A flexible, multifaceted approach is needed in health technology assessment of PET

Regional distribution of mechanical strain and macrophage-associated lung inflammation after ventilator-induced lung injury: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Alveolar macrophages activation to the pro-inflammatory phenotype M1 is pivotal in the pathophysiology of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI). Increased lung strain is a known determinant of VILI, but a direct correspondence between regional lung strain and macrophagic activation remains unestablished. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE is a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) radiopharmaceutical with a high affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2), which is overexpressed by pro-inflammatory-activated macrophages. Aim of the study was to determine, in a porcine model of VILI, whether mechanical strain correlates topographically with distribution of activated macrophages detected by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake.

METHODS

Seven anesthetized pigs underwent VILI, while three served as control. Lung CT scans were acquired at incremental tidal volumes, simultaneously recording lung mechanics. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE was administered, followed by dynamic PET scans. Custom MatLab scripts generated voxel-by-voxel gas volume and strain maps from CT slices at para-diaphragmatic (Para-D) and mid-thoracic (Mid-T) levels. Analysis of regional Voxel-associated Normal Strain (VoStrain) and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was performed and a measure of the statistical correlation between these two variables was quantified using the linear mutual information (LMI) method.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, the VILI group exhibited statistically significant higher VoStrain and Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVR) both at Para-D and Mid-T levels. Both VoStrain and SUVR increased along the gravitational axis with an increment described by statistically different regression lines between VILI and healthy controls and reaching the peak in the dependent regions of the lung (for strain in VILI vs. control was at Para-D: 760 ± 210 vs. 449 ± 106; at Mid-T level 497 ± 373 vs. 193 ± 160; for SUVR, in VILI vs. control was at Para-D: 2.2 ± 1.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1; at Mid-T level 1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 0.03). LMI in both Para-D and Mid-T was statistically significantly higher in VILI than in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In this porcine model of VILI, we found a topographical correlation between lung strain and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake at voxel level, suggesting that mechanical alteration and specific activation of inflammatory cells are strongly linked in VILI. This study represents the first voxel-by-voxel examination of this relationship in a multi-modal imaging analysis.

Regulatory Agencies and PET/CT Imaging in the Clinic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The regulatory steps necessary to bring new PET radiopharmaceuticals to the clinic will be reviewed. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides approval to manufacture and use diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, including those for cardiovascular PET/CT. Medicare not only provides insurance reimbursement for imaging procedures for its beneficiaries but also sets an example for third-party insurers to cover these procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

FDA provides extensive guidance for performing studies to obtain the safety and efficacy data needed to approve PET radiopharmaceuticals, and the pace of approval has recently increased. There also has been considerable progress in insurance coverage for PET by Medicare. Several promising agents for cardiovascular PET imaging are in the development pipeline. Challenges remain, however, including low levels of reimbursement and the application of appropriate use criteria for imaging procedures. It is important for cardiologists to understand the regulatory steps involved in translating PET radiopharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recent progress in both FDA approvals and Medicare coverage should facilitate the clinical use of new PET agents for molecular imaging of the heart.

Nuclear Imaging for Classic Fever of Unknown Origin: Meta-Analysis

Several studies have assessed nuclear imaging tests for localizing the source of fever in patients with classic fever of unknown origin (FUO); however, the role of these tests in clinical practice remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the test performance, diagnostic yield, and management decision impact of nuclear imaging tests in patients with classic FUO.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and other databases through October 31, 2015, to identify studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy or impact on diagnosis and management decisions of ¹⁸F-FDG PET alone or integrated with CT (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT), gallium scintigraphy, or leukocyte scintigraphy. Two reviewers extracted data. We quantitatively synthesized test performance and diagnostic yield and descriptively analyzed evidence about the impact on management decisions.

RESULTS

We included 42 studies with 2,058 patients. Studies were heterogeneous and had methodologic limitations. Diagnostic yield was higher in studies with higher prevalence of neoplasms and infections. Nonneoplastic causes, such as adult-onset Still's disease and polymyalgia rheumatica, were less successfully localized. Indirect evidence suggested that ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had the best test performance and diagnostic yield among the 4 imaging tests; summary sensitivity was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.90), specificity 0.52 (95% CI, 0.36-0.67), and diagnostic yield 0.58 (95% CI, 0.51-0.64). Evidence on direct comparisons of alternative imaging modalities or on the impact of tests on management decisions was limited.

