Survival of patients evaluated for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation - the Scandinavian experience

Disease recurrence after gut transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite three decades of clinical experience, this article is the first to comprehensively address disease recurrence after gut transplantation. Pertinent scientific literature is reviewed and management strategies are discussed with new insights into advances in gut pathobiology and human genetics.

RECENT FINDINGS

With growing experience and new perspectives in the field of gut transplantation, the topic of disease recurrence continues to evolve. The clinicopathologic spectrum and diagnostic criteria are better defined in milieu of the nature of the primary disease. In addition to neoplastic disorders, disease recurrence is suspected in patients with pretransplant Crohn's disease, gut dysmotility, hypercoagulability and metabolic syndrome. There has also been an increased awareness of the potential de-novo development of various disorders in the transplanted organs. For conventionally unresectable gastrointestinal and abdominal malignancies, ex-vivo excision and autotransplantation are advocated, particularly for the nonallotransplant candidates.

SUMMARY

Similar to other solid organ and cell transplantations, disease recurrence has been suspected following gut transplantation. Despite current lack of conclusive diagnostic criteria, recurrence of certain mucosal and neuromuscular disorders has been recently described in a large single-centre series with an overall incidence of 7%. Disease recurrence was also observed in recipients with pretransplant hypercoagulability and morbid obesity with respective incidences of 4 and 24%. As expected, tumour recurrence is largely determined by type, extent and biologic behaviour of the primary neoplasm. With the exception of high-grade aggressive malignancy, disease recurrence is still of academic interest with no significant impact on overall short and long-term outcome.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas

The traditionally promulgated perspectives of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) as rare, indolent tumours are blunt and have been outdated for the last 2 decades. Clear increments in their incidence over the past decades render them increasingly clinically relevant, and at initial diagnosis many present with nodal and/or distant metastases (notably hepatic). The molecular pathogenesis of these tumours is increasingly yet incompletely understood. Those arising from the small bowel (SB) or pancreas typically occur sporadically; the latter may occur within the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes. NENs can also be associated with endocrinopathy of hormonal hypersecretion. Tangible advances in the development of novel biomarkers, functional imaging modalities and therapy are especially applicable to this sub-set of tumours. The management of SB and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may be challenging, and often comprises a multidisciplinary approach wherein surgical, medical, interventional radiological and radiotherapeutic modalities are implemented. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of SB and pancreatic NETs. Moreover, we provide an outlook of the future in these tumour types which will include the development of precision oncology frameworks for individualised therapy, multi-analyte predictive biomarkers, artificial intelligence-derived clinical decision support tools and elucidation of the role of the microbiome in NEN development and clinical behaviour.

Surgical Approaches to the Management of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

Surgical approaches to hepatic metastases occupy an important role in the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and may have curative or palliative intentions. Resection of hepatic disease with curative intent is the only modality offering potential cure for patients with liver metastases; however, only a minority of patients are eligible. Regardless of resection margin, disease recurrence almost invariably occurs and novel adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapies are mandated to be included within multimodal treatment concepts. Liver transplantation in meticulously selected patients may be associated with excellent outcomes, but unfortunately demands on donated organs limit the wider utilization of this approach.

Liver transplantation and multivisceral transplantation in the management of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents a generally accepted albeit somewhat controversially discussed therapeutic strategy in highly selected patients with non-resectable hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumours (NET). Whilst there are some exclusion criteria, these are not universally followed, and the optimal set of inclusion parameters for deeming patients eligible has not yet been elucidated. This is due to heterogeneity in the study populations, as well differing approaches employed and also divergences in selection criteria between centres. Recent data have suggested that OLT may represent the most efficacious approach in terms of overall and disease-free survival to the management of NET metastatic to the liver when conducted in accordance with the modified Milan criteria. Therefore, a consensus set of selection criteria requires definition to facilitate stringent and fair allocation of deceased-donor organs, as well as consideration for living-donor organs. In the context of classically non-resectable metastatic tumour bulk, multivisceral transplantation with or without the liver may also be indicated, yet experience is very limited. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic work-up of patients in whom the aforementioned transplantation approaches are being considered, critically analyse the published experience and also anticipate future developments in this field, including a discussion of immediate and longer-term research priorities.

Neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and modified multivisceral transplantation for an advanced small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm: an updated case report

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) frequently metastasise to regional lymph nodes, and surgery is the mainstay of therapy for such patients. However, despite the possible use of advanced surgical techniques, the resection of both primary and locoregional diseases is not always attainable. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has been performed in a small number of patients with conventionally nonresectable, slow-growing tumours threatening the mesenteric root but has remained controversial. The use of donor skin in “sentinel flaps” in transplantation theoretically offers advantages in tailoring immunosuppression and monitoring for rejection. We represent (with extended follow-up) the first case of a patient with inoperable extensive mesenteric metastases from SI-NEN, who underwent neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy before a modified multivisceral transplant with a concomitant vascularised sentinel forearm flap. At 48 months after transplantation, our patient remained at full physical activity with no evidence of disease recurrence on either tumour biochemistry or radiological imaging.

Graft-versus-host Disease After Intestinal or Multivisceral Transplantation: A Scandinavian Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that develops after intestinal or multivisceral transplantation is difficult to diagnose and is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The objectives of this study were to investigate the incidence, clinical picture, risk factors, and outcome of GVHD in a Scandinavian cohort of patients who underwent intestinal or multivisceral transplantation during a period of 16 years (1998-2014). All transplanted patients (n = 26) were retrospectively analyzed with respect to donor- and recipient-derived risk factors. The diagnosis of GVHD was based on clinical signs, chimerism analyses of leukocytes, and histopathologic findings in biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

Five of 26 patients (19%) were diagnosed with GVHD, of which three had skin GVHD, one had skin and bone marrow GVHD, and one had passenger leukocyte syndrome. Only multivisceral-transplanted patients developed GVHD. Risk factors for development of GVHD were an underlying tumor diagnosis and neoadjuvant chemo- or brachytherapy administered before intestinal transplantation. All patients were given high-dose corticosteroids as first line treatment for their GVHD, and all survived their episodes of GVHD.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of GVHD appears to be increased in recipients of multivisceral transplantations who received chemotherapy due to an underlying malignancy. The reasons may be the large amount of lymphoid tissue in these types of grafts, and the cytotoxic effects of the malignancy and chemotherapy on healthy recipient tissues. These patients should be monitored closely for the development of GVHD.

Fifteen years' experience of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in the Nordic countries

OBJECTIVE

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation have gained acceptance as treatment modalities for patients with: intestinal failure and life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition (PN), rare cases of vascular abdominal catastrophes and selected cases of low-grade neoplastic tumors such as neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and desmoids involving the mesenteric root. The aim was to describe the survival and nutritional outcome in the transplanted Nordic patients and the complications attributed to this procedure.

METHOD

The authors included all Nordic patients transplanted between January 1998 and December 2013. Information on patients transplanted outside the Nordic region was collected through questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients received different types of intestinal allografts. Currently, there are two Nordic transplant centers (n = 29) performing these procedures (Gothenburg, Sweden n = 24, Helsinki, Finland n = 5). The remaining five patients were transplanted in the USA (n = 3) and the UK (n = 2). Most patients were transplanted for life-threatening failure of PN (70%) caused primarily by intestinal motility diseases (59%). Allograft rejection was the most common complication and occurred in 79% of the patients followed by post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (21%) and graft-versus-host disease (18%). The 1- and 5-year survival was 79% and 65% respectively for the whole cohort and nutritional autonomy was achieved in 73% of the adults and 57% of the children at 1 year after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

This collective Nordic experience confirms that intestinal transplantation is a complex procedure with many complications, yet with the possibility to provide long-term survival in selected conditions previously considered untreatable.

Modified liver-free multivisceral transplantation for a metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumor: a case report

Neuroendocrine tumors originating from the small bowel frequently metastasize to the lymph nodes and/or liver. Although surgical extirpation of the primary tumor and locoregional metastases epitomizes the management of patients with such tumors, this is not always possible with conventional surgical techniques. Nonresectable, slow-growing tumors involving the mesenteric root represent a generally accepted indication for deceased donor intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Furthermore, vascularized sentinel forearm flaps offer opportunities for monitoring graft rejection and tailoring immunosuppression regimens. Here, we report the first documented case of modified liver-free multivisceral transplantation preceded by neoadjuvant 177-lutetium peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in a patient with a small bowel neuroendocrine tumor and extensive lymph node metastases in the mesenterium. At a follow-up of 21 months the patient is biochemically and radiologically disease-free.

Surgical rehabilitation of short and dysmotile intestine in children and adults

AIMS

This is a descriptive study aiming to compare outcomes of intestinal rehabilitation surgery among pediatric and adult intestinal failure (IF) patients with either primary intestinal motility disorders or short bowel syndrome (SBS) treated by our nationwide program.

