Standardization of PSA determinations

Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization

Introduction:

Total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) are the most commonly used biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer. Despite standardization efforts, many available PSA assays may still produce discordant results. In the present study, we compared four PSA assays calibrated to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668 for tPSA and fPSA, respectively.

Methods:

Within the scope of the Prostate Cancer Early Detection Study Based on a ‘‘Baseline’’ PSA Value in Young Men (PROBASE), we tested tPSA and fPSA in serum samples from 50 patients in the four different PROBASE sites using four WHO-calibrated assays from Roche (Elecsys, Cobas), Beckman-Coulter (Access-II) and Siemens (ADVIA Centaur). The comparison was performed using the Passing–Bablok regression method.

Results:

Compared to Access, the median tPSA levels for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +3%, +11%–20%, and +17%–23%, respectively, while for median fPSA levels the differences for Centaur, Elecsys, and Cobas were +49%, +29%–31%, and +22%, respectively.

Discussion:

Despite all investigated assays being WHO-calibrated, the Elecsys and Cobas tPSA assays produced considerably higher results than the Access and Centaur assays. Differences in fPSA-recovery between all investigated assays were even more pronounced. When applying the tPSA cutoff of 3.1 μg/L recommended for WHO-calibrated assays, the use of higher calibrated assays may lead to unnecessary prostate biopsies. Conversely, if the historical threshold of 4 μg/L is applied when using WHO-calibrated assays, it could lead to falsely omitted prostate biopsies.

Biomarker development, from bench to bedside

This review describes studies performed by our group and other laboratories in the field aimed at development of biomarkers not only for cancer but also for other diseases. The markers covered include tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI), tumor-associated trypsin (TAT), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and their various molecular forms, their biology and diagnostic use. The discovery of TATI was the result of a hypothesis-driven project aimed at finding new biomarkers for ovarian cancer among urinary peptides. TATI has since proved to be a useful prognostic marker for several cancers. Recently, it has been named Serine Peptidase Inhibitor Kazal Type 1 (SPINK1) after being rediscovered by several groups as a tumor-associated peptide by gene expression profiling and proteomic techniques and shown to promote tumor development by stimulating the EGF receptor. To explain why a trypsin inhibitor is strongly expressed in some cancers, research focused on the protease that it inhibited led to the finding of tumor-associated trypsin (TAT). Elevated serum concentrations of TAT-2 were found in some cancer types, but fairly high background levels of pancreatic trypsinogen-2 limited the use of TAT-2 for cancer diagnostics. However, trypsinogen-2 and its complex with α1-protease inhibitor proved to be very sensitive and specific markers for pancreatitis. Studies on hCG were initiated by the need to develop more rapid and sensitive pregnancy tests. These studies showed that serum from men and non-pregnant women contains measurable concentrations of hCG derived from the pituitary. Subsequent development of assays for the subunits of hCG showed that the β subunit of hCG (hCGβ) is expressed at low concentrations by most cancers and that it is a strong prognostic marker. These studies led to the formation of a working group for standardization of hCG determinations and the development of new reference reagents for several molecular forms of hCG. The preparation of intact hCG has been adopted as the fifth international standard by WHO. Availability of several well-defined forms of hCG made it possible to characterize the epitopes of nearly 100 monoclonal antibodies. This will facilitate design of immunoassays with pre-defined specificity. Finally, the discovery of different forms of immunoreactive PSA in serum from a prostate cancer patient led to identification of the complex between PSA and α1-antichymotrypsin, and the use of assays for free and total PSA in serum for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer. Epitope mapping of PSA antibodies and establishment of PSA standards has facilitated establishment well-standardized assays for the various forms of PSA.

Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in American men, and a more aggressive form of the disease is particularly prevalent among African Americans. The therapeutic success rate for prostate cancer can be tremendously improved if the disease is diagnosed early. Thus, a successful therapy for this disease depends heavily on the clinical indicators (biomarkers) for early detection of the presence and progression of the disease, as well as the prediction after the clinical intervention. However, the current clinical biomarkers for prostate cancer are not ideal as there remains a lack of reliable biomarkers that can specifically distinguish between those patients who should be treated adequately to stop the aggressive form of the disease and those who should avoid overtreatment of the indolent form.

A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. A biomarker reveals further information to presently existing clinical and pathological analysis. It facilitates screening and detecting the cancer, monitoring the progression of the disease, and predicting the prognosis and survival after clinical intervention. A biomarker can also be used to evaluate the process of drug development, and, optimally, to improve the efficacy and safety of cancer treatment by enabling physicians to tailor treatment for individual patients. The form of the prostate cancer biomarkers can vary from metabolites and chemical products present in body fluid to genes and proteins in the prostate tissues.

