1
|
Keogh K, McKenna C, Waters SM, Porter RK, Fitzsimons C, McGee M, Kenny DA. Effect of breed and diet on the M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum transcriptome of steers divergent for residual feed intake. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9034. [PMID: 37270611 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Improving cattle feed efficiency through selection of residual feed intake (RFI) is a widely accepted approach to sustainable beef production. A greater understanding of the molecular control of RFI in various breeds offered contrasting diets is necessary for the accurate identification of feed efficient animals and will underpin accelerated genetic improvement of the trait. The aim of this study was to determine genes and biological processes contributing to RFI across varying breed type and dietary sources in skeletal muscle tissue. Residual feed intake was calculated in Charolais and Holstein-Friesian steers across multiple dietary phases (phase-1: high concentrate (growing-phase); phase-2: zero-grazed grass (growing-phase); phase-3: high concentrate (finishing-phase). Steers divergent for RFI within each breed and dietary phase were selected for muscle biopsy collection, and muscle samples subsequently subjected to RNAseq analysis. No gene was consistently differentially expressed across the breed and diet types examined. However, pathway analysis revealed commonality across breeds and diets for biological processes including fatty acid metabolism, immune function, energy production and muscle growth. Overall, the lack of commonality of individual genes towards variation in RFI both within the current study and compared to the published literature, suggests other genomic features warrant further evaluation in relation to RFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Keogh
- Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland
| | - Clare McKenna
- Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, D02 R590, Ireland
| | - Sinead M Waters
- Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland
| | - Richard K Porter
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, D02 R590, Ireland
| | - Claire Fitzsimons
- Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland
| | - Mark McGee
- Livestock Systems Research Department, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland
| | - David A Kenny
- Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Probability of pregnancy in beef cows with early-weaned calves. Livest Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
3
|
Lancaster PA, Larson RL. Evaluation of Strategies to Improve the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Cow–Calf Production Systems. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12030385. [PMID: 35158708 PMCID: PMC8833546 DOI: 10.3390/ani12030385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Beef cattle have a significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions globally, but they have a unique ability to digest plant material that is inedible for humans, thus producing human food from grasslands and rangelands. Additionally, many people around the world depend upon cattle ranching of grasslands and rangelands for their livelihoods. Identifying the strategies likely to have the largest impact on greenhouse gas emissions while improving or maintaining economic returns is necessary to guide future research. The goal of the current study was to evaluate four potential strategies for improving the environmental and economic sustainability of cow–calf production. The four strategies included (1) decreasing the feed required for maintenance, thus increasing the feed available for growth, (2) decreasing the time for cows to rebreed after calving, (3) increasing the digestibility of pasture grass, and (4) increasing the yield of pasture grass. A computer simulation model of a cow herd in Kansas, U.S.A., was modified to create variation in the four strategies. Decreasing the feed required for maintenance improved both environmental and economic sustainability, and increasing the yield of pasture grass improved economic sustainability, implying that these strategies should be primary targets to enhance the sustainability of cow–calf production systems. Abstract Grazing cow–calf production systems account for 60 to 70% of the greenhouse gas emissions of U.S. beef production. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the importance of management strategies (cow maintenance energy requirements, reproductive efficiency, forage nutritive value, and forage yield) on the sustainability of cow–calf production systems using a sensitivity analysis in a production systems model. The Beef Cattle Systems Model was used to simulate a cow–calf production system in the Kansas Flint Hills using Angus genetics over a 24 year time period. The model was modified to create variation among cow herds in the base net energy for the maintenance requirement (NEm_Req), postpartum interval (PPI), grazed forage digestibility (Forage_TDN), and forage yield per hectare (Forage_Yield). The model was run for 1000 iterations/herds of a 100-cow herd. A stepwise regression analysis in conjunction with standardized regression analysis was used to identify important predictors of an indicator of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity, dry matter intake per kilogram weaned, and two indicators of economic sustainability, winter feed use and returns over variable costs, using R statistical software. The most important predictor of DMI per kilogram weaned was calf weaning weight followed by NEm_Req, whereas returns over variable costs were primarily influenced by kilograms weaned per cow exposed and total purchased feed (supplement + winter feed), which were strongly influenced by NEm_Req and Forage_Yield, respectively. In conclusion, decreasing the net energy required for maintenance improved both economic and environmental sustainability, and increasing forage yield and length of the grazing season improved economic sustainability, implying that these strategies should be primary targets to enhance the sustainability of cow–calf production systems.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dallantonia EE, Fernandes MHMDR, Cardoso ADS, Leite RG, Ferrari A, Ongaratto F, Lage JF, Balsalobre MAA, Reis RA. Performance and greenhouse gas emission of Nellore and F1 Angus × Nellore yearling bulls in tropical production systems during backgrounding and finishing. Livest Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
