1
|
Macki M, Chryssikos T, Meade SM, Aabedi AA, Letchuman V, Ambati V, Krishnan N, Tawil ME, Tichelaar S, Rivera J, Chan AK, Tan LA, Chou D, Mummaneni P. Multilevel Laminoplasty for CSM: Is C3 Laminectomy Better Than C3 Laminoplasty at the Superior Vertebra? J Clin Med 2023; 12:7594. [PMID: 38137663 PMCID: PMC10743713 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In a multilevel cervical laminoplasty operation for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), a partial or complete C3 laminectomy may be performed at the upper level instead of a C3 plated laminoplasty. It is unknown whether C3 technique above the laminoplasty affects loss of cervical lordosis or range of motion. METHODS Patients undergoing multilevel laminoplasty of the cervical spine (C3-C6/C7) at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on surgical technique at C3: C3-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty ("C3 laminoplasty only", N = 61), C3 partial or complete laminectomy, plus C4-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty (N = 39). All patients had at least 1-year postoperative X-ray treatment. RESULTS Of 100 total patients, C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy were equivalent in all demographic data, except for age (66.4 vs. 59.4 years, p = 0.012). None of the preoperative radiographic parameters differed between the C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts: cervical lordosis (13.1° vs. 11.1°, p = 0.259), T1 slope (32.9° vs. 29.2°, p = 0.072), T1 slope-cervical lordosis (19.8° vs. 18.6°, p = 0.485), or cervical sagittal vertical axis (3.1 cm vs. 2.7 cm, p = 0.193). None of the postoperative radiographic parameters differed between the C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts: cervical lordosis (9.4° vs. 11.2°, p = 0.369), T1 slope-cervical lordosis (21.7° vs. 18.1°, p = 0.126), to cervical sagittal vertical axis (3.3 cm vs. 3.6 cm, p = 0.479). In the total cohort, 31% had loss of cervical lordosis >5°. Loss of lordosis reached 5-10° (mild change) in 13% of patients and >10° (moderate change) in 18% of patients. C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts did not differ with respect to no change (<5°: 65.6% vs. 74.3%, respectively), mild change (5-10°: 14.8% vs. 10.3%), and moderate change (>10°: 19.7% vs. 15.4%) in cervical lordosis, p = 0.644. When controlling for age, ordinal regression showed that surgical technique at C3 did not increase the odds of postoperative loss of cervical lordosis. C3 laminectomy versus C3 laminoplasty did not differ in the postoperative range of motion on cervical flexion-extension X-rays (23.9° vs. 21.7°, p = 0.451, N = 91). CONCLUSION There was no difference in postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or postoperative range of motion in patients who underwent either C3-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty or C3 laminectomy plus C4-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Macki
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Timothy Chryssikos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Seth M. Meade
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Alexander A. Aabedi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Vardhaan Ambati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Nishanth Krishnan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
- University of California San Francisco Medical School, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Michael E. Tawil
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Seth Tichelaar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Joshua Rivera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Andrew K. Chan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Lee A. Tan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| | - Praveen Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|