Development of a progestin-based estrus synchronization program: I. Reproductive response of cows fed melengestrol acetate for 20 days with an injection of progesterone

Induction of a new follicular wave in holstein heifers synchronized with norgestomet

Treatments with progestin to synchronize the bovine estrous cycle in the absence of the corpus luteum, induces persistence of a dominant follicle and a reduction of fertility at doses commonly utilized. The objective of the present research was to induce a new wave of ovarian follicular development in heifers in which stage of the estrous cycle was synchronized with norgestomet. Holstein heifers (n=30) were used, in which estrus was synchronized using two doses of PGF2alpha i.m. (25 mg each) 11 days apart. Six days after estrus (day 0=day of estrus) heifers received a norgestomet implant (6 mg of norgestomet). On day 12, heifers were injected with 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. and assigned to treatments (T1 to T4) as follows: treatment 1, heifers received a second norgestomet implant (T1: N+N, n=6), treatment 2, received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. (T2: N+GnRH, n=6), treatment 3, 200 mg of progesterone i.m. (T3: N+P4, n=6), treatment 4, control treatment with saline solution i.m. (T4: N+SS); in the four treatments (T1 to T4) implants were removed on day 14. For treatment 5, heifers received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. on day 9 and 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (T5: N+GnRH+PGF2alpha) at the time of implant removal (day 16). Ovarian evaluations using ultrasonographic techniques were performed every 48 h from days 3 to 11 and every 24 h from days 11 to 21. Blood samples were collected every 48 h to analyze for progesterone concentration. A new wave of ovarian follicular development was induced in 3/6, 6/6, 3/6, 1/6 and 6/6, and onset of estrus in 6/6, 0/6, 6/6, 6/6 and 6/6 for T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively. Heifers from T1, T3 and T4 that ovulated from a persistent follicle, showed estrus 37.5 +/- 12.10 h after implant removal and heifers that developed a new wave of ovarian follicular development showed it at 120.28 +/- 22.81 h (P<0.01). Ovulation occurred at 5.92 +/- 1.72 and 2.22 +/- 1.00 days (P<0.01), respectively. Progesterone concentration was <1 ng/ml from days 7 to 15 in T1, T2 and T4; for T3 progesterone concentration was 2.25 +/- 0.50 ng/ml on day 13 and decreased on day 15 to 0.34 +/- 0.12 ng/ml (P<0.01). For T5, progesterone concentration was 1.66 +/- 0.58 ng/ml on day 15. The more desirable results were obtained with T5, in which 100% of heifers had a new wave of ovarian follicular development induced, with onset of estrus and ovulation synchronized in a short time period.

The use of a progesterone-releasing device (CIDR-B) or melengestrol acetate with GnRH, LH, or estradiol benzoate for fixed-time AI in beef heifers

The objective of this experiment was to compare two progestins and three treatments for synchronizing follicular wave emergence and ovulation in protocols for fixed-time AI in beef heifers. On d 0 (beginning of the experiment), Angus and Angus-Simmental cross beef heifers at random stages of the estrous cycle either received a CIDR-B device (n = 257) or were started on 0.5 mg x anima(-1) x d(-1) melengestrol acetate (MGA; n = 246) and were randomly assigned to receive i.m. injections of 100 microg GnRH, 12.5 mg porcine LH (pLH), or 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P4). The last feeding of MGA was given on d 6 and on d 7, CIDR-B devices were removed and all heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol (PG). Consistent with their treatment groups on d 0, heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 12.5 mg pLH 48 h after PG (and were concurrently inseminated) or 1 mg EB 24 h after PG and were inseminated 28 h later (52 h after PGF). Estrus rate (combined for both progestins) in heifers receiving EB (92.0%) was greater (P < 0.05) than that in heifers receiving GnRH and pLH (combined) and a CIDR-B device (62.9%) or MGA (34.3%). Although the mean interval from PG treatment to estrus did not differ among groups (overall, 47.8 h; P = 0.85), it was less variable (P < 0.01) in MGA-fed heifers (SD = 2.5 h) than in CIDR-B-treated heifers (SD = 8.1 h). Pregnancy rates (determined by ultrasonography approximately 30 d after AI) did not differ (P = 0.30) among the six treatment groups (average, 58.0%; range, 52.5 to 65.0%). Although fixed-time AI was done, pregnancy rates were greater in heifers detected in estrus than in those not detected in estrus (62.6 vs 51.9%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, GnRH, pLH, or EB treatment in combination with a CIDR-B device or MGA effectively synchronized ovulation-for fixed-time AI, resulting in acceptable pregnancy rates in beef heifers.

