1
|
Mayer MA, Deliso M, Hong IS, Saltzman BM, Longobardi RS, DeLuca PF, Rizio L. Rehabilitation and Return to Play Protocols After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med 2024:3635465241233161. [PMID: 38622858 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241233161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is crucial for safe return to play (RTP) and reducing the chances of a reinjury. Yet, there is no consensus on the ideal functional tests to assess rehabilitation progress in soccer players after ACLR. PURPOSE The primary objective was to highlight the existing gap in the literature concerning the most effective standardized rehabilitation protocols and testing for facilitating successful RTP among soccer players. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted. Inclusion criteria encompassed original studies (level of evidence 1-4) that examined rehabilitation protocols, metrics of knee rehabilitation, and clinical outcomes after ACLR in soccer players. RESULTS This review incorporated 23 studies, predominantly retrospective case series, with a total number of 874 soccer players who underwent ACLR and rehabiliation. 5 (21.7%) studies utilized an accelerated rehabilitation protocol, while 7 (30.4%) of studies utilized a criterion-based rehabilitation. A wide heterogeneity of data was extracted including functional tests of rehabilitation and RTP such as strength test batteries, hop test batteries, and movement quality assessments. Of the 23 selected studies, 2 (8.7%) used all 3 test batteries, 8 (34.8%) used 2 test batteries, 12 (52.2%) used 1 test battery, and 1 (4.3%) used 0 of the test batteries. The mean time between surgery and RTP ranged from 3 to 8 months with only 2 (8.7%) studies reporting complications after ACLR. Lastly, out of the total studies examined, 9 (39.1%) assessed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), all of which demonstrated significant improvement from the initial assessment to the final follow up. CONCLUSION Soccer-specific rehabilitation after ACLR lacks standardization. Even though many studies have assessed protocols for optimal RTP and reduced secondary ACL injuries, there is a gap in the literature regarding the most effective protocols and RTP testing. The methodology reported by Kyritsis et al could serve as a foundation for future prospective randomized multicenter studies to establish a standard rehabilitation protocol and enable a successful return to soccer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie A Mayer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
| | - Marisa Deliso
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ian S Hong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
| | - Bryan M Saltzman
- OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raphael S Longobardi
- Department of Sports Medicine, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - Peter F DeLuca
- Department of Sports Medicine, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - Louis Rizio
- Department of Sports Medicine, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Syed RIB, Hangody LR, Frischmann G, Kós P, Kopper B, Berkes I. Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2245. [PMID: 38673520 PMCID: PMC11051221 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: After the increasingly common anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedure in competitive athletes, rehabilitation is crucial for facilitating a timely return to sports (RTS) and preventing re-injury. This pilot study investigates the patient-reported outcomes of postoperative rehabilitation in competitive athletes, comparing supervised rehabilitation (SVR) and home-based rehabilitation (HBR). Methods: After ACLR, 60 (out of 74 screened) athletes were recruited and equally divided into HBR and SVR groups using non-probability convenience sampling, with each group comprising 15 males and 15 females. The rehabilitation outcomes in the respective groups were evaluated at 8 months using measures (Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC-SKF], ACL Return to Sport after Injury [ACL-RSI]) and objective parameters (isometric muscle strength, hamstring/quadricep asymmetry). RTS was evaluated at 9 months, with ACL re-injury rates recorded approximately 6 months post-RTS. Results: Both groups exhibited decreased TAS scores (HBR: 8 to 6, SVR: 8 to 7), with the SVR group demonstrating superior postoperative IKDC-SKF scores (81.82 vs. 68.43) and lower ACL-RSI scores (49.46 vs. 55.25). Isometric and isokinetic muscle strength, along with asymmetry values, was higher in the SVR group 8 months post-ACLR (p < 0.05). The SVR group showed a higher RTS rate to the same level (76.6% vs. 53.3%), while the re-injury rate was the same in both the rehabilitation groups (3.3%). Conclusions: Although both rehabilitation approaches yielded comparable outcomes, SVR may demonstrate some superior biomechanical improvements in athletes, resulting in a higher RTS rate. However, the psychological outcomes and re-injury rates did not significantly differ between the groups, emphasizing the need to address individual psychological needs during rehabilitation. Further investigation is recommended with a larger sample size to address the differences of gender among competitive athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gergely Frischmann
- Biomechanics Lab, TSO Medical Hungary Kft., 1118 Budapest, Hungary; (G.F.); (P.K.)