5
|
Sapkota D, Kelly A, Crosson P, White R, McGee M. Quantification of cow milk yield and pre-weaning calf growth response in temperate pasture-based beef suckler systems: A meta-analysis. Livest Sci 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
6
|
Olchowy TWJ, Soust M, Alawneh J. The effect of a commercial probiotic product on the milk quality of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102:2188-2195. [PMID: 30639012 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Probiotics intended to improve plant health and productivity of pastures grazed by dairy cow are becoming commercially available in Australia. Great Land (GL; Terragen Biotech Pty Ltd., Coolum Beach, QLD, Australia) is one such biologic soil conditioner and spray-on probiotic with a label claim of "acting to improve plant health and productivity." The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of GL on the milk quality of cows grazing pasture top-dressed with GL. Lactating dairy cows of mixed age and breed (primarily Holstein-Friesian), in their second lactation or greater, and at least 80 d in milk were enrolled and randomly allocated into 1 of 2 study groups: a treatment cow group (n = 98; cows grazed pasture that was top-dressed with GL according to the product label) and a control cow group (n = 114; cows grazed untreated pasture). As required, both groups were supplemented at the same rate with a mixed ration during the grazing period. Composite milk samples were collected weekly from each cow during the study and analyzed to determine milk components. Milk volumes were recorded at each milking using the herd management software of the study farm. Mean differences in the milk component variables were compared using mixed-effects linear regression models. After controlling for the effect of days in milk, cow lactation, and time since a cow entered the study, the treatment cows produced an average of 1.21 L/cow per day more milk (95% confidence interval: 0.34-2.08 L/cow per day) and more milk protein (0.03 kg/d; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.05 kg/d) than the control cows. Pasture cover and pasture consumption did not differ between the GL-treated and the untreated study paddocks grazed by the treatment or control cows. A limited amount of published data have examined the effect of probiotic pasture treatment on the milk quality of dairy cows. This study suggests that application of such products may be beneficial. The mechanisms associated with this type of outcome remain to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T W J Olchowy
- Good Clinical Practice Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
| | - M Soust
- Terragen Biotech Pty Ltd., Coolum Beach, Queensland 4573, Australia
| | - J Alawneh
- Good Clinical Practice Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramírez-Restrepo CA, Vera RR. Bodyweight performance, estimated carcass traits and methane emissions of beef-cattle categories grazing Andropogon gayanus, Melinis minutiflora and Stylosanthes capitata mixed swards and Brachiaria humidicola pasture. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1071/an17624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Cow–calf operations constitute the main land-use system in the 18 million ha of well drained tropical savannas of Colombia located in the Orinoco basin. There, numerous sex and age animal categories are present, ranging from suckling calves to old cull cows and steers, which in variable proportions are stocked at one animal unit (AU)/5–10 ha, depending on the ranch and distance from markets. In parallel, early-on farm observations showed that when sown pastures are introduced, graziers recur to opportunistic partial fattening of cull animals for a rapid economic return. The paper reports animal weight gains of cull cows, old steers, and young heifers and yearlings over seven consecutive years grazing on a low fertiliser-input well managed Andropogon gayanus-based pasture and four contemporary years on Brachiaria humidicola. The first 2 years involved three stocking rates (SR; 1.38, 1.85 and 2.32 animal units/ha), whereas a single SR of 1.33 animal units/ha was used for the remainder. A large database that included chemical, and in vitro and in vivo digestibility, values for all forages involved, was used as an input to a mathematical model to estimate methane (CH4) emissions. Estimations were compared with weight-based predictions derived from chamber measurements recorded recently in tropical Australia. Faecal mineral concentration varied little (not significantly) among SR and animal categories. Weight gains of old steers were 4–24% larger than those of cull cows, which, in turn, were larger than those of young steers and heifers (P < 0.01). Excepting one year, the performance of cull cows and old steers did not differ between pastures, confirming earlier on-ranch observations of reasonable weight gains of adult cattle on both pastures. The predicted carcass composition of cull cows and old steers did not differ between pastures either. Over the length of the experiment, cull cows emitted significantly less CH4 than did old steers (129 vs 141 g/day) on A. gayanus, while emissions on B. humidicola amounted to 128 and 137 g/day respectively. Despite between-year differences in animal performance, they are indicative of well managed pasture sustainability. They also show some of the trade-offs involved in the use of contrasting animal categories and pastures in terms of weight performance and predicted carcass composition and CH4 production. The authors expect that the present results will contribute to a rational, science-based discussion of the role of beef systems vis-à-vis environment in a region with limited production alternatives.
