbinate sacrificing versus middle-turbinate sparing approaches to the sella

Preservation versus resection of middle turbinate in endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

BACKGROUND

The strategic position of the middle turbinate (MT) within the nasal cavity makes it the first kick start to resect pituitary pathology through Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Surgery (ETTS). This research aimed to determine if the type of endonasal endoscopic approach, MT resection (MTres) versus MT preservation (MTpre), for pituitary surgery affects olfaction and sinonasal function within a subjective as well as objective manner.

PATIENTS & METHODS

A prospective cohort comparative study was conducted to compare the sinonasal and olfaction outcomes pre and post operatively for both groups. Sinonasal symptoms were evaluated subjectively by Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), while objectively by Peri-Operative Sinus Endoscope Score (POSE) along with Lund-Mackay radiological scoring system (LMS), and a Sniffin Sticks Identification test (SIT) (Burghart, Germany) was used to measure the olfaction intensity. In both groups were used on a pre-operative period and after one, three, and six months post operatively.

RESULTS

96 patients were recruited within predetermined criteria. It is found that there are no significant differences in SIT between both groups with a ρ value 0.439 post operatively. The average change in score (delta) was an increase of 0.3, with changes ranging from -3 to +4. There was no significant difference in sinonasal symptoms score among both groups, with ρ 0.07 posts operatively. There was a minor upsurge in POSE score and LMS in the preservation group but without remarkable differences with ρ value 0.1 and 0.2 subsequently. It is found that there are no significant differences in SIT between both groups with a ρ value 0.439 post operatively.

CONCLUSION

Despite these amendments to the nasal cavity, we approved that these changes do not affect the sinonasal functions.

Management of the middle turbinate during and after sinus surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of the middle turbinate (MT) during and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has been controversial. Historically, there has been concern that resection of the MT may result in smell loss and frontal sinus stenosis. However, these concerns must be balanced by knowledge that a residual diseased MT may result in surgical failure. This review discusses the current evidence on treatment of the MT during and after ESS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several review articles have shown the safety of performing MT resection. Studies have not shown increase rates of frontal sinus stenosis, olfactory loss, or empty nose syndrome. However, the benefit of MT resection is highly debated. There have also been many recent advances and technological developments to assist in management of the postoperative MT.

SUMMARY

The literature supports the safety of performing MT resection, however, the benefit of resection over preservation is controversial. New technologies and techniques exist that may aid in preventing postoperative MT lateralization.