Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers

Validation of the standardization framework SSTR-RADS 1.0 for neuroendocrine tumors using the novel SSTR‑targeting peptide [18F]SiTATE

OBJECTIVES

Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR-PET/CT) using [68Ga]-labeled tracers is a widely used imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Recently, [18F]SiTATE, a SiFAlin tagged [Tyr3]-octreotate (TATE) PET tracer, has shown great potential due to favorable clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Reporting and Data System 1.0 (SSTR-RADS 1.0) for structured interpretation and treatment planning of NET using [18F]SiTATE.

METHODS

Four readers assessed [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT of 95 patients according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at two different time points. Each reader evaluated up to five target lesions per scan. The overall scan score and the decision on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were considered. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The ICC analysis on the inter-reader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 85%), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 90%), and the decision to recommend PRRT (ICC ≥ 85%) showed excellent agreement. However, significant differences were observed in recommending PRRT among experienced readers (ER) (p = 0.020) and inexperienced readers (IR) (p = 0.004). Compartment-based analysis demonstrated good to excellent inter-reader agreement for most organs (ICC ≥ 74%), except for lymph nodes (ICC ≥ 53%).

CONCLUSION

SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and consistent framework system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans, even using the novel SSTR-ligand [18F]SiTATE. Some inter-reader variability was observed regarding the evaluation of uptake intensity prior to PRRT as well as compartment scoring of lymph nodes, indicating that those categories require special attention during further clinical validation and might be refined in a future SSTR-RADS version 1.1.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a consistent framework for categorizing somatostatin receptor-targeted PET/CT scans when using [18F]SiTATE. The framework serves as a valuable tool for facilitating and improving the management of patients with NET.

KEY POINTS

SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a valuable tool for managing patients with NET. SSTR-RADS 1.0 categorizes patients with showing strong agreement across diverse reader expertise. As an alternative to [68Ga]-labeled PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, SSTR-RADS 1.0 reliably classifies [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.

Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

As structured reporting is increasingly used in the evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) for prostate cancer, there is a need to assess the reliability of these frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement among readers with varying levels of experience using PSMA-RADS 1.0 for interpreting PSMA-PET/CT scans, even when blinded to clinical data, and therefore to determine the feasibility of implementing this reporting system in clinical practice.

METHODS

PSMA-PET/CT scans of 103 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of experience according to the reporting and data system (RADS) for PSMA-PET/CT imaging PSMA-RADS 1.0 at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen and stratified according to PSMA-RADS 1.0. Overall scan score and compartment-based scores were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

PSMA-RADS 1.0 demonstrated excellent interreader agreement for both overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.91) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.93) across all four readers. The framework showed excellent intrareader agreement for overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.86) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.95), even among readers with varying levels of experience.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable method for assessing PSMA-PET/CT with strong consistency and agreement among readers. It shows great potential for establishing a standard approach to diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently even by readers with less experience.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study underlines that PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a valuable and highly reliable scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans of prostate cancer patients and can be used confidently by radiologists with different levels of experience in routine clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

PSMA-RADS version 1.0 is a scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans. Its reproducibility needs to be analyzed in order to make it applicable to clinical practice. Excellent interreader and intrareader agreement for overall scan scores and compartment-based scores using PSMA-RADS 1.0 were seen in readers with varying levels of experience. PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable tool for accurately diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently in clinical routine.

Spirocyclic Iodonium Ylides for Fluorine-18 Radiolabeling of Non-Activated Arenes: From Concept to Clinical Research

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful imaging tool for drug discovery, clinical diagnosis, and monitoring of disease progression. Fluorine-18 is the most common radionuclide used for PET, but advances in radiotracer development have been limited by the historical lack of methodologies and precursors amenable to radiolabeling with fluorine-18. Radiolabeling of electron-rich (hetero)aromatic rings remains a long-standing challenge in the production of PET radiopharmaceuticals. In this personal account, we discuss the history of spirocyclic iodonium ylide precursors, from inception to applications in clinical research, for the incorporation of fluorine-18 into complex non-activated (hetero)aromatic rings.

The diagnostic and prognostic role of combined [18F]FDG and [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides PET/CT in primary pulmonary carcinoids: a multicentric experience

OBJECTIVES

In the present retrospective multicentric study, we combined [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides and [18F]FDG-PET/CT findings aiming to investigate their capability to differentiate typical (TC) and atypical pulmonary carcinoids (AC) and their prognostic role.