The use of GnRH or estradiol to facilitate fixed-time insemination in an MGA-based synchronization regimen in beef cattle

Two experiments were conducted to compare pregnancy rates when GnRH or estradiol were given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based estrus synchronization program. Crossbred beef cattle were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg per day) for 7 days (designated days 0-6, without regard to stage of the estrous cycle) and given cloprostenol (PGF; 500 microg intramuscular (im)) on day 7. In Experiment 1, lactating beef cows (n=140) and pubertal heifers (n=40) were randomly allocated to three groups to receive 100 microg gonadorelin (GnRH), 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (E+P) in canola oil or no treatment (control) on day 0. All cattle were observed for estrus every 12 h from 36 to 96 h after PGF. Cattle in the GnRH group that were detected in estrus 36 or 48 h after PGF were inseminated 12 h later; the remainder were given 100 microg GnRH im 72 h after PGF and concurrently inseminated. Cattle in the E+P group were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5 or 1.0 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) in 2 ml canola oil im 24 h after PGF and were inseminated 30 h later. Cattle in the control group were inseminated 12 h after the first detection of estrus; if not in estrus by 72 h after PGF, they were given 100 microg GnRH im and concurrently inseminated. In the absence of significant differences, all data for heifers and for cows were combined and the 0.5 and 1.0 mg EB groups were combined into a single estradiol group. Estrus rates were 57.6, 57.4 and 60.0% for the GnRH, E+P and control groups, respectively (P=0.95). The mean (+/-S.D.) interval from PGF treatment to estrus was shorter (P<0.001) and less variable (P<0.001) in the E+P group (49.0+/-6.1 h) than in either the GnRH (64.2+/-15.9 h) or control (66.3+/-13.3 h) groups. Overall pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.005) in the GnRH (57.6%) and E+P (55.7%) groups than in the control group (30.0%) as were pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI (47.5, 55.7 and 28.3%, respectively). In Experiment 2, 122 crossbred beef heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone in oil on day 0 and subsequently received either 100 microg GnRH 36 h after PGF and inseminated 14 h later or 1 mg EB im 24 h after PGF and inseminated 28 h later in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pregnancy rates were not significantly different among groups (41.9, 32.2, 33.3 and 36.7% in GnRH/GnRH, GnRH/EB, EB/GnRH and EB/EB groups, respectively). In conclusion, GnRH or estradiol given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based synchronization regimen resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates to fixed-time insemination.

Effects of maturity of the potential ovulatory follicle on induction of oestrus and ovulation in cattle with oestradiol benzoate

The effect of maturity of the dominant follicle (DF) on the capacity of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) to induce oestrus and ovulation was examined in cattle. In experiment 1, 31 prepubertal heifers each received an intravaginal progesterone insert (IPI) and 1mg ODB i.m./500kg BW (ODB1). Daily ovarian ultrasonography detected emergence of a new follicular wave 3.1+/-0.1 days after ODB1. The IPI was removed when newly emerged DF were "young" (1.3+/-0.1 days after emergence; YDF; n=15) or "mature" (4.2+/-0.1 days; MDF; n=16), and 24h later, heifers received 0.75mg ODB/500kg BW (ODB2; n=16) or no further treatment (NoODB2; n=15). Most of the heifers receiving ODB2 were observed in oestrus (15/16) and ovulated (12/16), as compared to 0/15 and 1/15 in the NoODB2 group, respectively (P<0.01). In experiment 2, 32 heifers received ODB1 on day 6 of the oestrous cycle, and new follicular wave emergence was detected 3.2+/-0.1 days later. Heifers received an injection of prostaglandin-F2alpha (PGF) when the DF was young (1.1+/-0.1 days after emergence; YDF; n=16) or mature (4 days; MDF; n=16), and then ODB2 24h later or no further treatment (NoODB2). The interval from PGF to oestrus was greater (P<0.01) in the YDF-NoODB2 (70+/-3.9h) as compared to MDF-NoODB2 group (57+/-1.8h). Inclusion of ODB2 reduced (P<0.01) this interval to 47.0+/-0.7h without regard to the maturity of the DF (maturityxODB2, P<0.05) and also reduced (P<0.05) the interval to ovulation. In experiment 3, 21 suckling anoestrous cows received an IPI and ODB1 at 29.3+/-1.7 days postpartum. The IPI were removed either 1 day (YDF; n=9) or 3.9+/-0.1 days (MDF; n=9) after emergence of a new follicular wave and every cow received ODB2. Oestrus was subsequently detected in all but one animal. Ovulation of the newly emerged DF was detected within 48h of ODB2 in nine of nine cows of the MDF group, and in four of nine of the YDF group (P<0.05). During the subsequent ovulatory cycle, luteal size and plasma concentrations of progesterone were greater (P<0.01) in the MDF group compared to the YDF group. We conclude that behavioural oestrus is readily induced by 0.75mg ODB i.m./500kg BW. Maturity of the DF appeared to have little influence on the ability of the DF to ovulate in heifers. In contrast, young DF in lactating anoestrous cows were less likely to respond to the ovulatory cue provided, and luteal development was compromised in those that did ovulate.