Lipolytic effect of low-molecular-weight-heparin (Fragmin) and heparin/dihydroergotamine in thromboprophylactic doses during total hip replacement

Salutary effects of hemodialysis on low-density lipoprotein proinflammatory and high-density lipoprotein anti-inflammatory properties in patient with end-stage renal disease

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) causes oxidative stress, inflammation, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) deficiency and accelerated atherosclerosis. Uptake of oxidized LDL by macrophages results in foam cell and plaque formation. HDL mitigates atherosclerosis via reverse cholesterol transport and inhibition of LDL oxidation. ESRD heightens LDL inflammatory activity and suppresses HDL anti-inflammatory activity. The effect of hemodialysis on the LDL and HDL inflammatory properties is unknown. By removing the potential pro-oxidant/proinflammatory uremic toxins, dialysis may attenuate LDL inflammatory and HDL anti-inflammatory properties. Conversely, exposure to dialyzer membrane and tubing and influx of impurities from dialysate can intensify LDL and HDL inflammatory activities. This study examined the effect of hemodialysis on LDL and HDL inflammatory activities. Plasma samples were obtained from 12 normal control and 26 ESRD patients before and after hemodialysis with (16 patients) or without (10 patients) heparinization. HDL and LDL were isolated and tested for monocyte chemotactic activity in cultured endothelial cells. ESRD patients had increased LDL chemotactic activity, reduced HDL anti-inflammatory activity, paraoxonase and glutathione peroxidase levels, and elevated plasma IL-6 before dialysis. Hemodialysis partially improved LDL inflammatory and HDL anti-inflammatory activities and enhanced patients' HDL ability to suppress their LDL inflammatory activity. The salutary effect on LDL inflammatory activity was significantly greater in patients dialyzed with than those without heparin. ESRD heightens LDL inflammatory and impairs HDL anti-inflammatory activities. Hemodialysis partially improves LDL and HDL inflammatory activities. The salutary effects of hemodialysis are in part mediated by heparin, which is known to possess lipolytic and antioxidant properties.

Misleading serum free thyroxine results during low molecular weight heparin treatment

Measured free thyroxine concentrations in serum increase markedly after intravenous heparin administration, but the effect of heparin administered subcutaneously has not been adequately documented. We found in vitro increases of up to 63% in measured FT4 after a single dose of subcutaneous heparin (enoxaparin, 2000 units) in nine healthy volunteers, and the magnitude of these increases was correlated with initial serum triglyceride concentrations (r = 0.93, P <0.005) and in vitro free fatty acid release (r = 0.88, P <0.005). In 10 cardiac inpatients receiving repeated doses of enoxaparin (2000 units twice daily), measured FT4 increased by up to 171% in specimens taken 2–6 h after injection. When specimens were obtained 10 h after injection, the effect appeared to be minimized, with in vitro increases of <40%, but such increases may still be sufficient to cause interpretative errors. If FT4 estimation is absolutely necessary in patients receiving enoxaparin, specimens should be taken ≥10 h postdose and analyzed within 24 h.

Dalteparin: a low-molecular-weight heparin

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and to review the comparative clinical trial data evaluating the efficacy and safety of dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UH) for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search identified pertinent English-language publications on dalteparin and venous thromboembolism. Key search terms were dalteparin, Fragmin, LMWH, and venous thromboembolism. The search was supplemented by review articles, articles obtained from the bibliographies of the review articles, and the dalteparin approval database.

STUDY SELECTION

The most pertinent studies describing the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin in humans were selected; all abstracts and clinical evaluating the use of dalteparin for antithrombotic therapy were reviewed. Review articles by authors of international reputation were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from the review articles on the pharmacology of LMWHs and UH was summarized. Clinical trial data were extracted for study design, patient demographics, therapeutic regimens, methods of evaluation, and outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Dalteparin is an LMWH indicated for patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are considered to be at risk for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), which may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). In this population, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy between dalteparin and fixed-dose UH for DVT prophylaxis. Dalteparin has a predictable dose response and can be administered as a standard single daily subcutaneous dose for all patients. In therapeutic doses, dalteparin does not alter coagulation tests and therefore does not require routine laboratory monitoring, in contrast with adjusted-dose UH. Bleeding risks with dalteparin are comparable with and possibly less than those associated with UH. Preliminary studies suggest that dalteparin may be effective for other indications, including DVT prophylaxis for hip replacement surgery and the treatment of DVT and PE. Comparative cost-effectiveness data are not yet available.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin is the second LMWH to receive approval by the Food and Drug Administration. Dalteparin is indicated for prophylaxis against DVT in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Clinical studies have shown that single daily doses of dalteparin provide a safe and effective alternative to fixed-dose UH therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of dalteparin compared with UH and other LMWHs.