Disulfide bond in SUN2 regulates dynamic remodeling of LINC complexes at the nuclear envelope

Actin-based deformations of the nucleus control mouse multiciliated ependymal cell differentiation

Ependymal cells (ECs) are multiciliated cells in the brain that contribute to cerebrospinal fluid flow. ECs are specified during embryonic stages but differentiate later in development. Their differentiation depends on genes such as GEMC1 and MCIDAS in conjunction with E2F4/5 as well as on cell-cycle-related factors. In the mouse brain, we observe that nuclear deformation accompanies EC differentiation. Tampering with these deformations either by decreasing F-actin levels or by severing the link between the nucleus and the actin cytoskeleton blocks differentiation. Conversely, increasing F-actin by knocking out the Arp2/3 complex inhibitor Arpin or artificially deforming the nucleus activates differentiation. These data are consistent with actin polymerization triggering nuclear deformation and jump starting the signaling that produces ECs. A player in this process is the retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) protein, whose phosphorylation prompts MCIDAS activation. Overall, this study identifies a role for actin-based mechanical inputs to the nucleus as controlling factors in cell differentiation.

Mechanical Forces, Nucleus, Chromosomes, and Chromatin

Individual cells and cells within the tissues and organs constantly face mechanical challenges, such as tension, compression, strain, shear stress, and the rigidity of cellular and extracellular surroundings. Besides the external mechanical forces, cells and their components are also subjected to intracellular mechanical forces, such as pulling, pushing, and stretching, created by the sophisticated force-generation machinery of the cytoskeleton and molecular motors. All these mechanical stressors switch on the mechanotransduction pathways, allowing cells and their components to respond and adapt. Mechanical force-induced changes at the cell membrane and cytoskeleton are also transmitted to the nucleus and its nucleoskeleton, affecting nucleocytoplasmic transport, chromatin conformation, transcriptional activity, replication, and genome, which, in turn, orchestrate cellular mechanical behavior. The memory of mechanoresponses is stored as epigenetic and chromatin structure modifications. The mechanical state of the cell in response to the acellular and cellular environment also determines cell identity, fate, and immune response to invading pathogens. Here, we give a short overview of the latest developments in understanding these processes, emphasizing their effects on cell nuclei, chromosomes, and chromatin.

Feeling the force from within - new tools and insights into nuclear mechanotransduction

The ability of cells to sense and respond to mechanical signals is essential for many biological processes that form the basis of cell identity, tissue development and maintenance. This process, known as mechanotransduction, involves crucial feedback between mechanical force and biochemical signals, including epigenomic modifications that establish transcriptional programs. These programs, in turn, reinforce the mechanical properties of the cell and its ability to withstand mechanical perturbation. The nucleus has long been hypothesized to play a key role in mechanotransduction due to its direct exposure to forces transmitted through the cytoskeleton, its role in receiving cytoplasmic signals and its central function in gene regulation. However, parsing out the specific contributions of the nucleus from those of the cell surface and cytoplasm in mechanotransduction remains a substantial challenge. In this Review, we examine the latest evidence on how the nucleus regulates mechanotransduction, both via the nuclear envelope (NE) and through epigenetic and transcriptional machinery elements within the nuclear interior. We also explore the role of nuclear mechanotransduction in establishing a mechanical memory, characterized by a mechanical, epigenetic and transcriptomic cell state that persists after mechanical stimuli cease. Finally, we discuss current challenges in the field of nuclear mechanotransduction and present technological advances that are poised to overcome them.

Life outside the LINC complex - Do SUN proteins have LINC-independent functions?

Sad1 and UNC84 (SUN) and Klarsicht, ANC-1, and Syne homology (KASH) proteins interact at the nuclear periphery to form the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, spanning the nuclear envelope (NE) and connecting the cytoskeleton with the nuclear interior. It is now well-documented that several cellular functions depend on LINC complex formation, including cell differentiation and migration. Intriguingly, recent studies suggest that SUN proteins participate in cellular processes where their association with KASH proteins may not be required. Building on this recent research, we elaborate on the hypothesis that SUN proteins may perform LINC-independent functions and discuss the modalities that may allow SUN proteins to function at the INM when they are not forming LINC complex.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport rates are regulated by cellular processes that modulate GTP availability

Nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT), the facilitated diffusion of cargo molecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), enables numerous fundamental eukaryotic cellular processes. Ran GTPase uses cellular energy in the direct form of GTP to create a gradient across the nuclear envelope (NE) that drives the majority of NCT. We report here that changes in GTP availability resulting from altered cellular physiology modulate the rate of NCT, as monitored using synthetic and natural cargo, and the dynamics of Ran itself. Cell migration, cell spreading, and/or modulation of the cytoskeleton or its connection to the nucleus alter GTP availability and thus rates of NCT, regulating RNA export and protein synthesis. These findings support a model in which changes in cellular physiology that alter GTP availability can regulate the rate of NCT, impacting fundamental cellular processes that extensively utilize NCT.

