iNKT cells coordinate immune pathways to enable engraftment in nonconditioned hosts

Human CD4+ memory phenotype T cells use mitochondrial metabolism to generate sensitive IFN-γ responses

The transition of naive T lymphocytes into antigenically activated effector cells is associated with a metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis. This shift facilitates production of the key anti-tumor cytokine interferon (IFN)-γ; however, an associated loss of mitochondrial efficiency in effector T cells ultimately limits anti-tumor immunity. Memory phenotype (MP) T cells are a newly recognized subset that arises through homeostatic activation signals following hematopoietic transplantation. We show here that human CD4+ MP cell differentiation is associated with increased glycolytic and oxidative metabolic activity, but MP cells retain less compromised mitochondria compared to effector CD4+ T cells, and their IFN-γ response is less dependent on glucose and more reliant on glutamine. MP cells also produced IFN-γ more efficiently in response to weak T cell receptor (TCR) agonism than effectors and mediated stronger responses to transformed B cells. MP cells may thus be particularly well suited to carry out sustained immunosurveillance against neoplastic cells.

Exosomes, MDSCs and Tregs: A new frontier for GVHD prevention and treatment

The development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) represents a long-standing complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Different approaches have been used to control the development of GVHD with most relying on variations of chemotherapy drugs to eliminate allo-reactive T cells. While these approaches have proven effective, it is generally accepted that safer, and less toxic GVHD prophylaxis drugs are required to reduce the health burden placed on allo-HCT recipients. In this review, we will summarize the emerging concepts revolving around three biologic-based therapies for GVHD using T regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived-suppressor-cells (MDSCs) and mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) exosomes. This review will highlight how each specific modality is unique in its mechanism of action, but also share a common theme in their ability to preferentially activate and expand Treg populations in vivo. As these three GVHD prevention/treatment modalities continue their path toward clinical application, it is imperative the field understand both the biological advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Inflammatory CD4/CD8 double-positive human T cells arise from reactive CD8 T cells and are sufficient to mediate GVHD pathology

An important paradigm in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantations (allo-HCTs) is the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while preserving the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity of donor T cells. From an observational clinical study of adult allo-HCT recipients, we identified a CD4+/CD8+ double-positive T cell (DPT) population, not present in starting grafts, whose presence was predictive of ≥ grade 2 GVHD. Using an established xenogeneic transplant model, we reveal that the DPT population develops from antigen-stimulated CD8 T cells, which become transcriptionally, metabolically, and phenotypically distinct from single-positive CD4 and CD8 T cells. Isolated DPTs were sufficient to mediate xeno-GVHD pathology when retransplanted into naïve mice but provided no survival benefit when mice were challenged with a human B-ALL cell line. Overall, this study reveals human DPTs as a T cell population directly involved with GVHD pathology.

Harnessing invariant natural killer T cells to control pathological inflammation

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are innate T cells that are recognized for their potent immune modulatory functions. Over the last three decades, research in murine models and human observational studies have revealed that iNKT cells can act to limit inflammatory pathology in a variety of settings. Since iNKT cells are multi-functional and can promote inflammation in some contexts, understanding the mechanistic basis for their anti-inflammatory effects is critical for effectively harnessing them for clinical use. Two contrasting mechanisms have emerged to explain the anti-inflammatory activity of iNKT cells: that they drive suppressive pathways mediated by other regulatory cells, and that they may cytolytically eliminate antigen presenting cells that promote excessive inflammatory responses. How these activities are controlled and separated from their pro-inflammatory functions remains a central question. Murine iNKT cells can be divided into four functional lineages that have either pro-inflammatory (NKT1, NKT17) or anti-inflammatory (NKT2, NKT10) cytokine profiles. However, in humans these subsets are not clearly evident, and instead most iNKT cells that are CD4⁺ appear oriented towards polyfunctional (T_H0) cytokine production, while CD4^- iNKT cells appear more predisposed towards cytolytic activity. Additionally, structurally distinct antigens have been shown to induce T_H1- or T_H2-biased responses by iNKT cells in murine models, but human iNKT cells may respond to differing levels of TCR stimulation in a way that does not neatly separate T_H1 and T_H2 cytokine production. We discuss the implications of these differences for translational efforts focused on the anti-inflammatory activity of iNKT cells.