METHODS

From three centers, 61 patients were retrospectively included. Based on a dual tracer combination we classified PET scans as score 1, [18F]FDG- and [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides negative; score 2, [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides positive and [18F]FDG-negative; score 3, [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides negative and [18F]FDG-positive; score 4, both tracers positive. Moreover, for each patient, the ratios of SUVmax on [68Ga]-DOTA-PET to that on [18F]FDG-PET were calculated (SUVr).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients had a final diagnosis of TC. Twenty-two TC (57%) had positive [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides PET; instead, 21/26 (81%) AC had positive [18F]FDG-PET/CT. On dual-tracer analysis, scores 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 13%, 20%, 43% and 24% for all populations; 17%, 26%, 20% and 37% for TC; 8%, 11%, 73% and 8% for AC. Median SUVr was significantly higher in TC than AC (6.4 vs. 0.4, p = 0.011). The best value of SUVr to predict the final diagnosis was 1.05 (AUC 0.889). Relapse or progression of disease happened in 17 patients (11 affected by AC) and death in 10 cases (7 AC). AC diagnosis, positive [18F]FDG-PET, negative DOTA-PET and dual tracer score were significantly correlated with PFS (p = 0.013, p = 0.033, p = 0.029 and p = 0.019), while only AC diagnosis with OS (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

PET/CT findings had also a prognostic role in predicting PFS. Dual-tracer PET behavior may be used to predict the nature of pulmonary carcinoids and select the most appropriate management.

KEY POINTS

• Combination of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides PET/CT results may help to differentiate between atypical and typical lung carcinoids. • The SUVmax ratio between [18F]FDG and [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides PET may help to differentiate between atypical and typical lung carcinoids. • Histotype and PET/CT features have a prognostic impact on PFS.

Interobserver Agreement Rates on C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4-Directed Molecular Imaging and Therapy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement rates in patients scanned with C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed PET/CT, including the rate of patients eligible for CXCR4-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) based on scan results.

METHODS

Four independent observers reviewed 50 CXCR4-targeted [ 68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT of patients with various solid cancers. On a visual level, the following items were assessed by each reader: overall scan impression, number of organ and lymph node (LN) metastases and number of affected organs and LN regions. For a quantitative investigation, readers had to choose a maximum of 3 target lesions, defined as largest in size and/or most intense uptake per organ compartment. Reference tissues were also quantified, including unaffected hepatic parenchyma and blood pool. Last, all observers had to decide whether patients were eligible for CXCR4-targeted RLT. Concordance rates were tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). For interpretation, we applied the definition of Cicchetti (with 0.4-0.59 indicating fair; 0.6-0.74, good; 0.75-1, excellent agreement).

RESULTS

On a visual level, fair agreement was achieved for an overall scan impression (ICC, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.71). Organ and LN involvement (ICC, ≥0.4) demonstrated fair, whereas CXCR4 density and number of LN and organ metastases showed good agreement rates (ICC, ≥0.65). Number of affected organs and affected LN areas, however, showed excellent concordance (ICC, ≥0.76). Quantification in LN and organ lesions also provided excellent agreement rates (ICC, ≥0.92), whereas quantified uptake in reference organs provided fair concordance (ICC, ≥0.54). Again, excellent agreement rates were observed when deciding on patients eligible for CXCR4-RLT (ICC, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients scanned with CXCR4-targeted PET/CT, we observed fair to excellent agreement rates for both molecular imaging and therapy parameters, thereby favoring a more widespread adoption of [ 68 Ga]pentixafor in the clinic.

Validation of the SSTR-RADS 1.0 for the structured interpretation of SSTR-PET/CT and treatment planning in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients

OBJECTIVES

The recently proposed standardized reporting and data system for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT SSTR-RADS 1.0 showed promising first results in the assessment of diagnosis and treatment planning with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This study aimed to determine the intra- and interreader agreement of SSTR-RADS 1.0.

