Presentation of words to separate hemispheres prevents interword illusory conjunctions

Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see

Bilateral presentations of words, 1 in the left visual hemifield (LVF) and 1 in the right (RVF), are used widely in studies of hemispheric asymmetry. However, although words shown centrally (i.e., nonlaterally) produce perceptual interactions in which 1 word alters the perceived identity of the other, perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words have never been reported. To investigate this issue, the authors used brief, bilateral displays of words (e.g., romp-ramp) presented simultaneously. An eye tracker and forced-choice task ensured appropriate presentation and testing. Report accuracy was greatest for RVF words. However, this was accompanied by perceptual interactions that occurred almost exclusively in responses to LVF words, indicating that RVF words often altered the perceived identity of LVF words but not vice versa.

Interhemispheric integration of letter stimuli presented foveally or extra-foveally

Two experiments are reported in which participants decided whether a single target letter presented below and to the left or right of fixation matched either of two probe letters presented above the fixation cross to the left and right. The level of matching required was either physical (A-A) or abstract (A-a). All three letters were presented either extra-foveally (Experiment 1) or within the fovea (Experiment 2). In both experiments, physical matching was faster than abstract matching. Physical matching was faster within than across visual fields while abstract matching showed the opposite pattern. Matching was faster when the matching probe letter was in the LVF than when it was in the RVF. Importantly, the pattern of results was the same for extra-foveal and foveal presentations, supporting the theory that the representation of the fovea is split down the middle into two visual fields rather then being bilateral. The practical implication following this study is that lateralization studies can be performed with closer to fixation stimuli presentation.