Diagnostic utility of single-user peroral cholangioscopy in sclerosing cholangitis

What is the appropriate method of pathological specimen collection for cholangiocarcinoma detection in primary sclerosing cholangitis?

BACKGROUND

In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), it is important to understand the cholangiographic findings suggestive of malignancy, but it is difficult to determine whether cholangiocarcinoma is present due to modifications caused by inflammation. This study aimed to clarify the appropriate method of pathological specimen collection during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for surveillance of PSC.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed on 59 patients with PSC. The endpoints were diagnostic performance for benign or malignant on bile cytology and transpapillary bile duct biopsy, cholangiographic findings of biopsied bile ducts, diameters of the strictures and upstream bile ducts, and their differences.

RESULTS

The sensitivity (77.8% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.04), specificity (97.8% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.04), and accuracy (94.5% vs. 74.1%, P = 0.007) were all significantly greater for bile duct biopsy than for bile cytology. All patients with cholangiocarcinoma with bile duct stricture presented with dominant stricture (DS). The diameter of the upstream bile ducts (7.1 (4.2-7.2) mm vs. 2.1 (1.2-4.1) mm, P < 0.001) and the diameter differences (6.6 (3.1-7) mm vs. 1.5 (0.2-3.6) mm, P < 0.001) were significantly greater in the cholangiocarcinoma group than in the noncholangiocarcinoma group with DS. For diameter differences, the optimal cutoff value for the diagnosis of benign or malignant was 5.1 mm (area under the curve = 0.972).

CONCLUSION

Transpapillary bile duct biopsy should be performed via localized DS with upstream dilation for the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC. Especially when the diameter differences are greater than 5 mm, the development of cholangiocarcinoma should be strongly suspected.

Impact of trimodality sampling on detection of malignant biliary strictures compared with patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Malignant biliary strictures can be difficult to diagnose, with up to 20% considered indeterminate after initial tissue sampling. This study aimed to determine the performance characteristics of transpapillary biopsy sampling (TPB) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in isolation or in combination with standard brush cytology (BC) in patients who received trimodality sampling for biliary strictures.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with biliary strictures undergoing ERCP with trimodality sampling between September 2014 and April 2019. Performance characteristics for each diagnostic test alone and in combination were calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred four patients underwent trimodality biliary sampling, including 104 (51.0%) with malignancy. The diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy with BC (17.3%) significantly improved with dual modality (BC+FISH, 58.7%; BC+TPB, 40.4%) or trimodality sampling (68.3%; P < .001 for all comparisons). Trimodality sampling improved diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy compared with BC+FISH (P = .002) and BC+TPB (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity of trimodality sampling in detecting cholangiocarcinoma (79.7%) compared with pancreatic cancer (62.5%; P = .1). Among 57 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), the sensitivity of detecting biliary malignancy (n = 20) was 20% for BC and significantly improved with the addition of FISH (80%; P < .001) but not with TPB (35.0%; P = .25). Trimodality sampling did not further improve diagnostic sensitivity (85%) over BC+FISH (80%) for malignancy in the setting of PSC (P = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Trimodality sampling improves the diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of malignant biliary strictures with no significant difference in sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma compared with pancreatic cancer. However, in patients with PSC, trimodality sampling was not superior to BC+FISH.

Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of digital single-operator cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (d-SOC) with cholangioscopic biopsy sampling has shown promise in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Some studies have suggested higher sensitivity for visual impression compared with biopsy sampling, although assessors were not blinded to previous investigations. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement (IOA) of d-SOC in the visual appraisal of biliary strictures when blinded to additional information.

METHODS

A multicenter, international cohort study was performed. Cholangioscopic videos in patients with a known final diagnosis were systematically scored. Pseudonymized videos were reviewed by 19 experts in 2 steps: blinded for patient history and investigations and unblinded.