METHODS

SSTR-PET/CT scans of 100 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of expertise according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen by each reader (not more than three lesions per organ) and stratified according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria. Overall scan score and binary decision on PRRT were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Interreader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 0.91) and overall scan score (ICC ≥ 0.93) was excellent. The decision to state "functional imaging fulfills requirements for PRRT and qualifies patient as potential candidate for PRRT" also demonstrated excellent agreement among all readers (ICC ≥ 0.86). Intrareader agreement was excellent even among different experience levels when comparing target lesion-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.98), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 0.93), and decision for PRRT (ICC ≥ 0.88).

CONCLUSION

SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and accurate system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans with high intra- and interreader agreement. The system is a promising approach to standardize the diagnosis and treatment planning in NET patients.

KEY POINTS

• SSTR-RADS 1.0 offers high reproducibility and accuracy. • SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a promising method to standardize diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with NET.

High Interobserver Agreement on PSMA PET/CT Even in the Absence of Clinical Data

BACKGROUND

Recommended by current guidelines, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed PET/CT is increasingly used in men with prostate cancer (PC). We aimed to provide concordance rates using the PSMA reporting and data system (RADS) for scan interpretation and also determine whether such agreement rates are affected by available patient characteristics at time of scan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty men with PC, who all underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, were included. Three independent, experienced readers indicated general scan parameters (including overall scan result, organ or lymph node [LN] involvement, and appropriateness of radioligand therapy). Applying PSMA-RADS 1.0, observers also had to conduct RADS scoring on a target lesion (TL) and overall scan level. During the first read, observers were masked to all relevant clinical information, whereas on a second read, relevant patient characteristics were displayed, thereby allowing for determination of impact of available clinical information for scan interpretation. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]), which were then rated according to Cicchetti (0.4-0.59 fair, 0.6-0.74 good, and 0.75-1 excellent agreement).

RESULTS

For general parameters, agreement rates were excellent, including an overall scan result (ICC, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90), LN metastases (ICC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93), organ involvement (ICC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89), and indication for radioligand therapy (ICC, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96). Overall RADS scoring was also excellent with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.96-09.4). On a TL-based level, 251 different lesions were selected by the 3 observers (with 73 chosen by all 3 readers). RADS-based concordance rates were fair to excellent: all lesions, ICC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.85); LN, ICC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63-0.92); skeleton, ICC of 0.55 (95% CI, 0-0.84); and prostate, ICC of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.17-0.78). When performing a second read displaying patient's characteristics, there were only minor modifications to the previously applied RADS scoring on a TL-based level (overall, n = 8): each reader 1 and 2 in 3/60 (5%) instances, and reader 3 in 2/60 (3.3%) instances. The main reason for recategorization (mainly upstaging) was provided information on PSA levels (4/8, 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying PSMA-RADS, concordance rates were fair to excellent, whereas relevant modifications were rarely observed after providing clinical data. As such, even in the absence of patient information, standardized frameworks still provide guidance for reading PSMA PETs. Those findings may have implications for a high throughput in a busy PET practice, where patient details cannot always be retrieved at time of scan interpretation or in the context of clinical trials or central reviews in which readers may be blinded to clinical data.

PET Criteria by Cancer Type from Imaging Interpretation to Treatment Response Assessment: Beyond FDG PET Score

Background: in recent years, the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a reliable diagnostic tool in a wide variety of pathological conditions. This review aims to collect and review PET criteria developed for interpretation and treatment response assessment in cases of non-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) imaging in oncology. Methods: A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was made to find relevant published articles about non-[18F]FDG PET response criteria. Results: The comprehensive computer literature search revealed 183 articles. On reviewing the titles and abstracts, 149 articles were excluded because the reported data were not within the field of interest. Finally, 34 articles were selected and retrieved in full-text versions. Conclusions: available criteria are a promising tool for the interpretation of non-FDG PET scans, but also to assess the response to therapy and therefore to predict the prognosis. However, oriented clinical trials are needed to clearly evaluate their impact on patient management.

[18F]DCFPyL PET/CT for Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed positron emission tomography (PET) has gained increasing interest for imaging of men affected by prostate cancer (PC). In recent years, ⁶⁸Ga-labeled PSMA compounds have been widely utilized, although there is a trend towards increased utilization of ¹⁸F-labeled agents. Among others, [¹⁸F]DCFPyL (piflufolastat F 18, PYLARIFY) has been tested in multiple major trials, such as OSPREY and CONDOR, which provided robust evidence on the clinical utility of this compound for staging, restaging, and change in management. Recent explorative prospective trials have also utilized [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PET/CT for response assessment, e.g., in patients under abiraterone or enzalutamide, rendering this ¹⁸F-labeled PSMA radiotracer as an attractive biomarker for image-guided strategies in men with PC. After recent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, one may expect more widespread use, not only in the U.S., but also in Europe in the long term. In the present review, we will provide an overview of the current clinical utility of [¹⁸F]DCFPyL in various clinical settings for men with PC.