| | - Petra Kós
- Biomechanics Lab, TSO Medical Hungary Kft., 1118 Budapest, Hungary; (G.F.); (P.K.)
| | - Bence Kopper
- Department of Biomechanics, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - István Berkes
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary;
- Department of Traumatology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary;
- Department of Health Sciences and Sport Medicine, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alegrete J, Batalha N, Fernandes O, Parraca JA, Rodrigues AM, Londral AR, Sousa JP. Effectiveness of the KC@H programme compared with clinic-based rehabilitation in patients recovering from ACL reconstruction: a study protocol for a single-centre, two-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2024; 10:e001868. [PMID: 38390383 PMCID: PMC10882313 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients who cannot fully comply with conventional clinic-based rehabilitation (CR) sessions after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) may find additional internet-based sessions beneficial. These remote sessions include therapeutic exercises that can be done at home, potentially extending the reach of rehabilitation services to underserved areas, prolonging the duration of care and providing improved supervision. The study's main purpose is to determine if the Knee Care at Home (KC@H) programme is more effective than conventional CR alone in improving patient-reported, clinician-reported and physical functional performance outcome measures after ACLR. Additionally, the trial assesses the significance of changes in outcome measures for clinical practice. This protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial for postoperative recovery following ACLR. Adult participants of both sexes who meet specific criteria will be randomly assigned to either the CR group or the KC@H group. Only the latter group will receive internet-based sessions of therapeutic exercises at home and CR sessions. A follow-up evaluation will be conducted for both groups 12 weeks after the intervention ends. The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade de Évora and complies with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. All recordings will be stored on a secure server with limited access and deleted as soon as they are no longer needed. The KC@H programme is expected to be superior to conventional CR for patients recovering from ACLR across multiple outcome measures. Also, the programme has the potential to promote superior recovery and extend the reach and duration of care. Trial registration number: NCT05828355.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Alegrete
- Department of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
| | - Nuno Batalha
- Department of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
| | - Orlando Fernandes
- Department of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
| | - Jose Alberto Parraca
- Department of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
| | - Ana Maria Rodrigues
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Rita Londral
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Value for Health CoLAB, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João Paulo Sousa
- Department of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mitchell A, Waite O, Holding C, Greig M. The Development of a Return to Performance Pathway Involving A Professional Soccer Player Returning From A Multi-Structural Knee Injury: A Case Report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2023; 18:450-466. [PMID: 37020432 PMCID: PMC10069403 DOI: 10.26603/001c.73317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This case report describes a male professional soccer player returning to match play (English Championship League) following a medial meniscectomy that occurred during the course of rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The player underwent a medial meniscectomy eight months into an ACL rehabilitation program and following 10 weeks of rehabilitation successfully returned to competitive first team match play. This report outlines description of the pathology, the rehabilitation progressions, and the sports specific performance requirements of the player as they progressed through the return to performance pathway (RTP). The RTP pathway included nine distinct phases with evidenced based criteria required to exit each phase. The first five phases were indoor as the player progressed from the medial meniscectomy, through the rehabilitation pathways to the "gym exit Phase". The gym exit Phase was assessed with multiple criteria: a) capacity; b) strength; c) isokinetic dynamometry (IKD); d) hop test battery; e) force plate jumps; and f) supine isometric hamstring rate of force (RFD) development qualities to evaluate the players readiness to start sport specific rehabilitation. The last four phases of the RTP pathway are designed to regain the maximal physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities) in the gym and included the retraining of on-field sport specific qualities utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.' The player successfully returned to team play in the ninth and final phase of the RTP pathway. The purpose of this case report was to outline a RTP for a professional soccer player who successfully restored specific injury criteria (strength, capacity and movement quality), physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities). and on-field sport specific criteria utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.' Level of Evidence Level 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ollie Waite
- Medical Department Crystal Palace Football Club
| | | | - Matt Greig
- Sports Injuries Research Group Edge Hill University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arias R, Monaco J, Schoenfeld BJ. Return to Sport After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice. Strength Cond J 2023. [DOI: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
|
6
|