Current advances in molecular techniques have provided new tools facilitating the discovery of new biomarkers for prostate cancer. These emerging biomarkers will be beneficial and critical in developing new and clinically reliable indicators that will have a high specificity for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of prostate cancer biomarkers, with special emphasis on emerging markers, by evaluating their diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Both genes and proteins that reveal loss, mutation, or variation in expression between normal prostate and cancerous prostate tissues will be covered in this article. Along with the discovery of prostate cancer biomarkers, we will describe the criteria used when selecting potential biomarkers for further development towards clinical use. In addition, we will address how to appraise and validate candidate markers for prostate cancer and some relevant issues involved in these processes. We will also discuss the new concept of the biomarkers, existing challenges, and perspectives of biomarker development.

Toward metrological traceability in the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA): calibrating Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA assays to WHO standards compared with the traditional Hybritech standards

BACKGROUND

The metrological traceability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay calibration to WHO standards is desirable to potentially improve the comparability between PSA assays. A method comparison was performed between the traditionally standardized Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA and free PSA (fPSA) assays and a new alternate calibration of assays aligned to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668, respectively.

METHODS

Sera from 641 men with and without prostate cancer, various control materials and mixtures of different proportions of the WHO standards were measured with both assay calibrations.

RESULTS

Excellent comparability between the corresponding assay calibrations was observed, with correlation coefficients of at least 0.996. The Passing-Bablok slopes were 0.747 for total PSA (tPSA), 0.776 for fPSA and 1.02 for the percentage ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA), while the corresponding percentages of the new WHO-aligned assay results related to the traditional assays were 76.2%, 77% and 102.2%. Receiver operating characteristics revealed no differences between the two PSA assay calibrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO calibration yields results approximately 25% lower for tPSA and fPSA values when compared with the conventional Hybritech calibration. Using the WHO-aligned PSA assay, a tPSA cut-off of 3 microg/L should be considered in clinical practice, while %fPSA cut-offs could be retained.

Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update

BACKGROUND

The comparability of total and free prostate-specific antigen (tPSA and fPSA) results among commercial PSA assays has been suggested to be improved by calibration to WHO PSA reference materials and the development of equimolar-response assays. To characterize the current situation, we assessed 5 frequently used commercial assay combinations for tPSA and fPSA regarding the interchangeability of the PSA values and the ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA), equimolar characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Sera from 314 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 282 men with no evidence of prostate cancer (NPCa) were measured with tPSA and fPSA assays from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), Diagnostic Products Corporation (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010) and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur).

RESULTS

Method comparisons (Passing and Bablok regressions; Bland-Altman plots) showed assay-dependent results for tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA. With the Access tPSA values taken as 100%, tPSA concentrations varied from 87% (AxSYM and ADVIA Centaur) to 115% (Immulite), leading to different numbers of patients classified according to the commonly recommended tPSA cutoffs for performing a biopsy. Different %fPSA values also led to assay-dependent ROC analysis results, a finding that shows the importance for the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Interchangeability of tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA values obtained by commercial PSA assays remains inadequate, but attention to this issue may minimize the misinterpretation of PSA results obtained by different assays.

New developments in the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen

OBJECTIVE

Analytical evaluation of the calibration of three recently launched assays for the measurement of total prostate-specific antigen, i.e., IMx Total PSA (Abbott), Elecsys PSA (Roche), and IMMULITE 3rd Generation PSA (DPC).

DESIGN AND METHODS

For accuracy assessment two reference materials were applied namely, Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Dilutions of these preparations were analyzed with all assays. In addition, clinical specimens from known prostate cancer or benign prostate hyperplasia patients and samples taken from an ongoing prostate cancer screening study were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Application of the Stanford Calibrator revealed results well within 10% of the calculated values for all assays. Regarding the CRM Calibrator only the IMx Total PSA proved to approach the line of identity. The IMMULITE results differed about 40% and the Elecsys about 18% from the calculated values. The comparison with clinical specimens showed statistically different results for the combination IMMULITE-IMx and for IMMULITE-Elecsys. The regression lines for both collections were: y(IMx) = 0.86x(IMMULITE) +0.12 (n = 104, r = 0.970, Sy/x = 0.883 microg/L) and y(Elecsys) = 0.98x(IMMULITE) +0.38 (n = 97, r = 0.976, Sy/x = 0.733 microg/L). In the lower measuring range (PSA <5.0 microg/L) as measured with the screening samples (n = 43), these differences were less pronounced.

CONCLUSION

In analytical sense a difference was found for both reference preparations in the assays studied. Clinically, despite improvements in methodology, results for total prostate-specific antigen are still not interchangeable. The possible consequences need to be elaborated.

On the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen: an exercise with two reference preparations

In this study, 112 serum samples were analyzed for total prostate-specific antigen with three well-established assays i.e. Tandem R and Tandem E (both from Hybritech Inc., San Diego, USA) and Prostatus Free/Total from Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland. Thirty-two samples were collected from prostate cancer patients, 32 from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and 48 from men participating in a screening study for prostate cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the results before and after recalculation with the data obtained with two reference preparations for total prostate-specific antigen: Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Comparing the actual results revealed almost perfect correlations between Tandem R and Tandem E and between both Tandem assays and Prostatus. We observed statistically significant differences in accuracy between Tandem R and Tandem E: y(Tandem E)= 1.05 x(Tandem R)+0.07 and between Tandem E and Prostatus: y(Prostatus)= 0.94 x(Tandem E)+0.02 In both comparisons prostate-specific antigen values ranged from 0-40 microg/l. Recalculation with both reference preparations did not solve these discrepancies. One exception was the combination Tandem R and Tandem E. The application of either reference preparation solved the differences in accuracy here. In conclusion, even after recalibration, assays for total prostate-specific antigen are still not completely interchangeable.

