Clinical and biomedical studies on adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?

The aim of this study was to define clinicopathologic features and to investigate prognostic factors in early-stage cervical adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas in patients undergoing primary radical surgery. One hundred thirty-four patients with stage IB or II cervical adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinomas treated at a single institution were reviewed and compared to squamous carcinomas (N = 757) treated in the same period. Among adeno-adenosquamous carcinomas, stage II disease, parametrial extension, and deep cervical stromal invasion (>2/3) were associated with increased risk of pelvic lymph node metastases, while only clinical stage II, DNA index >1.3 (by flow cytometry), and pelvic node metastases were significantly associated with decreased survival by multivariate analyses. The five-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates of patients with adeno-adenosquamous vs squamous carcinoma were 72.2% vs 81.2% (P = 0.0109), and 74.1% vs 82.8% (P = 0.0136), respectively by Mantel-Cox test. After controlling confounding factors, histologic type (adeno-adenosquamous vs squamous) was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival [relative risk (RR): 1.2792; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0628-1.5399, P = 0.0092) and overall survival (RR: 1.2594, 95% CI: 1.0467-1.5155, P = 0.0146) in the whole series (N = 891). Although pattern of relapse by histologic type was not significantly different, patients with recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma did significantly worse than those with recurrent squamous carcinoma. In conclusion, the prognosis of adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix is slightly worse than squamous tumors. Since salvage of recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma after primary radical surgery is generally ineffective using conventional treatment, innovative strategies are necessary for the high-risk group after primary surgery and all recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinomas regardless of size or site.