CONCLUSION

Nuclear imaging tests, particularly ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, can be useful in identifying the source of fever in patients with classic FUO. The contribution of nuclear imaging may be limited in clinical settings in which infective and neoplastic causes are less common. Studies using standardized diagnostic algorithms are needed to determine the optimal timing for testing and to assess the impact of tests on management decisions and patient-relevant outcomes.

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Prospective Comparative Study of Dual-Time-Point FDG-PET/CT, Contrast-Enhanced CT, and Bone Scintigraphy

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with dual-time-point imaging, contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT), and bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with suspected breast cancer recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred women with suspected recurrence of breast cancer underwent 1-hour and 3-hour FDG-PET/CT, ceCT, and BS within approximately 10 days. The study was powered to estimate the precision of the individual imaging tests. Images were visually interpreted using a four-point assessment scale, and readers were blinded to other test results. The reference standard was biopsy along with treatment decisions and clinical follow-up (median, 17 months).

RESULTS

FDG-PET/CT resulted in no false negatives and fewer false positives than the other imaging techniques. Accuracy of results were similar for 1-hour and 3-hour FDG-PET/CT. For distant recurrence, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1) for FDG-PET/CT, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.94) for ceCT, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.94) for the combined ceCT+BS. Of 100 patients, 22 (22%) were verified with distant recurrence, and 18 of these had bone involvement. Nineteen patients (19%) had local recurrence only. In exploratory analyses, diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was better than ceCT alone or ceCT combined with BS in diagnosing distant, bone, and local recurrence, shown by a greater area under the receiver operating curve and higher sensitivity, specificity, and superior likelihood ratios.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT was accurate in diagnosing recurrence in breast cancer patients. It allowed for distant recurrence to be correctly ruled out and resulted in only a small number of false-positive cases. Exploratory findings suggest that FDG-PET/CT has greater accuracy than conventional imaging technologies in this patient group.

Added value of cost-utility analysis in simple diagnostic studies of accuracy: (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in prostate cancer staging

Diagnostic studies of accuracy targeting sensitivity and specificity are commonly done in a paired design in which all modalities are applied in each patient, whereas cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses are usually assessed either directly alongside to or indirectly by means of stochastic modeling based on larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However the conduct of RCTs is hampered in an environment such as ours, in which technology is rapidly evolving. As such, there is a relatively limited number of RCTs. Therefore, we investigated as to which extent paired diagnostic studies of accuracy can be also used to shed light on economic implications when considering a new diagnostic test. We propose a simple decision tree model-based cost-utility analysis of a diagnostic test when compared to the current standard procedure and exemplify this approach with published data from lymph node staging of prostate cancer. Average procedure costs were taken from the Danish Diagnosis Related Groups Tariff in 2013 and life expectancy was estimated for an ideal 60 year old patient based on prostate cancer stage and prostatectomy or radiation and chemotherapy. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were deduced from the literature, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare lymph node dissection with respective histopathological examination (reference standard) and (18)F-fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FCH-PET/CT). Lower bounds of sensitivity and specificity of FCH-PET/CT were established at which the replacement of the reference standard by FCH-PET/CT comes with a trade-off between worse effectiveness and lower costs. Compared to the reference standard in a diagnostic accuracy study, any imperfections in accuracy of a diagnostic test imply that replacing the reference standard generates a loss in effectiveness and utility. We conclude that diagnostic studies of accuracy can be put to a more extensive use, over and above a mere indication of sensitivity and specificity of an imaging test, and that health economic considerations should be undertaken when planning a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. These endeavors will prove especially fruitful when comparing several imaging techniques with one another, or the same imaging technique using different tracers, with an independent reference standard for the evaluation of results.

Cost-effectiveness of PET and PET/computed tomography: a systematic review

The development of clinical diagnostic procedures comprises early-phase and late-phase studies to elucidate diagnostic accuracy and patient outcome. Economic assessments of new diagnostic procedures compared with established work-ups indicate additional cost for 1 additional unit of effectiveness measure by means of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering the replacement of the standard regimen by a new diagnostic procedure. This article discusses economic assessments of PET and PET/computed tomography reported until mid-July 2014. Forty-seven studies on cancer and noncancer indications were identified but, because of the widely varying scope of the analyses, a substantial amount of work remains to be done.