18F-FDG PET/MRI for Staging and Interim Response Assessment in Pediatric and Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Prospective Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT as the Reference Standard

Molecular Imaging with PET-CT and PET-MRI in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Diseases

Molecular imaging has emerged as an integral part of oncologic imaging. Given the physiologic changes that precede anatomic changes, molecular imaging can enable early detection of disease and monitoring of response. [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron emission tomography (PET) is the predominant molecular imaging modality used in oncologic assessment and can be performed using PET/CT or PET/MR. In pediatric patients, PET/MRI imaging is generally preferred due to low radiation exposure and PET/MRI is particularly advantageous for imaging musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases, as MRI provides superior characterization of tissue changes as compared to CT. In this article, we provide an overview of the typical role of PET CT/MRI in assessment of some common pediatric malignancies and benign MSK diseases with case examples. We also discuss the relative advantages of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT, and review published data with a primary focus on the use of PET/MR.

Correlation of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in children with Hodgkin lymphoma: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The objective was to analyse if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can act as a non-radiation exposure surrogate for (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in children with histologically confirmed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) before treatment. This was done by analysing a potential correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in MRI and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FDG-PET/CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (six female, eleven male, median age: 16 years, range: 12-20 years) with histologically confirmed HL were retrospectively analysed. The patients underwent both MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT before the start of treatment. (18)F-FDG PET/CT data and correlating ADC maps in MRI were collected. For each HL-lesion two readers independently evaluated the SUVmax and correlating meanADC.

RESULTS

The seventeen patients had a total of 72 evaluable lesions of HL and there was no significant difference in the number of lesions between male and female patients (median male: 15, range: 12-19 years, median female: 17 range: 12-18 years, p = 0.021). The mean duration between MRI and PET/CT was 5.9 ± 5.3 days. The inter-reader agreement as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was excellent (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). The correlated SUVmax and meanADC of all 17 patients (ROIs n = 72) showed a strong negative correlation of -0.75 (95% CI: -0.84, - -0.63, p = 0.001). Analysis revealed a difference in the correlations of the examination fields. The correlated SUVmax and meanADC showed a strong correlation at neck and thoracal examinations (neck: -0.83, 95% CI: -0.93, - -0.63, p < 0.0001, thoracal: -0.82, 95% CI: -0.91, - -0.64, p < 0.0001) and a fair correlation at abdominal examinations of -0.62 (95% CI: -0.83, - -0.28, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax and meanADC showed a strong negative correlation in paediatric HL lesions. The assessment seemed robust according to inter-reader agreements. Our results suggest that ADC maps and meanADC have the potential to replace PET/CT in the analysis of disease activity in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients. This may help reduce the number of PET/CT examinations and decrease radiation exposure to children.

Diagnostic performance of prospective same-day 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Accurate staging and response assessment are essential for prognosis and to guide treatment in patients with lymphoma. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/MRI versus FDG PET/CT in adult patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and Non- Hodgkin lymphoma.

METHODS

In this single centre study, 50 patients were prospectively recruited. FDG PET/MRI was performed after staging FDG PET/CT using a single injection of 18F-FDG. Patients were invited to complete same-day FDG PET/MRI with FDG PET/CT at interim and end of treatment response assessments. Performance was assessed using PET/CT as the reference standard for disease site identification, staging, response assessment with Deauville score and concordance in metabolic activity.

RESULTS

Staging assessment showed perfect agreement (κ = 1.0, P = 0) between PET/MRI and PET/CT using Ann Arbor staging. There was excellent intermodality correlation with disease site identification at staging (κ = 0.976, P < 0.001) with FDG PET/MRI sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 94-98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99-100%). There was good correlation of disease site identification at interim assessment (κ = 0.819, P < 0.001) and excellent correlation at end-of-treatment assessment (κ = 1.0, P < 0.001). Intermodality agreement for Deauville scores was good at interim assessment (κ = 0.808, P < 0.001) and excellent at end-of-treatment assessment (κ = 1.0, P = 0). There was good-excellent concordance in SUV max and mean between modalities across timepoints. Minimum calculated radiation patient effective dose saving was 54% between the two modalities per scan.