Collapse
|
8
|
Edwards SR, Hobbs JD, Mulliniks JT. High milk production decreases cow-calf productivity within a highly available feed resource environment. Transl Anim Sci 2017; 1:54-59. [PMID: 32704630 PMCID: PMC7235463 DOI: 10.2527/tas2016.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The beef cattle industry tends to focus on selecting production traits with the purpose of maximizing cow-calf performance. One such trait is milking ability, which is considered the primary influence on weaning weight of the calf. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of actual milk yield on reproductive performance, circulating blood metabolites, and calf performance in beef cows in the Southeastern US. Over a 2 yr period, data were collected from 237, 3- to 9-yr-old Angus-sired beef cows on 3 research stations in Tennessee. On approximately d 58 and 129 postpartum, 24-hr milk production was measured with a modified weigh-suckle-weigh technique using a milking machine. Subsamples of milk were collected for analysis of milk components. Milk yield data were used to retrospectively classify cows on actual milk yield as High ( ≥ 10 kg/d), Mod (8 to 9 kg/d), or Low ( < 8 kg/d). Cow body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS) were collected weekly at each location through breeding. Calf BW was recorded at birth, mid-weight at d 58, and weaning. At d 58 and 129 of postpartum, milk yields were different (P < 0.001) among the treatment groups. Cow BW during the entire study were not different (P ≥ 0.22) with increasing milk yield. Timed-AI pregnancy rate were the lowest (P = 0.02) in the High milk producing cows with no difference (P > 0.05) between Low and Mod milk cows. In addition, overall pregnancy rate continued to be the lowest (P = 0.04) in High milk producing cows with the greatest pregnancy rate in Mod milk cows. Calf mid-weight at ∼d 58 was increased (P < 0.001) in calves from Mod and High milking cows. However, calf BW at weaning was not different (P = 0.22) among calves from different milk treatment groups. Results from this study suggest that even in management systems that modify the grazing environments with harvested feedstuffs, high milk production decreases reproductive efficiency. In addition, increasing milk production up to d 129 postpartum did not result in increased calf BW at weaning, indicating that the genetic potential for calf BW at weaning could not be improved with increased genetic potential for milk production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Edwards
- Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996
| | - J D Hobbs
- Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996
| | - J T Mulliniks
- Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mulliniks JT, Cope ER, McFarlane ZD, Hobbs JD, Waterman RC. Drivers of grazing livestock efficiency: how physiology, metabolism, experience and adaptability influence productivity. J Anim Sci 2016. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-0711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
10
|
Reproductive Systems for North American Beef Cattle Herds. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2016; 32:249-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
11
|
Greenwood PL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, González LA, Ingham AB. Development and application of a livestock phenomics platform to enhance productivity and efficiency at pasture. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE 2016. [DOI: 10.1071/an15400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Our capacity to measure performance- and efficiency-related phenotypes in grazing livestock in a timely manner, ideally in real-time without human interference, has been severely limited. Future demands and constraints on grazing livestock production will require a step change beyond our current approaches to obtaining phenotypic data. Animal phenomics is a relatively new term that describes the next generation of animal trait measurement, including methodologies and equipment used to acquire data on traits, and computational approaches required to turn data into phenotypic information. Phenomics offers a range of emerging opportunities to define new traits specific to grazing livestock, including intake and efficiency at pasture, and to measure many traits simultaneously or at a level of detail previously unachievable in the grazing environment. Application of this approach to phenotyping can improve the precision with which nutritional and other management strategies are applied, enable development of predictive biological traits, and accelerate the rate at which genetic gain is achieved for existing and new traits. In the present paper, we briefly outline the potential for livestock phenomics and describe (1) on-animal sensory-based approaches to develop traits diagnostic of productivity and efficiency, as well as resilience, health and welfare and (2) on-farm methods for data collection that drive management solutions to reduce input costs and accelerate genetic gain. The technological and analytical challenges associated with these objectives are also briefly considered, along with a brief overview of a promising field of work in which phenomics will affect animal agriculture, namely efficiency at pasture.
Collapse
|
12
|
Poore MH, Lehmkuhler JW. FORAGES AND PASTURES SYMPOSIUM: Use of marginal lands and fibrous byproducts in efficient beef and dairy production systems1. J Anim Sci 2015; 93:2607-8. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M. H. Poore
- Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
| | - J. W. Lehmkuhler
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546
| |
Collapse
|