How limb dominance influences limb symmetry in ACL patients: effects on functional performance. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2022; 14:206. [PMID: 36476618 PMCID: PMC9727863 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00579-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timing for return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is paramount for the avoidance of a secondary injury. A common criterion in RTS decision-making is the limb symmetry index (LSI) which quantifies (a)symmetries between the affected and unaffected limb. Limb dominance is one of many factors that may contribute to the recovery of the LSI after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to examine how limb dominance affects the LSI of functional performance tasks nine months following ACL reconstruction (time of RTS). METHODS At time of return to sport, n = 100 patients (n = 48 injured the dominant limb, n = 52 injured the non-dominant limb, n = 34 female, n = 66 male) with ACL reconstruction surgery performed isokinetic strength measurements of the knee extensors and flexors, and drop jumps (DJ), single leg hop for distance (SHD) and 6 m timed hop (6MTH) testings. RESULTS The findings indicated that injury of the dominant leg led to significantly higher LSI values in maximal isokinetic knee extensor strength (p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed for maximal isokinetic knee flexor strength, DJ, SHD or 6MTH performance. Stratifying for sex revealed no significant differences. Simple regression analyses demonstrated that LSI in maximal knee extensor strength significantly predicted LSIs in DJ and SHD while explaining 14% and 18% of the respective variance. CONCLUSIONS Given that limb dominance affects the LSI of muscle strength suggests that a differentiated interpretation of the LSI with respect to limb dominance should be considered for a safe return to sport. Monoarticular knee extensor strength and multiarticular hop test performance are interrelated and thus can show asymmetries which are not maladaptive but established during years of habituation or training.
Collapse
|
7
|
Disantis AE, Ruh E, Martin R, Enseki K, McClincy M. Rehabilitation Guidelines for Use Following a Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO): A North American Based Delphi Consensus. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2022; 17:1002-1015. [PMID: 36237641 PMCID: PMC9528724 DOI: 10.26603/001c.38043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment of acetabular dysplasia with a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has been shown to improve long term outcomes and is considered the gold standard in the setting of symptomatic hip dysplasia in patients younger than 35 years of age. Post-operative rehabilitation following a PAO plays an important role in helping patients return to their prior level of function and reduce the impact of strength deficits that may persist. Currently, there is a paucity of research supporting post-operative rehabilitation guidelines. The purpose of this study is to present expert-driven rehabilitation guidelines to reduce practice variation following a PAO. Methods A panel of 16 physiotherapists from across the United States and Canada who were identified as experts in PAO rehabilitation by high-volume hip preservation surgeons participated in this Delphi study. Panelists were presented with 11 questions pertaining to rehabilitation guidelines following a PAO. Three iterative survey rounds were presented to the panelists based on responses to these questions. This three-step Delphi method was utilized to establish consensus on post-operative rehabilitation guidelines following a PAO. Results Total (100%) participation was achieved for all three survey rounds. Consensus (>75%) was reached for 11/11 questions pertaining to the following areas: 1) weight-bearing and range of motion (ROM) precautions, 2) therapeutic exercise prescription including neuromuscular control, cardiovascular exercise, and flexibility, and 3) objective measures for return to straight line running and return to full participation in sports. Conclusion This Delphi study established expert-driven rehabilitation guidelines for use following a PAO. The standardization of rehabilitative care following PAO is essential for achieving optimal outcomes despite other factors such as geographical location and socioeconomic status. Further research on patient-reported outcomes is necessary to confirm successful rehabilitation following the guidelines outlined in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E Disantis
- Adolescent and Young Adult Hip Preservation Program, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Department of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University
| | - Ethan Ruh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
| | - RobRoy Martin
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University; UPMC Center for Sports Medicine
| | | | - Michael McClincy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Drole K, Paravlic AH. Interventions for increasing return to sport rates after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: A systematic review. Front Psychol 2022; 13:939209. [PMID: 36072023 PMCID: PMC9443932 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An injury followed by surgery poses many challenges to an athlete, one of which is rehabilitation, with the goal of returning to sport. While total restoration of physical abilities is a primary goal for most athletes, psychosocial factors also play an important role in the success of an athlete's return to sport (RTS). The purpose of this review was to examine the effectiveness of exercise and psychosocial interventions on RTS rates, which might be one of the most important outcomes for elite athletes. Methods To carry out this review, PubMed, SAGE Journals, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to July 2022. The inclusion criteria consisted exercise or psychosocial intervention for athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), with reporting RTS rates as an outcome. Results From 1032 identified articles, four reports (N = 130) met inclusion criteria, all of which examined the recovery after ACLR. The mean MINORS score for the included studies was 16.3 ± 6.1, of which non-comparative studies scored 11.0 ± 1.4, while comparative studies scored 21.5 ± 0.7. There were consistent findings for benefits of exercise and psychosocial interventions on RTS rates. Return to preinjury rates in the reviewed studies vary between 63 and 95% with lower % observed in female athletes and with shorter follow-up. Interventional studies reporting RTS rates with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed. Conclusion Physical and psychological function, as well as social support can be influenced by appropriate interventions, indicating future work on rehabilitation programs for return to preinjury might consider taking the holistic approach addressing those.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Drole