CONCLUSION

With high concordance in disease site identification, staging and response assessment, PET/MR is a potentially viable alternative to PET/CT in lymphoma that minimises radiation exposure.

Optimized Whole-Body PET MRI Sequence Workflow in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI might be the diagnostic method of choice for Hodgkin lymphoma patients, as it combines significant metabolic information from PET with excellent soft-tissue contrast from MRI and avoids radiation exposure from CT. However, a major issue is longer examination times than for PET/CT, especially for younger children needing anesthesia. Thus, a targeted selection of suitable whole-body MRI sequences is important to optimize the PET/MRI workflow. Methods: The initial PET/MRI scans of 84 EuroNet-PHL-C2 study patients from 13 international PET centers were evaluated. In each available MRI sequence, 5 PET-positive lymph nodes were assessed. If extranodal involvement occurred, 2 splenic lesions, 2 skeletal lesions, and 2 lung lesions were also assessed. A detection rate was calculated dividing the number of visible, anatomically assignable, and measurable lesions in the respective MRI sequence by the total number of lesions. Results: Relaxation time-weighted (T2w) transverse sequences with fat saturation (fs) yielded the best result, with detection rates of 95% for nodal lesions, 62% for splenic lesions, 94% for skeletal lesions, and 83% for lung lesions, followed by T2w transverse sequences without fs (86%, 49%, 16%, and 59%, respectively) and longitudinal relaxation time-weighted contrast-enhanced transverse sequences with fs (74%, 35%, 57%, and 55%, respectively). Conclusion: T2w transverse sequences with fs yielded the highest detection rates and are well suited for accurate whole-body PET/MRI in lymphoma patients. There is no evidence to recommend the use of contrast agents.

Prognostic value of combined MTV and ADC derived from baseline FDG PET/MRI in aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from baseline FDG PET/MRI compared to established clinical risk factors in terms of progression free survival (PFS) at 2 years in a cohort of diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and high-grade-B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL).

METHODS

Thirty-three patients and their baseline PET/MRI examinations were included. Images were read by two pairs of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists for defining lymphoma lesions. MTV was computed on PET, and up to six lymphoma target lesions with restricted diffusion was defined for each PET/MRI examination. Minimum ADC (ADC_min) and the corresponding mean ADC (ADC_mean) from the target lesion with the lowest ADC_min were included in the analyses. For the combined PET/MRI parameters, the ratio between MTV and the target lesion with the lowest ADC_min (MTV/ADC_min) and the corresponding ADC_mean (MTV/ADC_mean) was calculated for each patient. Clinical, histological, and PET/MRI parameters were compared between the treatment failure and treatment response group, while survival analyses for each variable was performed by using univariate Cox regression. In case of significant variables in the Cox regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank test was used to study the effect of the variables on PFS.

RESULTS

ECOC PS scale ≥2 (p = 0.05) and ADC_mean (p = 0.05) were significantly different between the treatment failure group (n = 6) and those with treatment response (n = 27). Survival analyses showed that ADC_mean was associated with PFS (p = 0.02, [HR 2.3 for 1 SD increase]), while combining MTV and ADC did not predict outcome. In addition, ECOG PS ≥2 (p = 0.01, [HR 13.3]) and histology of HGBCL (p = 0.02 [HR 7.6]) was significantly associated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC_mean derived from baseline MRI could be a prognostic imaging biomarker for DLBCL and HGBCL. Baseline staging with PET/MRI could therefore give supplementary prognostic information compared to today's standard PET/CT.

Optimized low-dose positron emission tomography/computed tomography schemes in pediatric tumor patients: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

It's clinically relevant to reduce the radiation dose to children while ensuring their positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) image quality. The optimal protocol for whole-body PET/CT imaging in children (non-model) has been less studied. In this study, we investigated the optimal protocol for PET/CT imaging of pediatric oncology by analyzing the radiation dose and image quality in18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT imaging of children with oncology.

