Treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis with cyclosporine A

Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis: State of the art treatment

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening condition. In the present review, we give a broad overview of the state of the art in the management of this condition. A systematic bibliographic search was performed in PubMed. Patient with ASUC should be hospitalized and managed by a multidisciplinary team (gastroenterologist plus surgeon). Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of medical therapy. However, about 30% of patients do not respond. After failing 3-5 days of corticosteroids, patients should be considered for either rescue medical therapy or for colectomy. Cyclosporin and infliximab are similarly effective and safe. Cyclosporin should be mainly used as a "bridge" in thiopurine-naïve patients. More recently, infliximab has become the most widely used salvage therapy. Third-line salvage therapy with either cyclosporin or infliximab is efficacious in some patients but carries a significant risk of complications. Colectomy is appropriate in case of complications or medical rescue therapy failure.

Review article: the practical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening condition for which optimal management strategies remain ill-defined.

AIM

To review the evidence regarding the natural history, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of ASUC to inform an evidence-based approach to management.

METHODS

Relevant articles addressing the management of ASUC were identified from a search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of ASUC, 31-35% is steroid-refractory. Infliximab and ciclosporin salvage therapies have improved patient outcomes in randomised controlled trials. Short-term response rates (within 3 months) have ranged from 40% - 54% for ciclosporin and 46-83% for infliximab. Long-term clinical response rates (≥1 year) have ranged from 42%-50% for ciclosporin and 50-65% for infliximab. Short-term and long-term colectomy rates have been respectively: 26-47% and 36-58% for ciclosporin, and 0-50% and 35-50% for infliximab. Mortality rates for ciclosporin and infliximab-treated patients have been: 0-5% and 0-2%, respectively. At present, management challenges include the selection, timing and assessment of response to salvage therapy, utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring and long-term maintenance of remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management of acute severe ulcerative colitis should be guided by risk stratification using predictive indices of corticosteroid response. Timely commencement and assessment of response to salvage therapy is critical to reducing morbidity and mortality. Emerging pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring may assist clinical decision-making and facilitate a shift towards individualised acute severe ulcerative colitis therapies.

Co-administration of α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine aggravates colon ulceration of acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis via facilitation of NO/COX-2/miR-210 cascade

In this work, α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine demonstrated significant protection against acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. We proposed that α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine co-administration might modulate their individual effects. Induction of ulcerative colitis in rats was performed by intra-rectal acetic acid (5% v/v) administration for 3 consecutive days. Effects of individual or combined used of α-lipoic acid (35 mg/kg ip) or cyclosporine (5mg/kg sc) for 6 days starting 2 days prior to acetic acid were assessed. Acetic acid caused colon ulceration, bloody diarrhea and weight loss. Histologically, there was mucosal atrophy and inflammatory cells infiltration in submucosa, associated with depletion of colon reduced glutathione, superoxide dismutase and catalase activities and elevated colon malondialdehyde, serum C-reactive protein (C-RP) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Colon gene expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and miR-210 was also elevated. These devastating effects of acetic acid were abolished upon concurrent administration of α-lipoic acid. Alternatively, cyclosporine caused partial protection against acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis. Cyclosporine did not restore colon reduced glutathione, catalase activity, serum C-RP or TNF-α. Unexpectedly, co-administration of α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine aggravated colon ulceration. Concomitant use of α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine significantly increased nitric oxide production, cyclooxygenase-2 and miR-210 gene expression compared to all other studied groups. The current findings suggest that facilitation of nitric oxide/cyclooxygenase-2/miR-210 cascade constitutes, at least partially, the cellular mechanism by which concurrent use of α-lipoic acid and cyclosporine aggravates colon damage. Collectively, the present work highlights the probable risk of using α-lipoic acid/cyclosporine combination in ulcerative colitis patients.

Medical Therapy of Active Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Medical therapy of mild and moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) of any extent is evidence-based and standardized by national and international guidelines. However, patients with steroid-refractory UC still represent a challenge.

Methods

A literature search using PubMed (search terms: ulcerative colitis, therapy, new, 1-2008-2015) resulted in 821 publications. For the current article, 88 citations were extracted including 36 randomized controlled studies, 18 reviews, and 8 meta-analyses.

Results

In steroid-refractory UC, early intensive therapy using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies or the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus is indicated in any case to prevent progression to a toxic megacolon and/or to avoid proctocolectomy. In patients with chronic disease activity, treatment with anti-TNF antibodies has a higher level of evidence than azathioprine therapy and should therefore be preferred. However, there is a subgroup of UC patients who may achieve prolonged steroid-free remission on azathioprine monotherapy. The importance of vedolizumab, a newly registered inhibiting antibody against integrin, has not yet been fully clarified since direct comparison studies are lacking, in particular in relation to anti-TNF antibodies.

Conclusion

There is a great need for additional innovative therapies, especially in cases of primary non-response or secondary loss of response to anti-TNF antibodies. New small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors) are promising with an acceptable safety profile and efficacy in UC. Further, strategies that target the intestinal microbiome are currently considered for patients with active or relapsing UC, and may in the future open up new therapeutic options.

