Pain Science in Practice: Linking Basic Pain Science to the Clinic and Quality Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Care

Spine Pain

OBJECTIVE

Spine pain is one of the most common presenting concerns in health care settings. This article reviews clinical strategies for evaluating and managing patients with spine pain.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Minimally invasive interventional procedures, virtual reality, predictive analytics, neuromodulation, and other evolving technologies are significantly impacting the management of spine pain. Advances in modern pain science have also led to effective skills and treatment strategies, including patient interviews and queries for insight regarding pain, education, and cognitive restructuring, and adjusting the timing of examination (after reeducation) and examination techniques to encourage the experience of movement in the absence of assumed tissue damage. An evolving understanding of the influence of patient-centric thoughts, framing, emotional status, and cognitive restructuring's influence on the brain's response to perceived threat are important aspects of spine pain management.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The correlation of clinical presentations with structural abnormalities is necessary but insufficient to evaluate and manage spine pain. Modern pain science acknowledges pain as a subjective experience but recognizes a critical distinction between tissue damage, nociception, and the experience of pain. What and how we communicate with patients, as well as evolving neuromodulation technologies, augment conventional approaches.

Conditioned Pain Modulation Does Not Differ Between People With Lower-Limb Tendinopathy and Nontendinopathy Controls: A Systematic Review With Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether people with lower-limb tendinopathy have reduced relative conditioned pain modulation (CPM) when compared to nontendinopathy controls. DESIGN: Systematic review with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched until August 29, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Cross-sectional studies comparing the magnitude of the CPM effect in people with lower-limb tendinopathy to nontendinopathy controls in a case-control design. DATA SYNTHESIS: Included studies provided IPD, which was reported using descriptive statistics. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) determined between-group differences in the relative CPM effect, when adjusting for co-variables. Study quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. RESULTS: Five records were included, IPD were provided for 4 studies (n = 219 with tendinopathy, n = 226 controls). The principal GEE (model 1) found no significant relative CPM effects for tendinopathy versus controls (B = -1.73, P = .481). Sex (B = 4.11, P = .160), age (B = -0.20, P = .109), and body mass index (B = 0.28, P = .442) did not influence relative CPM effect. The Achilles region had a reduced CPM effect (B = -22.01, P = .009). In model 2 (adjusting for temperature), temperature (B = -2.86, P = .035) and female sex (B = 21.01, P = .047) were associated with the size of the relative CPM effect. All studies were low-quality, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate. CONCLUSION: There were no between-group differences in the magnitude of the CPM effect, suggesting clinicians should manage lower-limb tendinopathy using interventions appropriate for peripherally dominant pain (eg, tendon loading exercises such as heavy slow resistance). Based on the "moderate"-certainty evidence, future studies are unlikely to substantially change these findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;54(1):1-10. Epub 19 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11940.

Pain Science in Practice (Part 4): Central Sensitization I

SYNOPSIS: Central sensitization is an umbrella term for facilitated synaptic plasticity. This editorial (1) explains the differences between homosynaptic and heterosynaptic plasticity, (2) explains the role of glia cells in dorsal horn neuroplasticity, and (3) briefly discusses the clinical relevance of central sensitization and nociplastic pain. Part 5 covers wind-up, classical central sensitization, and long-term potentiation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(1):1-4. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11569.