Analysis of TNF-antagonist switch over time and associated risk factors in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort

Thrombotic adverse events associated with TNF-alpha blockers: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database

Objective

This research is designed to explore the connection between tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blocker drugs and thrombotic adverse events.

Methods

The study included data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. We employed the disproportional analysis approach to analyze the signals of thrombosis-related adverse events associated with TNF-α blockers. Moreover, subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the circumstances of different age and gender groups. Additionally, the induction time and Weibull distribution were utilized for the further interpretation of the data.

Results

During the study period, among 1,382,627 patients in the FAERS database who had adverse events linked to TNF-α inhibitors, 9,714 could be attributed to thrombosis-related adverse events. In the remaining patients, different types of infection events accounted for a large proportion of the proportion. (N = 165,765) Thrombosis-related adverse event signals were detected in all five types of TNF-α inhibitor drugs. Among them, in the analysis of adalimumab, the adverse event signal of postpartum thrombosis was the strongest, and the positive signal of axillary vein thrombosis was the weakest. The analysis based on gender subgroups discovered some positive signals of adverse events that were not observed in the overall population. The Weibull distribution analysis indicated that all five drugs exhibited an premature aging type characteristic, and their induction decreased gradually over time.

Conclusion

This study suggests that TNF - α blockers are associated with various adverse events of thrombosis, with different risks in different patient groups and treatment stages. Clinical doctors should assess individual thrombosis risk and closely monitor coagulation related indicators when using TNF - α inhibitors. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing treatment and improving safety.

Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Dose Escalation and Treatment Switching in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Currently approved biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis have well-established efficacy. However, many patients fail to respond or lose response, leading to dose escalation or treatment switching.

Objective

We sought to identify real-world evidence on dose escalation and treatment switching and associated clinical and economic outcomes among adults with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE (up to 26 August 2020), and conference proceedings (2017-2020) for studies in adults with ulcerative colitis to assess clinical response and remission, colectomy, adverse events, and economic outcomes related to dose escalation and treatment switching.

Results

In 56 studies, dose escalation and treatment switching involving infliximab and/or adalimumab were most frequently investigated. Rates of clinical response after dose escalation were 20-95% (1.8-36 months), clinical remission rates were 10-94% (1.8-36 months), colectomy rates were 0-33% (12-38 months), and adverse event rates were 0-18%. Treatment switching rates in 21 studies were 4-70% over 3-62 months, with switch due to loss of response rates of 4-35% over 12-62 months (7 studies). Up to 35% of patients underwent colectomy 12-120 weeks after switching, and 13-38% experienced adverse events. Data relating to economic outcomes were limited to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but demonstrated increased direct costs associated with both dose escalation and treatment switching.

Conclusion

Dose escalation and treatment switching are common with existing therapies. However, clinical response and remission rates vary, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve optimal clinical and economic outcomes. This highlights the need for more efficacious and durable treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: the story continues

In the 1990s, tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy ushered in the biologic therapy era for inflammatory bowel disease, leading to marked improvements in treatment options and patient outcomes. There are currently four tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors approved as treatments for ulcerative colitis and/or Crohn's disease: infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol. Despite the clear benefits of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease either do not respond, experience a loss of response after initial clinical improvement or report intolerance to anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy. Optimizing outcomes of these agents may be achieved through earlier intervention, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring and thoughtful switching within class. To complement these approaches, evolving predictive biomarkers may help inform and optimize clinical decision making by identifying patients who might potentially benefit from an alternative treatment strategy. This review will focus on the current use of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease and the application of personalized medicine to improve future outcomes for all patients.

Switching TNFα inhibitors: Patterns and determinants

The aim of this study was to assess switching patterns and determinants for switching in patients initiating TNFα inhibitor (TNFα-i) treatment. Patients were included who started TNFα-i treatment between July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017, from three Dutch hospitals, and were diagnosed with rheumatic diseases (RD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or psoriasis. Outcomes were switching, defined as initiating another biological; switching patterns including multiple switches until the end of follow-up; determinants for first switch, assessed using multivariate logistic regression. A total of 2228 patients were included (median age 43.3 years, 57% female), of which 52% (n = 1155) received TNFα-i for RD, 43% (n = 967) for IBD, and 5% (n = 106) for psoriasis. About 16.6% of RD patients, 14.5% of IBD patients, and 16.0% of psoriasis patients switched at least once, mainly to another TNFα-i. TNFα-i dose escalation (OR 13.78, 95% CI 1.40-135.0) and high-dose corticosteroids initiation (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.10-12.15) were determinants for switching in RD patients. TNFα-i dose escalation (OR 8.22, 95% CI 3.76-17.93), immunomodulator initiation/dose escalation (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.04-4.34), high-dose corticosteroids initiation (OR 6.91, 95% CI 2.81-17.01) and serum concentration measurement (OR 5.44, 95% CI 2.74-10.79) were determinants for switching in IBD patients. Switching biological treatment occurred in about one in six patients. RD patients with TNFα-i dose escalation and/or high-dose corticosteroids initiation were more likely to switch. IBD patients with TNFα-i or immunomodulator initiation/dose escalation, high-dose corticosteroids initiation or serum concentration measurement were more likely to switch. These findings might help clinicians anticipating switching in TNFα-i treatment.