RESULTS

Forty-four high-quality videos were reviewed of 19 benign and 25 malignant strictures. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy was 74.2% and 46.9% (blinded) and 72.7% and 62.5% (unblinded). Cholangioscopic certainty of a malignant diagnosis led to overdiagnosis (sensitivity, 90.6%; specificity, 33%), especially if no additional information was provided. The IOA for the presence of malignancy was fair for both assessments (Fleiss' κ = .245 [blinded] and κ = .321 [unblended]). For individual visual features, the IOA ranged from slight to moderate for both assessments (κ = .059-.400 vs κ = .031-.452).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed low sensitivity and specificity for blinded and unblinded d-SOC video appraisal of indeterminate biliary strictures, with considerable interobserver variation. Although reaching a consensus on the optical features of biliary strictures remains important, optimizing visually directed biopsy sampling may be the most important role of cholangioscopy in biliary stricture assessment.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated cholangiocarcinoma: special considerations and best practices

Introduction: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, heterogenous, chronic cholestatic liver disease that causes fibro-inflammatory destruction of the intra- and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. The disease course may be variable, though in many cases it ultimately leads to biliary cirrhosis and its associated complications. PSC is also associated with malignancies, in particular cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a dreaded neoplasm of the biliary tract with a poor prognosis. Risk stratification and surveillance for this malignancy are important components of the care of patients with PSC.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss important considerations in the clinical epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surveillance of PSC-associated CCA.Expert opinion: Despite growing awareness of PSC, high-quality evidence regarding the management of PSC and its associated risk of CCA remains limited. Early diagnosis of PSC-associated CCA remains difficult, and treatment options are limited, especially when diagnosed at later stages. The recent introduction of recommendations for CCA surveillance will likely improve outcomes, though an optimal surveillance approach has yet to be validated prospectively. Further research is needed in the development of high-accuracy (and noninvasive) surveillance and diagnostic tools that may facilitate earlier diagnosis of CCA and potential disease cure.

Artificial intelligence in biliopancreatic endoscopy: Is there any role?

Artificial intelligence (AI) research in endoscopy is being translated at rapid pace with a number of approved devices now available for use in luminal endoscopy. However, the published literature for AI in biliopancreatic endoscopy is predominantly limited to early pre-clinical studies including applications for diagnostic EUS and patient risk stratification. Potential future use cases are highlighted in this manuscript including optical characterisation of strictures during cholangioscopy, prediction of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and selective biliary duct cannulation difficulty, automated report generation and novel AI-based quality key performance metrics. To realise the full potential of AI and accelerate innovation, it is crucial that robust inter-disciplinary collaborations are formed between biliopancreatic endoscopists and AI researchers.

Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part I: Classification, diagnosis and staging

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer, characterized by a poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapeutics. The progressive increase in CCA incidence and mortality registered worldwide in the last two decades and the need to clarify various aspects of clinical management have prompted the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) to commission the drafting of dedicated guidelines in collaboration with a group of Italian scientific societies. These guidelines have been formulated in accordance with the Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed by following the GRADE method and related advancements.

Approaches and Outcomes to Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

Distal cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Because of its location and aggressive nature, patients often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, and effective treatment options are limited. For patients with resectable disease, surgery is the only chance for cure, but achieving an R0 resection is paramount. Optimal adjuvant therapy in resectable disease remains under investigation. Randomized controlled trials investigating neoadjuvant therapy and its impact on resectability and long-term outcomes are needed to continue to improve the outcomes of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangioscopy Biopsies Improve Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma When Combined with Cytology and FISH, but Not in Patients with PSC

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) has been suggested to be a cost-effective strategy for the detection of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The aim of this study is to compare the performance characteristics of SOC-guided biopsies and transpapillary biopsies with standard sampling techniques for the detection of CCA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SOC between 1/2007 and 10/2018 at a single academic center was performed. Demographic, procedural, and outcomes data were recorded and analyzed using STATA 14.0. Sensitivity comparison between diagnostic tests was performed using exact McNemar test exclusively among patients with CCA. Two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included; 36 (39.1%) with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), 41 (44.6%) with CCA, and median follow-up was 15.1 months. In the overall cohort, brush cytology demonstrated a sensitivity of 44.7% and increased with the addition of FISH (56.8%; p = 0.12), FISH with SOC-guided biopsy (71.4%; p = 0.03), and FISH with transpapillary biopsy (64.5%; p = 0.01). However, in patients with PSC, there was no significant improvement in sensitivity with the addition of SOC-guided biopsy or transpapillary biopsy in addition to FISH when compared to brush cytology. There was no difference in the rates of overall adverse events (14% vs. 23.2%; p = 0.27) or infection (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.83) in patients with and without PSC.

