The social and gynecological long-term consequences of tubal sterilization. A personal six-year follow-up investigation

[Impact of contraceptive methods on women's lives: the case of tubal ligation]

This study focused on the long-term consequences of tubal ligation on women's lives. Women 30 to 49 years old living in Campinas, State of São Paulo (Brazil), were interviewed: 236 sterilized at least five years prior to the interview and 236 non-sterilized women. Their experiences with the currently used contraceptive methods were compared with regard to satisfaction, benefits, and damage attributed to the method, feelings of regret, and perception of effects on their health, body, menstruation, sex, affective and family life, job, studies, economic status, and self-esteem. Scores were created to compare the groups in relation to self-esteem, well-being/quality of life, relationship with partner, and gender issues. Satisfaction with the currently used contraceptive method was significantly higher among sterilized women, although they more frequently reported having regretted being sterilized at some moment in time. Relatively more sterilized women felt that the contraceptive method had improved their sex lives and economic status, while producing a negative effect on their menstruation. No significant difference was observed between the groups with regard to the scores studied.

Laparoscopic sterilisation: opinion and practice among gynaecologists in Scotland

OBJECTIVES

1. To produce a list of evidence-based criteria for good quality care relating to female laparoscopic sterilisation. 2. To assess the level of agreement with each criterion among gynaecologists in Scotland. 3. To obtain an overview of current sterilisation practice for comparison with the agreed criteria.

DESIGN

1. Agreement with criteria assessed by questionnaire survey; 2. Overview of current practice obtained by questionnaire survey and by casenote review.

SETTING

Scotland.

SAMPLE

1. Questionnaire survey: all 132 consultant gynaecologists in NHS practice. 2. casenote review: 988 consecutive women sterilised in 12 representative hospitals.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire survey was 94%. A list of 15 evidence-based criteria was produced, covering patient selection, information and counselling, techniques of tubal occlusion and timing of sterilisation. All 15 suggested criteria gained an overall balance of support among responding gynaecologists. Similar impressions of current practice were gained from the questionnaire survey and from the casenote review. Aspects of practice which measured up well to the agreed criteria included: only 6% of women sterilised were younger than 25 years of age; over 85% of casenotes included clear documentation that women had been counselled regarding failure rate and intended permanency; 88% of sterilisations were performed, or directly supervised by, a gynaecologist of consultant or senior registrar status; and only 2% of sterilisations were undertaken in combination with induced abortion. Aspects of practice which compared poorly with the agreed criteria, and for which recommendations for change have been made, included: only 22% of casenotes mentioned that the option of vasectomy had been discussed; only 30% of gynaecologists indicated that they provide locally produced information leaflets as an adjunct to counselling; four methods of tubal occlusion (including unipolar diathermy) were in use; and there were wide variations among hospitals in the use of day-case care, ranging from 19% to 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

A list of criteria for good quality care in relation to sterilisation has been validated by agreement among Scottish gynaecologists. Current practice (as assessed by questionnaire survey and casenote review) has been compared with the criteria and some recommendations for change in practice have been made. Following dissemination of these results and recommendations, re-audit will be undertaken in order to identify any changes.

Female sterilisation

Adverse effects of female sterilisation are a popular subject for media focus; however, in reality modern techniques mean that the benefits outweigh the risks.