Two split-time artificial insemination programs in suckled beef cows

Timed artificial insemination strategies with or without short-term natural service and pregnancy success in beef heifers

Objective was to compare estrous response, and first service and breeding season pregnancy rates in Angus cross beef heifers that received four progesterone (CIDR, vaginal insert) -based estrous-synchronization treatment regimens for timed artificial insemination (TAI) with or without short-term natural service (NS). Heifers (n = 1744; 4 locations) were assigned a reproductive tract score (RTS: 1 = immature, acyclic to 5 = mature, cyclic), body condition score (BCS: 1 = emaciated to 9 = obese) and temperament score (0 = calm to 1 = excitable). Within location, heifers were assigned to either of four treatment regimens. Heifers in Select-Synch + CIDR (C) + short-term NS (SSC + NS) treatment (n = 438) received 100 μg GnRH im + CIDR on Day -7 and CIDR removal + 25 mg PGF2α (im) + estrus-detection patches in the morning of Day 0 and were subjected to NS (bull to heifer ratio, 1:25) from the morning of Day 2 (48 h from CIDR removal) to evening of Day 8. Heifers in CO-Synch + C (COSC) +TAI + NS treatment (n = 433) received 100 μg GnRH + CIDR on Day -7 and CIDR removal + 25 mg PGF2α im + estrus-detection patches in the morning of Day 0 + 100 μg GnRH im + TAI on Day 2, 60 h from CIDR removal, and were subjected to natural service (bull: heifer, 1:25) from the evening of Day 2 immediately after AI through Day 8. Heifers in COSC + TAI treatment (n = 443) received 100 μg GnRH + CIDR on Day -7 and CIDR removal + 25 mg PGF2α im + estrus-detection patches in the morning of Day 0 + 100 μg GnRH im + TAI on Day 2, 60 h from CIDR removal. Heifers in SSC + split time AI (STAI) treatment (n = 430) received 100 μg GnRH + CIDR on Day -7 and CIDR removal + 25 mg PGF2α im + estrus-detection patches in the morning of Day 0. Heifers determined to be in estrus were inseminated at 64 h after PGF2α (25 mg, im) administration and non-estrous heifers determined to be in estrus 20 h later (at 84 h) were inseminated at that time, whereas remaining non-estrous heifers at 84 h received GnRH (100 μg) and were inseminated concomitantly. In SSC + NS and COSC + TAI + NS treatments, natural service bulls were removed and reintroduced (@ bull: heifer, 1:40) on Day 22 and kept until Day 63. In COSC + TAI and SSC + STAI bulls (bull: heifer, 1:40) were introduced on Day 14 and retained until Day 63. All heifers, irrespective of treatment regimens, were observed for estrus three times a day from Day 2 through Day 8. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed on Day 93, 30 days from end of breeding season. Accounting for temperament (P < 0.0001), BCS (P < 0.0001) and RTS (P < 0.0001), the breeding program influenced the estrous response (P < 0.0001). Heifers in COSC + TAI + NS (86.8%), SSC + STAI (84.9%), and SSC + NS (86.5%) treatments had greater estrous response compared with heifers in COSC + TAI (75.8%) treatment. Accounting for temperament (P < 0.01), BCS (P < 0.05) and RTS (P < 0.01), the treatment regimens influenced first service pregnancy rate (P < 0.05). Heifers in COSC + TAI + NS treatment had greater first service pregnancy rate (60.3%) compared with COSC + TAI (54.2%) (P < 0.05). First service pregnancy rate for heifers in SSC + STAI (59.3%) and SSC + NS (57.3%) treatments did not differ from COSC + TAI + NS and COSC + TAI treatments. Accounting for temperament (P < 0.001), BCS (P < 0.0001) and RTS (P < 0.0001), the treatment regimens influenced breeding season pregnancy rate (P < 0.05). Breeding season pregnancy rate for heifers in COSC + TAI + NS (95.4%) and COSC + STAI (94.5%) treatments were greater than that of heifers in COSC + TAI (90.8%) treatment (P < 0.05), and heifers in SSC + NS (94.1%%) treatment did not differ from heifers in other treatments. In conclusion, progesterone-based CO-Synch timed artificial insemination with short-term natural service treatment regimen resulted in proportionately more pregnancies than without short-term natural service treatment regimen. In addition, 64/84 h split-time AI or natural service following Select-Synch treatment regimen could be implemented as an alternative as these treatment regimens resulted in similar pregnancy rate as progesterone based CO-Synch timed artificial insemination with short-term natural service treatment regimen.