METHODS

Medical records of IF patients (n = 31, 71% children) having undergone autologous intestinal reconstructions (AIR) (n = 25), intestinal transplantation (ITx) (n = 5), or being listed for ITx (n = 2) between 1994 and 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

At surgery, median age was 3.4 (interquartile range, 1.0-22.1) in SBS (n = 22) and 16.5 (3.2-26.7) years in dysmotility patients (n = 9) who received median 60% and 83% of energy requirement parenterally, respectively. Median small bowel length was shorter in SBS than dysmotility patients (34 versus 157 cm, p < 0.001). Following AIR, none of the dysmotility patients achieved permanent intestinal autonomy, whereas 68% of SBS patients weaned off parenteral nutrition (PN) (p = 0.022) and none required listing for ITx. Five dysmotility patients who underwent ITx achieved intestinal autonomy. Regarding both AIR and ITx procedures, no significant difference in PN weaning was observed between the two subgroups. At last follow-up, 3.3 (0.6-8.0) years postoperatively, median plasma bilirubin was 6 (4-16) µmol/l, while liver biopsy showed fibrosis (Metavir stage 1-2) in 50% and cholestasis in 8%. Proportion of PN energy requirement had reduced significantly (p = 0.043) among PN-dependent SBS (n = 7) but not among dysmotility patients (n = 5). Overall survival was 90%.

CONCLUSION

AIR surgery was beneficial among selected SBS patients, whereas in intestinal dysmotility disorders, permanent PN weaning was only achieved by ITx.

Therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Patients who have neuroendocrine tumors frequently present with liver metastases. A wide panel of treatment options exists for these patients. Liver resection with curative intent achieves the best long-term results. Highly selected patients may be considered for liver transplantation. Substantial recurrence rates reported after surgical approaches call for neoadjuvant and adjuvant concepts. Liver-directed, locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiotherapy, offer excellent palliation for patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising palliative procedure for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. The efficacy of these treatment options needs to be evaluated in randomized trials. Somatostatin analogues have demonstrated effectiveness not only for symptomatic relief in patients with secreting tumors but also for the control of proliferation in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and most recently also in those originating from the pancreas. Chemotherapy is an option mainly for those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade tumors irrespective of the origin. Novel drugs targeting specific pathways within the tumor cell have produced improved progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Despite such a diverse armamentarium, there is uncertainty with regard to the optimal treatment regimens. Newly introduced molecular-based markers, along with the conduction of clinical trials comparing the efficacy of treatment modalities, offer a chance to move the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor disease toward personalized patient care. In this report, the authors review the approaches for treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, identify shortcomings, and anticipate future perspectives. Furthermore, clinical practice recommendations are provided for currently available treatment options. Although multiple modalities are available for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, optimal management is unclear. The current knowledge pertaining to these treatment options is analyzed.

Management of patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors have a disposition toward metastasis to the liver. A range of treatment modalities for neuroendocrine liver metastases is available in the clinical arena, the indications for which depend on tumor characteristics such as patterns of metastasis, tumor grade, and anatomical origin. The complete surgical resection of liver deposits represents the only option with the intent to cure and is the gold standard approach, whereas cytoreductive resection (debulking) presents another surgical option aiming to ameliorate the symptoms and prolong survival. Liver transplantation is generally an accepted option for highly selected patients. For patients ineligible for radical surgery, liver-directed therapies-transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, selective internal radiotherapy, and local tumor ablation-present alternative strategies. Systemic therapies include peptide receptor radiotherapy, somatostatin analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, and novel molecularly targeted drugs. However, despite the variety of treatments available, there exists little evidence to guide optimal clinical practice with currently available data predominantly retrospective in nature. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic procedures that influence the trajectory of treatment of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases before critically appraising the evidence pertaining to these therapeutic strategies.

Current status of the organ replacement approach for malignancies and an overture for organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine

Significant achievements in the organ replacement approach for malignancies over the last 2 decades opened new horizons, and the age of "Transplant Oncology" has dawned. The indications of liver transplantation for malignancies have been carefully expanded by a strict patient selection to assure comparable outcomes with non-malignant diseases. Currently, the Milan criteria, gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma, are being challenged by high-volume centers worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and liver transplantation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma has been successful in specialized institutions. For other primary and metastatic liver tumors, clinical evidence to establish standardized criteria is lacking. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation is an option for low-grade neoplasms deemed unresectable by conventional surgery. However, the procedure itself is in the adolescent stage. Solid organ transplantation for malignancies inevitably suffers from "triple distress," i.e., oncological, immunological, and technical. Organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine should serve as the "triple threat" therapy and revolutionize "Transplant Oncology."