A comparative evaluation of secretin bolus and secretin infusion as secretin provocation tests in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

Diagnostic efficacy of the secretin stimulation test for the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: an intra-individual comparison using different dosages in patients and controls

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The secretin stimulation test is the principal diagnostic tool to identify Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). We investigated, by intra-individual comparison, which dose of secretin results in the highest diagnostic efficacy to identify the ZES.

METHODS

Fifty-seven paired secretin stimulation tests, using both 0.26 microg/kg and 0.78 microg/kg secretin, performed in 13 ZES patients and 12 controls, were analyzed and the findings confirmed in a validation cohort.

RESULTS

A gastrin increase of >100 ng/l was found to be the most sensitive and specific criterion for a positive test. Higher gastrin increases after 0.78 microg/kg compared to 0.26 microg/kg secretin contributed to a slightly more sensitive (82.9 vs. 80.5%) but less specific (68.8 vs. 81.3%) test. A validation cohort, with 98 tests using 0.26 microg/kg secretin in 21 ZES patients and 39 controls, provided similar results. In ZES patients with normal fasting serum gastrin levels (<100 ng/l), there was no diagnostic benefit from the use of a higher secretin dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The 0.26 microg/kg secretin stimulation test has the best diagnostic efficacy for the ZES. and IAP.

Serum gastrin in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: II. Prospective study of gastrin provocative testing in 293 patients from the National Institutes of Health and comparison with 537 cases from the literature. evaluation of diagnostic criteria, proposal of new criteria, and correlations with clinical and tumoral features

In two-thirds of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), fasting serum gastrin (FSG) levels overlap with values seen in other conditions. In these patients, gastrin provocative tests are needed to establish the diagnosis of ZES. Whereas numerous gastrin provocative tests have been proposed, only the secretin, calcium, and meal tests are widely used today. Many studies have analyzed gastrin provocative test results in ZES, but they are limited by small patient numbers and methodologic differences. To address this issue, we report the results of a prospective National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of gastrin provocative tests in 293 patients with ZES and compare these data with those from 537 ZES and 462 non-ZES patients from the literature. In 97%-99% of gastrinoma patients, an increase in serum gastrin post secretin (Delta secretin) or post calcium (Delta calcium) occurred. In NIH ZES patients with <10-fold increase in FSG, the sensitivity/specificity of the widely used criteria were as follows: Delta secretin > or =200 pg/mL (83%/100%), Delta secretin >50% (86%/93%), Delta calcium > or =395 pg/mL (54%/100%), and Delta calcium >50% (78%/83%). A systematic analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of other possible criteria for a positive secretin or calcium test allowed us to identify a new criterion for secretin testing (Delta > or =120 pg/mL) with the highest sensitivity/specificity (94%/100%) and to confirm the commonly used criterion for calcium tests (Delta > or =395 pg/mL) (62%/100%). This analysis further showed that the secretin test was more sensitive than the calcium test (94% vs. 62%). Our results suggest that secretin stimulation should be used as the first-line provocative test because of its greater sensitivity and simplicity and lack of side effects. In ZES patients with a negative secretin test, 38%-50% have a positive calcium test. Therefore the calcium test should be considered in patients with a strong clinical suspicion of ZES but a negative secretin test. Furthermore, we found that some clinical (diarrhea, duration of medical treatment), laboratory (basal acid output), and tumoral (size, extent) characteristics correlate with the serum gastrin increase post secretin and post calcium. However, using the proposed criteria, the result of these provocative tests (that is, positive or negative) is minimally influenced by these factors, so secretin and calcium provocative tests are reliable in patients with different clinical, laboratory, and tumor characteristics. A systematic analysis of meal testing showed that 54%-77% of ZES patients have a <50% postprandial serum gastrin increase. However, 9%-20% of ZES patients had a >100% increase post meal, causing significant overlap with antral syndromes. Furthermore, we could not confirm the usefulness of meal tests for localization of duodenal gastrinomas. We conclude that the secretin test is a crucial element in the diagnosis of most ZES patients, the calcium test may be useful in selected patients, but the meal test is not helpful in the management of ZES. For secretin testing, the criterion with the highest sensitivity and specificity is an increase of > or =120 pg/mL, which should replace other criteria commonly used today.

Serum gastrin in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: I. Prospective study of fasting serum gastrin in 309 patients from the National Institutes of Health and comparison with 2229 cases from the literature

