Platelets and antithrombin III in uraemia: the acute effect of haemodialysis

Blood-incompatibility in haemodialysis: alleviating inflammation and effects of coagulation

Blood-incompatibility is an inevitability of all blood-contacting device applications and therapies, including haemodialysis (HD). Blood leaving the environment of blood vessels and the protection of the endothelium is confronted with several stimuli of the extracorporeal circuit (ECC), triggering the activation of blood cells and various biochemical pathways of plasma. Prevention of blood coagulation, a major obstacle that needed to be overcome to make HD possible, remains an issue to contend with. While anticoagulation (mainly with heparin) successfully prevents clotting within the ECC to allow removal of uraemic toxins across the dialysis membrane wall, it is far from ideal, triggering heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in some instances. Soluble fibrin can form even in the presence of heparin and depending on the constitution of the patient and activation of platelets, could result in physical clots within the ECC (e.g. bubble trap chamber) and, together with other plasma and coagulation proteins, result in increased adsorption of proteins on the membrane surface. The buildup of this secondary membrane layer impairs the transport properties of the membrane to reduce the clearance of uraemic toxins. Activation of complement system-dependent immune response pathways leads to leukopenia, formation of platelet–neutrophil complexes and expression of tissue factor contributing to thrombotic processes and a procoagulant state, respectively. Complement activation also promotes recruitment and activation of leukocytes resulting in oxidative burst and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, thereby worsening the elevated underlying inflammation and oxidative stress condition of chronic kidney disease patients. Restricting all forms of blood-incompatibility, including potential contamination of dialysis fluid with endotoxins leading to inflammation, during HD therapies is thus still a major target towards more blood-compatible and safer dialysis to improve patient outcomes. We describe the mechanisms of various activation pathways during the interaction between blood and components of the ECC and describe approaches to mitigate the effects of these adverse interactions. The opportunities to develop improved dialysis membranes as well as implementation strategies with less potential for undesired biological reactions are discussed.

Granulocyte Elastase, β-Thromboglobulin, and C3D during Acetate or Bicarbonate Hemodialysis with Hemophan® Compared to a Cellulose Acetate Membrane

Twenty-two patients were dialysed in a cross-over design using Hemophan® or cellulose acetate membranes. The dialysate buffer was acetate (n = 12) or bicarbonate (n = 10). Blood was sampled at 0, 15, 60 and 180 min and mean values were adjusted for changes in total protein in each sample. At 15 min during dialysis a decrease in leukocytes and platelets occurred with both membranes, irrespective of the buffer (Wilcoxon, p < 0.006). During dialysis, increases were found in granulocyte elastase inhibitor complex (E-α1-PI), β-thromboglobulin and C3d. β2-microgrobulin was not significantly changed in blood after dialysis with Hemophan® or cellulose acetate membranes with bicarbonate buffer. Side effects were more pronounced at 180 min during dialysis with bicarbonate in patients using cellulose acetate than with Hemophan® (p = 0.021, n = 8). Hemophan® seemed to be more favourable than cellulose acetate membranes in regard to leukopenia and E- α1-PI. The dialysate buffer may also alter membrane biocompatibility.

Anticoagulation intensity sufficient for haemodialysis does not prevent activation of coagulation and platelets

BACKGROUND

A single bolus of dalteparin at the start of haemodialysis (HD) may prevent clot formation, but subclinical activation of platelets and coagulation may still occur. Consequently, the relationship between clinical clotting events and activation markers of platelets and coagulation before and during HD is of interest.

METHODS

The effect of tapered doses of dalteparin during 84 HD sessions (4-4.5 h) was prospectively examined in 12 patients. Six of the patients were treated with warfarin. The initial dalteparin dose was reduced to 50% if no clotting was observed. Clinical clotting was evaluated by inspection of the air trap every hour and by inspection of the dialyser after each session. Anti-FXa activity was measured for assessment of dalteparin activity. Markers of activated plasma coagulation, (thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PF1+2)) and a marker of platelet activation (beta-thromboglobulin, beta-TG), were measured before the start of and after 3 and 4 h of dialysis. Ten pre-dialytic patients with chronic renal failure served as a control group. A total of 230 measurements of each parameter were performed.

RESULTS

An anti-FXa activity above 0.4 IU/ml at the end of HD inhibits overt clot formation for 4 h. This was obtained by an intravenous dalteparin dose of about 5000 IU. TAT and PF1+2 correlated to clinical clotting episodes (r=0.50 and 0.47, P<0.001). beta-TG was not significantly correlated to clinical clotting. All parameters increased during the sessions (TAT, PF1+2, beta-TG, P<0.001). When measurements during clinical clotting episodes were disregarded, all parameters were still markedly increased. Warfarin-treated patients had lower TAT and PF1+2. Dialysis patients had higher beta-TG values than pre-dialytic patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite clinically effective anticoagulation, obtained by dalteparin administration, platelets and coagulation are activated by HD, resulting in a potentially thrombophilic state. Warfarin treatment reduces clinical clot formation and subclinical activation of coagulation.

Hemodialysis with defibrotide: effects on coagulation parameters

In a crossover study conducted with eight uremic patients maintained on hemodialysis, the Authors compared the effects of heparin (100 IU/kg at the start of dialysis) and defibrotide (400 mg at the start, repeated at 2 hours of ongoing dialysis) on the parameters of blood coagulation (VIII:C, AT III, TAT, PC antigen and activity, PS, and FPA), each being assessed before dialysis and at 2, 3 and 4 hours of the ongoing procedure. Heparin-assisted dialysis resulted in a significant rise of VIII:C and AT III; with defibrotide, instead, there was evidence of thrombin activation (increased FPA and TAT). PC levels were raised with both dialysis modalities; however, PC activity and PS levels were increased only in defibrotide-assisted dialysis. There were no adverse reactions or evidence of fibrin formation. These results confirm the antithrombotic activity of defibrotide in the course of dialysis and indicate that this action is independent of thrombin neutralization.

Haemostatic aspects of renal transplantation

Platelet function and protein C activity and antigen level was studied in 31 renal transplant recipients and 10 healthy controls. The patients were divided into three groups: (I) cyclosporin treated, (II) azathioprine treated, and (III) azathioprine treated patients with chronic rejection. The platelet function in the renal transplant patients was normal and there was no difference between groups I and II. The specific activity of protein C was decreased in patients after renal transplantation and decreasing protein C activity and progressive renal failure was found to be positively correlated in the azathioprine treated groups.