Effect of expression of estrus and treatment with GnRH on pregnancies per AI in beef cattle synchronized with an estradiol/progesterone-based protocol

Three experiments evaluated the effects of expression of estrus and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) treatment on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in beef cattle that were treated with an estradiol/progesterone (P4)-based protocol for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). In Experiment 1, 20 non-lactating beef cows were treated with 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and an intravaginal device containing 0.5 g of P4. Seven days later, P4 devices were removed and all cows received prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF_2α) and 0.5 mg estradiol cypionate (ECP). Estrus was detected using tail paint and cows that did not show estrus by 48 h after P4 device removal were randomized to receive GnRH or no treatment. Ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, occurred earlier in cows that showed estrus (68.0 ± 2.5 h) than in cows that did not (82.0 ± 2.1 h, P < 0.05). Furthermore, cows that received GnRH ovulated earlier (78.0 ± 2.6 h) than those that did not (86.0 ± 2.0, P < 0.05). Experiment 2 determined whether expression of estrus and the administration of GnRH to animals that did not show estrus increased P/AI. Non-lactating beef cows and heifers (n = 1356) were treated as in Experiment 1 (P4 device removal, PGF2α and ECP administration on Day 7) or extended until Day 8. All animals in estrus by 48 h after P4 device removal were inseminated and those not showing estrus received GnRH or no treatment and were FTAI 8 h later (i.e., at 56 h). P/AI were greater (P < 0.01) in animals that were observed in estrus by 48 h (56.4%) than in those that did not show estrus (46.5%). Likewise, animals that did not show estrus but were treated with GnRH had greater P/AI (53.8%, P < 0.04) than those that did not receive GnRH (37.9%). Experiment 3 was designed to determine the effect of delaying GnRH treatment to the time of FTAI (at 56 h) in cows not showing estrus by 48 h after P4 device removal. Suckled beef cows (n = 969) were treated as in Experiment 1, except that all cows also received 400 IU of eCG at the time of P4 device removal on Day 7. Cows that showed estrus by 48 h or 56 h had greater P/AI (62.3%, P < 0.05) than those did not show estrus (51.5%). Furthermore, when cows that did not show estrus by 48 h were analyzed separately, P/AI were greater (P < 0.05) in those that received GnRH at 48 h and were FTAI by 56 h (64.9%) than in those that received GnRH concurrent with FTAI by 56 h after device removal (54.6%). In summary, expression of estrus was associated with earlier ovulations and resulted in greater P/AI in cows and heifers treated with an estradiol/P4-based protocol for FTAI. Furthermore, GnRH treatment in animals that did not show estrus hastened the time of ovulation and increased P/AI.

Effect of estrus expression or treatment with GnRH on pregnancies per embryo transfer and pregnancy losses in beef recipients synchronized with estradiol/progesterone-based protocols