Training on Reporting and Data System (RADS) for Somatostatin-Receptor Targeted Molecular Imaging Can Reduce the Test Anxiety of Inexperienced Readers

Purpose

For somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), a standardized framework termed SSTR-reporting and data system (RADS) has been proposed. We aimed to elucidate the impact of a RADS-focused training on reader’s anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, the motivational beliefs in learning such a system, whether it increases reader’s confidence, and its implementation in clinical routine.

Procedures

A 3-day training course focusing on SSTR-RADS was conducted. Self-report questionnaires were handed out prior to the course (Pre) and thereafter (Post). The impact of the training on the following categories was evaluated: (1) test anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, (2) motivational beliefs, (3) increase in reader’s confidence, and (4) clinical implementation. To assess the effect size of the course, Cohen’s d was calculated (small, d = 0.20; large effect, d = 0.80).

Results

Of 22 participants, Pre and Post were returned by 21/22 (95.5%). In total, 14/21 (66.7%) were considered inexperienced (IR, < 1 year experience in reading SSTR-PET/CTs) and 7/21 (33.3%) as experienced readers (ER, > 1 year). Applying SSTR-RADS, a large decrease in anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT was noted for IR (d =  − 0.74, P = 0.02), but not for ER (d = 0.11, P = 0.78). For the other three categories motivational beliefs, reader’s confidence, and clinical implementation, agreement rates were already high prior to the training and persisted throughout the course (P ≥ 0.21).

Conclusions

A framework-focused reader training can reduce anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CTs, in particular for inexperienced readers. This may allow for a more widespread adoption of this system, e.g., in multicenter trials for better intra- and interindividual comparison of scan results.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-022-01712-6.

Data-driven analysis of kappa opioid receptor binding in major depressive disorder measured by positron emission tomography

Preclinical studies have implicated kappa opioid receptors (KORs) in stress responses and depression-related behaviors, but evidence from human studies is limited. Here we present results of a secondary analysis of data acquired using positron emission tomography (PET) with the KOR radiotracer [¹¹C]GR103545 in 10 unmedicated, currently depressed individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD; 32.6 ± 6.5 years, 5 women) and 13 healthy volunteers (34.8 ± 10 years, 6 women). Independent component analysis was performed to identify spatial patterns of coherent variance in KOR binding (tracer volume of distribution, V_T) across all subjects. Expression of each component was compared between groups and relationships to symptoms were explored using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Three components of variation in KOR availability across ROIs were identified, spatially characterized by [¹¹C]GR103545 V_T in (1) bilateral frontal lobe; (2) occipital and parietal cortices, right hippocampus, and putamen; and (3) right anterior cingulate, right superior frontal gyrus and insula, coupled to negative loading in left middle cingulate. In MDD patients, component 3 was negatively associated with symptom severity on the HDRS (r = -0.85, p = 0.0021). There were no group-wise differences in expression of any component between patients and controls. These preliminary findings suggest that KOR signaling in cortical regions relevant to depression, particularly right anterior cingulate, could reflect MDD pathophysiology.

Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects

A new era of precision diagnostics and therapy for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms began with the approval of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging followed by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). With the transition from SSTR-based γ-scintigraphy to PET, the higher sensitivity of the latter raised questions regarding the direct application of the planar scintigraphy-based Krenning score for PRRT eligibility. Also, to date, the role of SSTR PET in response assessment and predicting outcome remains under evaluation. In this comprehensive review article, we discuss the current role of SSTR PET in all aspects of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including its relation to conventional imaging, selection of patients for PRRT, and the current understanding of SSTR PET-based response assessment. We also provide a standardized reporting template for SSTR PET with a brief discussion.