CONCLUSIONS

SOC-guided and transpapillary biopsies improve sensitivity for the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in combination with other ERCP-based techniques compared to brush cytology alone. However, while safe, these modalities do not significantly improve the sensitivity for the detection of malignancy in PSC patients.

Role of Peroral Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by idiopathic biliary stricture followed by progressive cholestasis and fibrosis. When diagnosing PSC, its differentiation from other types of sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma is necessary. The cholangioscopic findings of PSC have not been investigated sufficiently. PSC and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis are difficult to distinguish by peroral cholangioscopy (POCS), but POCS is useful for excluding cholangiocarcinoma. POCS findings vary according to the condition and stage of disease. In the active phase, findings such as mucosal erythema, ulceration, fibrinous white exudate, and an irregular surface are observed and may reflect strong inflammation in the biliary epithelium. On the other hand, findings such as scarring, pseudodiverticula, and bile duct stenosis appear in the chronic phase and may reflect fibrosis and stenosis resulting from repeated inflammation. Observation of inside the bile duct by POCS might confirm the current PSC activity. Because POCS offers not only information regarding the diagnosis of PSC and PSC-associated cholangiocarcinoma but also the current statuses of biliary inflammation and stenosis, POCS could significantly contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of PSC once the characteristic findings of PSC are confirmed by future studies.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Surveillance for Hepatobiliary Cancers in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this clinical practice update is to define key principles in the surveillance of hepatobiliary cancers including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

METHODS

The recommendations outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence including observational studies and systematic reviews, and incorporates expert opinion where applicable. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Surveillance for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer should be considered in all adult patients with PSC regardless of disease stage, especially in the first year after diagnosis and in patients with ulcerative colitis and those diagnosed at an older age. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Surveillance for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer should include imaging by ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, with or without serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, every 6 to 12 months BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with brush cytology should not be used routinely for surveillance of cholangiocarcinomas in PSC. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Cholangiocarcinomas should be investigated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with brush cytology with or without fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis and/or cholangioscopy in PSC patients with worsening clinical symptoms, worsening cholestasis, or a dominant stricture. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Fine-needle aspiration of perihilar biliary strictures should be used with caution in PSC patients considered to be liver transplant candidates because of concerns for tumor seeding if the lesion is a cholangiocarcinoma. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Surveillance for cholangiocarcinoma should not be performed in PSC patients with small-duct PSCs or those younger than age 20. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: The decision to perform a cholecystectomy in PSC patients with a gallbladder polyp should be based on the size and growth of the polyp, as well as the clinical status of the patient, with the knowledge of the increased risk of gallbladder cancer in polyps greater than 8 mm. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in PSC patients with cirrhosis should include ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, with or without α-fetoprotein every 6 months.

Biliary interventions using single-operator cholangioscopy

Cholangioscopy provides an opportunity to directly visualize the bile duct for diagnosing biliary lesions and for therapeutic interventions. Although there are different cholangioscopy techniques available, single-operator cholangioscopy has gained widespread acceptance as the standard technique for interventions in the biliary system because of its ease of use and widespread availability. Single-operator cholangioscopy can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic indications in the biliary tract. Diagnostic cholangioscopy is used for direct evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures with biopsies, diagnosing filling defects in the bile ducts observed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) imaging, preoperative mapping of the precise location and extension of tumors of the biliary tract, and diagnosis of intraductal neoplasms. Therapeutic cholangioscopy is used for visually guided treatment of biliary stones that have failed extraction with conventional ERC techniques, residual or impacted stones by using intraductal lithotripsy, ablation of biliary tumors and for facilitation of guidewire advancement into selective intrahepatic ducts for adequate biliary drainage. In this review, we will focus on advances in the single-operator cholangioscopy techniques in the diagnosis and management of biliary disorders.

British Society of Gastroenterology and UK-PSC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

These guidelines on the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included medical representatives from hepatology and gastroenterology groups as well as patient representatives from PSC Support. The guidelines aim to support general physicians, gastroenterologists and surgeons in managing adults with PSC or those presenting with similar cholangiopathies which may mimic PSC, such as IgG4 sclerosing cholangitis. It also acts as a reference for patients with PSC to help them understand their own management. Quality of evidence is presented using the AGREE II format. Guidance is meant to be used as a reference rather than for rigid protocol-based care as we understand that management of patients often requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Large-duct cholangiopathies: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment

Cholangiopathies describe a group of conditions affecting the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree. Impairment to bile flow and chronic cholestasis cause biliary inflammation, which leads to more permanent damage such as destruction of the small bile ducts (ductopaenia) and biliary cirrhosis. Most cholangiopathies are progressive and cause end-stage liver disease unless the physical obstruction to biliary flow can be reversed. This review considers large-duct cholangiopathies, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, ischaemic cholangiopathy, portal biliopathy, recurrent pyogenic cholangitis and Caroli disease.