Systematic analysis of annual health resource utilization and costs in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Switzerland

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Real-life data on health resource utilization and costs of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease are lacking in Switzerland. We aimed to assess health resource utilization and costs during a 1-year follow-up period starting with an index hospitalization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

On the basis of claims data of the Helsana health insurance group, health resource utilization was assessed and costs reimbursed by mandatory basic health insurance [in Swiss Francs (CHF); 1 CHF=0.991 US$] were calculated during a 1-year follow-up period starting with an index hospitalization in the time period between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014.

RESULTS

Of 202 002 patients with at least one hospitalization in 2013-2014, a total of 270 (0.13%) patients had inflammatory bowel disease as main diagnosis [112 (41.5%) ulcerative colitis (UC), 158 (58.5%) Crohn's disease (CD), 154/270 (57.0%) females]. In comparison with patients with UC, patients with CD were significantly more frequently treated with biologics (45.6 vs. 20.5%, P<0.001) and more frequently underwent surgery during index hospitalization (27.8 vs. 9.8%, P=0.002). Compared with patients with UC, those with CD had significantly more consultations [odds ratio (OR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.12, P=0.016], higher median annual total costs (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.05-1.48, P=0.012), and higher outpatient costs (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.07-1.66, P=0.011). In the bivariate model, median total costs for patients with CD and those with UC were 24 270 and 17 270 CHF, respectively (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

When compared with patients with UC, hospitalized patients with CD have during a 1-year follow-up a higher rate of outpatient consultations and generate higher costs.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed

BACKGROUND

One-third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving anti-TNFs do not respond to treatment, and a relevant proportion experience loss of response or intolerance.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a second anti-TNF agent after primary/secondary failure or intolerance to a first drug.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

studies evaluating the efficacy of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) and certolizumab-pegol (CZP) as the second anti-TNF in CD or UC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Bibliographical searches (PubMed/Embase).

DATA SYNTHESIS

percentage of response/remission; the meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

We included 46 studies (37 CD, 8 UC, 1 pouchitis). The CD studies comprised 32 switching IFX→ADA, 4 IFX→CZP and 1 ADA→IFX. Overall, the second anti-TNF after the failure of IFX in CD induced remission in 43% and response in 63% of patients. The remission rate was higher when the reason to withdraw the first anti-TNF was intolerance (61%) than after secondary (45%) or primary failure (30%); response rates were, respectively, 72%, 62% and 53%. All UC studies switched IFX→ADA, six of them reporting remission rates ranging from 0% to 50%. Adverse events rate ranged from 0% to 81% in CD, most of them mild (serious adverse event 0-21%, discontinuation rate <20%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of a second anti-TNF in CD patients largely depends on the cause for switching. The remission rate is higher when the reason to withdraw the first anti-TNF is intolerance (61%), compared with secondary (45%) or primary failure (30%). Further studies of switch ADA→IFX are needed to evaluate this strategy. PROSPERO-registry-number: CRD42014012943.

Early investigational TNF receptor antagonists for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a life-long, immunologically mediated condition that results from an inappropriate activation of the mucosal immune system by intestinal luminal antigens in genetically susceptible individuals. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine central to UC pathogenesis.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the evidence for the use of the anti-TNF (αTNF) medications infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab and golimumab in the management of UC. It highlights the newer biosimilar agents that are becoming available and the early stage investigation of an orally administered αTNF agent.

EXPERT OPINION

αTNF therapy is effective but only in a proportion of UC patients. As there is now strong evidence that UC is not just a single disease but a series of phenotypes with distinct genetic, serological and environmental aspects, understanding the heterogeneity of the innate immunological response in UC could allow for better targeted patient management. Identifying differences in the efficacy of the various αTNF agents is difficult as there are no head-to-head studies, but only infliximab has proven clinical efficacy in the management of acute severe colitis. Biosimilars to the αTNF agents are now available and with the added competition, medications costs should fall allowing for greater patient access.