Scalp topographies dissociate attentional ERP components during auditory information processing

A frontal attention mechanism in the visual mismatch negativity

•

We examine frontal mechanisms underlying the visual mismatch negativity.

•

EEG and fMRI activity was examined in respect to unattended oddball stimuli.

•

Left inferior frontal gyrus was associated with changes in the stimuli.

•

Our findings correspond to similarly implicated regions in the auditory domain.

Automatic detection of environmental change is a core component of attention. The mismatch negativity (MMN), an electrophysiological marker of this mechanism, has been studied prominently in the auditory domain, with cortical generators identified in temporal and frontal regions. Here, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess whether the underlying frontal regions associated with auditory change detection also play a role in visual change detection. Twenty healthy young adults completed a visual MMN task in separate EEG and fMRI sessions. Region of interest analyses were conducted on left and right middle frontal (MFG) and inferior frontal (IFG) gyri, i.e., the frontal areas identified as potential auditory MMN generators. A significant increase in activation was observed in the left IFG and MFG in response to blocks containing deviant stimuli. These findings suggest that a frontal mechanism is involved in the detection of change in the visual MMN. Our results support the notion that frontal mechanisms underlie attention switching, as measured via MMN, across multiple modalities.

Oscillatory characteristics of the visual mismatch negativity: what evoked potentials aren't telling us

The visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) response is typically examined by subtracting the average response to a deviant stimulus from the response to the standard. This approach, however, can omit a critical element of the neural response, i.e., the non-phase-locked (“induced”) oscillatory activity. Recent investigations of the oscillatory characteristics of the auditory mismatch negativity (aMMN) identified a crucial role for theta phase locking and power. Oscillatory characteristics of the vMMN from 39 healthy young adults were investigated in order to establish whether theta phase locking plays a similar role in the vMMN response. We explored changes in phase locking, overall post-stimulus spectral power as well as non-phase-locked spectral power compared to baseline (−300 to 0 ms). These were calculated in the frequency range of 4–50 Hz and analysed using a non-parametric cluster based analysis. vMMN was found intermittently in a broad time interval 133–584 ms post-stimulus and was associated with an early increase in theta phase locking (75–175 ms post-stimulus) that was not accompanied by an increase in theta power. Theta phase locking in the absence of an increase in theta power has been associated with the distribution and flow of information between spatially disparate neural locations. Additionally, in the 450–600 ms post-stimulus interval, deviant stimuli yielded a stronger decrease in non-phase-locked alpha power than standard stimuli, potentially reflecting a shift in attentional resources following the detection of change. The examination of oscillatory activity is crucial to the comprehensive analysis of a neural response to a stimulus, and when combined with evoked potentials (EPs) provide a more complete picture of neurocognitive processing.

The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited

The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related brain potential elicited by the occurrence of a rare event (deviance) in an otherwise regular acoustic environment, and is assumed to reflect a preattentive mechanism for change detection. A widely adopted model holds that MMN has main generators in the superior temporal planes bilaterally, which are responsible for the sensory memory part of change detection, as well as frontal lobe sources responsible for triggering an attention shift upon change detection. Whereas the temporal sources have been documented in numerous studies across species and methodologies, much less is known about the frontal sources. The present review examines the current state of the evidence for their existence, location, and possible function. It confirms that the frontal generator is still a less consistent finding in MMN research than the temporal generator. There is clear evidence from scalp EEG and, especially, current source density studies for the existence of an MMN generator that is functionally distinct from the main supratemporal generator of the MMN. Evidence from fMRI, PET, optical imaging, EEG source imaging, and lesion studies implicates mainly the inferior frontal and possibly also the medial frontal cortex. However, these results should be taken with caution because of the paucity of support from more direct measures like intracranial recordings and MEG, and the negative findings from several fMRI and PET, as well as EEG source imaging studies. Recent studies also raise questions about the exact role of the frontal generator in triggering an attention shift. Delineating the exact cortical locations of frontal MMN generators, the conditions under which they are activated and, consequently, their function, remains an acute challenge.

Electrophysiologic signs of auditory competition in the human brain

The present project investigated the electrophysiologic effects of auditory competition on components of the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP). A group of 12 young female listeners attended to deviant tones interspersed among frequent tones in one ear while trains of deviant and frequent tones of a different frequency were either present or absent at the opposite ear. Comparison of event-related potential (ERP) waveforms with competition- and attention-related difference waves revealed evidence that the neural effects of competition were not simply a moderation of the effects of selective attention (i.e. the processing negativity). The two difference waves exhibited amplitude peaks that were not mirror-images with respect to polarity. This suggests the existence of a unique underlying neural process that is responsible for the effects of competition on the LAEP.

Role of the primary auditory cortex in auditory selective attention studied by whole-head neuromagnetometer

In order to identify the human cortical areas involved in the auditory attention, neuromagnetic fields were recorded from 12 healthy adults with a 122-channel whole-head magnetometer while the subjects performed the auditory selective attention task. Randomized sequence of 900 Hz (P=0.9) and 950 Hz (P=0.1) tones was presented to each ear with random interstimulus intervals across ears ranging from 300 to 500 ms. Subjects were asked to pay attention to the designated ear (attended ear) and to count the number of the 950 Hz tones presented to the attended ear. Twelve sessions were performed for each subject, among which the attended ear was changed alternately in a counterbalanced order among subjects. In seven out of twelve subjects, averaged neuromagnetic fields in response to frequent tones presented to the attended ear showed attention-related deflection over the bilateral temporal areas starting at around 100 ms after the stimulus presentation. Although the dipole moment for N100m in the attended condition showed significant increase compared to that in the non-attended condition, locations of the two equivalent current dipoles in the auditory cortex were not significantly different from each other. Moreover, a simulation study supported the enhancement of N100m rather than participation of additional dipoles in the auditory selective attention task. These results suggest that the primary auditory cortex plays a main role in the auditory selective attention starting as early as 100 ms after the stimulus presentation.

Disrupting human auditory change detection: Chopin is superior to white noise

A deviant sound in a sequence of standard sounds elicits a neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF) reflecting change detection based on the auditory sensory memory trace. To illuminate the nature of this trace, we investigated the effects of white noise and music maskers on the MMF. The stimuli were delivered to the participant's right ear, and the maskers were delivered to the same or contralateral ear. Only maskers containing transients (music) presented to either ear abolished the MMF. In parallel, the ability to discriminate the deviants decreased dramatically, probably because of integration of transient features of the music to the neural representations of standards and deviants. As a result, the similarity of these representations prevents change detection. White noise affected the MMF amplitude only when presented to the same ear to which the stimuli were presented. All maskers decreased the M100 but not the M50 amplitude, suggesting that the neural generators behind these responses are functionally separate.