Experience and Availability of Pelvic Binders at Swedish Trauma Units; A Nationwide Survey

Novel resuscitation strategies in patients with a pelvic fracture

Patients with a pelvic ring injury and hemodynamic instability can be challenging to manage with high rates of morbidity and mortality rates. Protocol-based resuscitation strategies are critical to successfully manage these potentially severely injured patients in a well-coordinated manner. While some aspects of treatment may vary slightly from institution to institution, it is critical to identify pelvic injuries and their associated injuries expediently. The first step at the scene of injury or in the trauma resuscitation bay should be the immediate application of a circumferential pelvic sheet or binder, initiation of physiologically optimal fluid resuscitation in the form 1:1:1 (pRBC:FFP:platelets) or whole blood, and to consider TXA as a safe adjunct to treat coagulopathy. Providers should have a very low threshold for emergent operative intervention in the form of pelvic external fixation and/or pelvic packing. This occurs in addition to simultaneous interventions addressing the other possible sources of bleeding in patients demonstrating signs of hemorrhagic shock and failure to respond to early resuscitation and external pelvic tamponade. Finally, while arterial injury is only present in a small percentage of patients with a pelvic ring injury, percutaneous vascular intervention with selective angiography and REBOA have been shown to be efficacious for patients with clinical indicators of arterial injury or who remain hemodynamically unstable despite external pelvic tamponade and packing to address venous bleeding. They should be performed when as early as possible for patients in true extremis limit further hemorrhage and allow resuscitation efforts to continue.

Application of Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices in Pelvic Ring Fractures-Are Guidelines Followed in Daily Practice?

Early administration of a pelvic circumferential compression device (PCCD) is recommended for suspected pelvic trauma. This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of PCCD in patients with pelvic fractures assigned to the resuscitation room (RR) of a Level I trauma center. Furthermore, correct application of the PCCD as well as associated injuries with potential clinical sequelae were assessed. All patients with pelvic fractures assigned to the RR of a level one trauma center between 2016 and 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Presence and position of the PCCD on the initial trauma scan were assessed and rated. Associated injuries with potential adverse effects on clinical outcome were analysed. Seventy-seven patients were included, of which 26 (34%) had a PCCD in place. Eighteen (23%) patients had an unstable fracture pattern of whom ten (56%) had received a PCCD. The PCCD was correctly placed in four (15%) cases, acceptable in 12 (46%) and incorrectly in ten (39%). Of all patients with pelvic fractures (n = 77, 100%) treated in the RR, only one third (n = 26, 34%) had a PCCD. In addition, 39% of PCCDs were positioned incorrectly. Of the patients with unstable pelvic fractures (n = 18, 100%), more than half either did not receive any PCCD (n = 8, 44%) or had one which was inadequately positioned (n = 2, 11 %). These results underline that preclinical and clinical education programs on PCCD indication and application should be critically reassessed.

Three Dimensional Quality Assessments of Applied Pelvic Binders

Objective:

To assess the quality of applied pelvic binders using three dimensional computer tomography (3D CT).

Methods:

A local trauma registry was used to identify patients with pelvic fractures after high-energy trauma during 2011-2015. A 3D CT reconstruction was made from the initial trauma computer tomography images to assess the level of application, symmetricity of the binder and achieved fracture reduction. An acceptable application of the pelvic binder was deemed if it was at the trochanteric level, symmetric and minimized residual displacement.

Results:

We found 73 patients with a pelvic fracture and a pelvic binder on the initial trauma CT-scan. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 46±17 years and 40% (n=29) were females. The median ISS score was 38 (IQR;29-50), the mean systolic blood pressure on arrival was 106±46 mmHg and the median GCS on arrival was 14 (IQR;7-15). We found that 59% (n=43) of the binders were correctly applied (symmetric at the trochanteric level, symmetrical and with acceptable residual displacement of the fracture). The 30-day mortality was higher in patients with non-correct application 17% (n=5/30) compared to patients with correct application of the pelvic binder 9.3% (n=4/43) however this was not statistically significant (p=0.562).

Conclusion:

A substantial number of patients had non-correct application of pelvic binders. Future studies using 3D technique are encouraged to further investigate clinical impacts of non-appropriate application of pelvic binders.