What Means Fourth Industrial Revolution for Medicine

An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Improving Cancer Care in the State of Mississippi as an Example of Cancer Care Improvements in the Global South

Cancer disparities, a critical public health issue, particularly in states such as Mississippi, where socioeconomic factors significantly influence health outcomes, require our collective attention. This paper delves into the multifaceted nature of cancer disparities through a macro-level analysis of cancer data, specifically focusing on Mississippi as a microcosm of broader national and global trends. Two key indices, the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) and the Social Deprivation Index (SDeI), provide valuable insights. The former offers a macro-level understanding of the socioeconomic factors that shape health and cancer outcomes. The latter quantifies disadvantages in small areas, identifying regions that need scientific, policy, and administrative support. The poor health care and cancer care (CC) outcomes in Mississippi are well documented and detailed here. However, SDI and SDeI data are not yet available in Mississippi. With biological, technological, and clinical research design advancements and other new innovative strategies emerging in the past decade in CC, a 'leapfrogging' of CC outcomes in Mississippi is within our reach. To achieve this goal, an interdisciplinary approach (IDA) addressing and solving the challenges faced in Mississippi is required. The IDA team must include disciplines that can determine SDI and SDeI for Mississippi and tie those findings to successfully apply new technological advances and innovations efficiently and cost-effectively by building infrastructure and developing implementation strategies. This can serve as a pilot demonstration project that will also help other similar regions within the United States, as well as the Global South.

Progress on Electro-Enhancement of Cell Manufacturing

With the long persistence of complex, chronic diseases in society, there is increasing motivation to develop cells as living medicine to treat diseases ranging from cancer to wounds. While cell therapies can significantly impact healthcare, the shortage of starter cells meant that considerable raw materials must be channeled solely for cell expansion, leading to expensive products with long manufacturing time which can prevent accessibility by patients who either cannot afford the treatment or have highly aggressive diseases and cannot wait that long. Over the last three decades, there has been increasing knowledge on the effects of electrical modulation on proliferation, but to the best of the knowledge, none of these studies went beyond how electro-control of cell proliferation may be extended to enhance industrial scale cell manufacturing. Here, this review is started by discussing the importance of maximizing cell yield during manufacturing before comparing strategies spanning biomolecular/chemical/physical to modulate cell proliferation. Next, the authors describe how factors governing invasive and non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES) including capacitive coupling electric field may be modified to boost cell manufacturing. This review concludes by describing what needs to be urgently performed to bridge the gap between academic investigation of ES to industrial applications.

Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in improving skin lesion diagnosis in primary care

Dermatological conditions are a relevant health problem. Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being applied to dermatology as a diagnostic decision support tool using image analysis, especially for skin cancer detection and disease classification. The objective of this study was to perform a prospective validation of an image analysis ML model, which is capable of screening 44 skin diseases, comparing its diagnostic accuracy with that of General Practitioners (GPs) and teledermatology (TD) dermatologists in a real-life setting. Prospective, diagnostic accuracy study including 100 consecutive patients with a skin problem who visited a participating GP in central Catalonia, Spain, between June 2021 and October 2021. The skin issue was first assessed by the GPs. Then an anonymised skin disease picture was taken and uploaded to the ML application, which returned a list with the Top-5 possible diagnosis in order of probability. The same image was then sent to a dermatologist via TD for diagnosis, as per clinical practice. The GPs Top-3, ML model's Top-5 and dermatologist's Top-3 assessments were compared to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the ML models. The overall Top-1 accuracy of the ML model (39%) was lower than that of GPs (64%) and dermatologists (72%). When the analysis was limited to the diagnoses on which the algorithm had been explicitly trained (n = 82), the balanced Top-1 accuracy of the ML model increased (48%) and in the Top-3 (75%) was comparable to the GPs Top-3 accuracy (76%). The Top-5 accuracy of the ML model (89%) was comparable to the dermatologist Top-3 accuracy (90%). For the different diseases, the sensitivity of the model (Top-3 87% and Top-5 96%) is higher than that of the clinicians (Top-3 GPs 76% and Top-3 dermatologists 84%) only in the benign tumour pathology group, being on the other hand the most prevalent category (n = 53). About the satisfaction of professionals, 92% of the GPs considered it as a useful diagnostic support tool (DST) for the differential diagnosis and in 60% of the cases as an aid in the final diagnosis of the skin lesion. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the model in this study, under real-life conditions, is lower than that of both GPs and dermatologists. This result aligns with the findings of few existing prospective studies conducted under real-life conditions. The outcomes emphasize the significance of involving clinicians in the training of the model and the capability of ML models to assist GPs, particularly in differential diagnosis. Nevertheless, external testing in real-life conditions is crucial for data validation and regulation of these AI diagnostic models before they can be used in primary care.