Imaging Kappa Opioid Receptors in the Living Brain with Positron Emission Tomography

Kappa opioid receptor (KOR) neuroimaging using positron emission tomography (PET) has been immensely successful in all phases of discovery and validation in relation to radiotracer development from preclinical imaging to human imaging. There are now several KOR-specific PET radiotracers that can be utilized for neuroimaging, including agonist and antagonist ligands, as well as C-11 and F-18 variants. These technologies will increase KOR PET utilization by imaging centers around the world and have provided a foundation for future studies. In this chapter, I review the advances in KOR radiotracer discovery, focusing on ligands that have been translated into human imaging, and highlight key attributes unique to each KOR PET radiotracer. The utilization of these radiotracers in KOR PET neuroimaging can be subdivided into three major investigational classes: the first, measurement of KOR density; the second, measurement of KOR drug occupancy; the third, detecting changes in endogenous dynorphin following activation or deactivation. Given the involvement of the KOR/dynorphin system in a number of brain disorders including, but not limited to, pain, itch, mood disorders and addiction, measuring KOR density in the living brain will offer insight into the chronic effects of these disorders on KOR tone in humans. Notably, KOR PET has been successful at measuring drug occupancy in the human brain to guide dose selection for maximal therapeutic efficacy while avoiding harmful side effects. Lastly, we discuss the potential of KOR PET to detect changes in endogenous dynorphin in the human brain, to elucidate neural mechanisms and offer critical insight into disease-modifying therapeutics. We conclude with comments on other translational neuroimaging modalities such as MRI that could be used to study KOR-dynorphin tone in the living human brain.

Natural product-based Radiopharmaceuticals:Focus on curcumin and its analogs, flavonoids, and marine peptides

Natural products provide a bountiful supply of pharmacologically relevant precursors for the development of various drug-related molecules, including radiopharmaceuticals. However, current knowledge regarding the importance of natural products in developing new radiopharmaceuticals remains limited. To date, several radionuclides, including gallium-68, technetium-99m, fluorine-18, iodine-131, and iodine-125, have been extensively studied for the synthesis of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. The availability of various radiolabeling methods allows the incorporation of these radionuclides into bioactive molecules in a practical and efficient manner. Of the radiolabeling methods, direct radioiodination, radiometal complexation, and halogenation are generally suitable for natural products owing to their simplicity and robustness. This review highlights the pharmacological benefits of curcumin and its analogs, flavonoids, and marine peptides in treating human pathologies and provides a perspective on the potential use of these bioactive compounds as molecular templates for the design and development of new radiopharmaceuticals. Additionally, this review provides insights into the current strategies for labeling natural products with various radionuclides using either direct or indirect methods.

•

Potential use of natural products for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals.

•

Profile of potential natural products as molecular templates for the synthesis of new radiopharmaceuticals: Focus on curcumin and its closely related substances, flavonoids, and marine peptides.

•

Radiolabeling strategies, challenges, and examples of natural product-based radiopharmaceuticals under investigation.

Preclinical dosimetry models and the prediction of clinical doses of novel positron emission tomography radiotracers

Dosimetry models using preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) data are commonly employed to predict the clinical radiological safety of novel radiotracers. However, unbiased clinical safety profiling remains difficult during the translational exercise from preclinical research to first-in-human studies for novel PET radiotracers. In this study, we assessed PET dosimetry data of six ¹⁸F-labelled radiotracers using preclinical dosimetry models, different reconstruction methods and quantified the biases of these predictions relative to measured clinical doses to ease translation of new PET radiotracers to first-in-human studies. Whole-body PET images were taken from rats over 240 min after intravenous radiotracer bolus injection. Four existing and two novel PET radiotracers were investigated: [¹⁸F]FDG, [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-RGDfK, [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide ([¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-OC), [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-NOC, [¹⁸F]ENC2015 and [¹⁸F]ENC2018. Filtered-back projection (FBP) and iterative methods were used for reconstruction of PET data. Predicted and true clinical absorbed doses for [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-OC were then used to quantify bias of preclinical model predictions versus clinical measurements. Our results show that most dosimetry models were biased in their predicted clinical dosimetry compared to empirical values. Therefore, normalization of rat:human organ sizes and correction for reconstruction method biases are required to achieve higher precision of dosimetry estimates.

[Theranostics and hybrid imaging for somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Conventional imaging tests like computed tomography (CT) cannot visualize somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression on the tumor cell surface.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

For imaging of SSTR-expressing tumors conventional morphological imaging tests such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are employed.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Molecular imaging of SSTR expression on the tumor cell surface, in particular by using (whole body) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are considered the current standard of care. Only the use of CT enables for exact localization of putative sites of disease (hybrid imaging).

