Comparison of two concentrations of triamcinolone injection in the prevention of supratip edema after external rhinoplasty: A randomized trial

Efficacy and Safety of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections Following Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Recommended Doses, Complications, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Triamcinolone acetonide injections (TAIs) have been suggested to decrease complications following rhinoplasty. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of TAIs following rhinoplasty.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 2023, without any timeframe limitations. The following terms were used: (Triamcinolone OR steroid injections OR triamcinolone acetonide) AND (Skin thickness OR supratip edema OR supratip deformity OR Pollybeak deformity) AND (rhinoplasty OR external rhinoplasty). We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies (prospective, retrospective, and case series).

RESULTS

In total, six of the 1604 articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 1524 patients were included in this study. Our results included patient demographics, type of rhinoplasty, post-injection follow-up period, site of injection, type of syringe used, timing of the first dose, volume and concentration used, time interval between doses, response to the injection, and complications of injection.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to address this issue. Our results demonstrate the ease and safety of TAIs as a first-line treatment, with positive outcomes and limited complications. TAIs can be used early postoperatively to minimize the need for revision surgery. Despite the limited number of studies on TAIs, this study provides the best available evidence that can help surgeons decide when to use the injection, the intervals between doses, and the duration of use. Further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparing the efficacy of different steroids for rhinoplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty can cause tissue trauma and inflammatory responses. Edema and ecchymosis, especially on the face, accompanied by inflammation are common complications. The anti-inflammatory properties of steroids can reduce postoperative edema and ecchymosis.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to determine the most effective type of steroids for preventing complications related to rhinoplasty.

METHODS

The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The population of comprised patients who underwent rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty. Different types of steroids administrated intravenously during the perioperative period were compared. The primary outcome of postoperative edema and other outcomes were evaluated on postoperative day 1, 3, and 7. Random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that dexamethasone and methylprednisolone significantly reduced edema on postoperative day 1 compared with placebo. No significant differences between the effects of any of two types of steroids were noted.

CONCLUSION

At least one dose of intravenous steroid intervention is recommended during the perioperative period of rhinoplasty. However, in terms of reducing edema and ecchymosis, no significant differences were noted among dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, and betamethasone.

Prevention and non-surgical treatment of soft tissue polly beak deformity after rhinoplasty: a scoping review

The aim of this study is to map the available evidence of surgical preventive measures and postoperative methods for addressing supratip fibrosis (polly beak deformity) following rhinoplasty, to describe the postoperative results and to identify the most effective techniques. A scoping review was performed, selecting articles from the following medical electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to October 2022. The following keywords were used: supratip fullness, supratip deformity, polly beak deformity and supratip fibrosis. A total of 19 studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these 18 were included, and were divided into two categories: studies that solely used non-surgical management and studies that used operative techniques to prevent soft tissue polly beak deformity. Cartilaginous causes of polly beak deformity were excluded. Although a number of different methods are described in literature, the effectiveness and potential of each are still open to debate. Randomized controlled trials that use a standardized objective measurement method for soft tissue polly beak deformity are needed to objectively compare different methods.

Fine-Tuning of the Supratip in Rhinoplasty: An External Approach

BACKGROUND

Supratip deformity, also known as the pollybeak deformity, accounts for one of the most common iatrogenic deformities requiring revision surgery in rhinoplasty. We aimed to present a novel technique to prevent supratip deformity and increase the tip definition, especially in patients with thick skin.

METHODS

A total of eighty-three patients were included in the study. In control group, thirty-three consecutive patients with thick skin underwent structured primary rhinoplasty without any additional maneuvers. In study group, thirty-one consecutive patients with thick skin underwent the same operation with an additional "External supratip suture (ESS)." Nineteen patients with moderate skin were also operated using the ESS to accentuate the supratip break and control the soft tissue response. Patients' supratip regions were analyzed with reference to a tangent line from the tip defining point to the nasion. Two independent blinded plastic surgeons rated the supratip aesthetics on a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

The ESS maneuver had better results in the supratip region according to the two parameters which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). No ischemic complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

This simple and reliable external approach is a powerful maneuver which can be an effective technique not only in patients with thick skin, but also in moderate skin patients who requires better supratip definition. It enables surgeon to reduce the nasal volume efficiently in patients with noncompliant skin by controlling skin redraping by adhering to Auersvald's hemostatic net principles. We believe that this approach will find a place in the armamentarium of rhinosurgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266.

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Ecchymosis after Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to compare the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (low-level laser therapy) on ecchymosis after rhinoplasty.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty rhinoplasty candidates were randomly divided into two groups. Photobiomodulation, including red light (660 nm), infrared light (840 nm), and infrared laser, was used in the first group on the first postoperative day, and its effect on periorbital ecchymosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

The findings showed that low-power laser reduced ecchymosis significantly (p = 0.005^*).

CONCLUSION

Photobiomodulation may be effectively used for reducing ecchymosis after rhinoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . RCT registration number is IRCT20080820001056N3.

Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies have shown little statistical difference in outcomes following rhinoplasty, demonstrating near equivalent results across all surgical techniques. Cross-study comparisons of these trials are difficult because variation in outcome reporting prevents statistical pooling and analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to identify all outcomes and outcome measures used to evaluate postoperative results in rhinoplasty.

METHODS

An extensive computerized database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed; all trials involving n ≥ 20 patients, aged 18 years and older undergoing a primary, open rhinoplasty procedure, were included for review.

RESULTS

Of the 3235 citations initially screened, 72 studies met the stated inclusion criteria. A total of 53 unique outcomes and 55 postoperative outcome measures were identified. Outcomes were divided into 6 unique domains: objective signs, subjective symptom severity, physical function related to activities of daily living, patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, and quality of life. The identified outcome measures consisted of 5 nasal-specific, author-reported instruments; 5 nasal specific, patient-reported instruments; 5 patient-reported, generic instruments; and 40 author-generated instruments. Of the outcome measures identified, the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22, and FACE-Q were the only instruments to demonstrate adequate validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change in patients who underwent a rhinoplasty procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the outcomes and outcome measures employed to assess postsurgical outcomes following rhinoplasty. A standardized core outcome set is urgently needed to make it possible for future investigators to compare results of various techniques in rhinoplasty surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2