- Faculty of Sport, Institute of Kinesiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Armin H Paravlic
- Faculty of Sport, Institute of Kinesiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.,Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bullock GS, Sell TC, Zarega R, Reiter C, King V, Wrona H, Mills N, Ganderton C, Duhig S, Räisäsen A, Ledbetter L, Collins GS, Kvist J, Filbay SR. Kinesiophobia, Knee Self-Efficacy, and Fear Avoidance Beliefs in People with ACL Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2022; 52:3001-3019. [PMID: 35963980 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve the understanding of the psychological impacts of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, a systematic review synthesizing the evidence on knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury is needed. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to investigate knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury, and compare these outcomes following management with rehabilitation alone, early and delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS Seven databases were searched from inception to April 14, 2022. Articles were included if they assessed Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (KSES), or Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using domain-based RoB tools (ROBINS-1, RoB 2, RoBANS), and GRADE-assessed certainty of evidence. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled outcomes, stratified by time post-injury (pre-operative, 3-6 months, 7-12 months, > 1-2 years, > 2-5 years, > 5 years). RESULTS Seventy-three studies (70% high RoB) were included (study outcomes: TSK: 55; KSES: 22; FABQ: 5). Meta-analysis demonstrated worse kinesiophobia and self-efficacy pre-operatively (pooled mean [95% CI], TSK-11: 23.8 [22.2-25.3]; KSES: 5.0 [4.4-5.5]) compared with 3-6 months following ACLR (TSK-11: 19.6 [18.7-20.6]; KSES: 19.6 [18.6-20.6]). Meta-analysis suggests similar kinesiophobia > 3-6 months following early ACLR (19.8 [4.9]) versus delayed ACLR (17.2 [5.0]). Only one study assessed outcomes comparing ACLR with rehabilitation only. CONCLUSIONS Knee self-efficacy and kinesiophobia improved from pre-ACLR to 3-6 months following ACLR, with similar outcomes after 6 months. Since the overall evidence was weak, there is a need for high-quality observational and intervention studies focusing on psychological outcomes following ACL injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett S Bullock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA. .,Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research-Versus Arthritis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nilani Mills
- Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Steven Duhig
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Anu Räisäsen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, OR, USA.,Department of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Kvist
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Medicine, Linkoping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephanie R Filbay
- Centre of Health, Exercise, and Sport Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Badawy CR, Jan K, Beck EC, Fleet N, Taylor J, Ford K, Waterman BR. Contemporary Principles for Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport for Athletes Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4:e103-e113. [PMID: 35141542 PMCID: PMC8811493 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advancements in our understanding of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention and nonsurgical management, ACL reconstruction continues to occur at an alarming rate. Among athletic patients, individuals participating in basketball, soccer, and football have the highest incidence of ACL injury, often requiring surgical intervention. To ensure the optimal treatment strategy for return to sport and prevention of secondary graft re-tear, it is important to tailor to the specific demands of the injured athlete and apply evidence-based best practices and rehabilitation principles. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with a brief background regarding ACL injuries, a focused review of clinical outcome studies after ACL reconstruction, and an updated framework with expert-guided recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation and return to sporting activity. Currently, there is no gold standard for rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction, highlighting the need for robust studies evaluating the best modalities for athlete rehabilitation, as well as determining the efficacy of new tools for improving therapy including blood flow restriction therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Based on clinical experience, a renewed focus on objective, criteria-based milestones may maximize the ability of return to preinjury levels of athletic function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Badawy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kyleen Jan
- University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Niles Fleet
- Department of Athletics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey Taylor
- Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kevin Ford
- Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Brian R Waterman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|