PERFORMANCE

Hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT are of utmost importance for staging and monitoring of treatment efficacy. SSTR-PET is superior to SPECT and the PET radiotracer ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE has been approved in multiple countries. In addition, SSTR positivity revealed by SPECT or PET pave the way for a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Such a theranostic approach enables for systemic or locoregional radiation with β‑emitting radionuclides, which are linked to the identical amino acid peptide used for PET or SPECT imaging. The prospective, randomized Netter‑1 trial has shown significant benefit for patients receiving PRRT.

ACHIEVEMENTS

A combined use of conventional and functional imaging tests is superior to conventional imaging alone and allows for identification of suitable candidates for a theranostic approach.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

In case of clinical suspicion or after having obtained histological evidence, hybrid SSTR-SPECT/CT or -PET/CT should be performed, preferably in a dedicated molecular imaging center.

High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT

Recently, a standardized framework system for interpreting somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT, termed the SSTR reporting and data system (RADS) 1.0, was introduced, providing reliable standards and criteria for SSTR-targeted imaging. We determined the interobserver reliability of SSTR-RADS for interpretation of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans in a multicentric, randomized setting. Methods: A set of 51 randomized ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans was independently assessed by 4 masked readers with different levels of experience (2 experienced readers and 2 inexperienced readers) trained on the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria (based on a 5-point scale from 1 [definitively benign] to 5 [high certainty that neuroendocrine neoplasia is present]). For each scan, SSTR-RADS scores were assigned to a maximum of 5 target lesions (TLs). An overall scan impression based on SSTR-RADS was indicated, and interobserver agreement rates on a TL-based, on an organ-based, and on an overall SSTR-RADS score-based level were computed. The readers were also asked to decide whether peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) should be considered on the basis of the assigned RADS scores. Results: Among the selected TLs, 153 were chosen by at least 2 readers (all 4 readers selected the same TLs in 58 of 153 [37.9%] instances). The interobserver agreement for SSTR-RADS scoring among identical TLs was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.73 for 4, 3, and 2 identical TLs). For lymph node and liver lesions, excellent interobserver agreement rates were derived (ICC, 0.91 and 0.77, respectively). Moreover, the interobserver agreement for an overall scan impression based on SSTR-RADS was excellent (ICC, 0.88). The SSTR-RADS-based decision to use PRRT also demonstrated excellent agreement, with an ICC of 0.80. No significant differences between experienced and inexperienced readers for an overall scan impression and TL-based SSTR-RADS scoring were observed (P ≥ 0.18), thereby suggesting that SSTR-RADS seems to be readily applicable even for less experienced readers. Conclusion: SSTR-RADS-guided assessment demonstrated a high concordance rate, even among readers with different levels of experience, supporting the adoption of SSTR-RADS for trials, clinical routine, or outcome studies.

The Changing Face of Nuclear Cardiology: Guiding Cardiovascular Care Toward Molecular Medicine

Radionuclide imaging of myocardial perfusion, function, and viability has been established for decades and remains a robust, evidence-based and broadly available means for clinical workup and therapeutic guidance in ischemic heart disease. Yet, powerful alternative modalities have emerged for this purpose, and their growth has resulted in increasing competition. But the potential of the tracer principle goes beyond the assessment of physiology and function, toward the interrogation of biology and molecular pathways. This is a unique selling point of radionuclide imaging, which has been underrecognized in cardiovascular medicine until recently. Now, molecular imaging methods for the detection of myocardial infiltration, device infection, and cardiovascular inflammation are successfully gaining clinical acceptance. This is further strengthened by the symbiotic quest of cardiac imaging and therapy for an increasing implementation of molecule-targeted procedures, in which specific therapeutic interventions require specific diagnostic guidance toward the most suitable candidates. This review will summarize the current advent of clinical cardiovascular molecular imaging and highlight its transformative contribution to the evolution of cardiovascular therapy beyond mechanical interventions and broad blockbuster medication, toward a future of novel, individualized molecule-targeted and molecular imaging-guided therapies.