Long-term increase in serum cholesterol levels in ulcerative colitis patients treated with cyclosporine: an underdiagnosed side effect frequently associated with other drug-related complications

INTRODUCTION

Several serious side effects may limit the use of cyclosporine. Cyclosporine has been reported to increase the total cholesterol level; however, the change in serum cholesterol levels before and after cyclosporine therapy has not been examined in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. The purpose of this article was to compare serum cholesterol levels before and after cyclosporine therapy in patients with refractory UC and to examine the relationship between serum cholesterol levels and other common side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed serum cholesterol levels in UC patients who had been treated with cyclosporine. Data of 72 patients were analyzed and compared to a control group treated with Infliximab.

RESULTS

The average duration of cyclosporine therapy was 9.6 months, and side effects developed in 52 patients. Elevated cholesterol levels were detected in 47.2% of the patients. Serum cholesterol levels were significantly increased during and after discontinuation of cyclosporine therapy compared to the time before use of the drug. However, cholesterol levels measured during cyclosporine therapy were significantly higher compared to the time after its discontinuation (p < 0.001). Patients with drug-related side effects showed higher cholesterol levels after discontinuation of the therapy compared to those who did not experience any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that cyclosporine therapy may result in increased serum cholesterol levels even in the long-term, after discontinuation of the therapy. Considering that significantly higher post-therapy cholesterol levels were more common in patients who developed drug-related complications, routine measurement of serum cholesterol may increase the safety of the drug.

Cyclosporine in patients with severe steroid refractory ulcerative colitis in the era of infliximab. Review article

Corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for severe ulcerative colitis. However, at least a third of patients fail to respond and face a colectomy. In these, rescue therapy with cyclosporine or infliximab (IFX), aimed at avoiding surgery, has been used in recent years. Of the two options, infliximab is largely preferred in both Sweden and Norway, whereas cyclosporine (CyA) is generally regarded as difficult to use, rather toxic and showing limited long-term efficacy. In light of some new recent data, herein, we provide an update of the literature in the field. It appears that there are theoretical and practical arguments on each side, and as of today, the choice between IFX or CyA for rescue therapy cannot be made on strong evidence. Thus, the best choice of medical rescue therapy will depend on the results of ongoing RCTs as well as future research in the field.

Current and emerging drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

During the last decade a large number of biological agents against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), as well as many biochemical substances and molecules specifically for the medical treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have been developed. This enormous progress was a consequence of the significant advances in biotechnology along with the increased knowledge of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. However, conventional therapies remain the cornerstone of treatment for most patients. During recent years conventional and biologic IBD therapies have been optimized. Newer mesalazine formulations with a reduced pill size and only one dose per day demonstrate similar efficacy to older formulations. New corticosteroids retain the efficacy of older corticosteroids while exhibiting a higher safety profile. The role of antibiotics and probiotics has been further clarified. Significant progress in understanding thiopurine metabolism has improved the effective dose along with adjunctive therapies. Quite a large number of substances and therapies, including biologic agents other than TNF-α inhibitors, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, microbes and microbial products, leukocytapheresis, and other substances under investigation, could offer important benefits to our patients. In this paper we review the established and emerging therapeutic strategies in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.

Treatment of acute ulcerative colitis with infliximab, a retrospective study from three Danish hospitals

BACKGROUND

In acute steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis, rescue therapy with infliximab has become a therapeutic option in patients facing colectomy. Data on efficacy and safety in this setting are sparse.

METHODS

Patients with ulcerative colitis and acute and severe steroid-refractory disease, who were given infliximab as rescue therapy, were identified by a review of patients' records and databases of infliximab-treated patients. Data on patient background, concomitant medication, endoscopic and laboratory results, clinical activity and adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients, all admitted because of high disease activity of short duration, and failing high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, received infliximab treatment and were followed up for a median of 538 days (range 2-1769). Colectomy was avoided in 61% of cases. No fatalities were observed. Concomitant medication at the end of follow-up indicated a low number of relapses in patients without colectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a lasting benefit of infliximab rescue therapy in 61% of patients with acute, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis, a low incidence of late colectomies, and low frequency of steroid use in patients who avoided colectomy. High levels of C-reactive protein on admittance and at the first infliximab infusion were associated with colectomy. Our study adds to the growing experience of infliximab treatment of patients with acute, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Review article: the optimal medical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is a clinical challenge, with a mortality rate of approximately 1-2%. The traditional management with intravenous corticosteroids has been modified by introduction of ciclosporin and more recently, infliximab.

AIM

To provide a detailed and comprehensive review of the medical management of acute severe UC.

METHODS

PubMed and recent conference abstracts were searched for articles relating to treatment of acute severe UC.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of patients respond to intravenous steroids in the short term. In those who fail steroids, low-dose intravenous ciclosporin at 2 mg/kg/day is effective. Approximately 75% and 50% of patients treated with ciclosporin avoid colectomy in the short and long-terms, respectively. Long-term outcome of ciclosporin therapy is improved by introduction of azathioprine on discharge from hospital, together with oral ciclosporin as a bridging therapy. Controlled data show that infliximab is effective as rescue therapy for acute severe UC and the effect appears to be durable, although longer-term follow-up data are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ciclosporin and infliximab have demonstrated efficacy as rescue medical therapies in patients with acute severe UC, but surgery needs to be considered if there is failure to improve or clinical deterioration.