Inhibition of PDIs Downregulates Core LINC Complex Proteins, Promoting the Invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells in Confined Spaces In Vitro

Eukaryotic cells tether the nucleoskeleton to the cytoskeleton via a conserved molecular bridge, called the LINC complex. The core of the LINC complex comprises SUN-domain and KASH-domain proteins that directly associate within the nuclear envelope lumen. Intra- and inter-chain disulphide bonds, along with KASH-domain protein interactions, both contribute to the tertiary and quaternary structure of vertebrate SUN-domain proteins. The significance of these bonds and the role of PDIs (protein disulphide isomerases) in LINC complex biology remains unclear. Reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE analyses revealed a prevalence of SUN2 homodimers in non-tumorigenic breast epithelia MCF10A cells, but not in the invasive triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell line. Furthermore, super-resolution microscopy revealed SUN2 staining alterations in MCF10A, but not in MDA-MB-231 nuclei, upon reducing agent exposure. While PDIA1 levels were similar in both cell lines, pharmacological inhibition of PDI activity in MDA-MB-231 cells led to SUN-domain protein down-regulation, as well as Nesprin-2 displacement from the nucleus. This inhibition also caused changes in perinuclear cytoskeletal architecture and lamin downregulation, and increased the invasiveness of PDI-inhibited MDA-MB-231 cells in space-restrictive in vitro environments, compared to untreated cells. These results emphasise the key roles of PDIs in regulating LINC complex biology, cellular architecture, biomechanics, and invasion.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport rates are regulated by cellular processes that modulate GTP availability

Nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT), the facilitated diffusion of cargo molecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), enables numerous fundamental eukaryotic cellular processes. Ran GTPase uses cellular energy in the direct form of GTP to create a gradient across the nuclear envelope (NE) that drives the majority of NCT. We report here that changes in GTP availability resulting from altered cellular physiology modulate the rate of NCT, as monitored using synthetic and natural cargo, and the dynamics of Ran itself. Cell migration, cell spreading and/or modulation of the cytoskeleton or its connection to the nucleus alter GTP availability and thus rates of NCT, regulating RNA export and protein synthesis. These findings support a model in which changes in cellular physiology that alter GTP availability can regulate the rate of NCT, impacting fundamental cellular processes that extensively utilize NCT.

Building and breaking mechanical bridges between the nucleus and cytoskeleton: Regulation of LINC complex assembly and disassembly

The nucleus is physically coupled to the cytoskeleton through LINC complexes, macromolecular bridges composed of SUN and KASH proteins that span the nuclear envelope. LINC complexes are involved in a wide variety of critical cellular processes. For these processes to occur, cells regulate the composition, assembly, and disassembly of LINC complexes. Here we discuss recent studies on the regulation of the SUN-KASH interaction that forms the core of the LINC complex. These new findings encompass the stages of LINC complex assembly, from the formation of SUN-KASH heterooligomers to higher-order assemblies of LINC complexes. There is also new work on how components of the LINC complex are selectively dismantled, particularly by proteasomal degradation. It is becoming increasingly clear that LINC complexes are subject to multiple layers of regulation.

Dynamic regulation of LINC complex composition and function across tissues and contexts

The concept of mechanotransduction to the nucleus through a direct force transmission mechanism has fascinated cell biologists for decades. Central to such a mechanism is the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, which spans the nuclear envelope to couple the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton to the nuclear lamina. In reality, there is not one LINC complex identity, but instead, a family of protein configurations of varied composition that exert both shared and unique functions. Regulated expression of LINC complex components, splice variants, and mechanoresponsive protein turnover mechanisms together shape the complement of LINC complex forms present in a given cell type. Disrupting specific gene(s) encoding LINC complex components therefore gives rise to a range of organismal defects. Moreover, evidence suggests that the mechanical environment remodels LINC complexes, providing a feedback mechanism by which cellular context influences the integration of the nucleus into the cytoskeleton. In particular, evidence for crosstalk between the nuclear and cytoplasmic intermediate filament networks communicated through the LINC complex represents an emerging theme in this active area of ongoing investigation.