18F-Labeled, PSMA-Targeted Radiotracers: Leveraging the Advantages of Radiofluorination for Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer with 68Ga-labeled compounds has rapidly become adopted as part of routine clinical care in many parts of the world. However, recent years have witnessed the start of a shift from 68Ga- to 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. The latter imaging agents have several key advantages, which may lay the groundwork for an even more widespread adoption into the clinic. First, facilitated delivery from distant suppliers expands the availability of PET radiopharmaceuticals in smaller hospitals operating a PET center but lacking the patient volume to justify an onsite 68Ge/68Ga generator. Thus, such an approach meets the increasing demand for PSMA-targeted PET imaging in areas with lower population density and may even lead to cost-savings compared to in-house production. Moreover, 18F-labeled radiotracers have a higher positron yield and lower positron energy, which in turn decreases image noise, improves contrast resolution, and maximizes the likelihood of detecting subtle lesions. In addition, the longer half-life of 110 min allows for improved delayed imaging protocols and flexibility in study design, which may further increase diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, such compounds can be distributed to sites which are not allowed to produce radiotracers on-site due to regulatory issues or to centers without access to a cyclotron. In light of these advantageous characteristics, 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers may play an important role in both optimizing this transformative imaging modality and making it widely available. We have aimed to provide a concise overview of emerging 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers undergoing active clinical development. Given the wide array of available radiotracers, comparative studies are needed to firmly establish the role of the available 18F-labeled compounds in the field of molecular PCa imaging, preferably in different clinical scenarios.

Proposal for Systemic-Therapy Response-Assessment Criteria at the Time of PSMA PET/CT Imaging: The PSMA PET Progression Criteria

In around 20% of men with prostate cancer, metastasis develops during the course of their disease. Accordingly, discovering and developing new potent treatment strategies for patients with metastatic prostate cancer has been a major research focus during the last few decades. Identifying disease progression, especially within clinical trials, is essential in determining drug effectiveness. One major remaining question is how best to define disease progression. The criteria of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) include clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as conventional imaging modalities such as MRI, CT, and bone scan findings, but advanced molecular imaging techniques, especially prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET findings, are not considered. This is a problem because PSMA PET is used not only for detecting biochemical recurrence but also for restaging and as an intermediate-endpoint biomarker in ongoing clinical trials. Therefore, response criteria and PSMA PET progression (PPP) criteria need to be established with some urgency. The intent of this article is therefore to define prostate cancer progression by PSMA PET criteria. Our PPP proposal is based on the same principles as were applied for the PCGW2 criteria but adds value by including PSMA PET criteria. PPP defines PSMA treatment response using 3 different criteria. The first is the appearance of 2 or more new PSMA-positive distant lesions. The second is the appearance of 1 new PSMA-positive lesion plus consistent clinical or laboratory data and recommended confirmation by biopsy or correlative imaging within 3 mo of PSMA PET. The third is an increase in size or PSMA uptake of 1 or more existing lesions by at least 30%, plus consistent clinical or laboratory data or confirmation by biopsy or correlative imaging within 3 mo of PSMA PET.

Recent Updates on Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (MI-RADS) for Theranostic Radiotracers-Navigating Pitfalls of SSTR- and PSMA-Targeted PET/CT

The theranostic concept represents a paradigmatic example of personalized treatment. It is based on the use of radiolabeled compounds which can be applied for both diagnostic molecular imaging and subsequent treatment, using different radionuclides for labelling. Clinically relevant examples include somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET), as well as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer (PC). As such, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy using positron emission tomography (PET). While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography scans, the reader has to navigate certain pitfalls, including (I.) varying normal biodistribution between different PSMA- and SSTR-targeting PET radiotracers, (II.) varying radiotracer uptake in numerous kinds of both benign and malignant lesions, and (III.) resulting false-positive and false-negative findings. Thus, two novel reporting and data system (RADS) classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS) have been recently introduced under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS). Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e., if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied. Learning objectives of the present case-based review are as follows: (I.) the theranostic concept for the treatment of NET and PC will be briefly introduced, (II.) the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT will be identified, (III.) the novel framework system for theranostic radiotracers (MI-RADS) will be explained, applied to complex clinical cases and recent studies in the field will be highlighted. Finally, current treatment strategies based on MI-RADS will be proposed, which will demonstrate how such a generalizable framework system truly paves the way for clinically meaningful molecular imaging-guided treatment of either PC or NET. Thus, beyond an introduction of MI-RADS, the present review aims to provide an update of recently published studies which have further validated the concept of structured reporting systems in the field of theranostics.