Clinical practice guidelines for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis

IgG4‐related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4‐SC) is a distinct type of cholangitis frequently associated with autoimmune pancreatitis and currently recognized as a biliary manifestation of IgG4‐related disease. Although clinical diagnostic criteria of IgG4‐SC were established in 2012, differential diagnosis from primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma is sometimes difficult. Furthermore, no practical guidelines for IgG4‐SC are available. Because the evidence level of most articles retrieved through searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases was below C based on the systematic review evaluation system of clinical practice guidelines MINDS 2014, we developed consensus guidelines using the modified Delphi approach. Three committees (a guideline creating committee, an expert panelist committee for rating statements according to the modified Delphi method, and an evaluating committee) were organized. Eighteen clinical questions (CQs) with clinical statements were developed regarding diagnosis (14 CQs) and treatment (4 CQs). Recommendation levels for clinical statements were set using the modified Delphi approach. The guidelines explain methods for accurate diagnosis, and safe and appropriate treatment of IgG4‐SC.

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of complicated biliary calculus: A PRISMA-compliant systematic reviews and meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (LHLL) in the treatment of complicated biliary calculus.

METHODS

We systematically searched the electronic database (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) up to May 2018 to identify case-controlled studies that compared LHLL with laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) for complicated biliary calculus.

RESULTS

Five case-controlled studies were included, with 541 patients (273 in the LHLL group and 268 in the LBDE group). Compared with LBDE, LHLL was associated with shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -40.04, P < .001) and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD = -56.42, P < .001), lesser duration of hospitalization (WMD = -3.93, P < .001) and lower rate of residual stone (OR = 0.13, P < .001). There was no statistically significant differences in bile leakage (OR = 0.48, P = .23) and hemobilia (OR = 0.49, 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that the efficacy of LHLL is superior to that of LBDE but they are similarly safe for the treatment of complicated biliary calculus. Limited by the quantity and quality of the studies included, these conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.

Cholangioscopy in the digital era

Cholangioscopy allows direct visualization and subsequent therapeutic maneuvers of the biliary ductal system. With advances in endoscopic and imaging technology, cholangioscopy has become an important modality for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures and an essential therapeutic tool for difficult to remove biliary stones. Enhanced imaging and operability of the latest generation cholangioscopes have further expanded their clinical applications to include ductal tumor ablation, gallbladder drainage, access to difficult to reach branches of the biliary tree, and biliary foreign body manipulation. In this review, we discuss the technical evolution of cholangioscopy into the digital era and review the clinical evidence supporting its use in the diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract disease.

Clinical guidelines for primary sclerosing cholangitis 2017

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is relatively rare disease and pathogenesis and methods of treatments were still not established. Then, we had conducted the making clinical guidelines to manage patients with PSC based on the literature review and expert opinions. These clinical guidelines were made for the medical doctors on the management of PSC, except child case of PSC.

METHODS

We had employed modified Delphi method. The production committee decided guidelines, strength of recommendations and evidence level after reviewed literatures systematically, and The Expert panel evaluated those. The Scientific Committee of the Japan Biliary Association (JBA) evaluated revised guidelines, and the Public comments were collected on web site of JBA.

RESULTS

We had made 16 guidelines about epidemiology/pathophysiology, diagnostics, therapy and prognosis. Also, we had made both diagnostic and therapeutic flow chart.

CONCLUSIONS

We hope that these guidelines will contribute to the improvement and development of the medical care of PSC.

Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)

Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are estimated to be present in 10-20% of individuals with symptomatic gallstones. They can result in a number of health problems, including pain, jaundice, infection and acute pancreatitis. A variety of imaging modalities can be employed to identify the condition, while management of confirmed cases of CBDS may involve endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, surgery and radiological methods of stone extraction. Clinicians are therefore confronted with a number of potentially valid options to diagnose and treat individuals with suspected CBDS. The British Society of Gastroenterology first published a guideline on the management of CBDS in 2008. Since then a number of developments in management have occurred along with further systematic reviews of the available evidence. The following recommendations reflect these changes and provide updated guidance to healthcare professionals who are involved in the care of adult patients with suspected or proven CBDS. It is not a protocol and the recommendations contained within should not replace individual clinical judgement.

Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Although several ERCP-based diagnostic modalities are available for diagnosing CCA, it is unclear whether one modality is more cost-effective than the others. The primary aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ERCP-based techniques for diagnosing CCA in patients with PSC-induced biliary strictures.

METHODS

We performed a cost utility analysis to assess the net monetary benefit for accurately diagnosing CCA using 5 different diagnostic strategies: (1) ERCP with bile duct brushing for cytology, (2) ERCP with brushings for cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-trisomy, (3) ERCP with brushings for cytology and FISH-polysomy, (4) ERCP with intraductal biopsy sampling, and (5) single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) with targeted biopsy sampling. A Monte Carlo simulation assessed outcomes including quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

SOC with targeted biopsy sampling, as compared with ERCP with brushing for FISH-polysomy, produced an incremental QALY gain of .22 at an additional cost of $8562.44, resulting in a base case ICER of $39,277.25. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that diagnosis with SOC was cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000. SOC was the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

SOC with biopsy sampling is the most cost-effective diagnostic modality for CCA in PSC strictures.

Risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: diagnosis and surveillance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with an increased risk of hepatobiliary and extrahepatic malignancy. Particularly the risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is greatly increased. To provide potentially curative treatments for affected patients an early diagnosis of CCA is crucial. We here review the current advances with respect to CCA diagnosis and surveillance and discuss a rational approach on how to perform surveillance of CCA in PSC patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the shortcomings of the current modalities for the surveillance and diagnosis of CCA in PSC, recent studies have focused on novel biomarkers for CCA. These include serum biomarkers (e.g., circulating angiopoeitin-2, cytokeratin-19 fragments, and antiglycoprotein 2 IgA autoantibodies, microRNA) as well as proteomics obtained from urine and/or bile. Novel approaches that may enhance the diagnostic value of brush cytology in future include the optimization of fluorescence in situ hybridization probes and the assessment of genetic aberrations. In addition, studies on advanced techniques (e.g., single-operator cholangioscopy and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy) have shown promising results with respect to CCA detection.

SUMMARY

Despite recent advances in the diagnosis of CCA in PSC, the detection of early-stage CCA remains difficult. A better understanding of CCA pathogenesis and large prospective studies on novel biomarkers and techniques are required to timely diagnose CCA in the future.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of current endoscopic modalities for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is suboptimal.

AIM

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based modalities, independently or in combination, for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC-induced biliary strictures.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases were performed through December 2015. Measured outcomes included sensitivity and specificity of all diagnostic modalities independently or in combination. A bivariate model was used to compute the pooled sensitivity and specificity, and to plot the summary receiver operating characteristics curve with summary point and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A logistic regression model was used to impute the incremental performance of combining two diagnostic tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria: 13 on bile duct brushing for cytology, 7 on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), 2 on probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, and 4 on single-operator cholangioscopy with targeted biopsies. Single-operator cholangioscopy with targeted biopsies was the most accurate diagnostic modality at 96% (95% CI, 94-97%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of single-operator cholangioscopy for diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC was 65% (95% CI, 35-87%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio to detect cholangiocarcinoma was 59 (95% CI, 10-341).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-operator cholangioscopy with targeted biopsies appears to be the most accurate ERCP-based modality for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, future large, well-designed comparative diagnostic studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Risk and Surveillance of Cancers in Primary Biliary Tract Disease

Primary biliary diseases have been associated in several studies with various malignancies. Understanding the risk and optimizing surveillance strategy of these malignancies in this specific subset of patients are an important facet of clinical care. For instance, primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with an increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma (which is very challenging to diagnose) and when IBD is present for colorectal cancer. On the other hand, primary biliary cirrhosis patients with cirrhosis or not responding to 12 months of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this review we will discuss in detail the risks and optimal surveillance strategies for patients with primary biliary diseases.

