Blind loop syndrome: multiple ileal ulcers following side-to-side anastomosis

Rapid Improvement in Diabetes After Simple Side-to-side Jejunoileal Bypass Surgery: Does It Need a Ligation or Not?

BACKGROUND

Dual-path side-to-side jejunoileal bypass (SSJIB) can markedly ameliorate diabetes and obesity. However, whether SSJIB requires the ligation of the bypassed loop (single-path) and what is the most appropriate length of the bypassed small bowel remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ligation and the length of the bypassed small bowel in mediating changes in glucose homeostasis after SSJIB in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats.

METHODS

Fourteen STZ-induced diabetic rats were randomized into two groups: one group was subjected to 50% SSJIB (SSJIB-50 group) and one group was subjected to sham surgery (sham group). Three weeks later, the SSJIB-50 group was re-operated, and the bypassed segment was ligated (SSJIBL-50 group). Three weeks later, the SSJIBL-50 group was operated again, and 60% of the length of the proximal small intestine was bypassed (SSJIBL-60 group). The measured primary outcomes were body weight, food intake, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS

Body weight in the SSJIBL-60 group was lower than that in the sham group. Food intakes in the SSJIBL-50 and SSJIBL-60 groups were lower than that in the sham group. FBG and OGTT were not improved in the SSJIB-50 group compared with the sham group. However, FBG and OGTT were improved in the SSJIBL-50 group and were further improved in the SSJIBL-60 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ligation of the first portion of the bypassed loop is essential to SSJIB, and bypassing approximately 60% of the small intestine length may be appropriate in SSJIBL.

In vitro description of a new technique for stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses and CT scan anatomical comparison with other techniques

Background

Stapled jejunocecal anastomoses are commonly performed in equine abdominal surgery. They carry higher complication rates compared to handsewn techniques. In human surgery various causes likely to lead to failure of stapled techniques have been evaluated, including staple line failure. Recently Freeman proposed a technique to perform a stapled jejunocecal anastomosis in horses while avoiding blind pouch formation. The aim of this study is to describe a method for stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses and to compare it with other techniques with computed tomography to assess stomal area, shape and blind pouch size.

Methods

Intestinal specimens comprising the cecum, ileum and jejunum from 18 horses were collected and were divided into three groups. In Group S a standard stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis was performed. In Group F the anastomosis was performed using a modified technique proposed by Freeman. In Group G the anastomosis was performed with a modified technique proposed by the authors. Inflated bowel segments were CT scanned to obtain a MultiPlanar Reconstruction of the stoma and afferent small intestine before calculating the cross-sectional area of each of these regions. The ratio of the measured areas was compared between the three techniques. The volume of the blind-end pouch was measured and its ratio with the intestinal area compared between techniques. The cecum was opened and the length of the stoma measured with a caliper and compared to the intended initial length.

Results

The stomal/intestinal area ratio was not significantly different between techniques.

No statistically significant difference was found in the stomal ideal/real perimeter ratio.

There was no statistically significant difference in the intended/real stomal length ratio, and all techniques featured an increase in stomal length ranging from 2 to 12 %. Blind pouch formation was a consistent finding in Group S and was virtually absent in Groups F and G.

Conclusions

Both the Freeman and the new (G) technique were comparable to the standard technique in terms of stomal area, stomal shape and difference in stomal elongation. They consistently produced a smaller blind pouch and allowed easier placement of the staplers.

Migrating motor complex changes after side-to-side ileal bypass in mouse ileum ex-vivo: mechanism underlying the blind loop syndrome?

PURPOSE

This study was intended to investigate the migrating motor complex (MMC) changes after ileal bypass in ex-vivo mouse models.

METHODS

Partial (side-to-side) and total bypass (occlusion of proximal part of bypassed loop) were performed on ileums of female Institute of Cancer Research mice. After 2 and 4 weeks, the bypassed segments were harvested and MMCs were recorded at 4 different sites ex-vivo. Amplitude, duration, interval, direction of propagation, and the area under the curve (AUC) of MMCs were measured and compared to those of the controls.

RESULTS

In control mice (n = 7), most MMCs propagated aborally (91.1%). After 2 weeks of partial bypass (n = 4), there was a significant decrease in both amplitude and AUC, and orally-propagating MMCs increased significantly (45%, P = 0.002). Bidirectional MMCs (originating in the bypassed loop and propagating in both directions) were also observed (10%). The amplitude of the MMCs remained decreased at 4 weeks after partial bypass (n = 4), and neither the AUC nor the direction of propagation showed significant changes compared to 2 weeks. Similarly, in the total bypass model, both the amplitude and AUC of the MMCs decreased significantly compared to controls. In contrast to partial bypass, 95% of the MMCs within the bypassed loop propagated aborally after 2 weeks (n = 6), which was similar to the control state. After 4 weeks (n = 5), however, MMCs either lost their temporal relationship or completely disappeared.

CONCLUSION

The changes in propagation direction of the MMCs in the partially bypassed loop may contribute to stagnation of bowel contents and the development of blind loop syndrome.

CT findings for postsurgical blind pouch of small bowel

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to define the CT criteria for blind pouches formed after enteric anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

Familiarity with the CT appearance of blind pouches avoids the mistaking of these entities for bowel obstruction or abscesses.