The assessment of fasting serum gastrin (FSG) is essential for the diagnosis and management of patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Although many studies have analyzed FSG levels in patients with gastrinoma, limited information has resulted from these studies because of their small size, different methodologies, and lack of correlations of FSG levels with clinical, laboratory, or tumor features in ZES patients. To address this issue, we report the results of a prospective National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 309 patients with ZES and compare our results with those of 2229 ZES patients in 513 small series and case reports in the literature. In the NIH and literature ZES patients, normal FSG values were uncommon (0.3%-3%), as were very high FSG levels >100-fold normal (4.9%-9%). Two-thirds of gastrinoma patients had FSG values <10-fold normal that overlap with gastrin levels seen in more common conditions, like Helicobacter pylori infection or antral G-cell hyperplasia/hyperfunction. In these patients, FSG levels are not diagnostic of ZES, and gastrin provocative tests are needed to establish the diagnosis. Most clinical variables (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 status, presence or absence of the most common symptoms, prior medical treatment) are not correlated with FSG levels, while a good correlation of FSG values was found with other clinical features (prior gastric surgery, diarrhea, duration from onset to diagnosis). Increasing basal acid output, but not maximal acid output correlated closely with increasing FSG. Numerous tumoral features correlated with the magnitude of FSG in our study, including tumor location (pancreatic > duodenal), primary size (larger > smaller) and extent (liver metastases > local disease). In conclusion, this detailed analysis of FSG in a large number of patients with ZES allowed us to identify important clinical guidelines that should contribute to improved diagnosis and management of patients with ZES.

Severe gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis

Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is the most common organ system involved in systemic sclerosis (SSc). GIT involvement is mainly attributed to GIT dismobility and wide mouth diverticular. GIT involvement in SSc can be also severely debilitating and even life threatening. To our knowledge, the presence of gastrointestinal bleeding due to the presence of multiple peptic ulcers in scleroderma patients is not well described. In this case report, we describe a scleroderma patient with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding due to multiple peptic ulcers, in which vagotomy, pyloroplasty, and cholocystectomy were performed and subcutaneous somatostatin was administered to discontinue the recurrent bleeding and stabilize her clinical condition.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective study of 107 cases and comparison with 1009 cases from the literature

In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), the most common functional pancreatic endocrine tumor (PET) syndrome is Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). ZES has been well studied in its sporadic form (that is, without MEN1); however, there are limited data on patients with MEN1 and ZES (MEN1/ZES), and the long-term natural history is largely unknown. To address this issue we report the results of a prospective long-term National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 107 MEN1/ZES patients and compare our results with those of 1009 MEN1/ZES patients in 278 case reports and small series in the literature. Patients were clinically, radiologically, and biochemically evaluated yearly for all MEN1 manifestations (mean follow-up, 10 yr; range, 0.1-31 yr). Compared with patients from the literature, the NIH MEN1/ZES patients more frequently had pituitary (60%) and adrenal (45%) disease and carcinoid tumors (30%), but had equal frequency of hyperparathyroidism (94%), thyroid disease (6%), or lipomas (5%). Twenty-five percent of both the NIH and the literature patients lacked a family history of MEN1; ZES was the initial clinical manifestation of MEN1 in 40%. ZES onset preceded the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism in 45%. However, ZES was rarely (8%) the only initial manifestation of MEN1 if careful testing was done. ZES occurred before age 40 years in 50%-60% of the current patients, in contrast to older studies. The diagnosis of ZES is delayed 3-5 years from its onset and is delayed as long as in sporadic ZES cases. Pituitary disease and carcinoid tumors (gastric > bronchial, thymic) are more frequent than generally reported, whereas a second functional PET is uncommon. In patients with MEN1/ZES without a family history of MEN1, the MEN1 manifestations are not as severe. This study shows that MEN1/ZES patients differ in many aspects from those commonly reported in older studies involving few MEN1/ZES patients. In this study we have identified a number of important clinical and laboratory features of MEN1/ZES that were not previously appreciated, which should contribute to earlier diagnosis and improve both short- and long-term management.

Gastric secretion in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Correlation with clinical expression, tumor extent and role in diagnosis--a prospective NIH study of 235 patients and a review of 984 cases in the literature