Advances in Therapeutic Cholangioscopy

Nowadays, cholangioscopy is an established modality in diagnostic and treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. The more widespread use and the recent development of new technologies and accessories had renewed the interest of endoscopic visualization of the biliary tract, increasing the range of indications and therapeutic procedures, such as diagnostic of indeterminate biliary strictures, lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones, ablative techniques for intraductal malignancies, removal of foreign bodies and gallbladder drainage. These endoscopic interventions will probably be the last frontier in the near future. This paper presents the new advances in therapeutic cholangioscopy, focusing on the current clinical applications and on research areas.

Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of biliary brush cytology and the factors affecting positive results in patients with biliary strictures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of all patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary brush cytology at our institution from November 2004 to December 2013 were reviewed in this retrospective study. The yield of positive brush cytology and the factors affecting positive yield, such as stricture location, age, gender and preprocedure CA 19.9 level were assessed. The final histopathology, diagnosis obtained by other methods, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, CT scan, Tru-Cut biopsy and/or clinical/radiological follow-up were used to identify true- and false-positive/negative results. The brush cytology results were divided into 4 main categories: malignant, benign, atypical cells and inadequate.

RESULTS

A total of 1,168 patients underwent ERCP during this 9-year period. Out of these, 142 patients had ERCP and biliary brushings for diagnosis. The mean age of the patients at presentation was 58.7 years (range 23-84 years; 64.8% males). The indication for referral was obstructive jaundice in all patients. Of the 142 patients, 77 (54.2%) had a distal common bile duct (CBD) stricture and 65 (45.8%) had a proximal /complex hilar stricture. The strictures were classified as proximal or distal, based on their relationship with the cystic duct; those below the cystic duct insertion were classified as distal and those above it were considered proximal. The diagnostic yield of brush cytology was 58.5%. The diagnostic yield was higher for proximal than for distal CBD strictures (67 vs. 50%; p = 0.047). It was also higher for females (58 vs. 57.6%; p = 0.94), patients >50 years (60 vs. 50%; p = 0.29) and those with a CA 19.9 level >300 IU/ml (59.4 vs. 55.5%; p = 0.65) but did not reach statistical significance for any of these parameters. Complete follow-up data were available for 96 patients and 46 patients were lost to follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 65.3, 100, 100 and 27%, respectively. When patients with atypia were included in the group with positive results, the diagnostic yield increased to 65.5% with a diagnostic sensitivity of 68.6%. There were 27 false-negative diagnoses, 10 patients were true-negative and no patients had a false-positive diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Biliary brush cytology is a safe and simple initial diagnostic procedure in patients with biliary strictures and can be performed at the time of therapeutic ERCP. If performed correctly and then interpreted by a dedicated cytopathologist, it has a good diagnostic yield and sensitivity. We feel that the low rates of success with this technique reported in some earlier studies have led to a feeling that this is not a particularly useful technique. We recommend that this topic should be revisited, and that the technique should be used more often.

Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures

Biliary strictures frequently present a diagnostic challenge during pre-operative evaluation to determine their benign or malignant nature. A variety of benign conditions, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, frequently mimic malignancies. In addition, PSC and other chronic biliary diseases increase the risk of cholangiocarcinoma and so require ongoing vigilance. Although traditional methods of evaluation including imaging, detection of circulating tumour markers, and sampling by endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have a high specificity, they suffer from low sensitivity. Currently, up to 20% of biliary strictures remain indeterminate after pre-operative evaluation and necessitate surgical intervention for a definitive diagnosis. The discovery of novel biomarkers, new imaging modalities and advanced endoscopic techniques suggests that a multimodality approach might lead to better diagnostic accuracy.

Endoscopic diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: From endoscopic retrograde cholangiography to bile proteomics

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. In clinical practice, the diagnosis remains challenging and often requires endoscopic approaches. Endoscopic retrograde and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography are the first-line endoscopic procedures for the evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures. Tissue acquisition via brush cytology and forceps biopsies allows the cytological and/or histological confirmation of the disease. Due to the low sensitivity of these techniques, repetitive examinations and/or alternative approaches are required. Cholangioscopy, endoscopic and intraductal ultrasound and confocal laser endomicroscopy are additional methods which can be applied for the diagnosis of CCA. Particularly, new experimental approaches like bile and urine proteomic analyses show promising results which have to be evaluated prospectively for further integration in diagnostic algorithms.