Two experiments were designed to determine the effect of expression of estrus or GnRH treatment on pregnancies per embryo transfer (P/ET) and pregnancy losses in beef recipients that were synchronized with estradiol/progesterone based protocols for fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET). Experiment 1 evaluated the effect of expression of estrus and GnRH treatment in the absence of estrus on P/ET. Beef cows (n = 729) were treated with 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and an intravaginal device containing 0.5 g of progesterone. Devices were removed 8 d later and all cows received prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), 400 IU eCG, and 0.5 mg estradiol cypionate (ECP) at that time. Expression of estrus was determined at 48 and 56 h after device removal using tail-paint and cows that did not show positive signs of estrus by 48 h received GnRH or no treatment at random. The overall estrus rate was 76.0% (554/729); 68.0% had positive signs of estrus by 48 h after progesterone device removal and 28.0% of those not in estrus by 48 h showed estrus by 56 h. The proportion of recipients receiving in vivo-derived (IVD) or in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos and P/ET were greater in recipients that showed estrus by 48 and 56 h (94.0% and 48.4%, respectively) than in those that did not show estrus 41.0% and 29.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). However, GnRH treatment of recipients not showing estrus by 48 h did not improve P/ET. Experiment 2 evaluated the effect of expression of estrus on P/ET and pregnancy loses up to parturition in recipients synchronized with two estradiol-based protocols. Beef cows (n = 403) were divided at random to receive the same synchronization protocol as in Experiment 1 (ECP) or a J-Synch protocol (device removal on day 6 and without using estradiol cypionate to induce ovulation). In this experiment, pregnancy was determined at 30 and 60 d by ultrasonography, and all pregnant recipients were followed until parturition to determine pregnancy losses during gestation. Although the number of recipients receiving IVP embryos was greater in the ECP group (90.5% vs. 83.5%; P = 0.03), P/ET did not differ (ECP: 37.0% and J-Synch: 39.0%; P = 0.43). Overall, 88.0% (357/407) of the recipients synchronized showed estrus and a greater P/ET (P = 0.05) was found in the recipients that showed estrus (39.0%) vs. those that did not show estrus (26.0%), regardless of treatment group. Pregnancy losses were lower (P = 0.004) and the calving rate was higher (P = 0.01) in recipients that showed estrus (25.0% and 29.3%, respectively) than in those that did not (88.8% and 2.9%, respectively). In summary, expression of estrus was associated with a greater P/ET in recipients treated with two different estradiol/P4-based synchronization protocols. The expression of estrus was associated with a greater proportion of recipients receiving embryos, P/ET and calving rate. Treatment with GnRH did not improve P/ET in the recipients that did not show estrus, questioning the its use in recipients synchronized with estradiol/progesterone based FTET protocols.

Estrous response and pregnancy percentages following use of a progesterone-based, split-time estrous synchronization treatment regimens in beef heifers

Mean estrous response rate (%ERR) and pregnancy/AI percentages (%P/AI) were determined after imposing split-time AI (STAI) and fixed time AI (FTAI) following 14-d controlled internal drug release (CIDR)+PGF2α or 5-d Select Synch + CIDR regimens. In Experiment 1, 1152 heifers (five locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d and to 54 + 74- or 64 + 84-h STAI treatment combinations. Estrous detection patches were affixed at PGF2α administration (19 day after- and on day 5 at- CIDR removal for 14- and 5-d regimens, respectively), assessed at 54- or 64-h and again at 74- or 84-h after PGF2α. Heifers determined to be in estrus at respective times were inseminated and non-estrous heifers at 74- or 84-h were given GnRH and inseminated concomitantly. The %ERR between 54 + 74- and 64 + 84-h STAI combinations differed (73.2 % and 78.8 %, respectively; P < 0.05), but %P/AI did not. In Experiment 2, 2014 heifers (eight locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d regimens and were inseminated split-time (64+84-h combination, similar to Experiment 1) or at fixed time (72- or 56-h after PGF2α for 14- or 5-d regimens, respectively). There were differences (P < 0.01) between STAI and FTAI treatments for %ERR (81.3 % and 64.4 %) and %P/AI (61.2 % and 55.4 %). Estrous synchronization regimen by AI treatment interaction (P < 0.05) showed that the %ERR were 79.8 %, 82.6 %, 66.2 % and 62.8 % and the %P/AI were 58.9 %, 63.4 %, 56.5 % and 56.5 % (for 14-d/STAI, 5-d/STAI, 14-d/FTAI and 5-d/FTAI, respectively). In conclusion, the 5-d CIDR with 64+84-h STAI combination was the most effective because of the greater %P/AI when this regimen was imposed.