We prospectively studied 235 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) (205 without and 30 with prior acid-reducing surgery) and compared the results with 984 patients from 182 reports in the literature. The aims of the study were to evaluate the sensitivity of proposed acid secretory criteria for the diagnosis of ZES, propose new criteria, evaluate the variability and methodology of gastric secretory testing, and correlate the symptoms and signs of ZES, tumor extent, and primary tumor size and location with the degree of gastric acid hypersecretion. Multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1 (MEN1) occurred in 22% of patients. The mean basal acid output (BAO) in patients without and with prior acid-reducing surgery was 41.2 +/- 1.7 mEq/hr (range, 1.6-118.3 mEq/hr) and 27.6 +/- 3.5 mEq/hr (range 5.9-102.9 mEq/hr), respectively. In patients with MEN1, those with female gender, Hispanic, or Asian race had lower BAOs. Diarrhea, esophageal stricture, and pyloric scarring were associated with a higher BAO. Neither other symptoms nor the tumor extent, primary tumor location, or size correlated with the magnitude of acid hypersecretion. ZES diagnosis was delayed a mean of 5.5 +/- 0.4 yr. Patients who were misdiagnosed as having either Crohn or celiac disease had higher BAOs. The sensitivities from our study and the literature review of the proposed BAO criteria for the diagnosis of ZES in patients without previous gastric acid-reducing surgery were 91% and 90% for BAO > or = 15 mEq/hr, 86% and 82% for BAO > or = 18 mEq/hr, 69% and 67% for BAO > 25 mEq/hr, and < 60% for BAO > 31 mEq/hr, respectively. The specificities of all the proposed BAO criteria were high. Both the criterion of BAO > or = 15 mEq/hr and BAO > or = 18 mEq/hr had good specificities and equal sensitivity. With prior acid-reducing surgery, the sensitivities in our study and from the literature review were 100% and 81% for BAO > or = 5 mEq/hr, 73% and 45% for BAO > 14.4 mEq/hr, and 37% and 31% for BAO > 19.2 mEq/hr, respectively. The reported mean specificity for the criterion of BAO > or = 5 mEq/hr was 85%, while it was 100% for the other 2 criteria. The maximal acid output (MAO) criterion of > 70 mEq/hr had sensitivities in the present National Institutes of Health (NIH) study and the literature review of 39% and 31%, respectively, and the criterion of MAO > 100 mEq/hr had a sensitivity of < 15% in patients with no prior acid-reducing surgery. The proposed criterion of BAO/MAO ratio > 0.6 had a low sensitivity. The proposed criterion of the ratio of basal and maximal acid H+ concentration (BAC/MAC ratio) > or = 0.6 had an excellent sensitivity-- > or = 89% in patients with or without previous acid-reducing surgery. The reported specificity for both the BAO/MAO criterion and the BAC/MAC criterion were similar, but BAC/MAC had a better sensitivity. Combination criteria of BAO generally did not improve sensitivity. The criterion of pH < or = 1 was met by only 27% of patients, and pH < or = 0.96 by 21% of patients with previous acid-reducing surgery. For patients with MEN1 with no prior acid-reducing surgery, the sensitivities were lower compared with patients with the sporadic form of ZES. The mean gastric volume in patients without prior acid-reducing surgery was 314 +/- 10 mL/hr and 247 +/- 25 mL/hr in patients with prior acid-reducing surgery. A basal volume criteria of > 160 mL/hr in patients without prior acid-reducing surgery occurred in > 86% of patients, and > 140 mL/hr in 87% of patients with prior acid-reducing surgery; these, thus, are neglected findings that have good sensitivities. Our analysis shows criteria based on MAO, pH, and BAO/MAO ratio do not have high sensitivities and thus are not useful. In patients without prior acid-reducing surgery, the criteria of BAO > or = 15 mEq/hr, BAC/MAC ratio > or = 0.6, and basal gastric volume > 160 mL/hr are useful for the diagnosis of ZES and have good specificities. In patients with prior acid-reducing surgery, the criteria of BAO > or = 5 mEq/hr, BAC/MAC ratio > or = 0.6, and basal gastric volume > 140 mL/hr have high sensitivities. In patients with sporadic ZES without acid-reducing surgery, the criterion of BAO > or = 18 mEq/hr is recommended as it has a similar sensitivity but higher specificity than the criterion of BAO > or = 15 mEq/hr. Only 1 patient in either data set (NIH or the literature) with or without previous acid-reducing surgery had a basal gastric pH > 2, therefore this finding essentially excludes the diagnosis of ZES. Gastric secretory measurements for 30 minutes, but not 15 minutes, give results comparable to those for a full hour. On the basis of these results, a number of gastric secretory criteria are proposed, including some for the first time, and alterations in methodology are proposed that should prove useful in the diagnosis of ZES.

Diagnosis and treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

A diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome has been developed, based on the review of a large personal experience and the most recent literature. The mainstay of a modern ZES management is the eradication of tumoral processes whenever feasible. Diagnosis is centred upon gastric acid and gastrin secretion measurements both in basal conditions and on secretin stimulation. Recognition of other endocrine involvement and familial inheritance is of the utmost importance in distinguishing sporadic ZES patients from those who have the condition known as multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Blood calcium and phosphorus levels, parathyroid hormone concentration, combined if necessary with urinary cyclic AMP excretion measurement, should be performed routinely once ZES diagnosis is established or highly suspected. Localization of the tumour is the next essential step, and this has been considerably facilitated by the recent development in imaging techniques: it involves computerized axial tomography and selective abdominal angiography, a combination of which allows tumour detection in 60-70% of sporadic gastrinoma patients, with a maximal sensitivity for well-developed hepatic metastases. In sporadic ZES exploratory laparotomy is legitimate when preoperative localization of the tumour has failed; this laparotomy will allow further detection and then eradication of gastrinomas in a significant number of patients. Control of gastric acid secretion is mandatory throughout the work-up period; modern antisecretory agents are efficacious in most cases; total gastrectomy, when control of acid hypersecretion has failed, is now exceptional. Eradication of the tumour should be attempted in cases of sporadic ZES in the absence of recognizable liver involvement. The chance of a definite cure provided by surgery when performed by an experienced surgeon varies from 20% to 60% in pancreatic and ectopic gastrinomas respectively. In ZES patients with MEN I, exploratory laparotomy is seldom indicated (other than for symptomatic associated endocrine secretion), as the chance of a definite cure by surgery is very rare. Parathyroid surgery is often indicated and should take place before any form of abdominal surgery. In cases of hepatic metastases, chemotherapy with streptozocin and fluorouracil is indicated and soon, perhaps, chemo-embolization.