METHODS

One hundred children with tumors who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were included. CT grouping: randomly divided into 18 groups A-R according to the combination of three parameters: tube voltage (80/120 kV), automatic milliamp range (20-39/40-59/60-80 mA), and noise index (NI) (8/12/14). PET grouping: randomly divided into 9 groups a-i according to the combination of two parameters: the pharmaceuticals injection dose (0.08/0.12/0.15 mCi/kg) and time per bed (120/150/180 s). The effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated separately for each group and the image quality of CT and PET was evaluated subjectively using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) objective evaluation and 5-point evaluation method, respectively.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven images in CT and 57 images in PET were included. The best quality of CT images was in group K (120 kV/40-59 mA/8); there are 9 groups had good image quality and lower dose length product (DLP) than group K (SD ±10), while the difference in DLP between groups was large. The Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) test showed that the difference in image quality between the 9 groups was not statistically significant. The best PET image quality was in group i [0.15 (mCi/kg)/180 s]; there are four groups had good image quality and lower ED_PET than group i (CV ±3.5%), while the difference in ED_PET between groups was large (4.4-6.5 mSv), and the K-W test showed that the difference in image quality between the four groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05), with the lowest ED_PET being in the g group.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal protocols for CT scanning and PET imaging in this experiment were group H (80 kV/40-59 mA/14) and group g [0.08 (mCi/kg)/180 s], respectively.Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200061386.

Improving protocols for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: oncological and inflammatory applications

Whole-body MRI is increasingly used in the evaluation of a range of oncological and non-oncological diseases in infants, children and adolescents. Technical innovation in MRI scanners, coils and sequences have enabled whole-body MRI to be performed more rapidly, offering large field-of-view imaging suitable for multifocal and multisystem disease processes in a clinically useful timeframe. Together with a lack of ionizing radiation, this makes whole-body MRI especially attractive in the pediatric population. Indications include lesion detection in cancer predisposition syndrome surveillance and in the workup of children with known malignancies, and diagnosis and monitoring of a host of infectious and non-infectious inflammatory conditions. Choosing which patients are most likely to benefit from this technology is crucial, but so is adjusting protocols to the patient and disease to optimize lesion detection. The focus of this review is on protocols and the elements impacting image acquisition in pediatric whole-body MRI. We consider the practical aspects, from scanner and coil selection to patient positioning, single-center generic and indication-specific protocols with technical parameters, motion reduction strategies and post-processing. When optimized, collectively these lead to better standardization of whole-body MRI, and when married to systematic analysis and interpretation, they can improve diagnostic accuracy.

Molecular imaging in oncology: Current impact and future directions

The authors define molecular imaging, according to the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, as the visualization, characterization, and measurement of biological processes at the molecular and cellular levels in humans and other living systems. Although practiced for many years clinically in nuclear medicine, expansion to other imaging modalities began roughly 25 years ago and has accelerated since. That acceleration derives from the continual appearance of new and highly relevant animal models of human disease, increasingly sensitive imaging devices, high-throughput methods to discover and optimize affinity agents to key cellular targets, new ways to manipulate genetic material, and expanded use of cloud computing. Greater interest by scientists in allied fields, such as chemistry, biomedical engineering, and immunology, as well as increased attention by the pharmaceutical industry, have likewise contributed to the boom in activity in recent years. Whereas researchers and clinicians have applied molecular imaging to a variety of physiologic processes and disease states, here, the authors focus on oncology, arguably where it has made its greatest impact. The main purpose of imaging in oncology is early detection to enable interception if not prevention of full-blown disease, such as the appearance of metastases. Because biochemical changes occur before changes in anatomy, molecular imaging-particularly when combined with liquid biopsy for screening purposes-promises especially early localization of disease for optimum management. Here, the authors introduce the ways and indications in which molecular imaging can be undertaken, the tools used and under development, and near-term challenges and opportunities in oncology.

Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging for Phenotyping and Management of Lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) represents molecular imaging for non-invasive phenotyping of physiological and biochemical processes in various oncological diseases. PET imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) for glucose metabolism evaluation is the standard imaging modality for the clinical management of lymphoma. One of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET applications is the detection and pre-treatment staging of lymphoma, which is highly sensitive. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also applied during treatment to evaluate the individual chemo-sensitivity and accordingly guide the response-adapted therapy. At the end of the therapy regiment, a negative PET scan is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy may be alleviated. Future PET studies using non-¹⁸F-FDG radiotracers, such as ⁶⁸Ga-labeled pentixafor (a cyclic pentapeptide that enables sensitive and high-contrast imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4), ⁶⁸Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) that reflects the tumor microenvironment, and ⁸⁹Zr-labeled atezolizumab that targets the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), may complement ¹⁸F-FDG and offer essential tools to decode lymphoma phenotypes further and identify the mechanisms of lymphoma therapy.

A comparison of FDG PET/MR and PET/CT for staging, response assessment, and prognostic imaging biomarkers in lymphoma

The aim of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/MR compared to PET/CT in a patient cohort including Hodgkins lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphoma at baseline and response assessment. Sixty-one patients were examined with FDG PET/CT directly followed by PET/MR. Images were read by two pairs of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists. Concordance for lymphoma involvement between PET/MR and the reference standard PET/CT was assessed at baseline and response assessment. Correlation of prognostic biomarkers Deauville score, criteria of response, SUVmax, SUVpeak, and MTV was performed between PET/MR and PET/CT. Baseline FDG PET/MR showed a sensitivity of 92.5% and a specificity 97.9% compared to the reference standard PET/CT (κ 0.91) for nodal sites. For extranodal sites, a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 99.5% were found (κ 0.84). Concordance in Ann Arbor was found in 57 of 61 patients (κ 0.92). Discrepancies were due to misclassification of region and not lesion detection. In response assessment, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity 99.9% for all sites combined were found (κ 0.92). There was a perfect agreement on Deauville scores 4 and 5 and criteria of response between the two modalities. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for SUVmax, SUVpeak, and MTV values showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9). FDG PET/MR is a reliable alternative to PET/CT in this patient population, both in terms of lesion detection at baseline staging and response assessment, and for quantitative prognostic imaging biomarkers.

The Utility of Metabolic Parameters on Baseline F-18 FDG PET/CT in Predicting Treatment Response and Survival in Paediatric and Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma

Lymphoma is the third most common paediatric cancer. Early detection of high-risk patients is necessary to anticipate those who require intensive therapy and follow-up. Current literature shows that residual tumor avidity on PET (Positron Emission Tomography) following chemotherapy corresponds with decreased survival. However, the value of metabolic parameters has not been adequately investigated. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic and other parameters in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma. We recorded tMTV (total Metabolic Tumor Volume), TLG (Total Lesion Glycolysis), and SUVmax (maximum Standard Uptake Value) on baseline PET, as well the presence of bone marrow or visceral involvement. HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) status and baseline biochemistry from clinical records were noted. All patients received stage-specific standard of care therapy. Response assessment on end-of-treatment PET was evaluated according to the Deauville criteria. We found that bone marrow involvement (p = 0.028), effusion (p < 0.001), and treatment response (p < 0.001) on baseline PET, as well as HIV status (p = 0.036) and baseline haemoglobin (p = 0.039), were significantly related to progression-free survival (PFS), whereas only effusion (p = 0.017) and treatment response (p = 0.050) were predictive of overall survival (OS). Only baseline tMTV predicted treatment response (p = 0.017). This confirms the value of F-18 FDG PET/CT (Fluoro-deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) in prognostication in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma; however, further studies are required to define the significance of metabolic parameters.