Weekly chlorhexidine douche: does it reduce healthcare-associated bloodstream infections?

Chlorhexidine Bathing to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Hematology Units: A Prospective, Controlled Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing decreases the incidence of bloodstream infections in intensive care units, but its effect has been understudied in patients with hematological malignancies in noncritical care units.

METHODS

Adults with hematological malignancies hospitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy in noncritical care units were offered daily 2% CHG bathing. We compared outcomes of patients who chose CHG bathing (CHG group) with outcomes of those who did not choose CHG bathing (usual-care group). The primary outcome was gram-positive cocci-related, skin flora-related, or central line-associated bloodstream infection. The negative control outcome was gut-origin bacteremia.

RESULTS

The CHG group (n = 485) had a crude incidence rate of the primary outcome that was 60% lower than the rate for the usual-care group (n = 408; 3.4 vs 8.4 per 1000 patient-days, P = .02) but had a similar crude incidence rate of the negative control outcome (4.5 vs 3.2 per 1000 patient-days; P = .10). In multivariable analyses, CHG bathing was associated with a 60% decrease in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; P < .001). In contrast, CHG bathing had no effect on the negative control outcome (adjusted HR, 1.1; P = .781). CHG bathing was well tolerated by participants in the CHG group.

CONCLUSIONS

CHG bathing could be a highly effective approach for preventing gram-positive cocci-related, skin flora-related, or central line-associated bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies who are hospitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy in noncritical care units.

Effect of chlorhexidine bathing on colonization or infection with Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) have increased prevalence in intensive care units (ICUs). A common strategy to prevent HAIs is bathing patients with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG). However, the effectiveness of CHG bathing against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of CHG bathing on Acinetobacter baumannii colonization and infection in the ICU setting. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL was performed from inception through to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pre-post studies, or interrupted time series (ITS) studies were included. The numbers of patients with/without colonization or infection of A. baumannii in the experimental or control groups were extracted from each study. Quality assessment was performed by the related instruments of National Institute of Health. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the random-effects model. One RCT and 12 pre-post or ITS studies comprising 18,217 patients were included, of which 8069 were in the CHG bathing arm and 9051 in the control arm. CHG bathing was associated with a reduced colonization of A. baumannii (RR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.77; P<0.001). Chlorhexidine at 4% showed a better effect than 2% chlorhexidine (meta-regression P=0.044). CHG bathing was associated with a non-significant reduction of infection (pooled RR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.13-1.25). This study suggests that CHG bathing significantly reduces colonization of A. baumannii in the ICU setting. However, more trials are needed to confirm whether CHG bathing can reduce infections with A. baumannii.

Review of Strategies to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) in Adult ICUs

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are costly and morbid. Despite evidence-based guidelines, Some intensive care units (ICUs) continue to have elevated infection rates. In October 2015, we performed a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature within the PubMed and Cochrane databases for interventions to reduce CLABSI and/or CAUTI in adult ICUs and synthesized findings using a narrative review process. The interventions were categorized using a conceptual model, with stages applicable to both CAUTI and CLABSI prevention: (stage 0) avoid catheter if possible, (stage 1) ensure aseptic placement, (stage 2) maintain awareness and proper care of catheters in place, and (stage 3) promptly remove unnecessary catheters. We also looked for effective components that the 5 most successful (by reduction in infection rates) studies of each infection shared. Interventions that addressed multiple stages within the conceptual model were common in these successful studies. Assuring compliance with infection prevention efforts via auditing and timely feedback were also common. Hospitalists with patient safety interests may find this review informative for formulating quality improvement interventions to reduce these infections.

Prevention of central venous line associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In adult Intensive Care Units, the complexity of patient treatment requirements make the use of central venous lines essential. Despite the potential benefits central venous lines can have for patients, there is a high risk of bloodstream infection associated with these catheters.

AIM

Identify and critique the best available evidence regarding interventions to prevent central venous line associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care unit patients other than anti-microbial catheters.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published from January 2007 to February 2016 was undertaken. A systematic search of seven databases was carried out: MEDLINE; CINAHL Plus; EMBASE; PubMed; Cochrane Library; Scopus and Google Scholar. Studies were critically appraised by three independent reviewers prior to inclusion.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. A range of interventions were found to be used for the prevention or reduction of central venous line associated bloodstream infections. These interventions included dressings, closed infusion systems, aseptic skin preparation, central venous line bundles, quality improvement initiatives, education, an extra staff in the Intensive Care Unit and the participation in the 'On the CUSP: Stop Blood Stream Infections' national programme.

CONCLUSIONS

Central venous line associated bloodstream infections can be reduced by a range of interventions including closed infusion systems, aseptic technique during insertion and management of the central venous line, early removal of central venous lines and appropriate site selection.