Effects of twice daily compared with split-time estrous detection on pregnancy percentage in recipient beef cows

Objectives were to compare pregnancy percentages per embryo transfer (P/ET) in recipient beef cows following twice daily compared with split-time estrous detection and to determine associations of dominant follicle diameter, CL volume and progesterone concentrations. All cows (n = 695) were treated to synchronize time of estrus among cows using a CIDR + Select-Synch treatment regimen and randomly assigned to twice-daily or split-time estrous detection (CS-DEET or CS-SEET, respectively). Cows in the CS-DEET group were observed twice daily (eight times) for estrus until 96 h after the time of PGF2α administration, whereas cows in the CS-SEET group were observed twice (64 and 84 h after PGF2α). In 280 recipient cows, blood sampling (for progesterone) and ultrasonographic assessment of dominant follicle diameter were conducted 48 h after the time of PGF2α administration. At 7 d after estrus, the CL was imaged and there was transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo into cows with a CL ≥ 1.5 cm. There were positive correlations between follicle diameter and CL volume (r_s = 0.827; P < 0.001) and CL volume and progesterone concentration (r_s = 0.680; P < 0.001). Progesterone and CL volume differed between cows in CS-SEET and CS-DEET groups P < 0.05), however, percentage P/ET for cows in the CS-SEET and CS-DEET groups did not differ (P > 0.1). Dominant follicle diameter, CL volume and progesterone concentrations were greater in pregnant compared with nonpregnant cows. In conclusion, percentage P/ET did not differ when there was twice daily and split-time estrous detection highlighting the value of this approach in beef enterprises.

Evaluation of split-time artificial insemination following administration of a long or short-term progestin-based estrus synchronization protocol in beef heifers

Fixed-time and split-time AI were compared following the melengestrol acetate (MGA^®) prostaglandin F_2α (Experiment 1) and 7-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR^®) protocols (Experiment 2). Heifers in Experiments 1 (n = 524) and 2 (n = 456) were assigned within pen to balanced treatments based on weight and reproductive tract score (RTS; Scale 1-5). In Experiment 1, MGA^® (0.5 mg∙animal^-1∙d^-1) was fed for 14 d, and prostaglandin F_2α (PG; 250 μg im cloprostenol sodium) was administered 19 d after MGA^® withdrawal. In Experiment 2, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 μg gonadorelin acetate) was administered coincident with CIDR^® (1.38 g progesterone [P₄]) insertion. Inserts were removed after 7 d, and PG (250 μg im cloprostenol sodium) was administered at CIDR^® removal. In both experiments, estrus detection aids (Estrotect^®) were applied at the time of PG administration. Estrous status was recorded at FTAI or STAI. Estrus was defined as removal of ≥ 50% of the grey coating from the Estrotect^® patch. Heifers assigned to FTAI treatments received GnRH and were artificially inseminated at the standard time for FTAI for each protocol: 72 or 54 h after PG administration for the MGA-PG or 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR^® protocol, respectively. In the STAI treatments, only heifers that expressed estrus prior to the standard time of FTAI were artificially inseminated at that time. For heifers failing to express estrus, AI was postponed 24 h. Only heifers that failed to exhibit estrus by the delayed time received GnRH concurrent with AI. In both experiments, estrous response prior to the standard time of FTAI did not differ between treatments. Total estrous response was increased (P < 0.01) among heifers assigned to STAI in Experiment 1 (88%, STAI; 72%, FTAI) and 2 (74%, STAI; 47%, FTAI). In Experiment 1, pregnancy rates resulting from AI were greater (P < 0.04) for heifers assigned to STAI compared with FTAI (55% vs 46%, respectively). In Experiment 2, pregnancy rates resulting from AI were similar between treatments (48% and 46%, respectively; P = 0.6). In summary, when compared with FTAI, STAI resulted in greater estrous response following both the MGA^®-PG and 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR^® protocols. The increased estrous response through use of STAI was associated with a corresponding increase in pregnancy rates to AI following the MGA^®-PG protocol; however, a similar improvement in pregnancy rates was not observed following the 7-d CO-Synch + CIDR^® protocol.