Prostate-specific antigen

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is serine protease produced at high concentrations by normal and malignant prostatic epithelium. It is mainly secreted into seminal fluid, where it digests the gel forming after ejaculation. Only minor amounts of PSA leak out into circulation from the normal prostate, but the release of PSA is increased in prostatic disease. Thus PSA is a sensitive serum marker for prostate cancer but its specificity is limited by a high frequency of falsely elevated values in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Approximately two-thirds of all elevated values (>4 microg/l) in men over 50 years of age are due to BPH. In serum, most of the PSA immunoreactivity consists of a complex between PSA and alpha1-antichymotrypsin (PSA-ACT) whereas approximately 5-40% are free. The proportion of PSA-ACT is larger and the free fraction is smaller in prostate cancer than in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Determination of the proportion of free PSA has become widely used to improve the cancer specificity of PSA especially in men with PSA values in the 'grey zone' (4-10 microg/l). PSA also occurs in complexes with other protease inhibitors and determination of these and other markers may further improve the diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer. Interpretation of the results for many different markers is complicated, but this can be simplified by using statistical methods. The diagnostic accuracy can be further improved by using logistic regression or neural networks to estimate the combined impact of marker results and other findings like digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and heredity.

The clinical importance of free prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)

The proportion of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum relative to total PSA (F/T) is lower in patients with prostate cancer than in those with elevated levels of PSA due to benign prostatic disease. When applied to early diagnosis and screening for prostate cancer, the proportion of free PSA can be used to reduce the number of false-positive results by 20-40%. The utility of F/T is better in men with a small prostate volume, i.e. in relatively young men, who are most likely to benefit from early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. The concentrations of PSA and especially free PSA are affected by considerable intra-individual variation and sample stability. Assay standardization is variable and it is therefore important to establish reference values for the methods used. Better control of these factors is likely to improve the diagnostic accuracy. The utility of determining free PSA can be improved by evaluating the combined impact of free and total PSA by logistic regression analysis or neural networks.

Prostate-specific antigen and new related markers for prostate cancer

Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or human kallikrein 3, is the most valuable tool available for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, as currently used it is insufficiently sensitive and specific for early detection or staging of the malignancy. Many new concepts have been introduced in order to optimize the clinical use of PSA measurements, but each one has its own drawbacks. The molecular forms of PSA, especially the free PSA, seem to be useful for the detection of prostate cancer in men with PSA concentrations falling in the 4-10 microg/l range. New molecular techniques, such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal amounts of PSA messenger RNA and prostate-specific membrane antigen, offer new promise for the prognosis and possibly staging of prostate cancer. On the other hand, human kallikrein 2, a serine protease closely related to PSA that is also expressed predominantly in the prostate, may be a new adjuvant marker for prostate cancer. As for its biological functions, PSA can no longer be regarded as a specific prostate molecule associated mainly with semen liquefaction when it has a possible role as a prognostic indicator in female breast cancer. The biological role of PSA in normal tissues and tumors may be much more complex than previously thought and requires further investigation.

Prostate-specific antigen forms a complex with and cleaves alpha 1-protease inhibitor in vitro

BACKGROUND

Complexes between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and alpha 1-protease inhibitor (API) occur in serum and they are of potential interest in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Pure PSA-API complexes are needed for development of specific assays, but complex formation has not earlier been achieved in vitro.

METHODS

PSA was incubated with an excess of API at 37 degrees C. Complexes formed were quantitated by an immunofluorometric assay using antibodies to PSA and API. The products were further characterized by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting and amino-acid sequencing. PSA-API was purified by gel filtration and immunoaffinity chromatography.

RESULTS

PSA formed an SDS-stable 80-kDa one-to-one complex with API. The rate of formation of PSA-API was slow compared to that of PSA-alpha 2-macroglobulin (A2M) or PSA-alpha 1-antichymotrypsin (ACT), and only about 15% of PSA complexed with a 5-fold molar excess of API at 37 degrees C in 7 days. A major part of API was cleaved between 358-Met and 359-Ser, causing loss of inhibitory activity. PSA-API formed in vitro was purified by gel filtration and immunoaffinity chromatography with anti-PSA antibody. After incubation for 7 days at 37 degrees C, 30-40% of the complex had dissociated causing release of active PSA and proteolytically cleaved inactive API. The dissociation was accelerated in the presence of serum, and released PSA complexed with A2M and ACT.

CONCLUSIONS

PSA forms a complex with API in vitro, but the reaction is slow and part of the API is cleaved. Complex formation is reversible and released PSA is enzymatically active, whereas API is inactivated. Purified PSA-API will facilitate development of quantitative immunoassays for this complex.