Comparators (medicinal and non medicinal) for marketing authorization, for public health, for payers and at the European level

Opposite effects of statins on the risk of tuberculosis and herpes zoster in patients with diabetes: A population-based cohort study

It remains uncertain whether statin use is associated with the risks of tuberculosis (TB) and herpes zoster in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study aims to assess the effects of statins vs nonstatin lipid-lowering agents on the risk of these infectious diseases in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

Participants in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2001-2013 were classified as statin users, nonstatin users and lipid-lowering drug-free groups. Participants were observed for incident TB and herpes zoster from diabetes diagnosis until treatment crossover or December 2013. Statin user and nonstatin user were the time-dependent variables in Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Over 240 782 person-years of observation, statin users (n = 17 696) were associated with a lower TB risk than nonstatin users (n = 5327) and the drug-free group (n = 22 316) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.99 and aHR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.44-0.73). Compared with nonstatin users, statin users showed a dose-dependent association with TB risk (low-potency statin users, aHR: 0.692; 95% CI: 0.455-1.053; high-potency users, aHR: 0.491; 95% CI: 0.241-0.999). Statin users presented with a higher risk of herpes zoster than nonstatin users and the drug-free group (aHR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.01-1.50 and aHR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.09-1.33). The risks of TB and herpes zoster were not statistically different between nonstatin users and the drug-free group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with nonstatin drugs, statin use was specifically associated with a decreased risk of TB but a moderately increased risk of herpes zoster in this cohort study.

Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of oral triptan therapy for migraine in four European countries

AIM

To assess the differences in the cost-effectiveness of oral triptan therapy for migraines among European countries.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis of triptan therapy for migraine was conducted from a health-care payer perspective in four European countries (France, Italy, Spain and the UK). The study included those orally administered triptans available in all of these countries (almotriptan, brand-name sumatriptan, generic sumatriptan, zolmitriptan), and it was performed using a decision-tree model that incorporated costs of the drugs and probabilities associated with the possible events and outcomes. Average cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated in two different scenarios.

RESULTS

The average cost-effectiveness ratio showed wide variations across the different countries, these differences being up to 131 % (almotriptan), 77 % (brand-name sumatriptan), 153 % (generic sumatriptan) and 77 % (zolmitriptan). Generic sumatriptan was the most cost-effective drug analysed in the studied countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution must be taken when trying to transfer conclusions of pharmacoeconomics studies on migraines even in neighbouring countries. This cross-country variability is a concern for decision-makers and also for the elaboration of international recommendations and clinical practice guidelines.