1
|
Worth LM, Macias-Konstantopoulos W, Moy L, Perl HI, Crandall C, Chavez R, Forcehimes A, Mandler R, Bogenschutz MP. Optimizing Recruitment and Retention in Substance Use Disorder Research in Emergency Departments. West J Emerg Med 2023; 24:228-235. [PMID: 36976606 PMCID: PMC10047737 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical trial recruitment and retention of individuals who use substances are challenging in any setting and can be particularly difficult in emergency department (ED) settings. This article discusses strategies for optimizing recruitment and retention in substance use research conducted in EDs. METHODS Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED) was a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) protocol designed to assess the impact of a brief intervention with individuals screening positive for moderate to severe problems related to use of non-alcohol, non-nicotine drugs. We implemented a multisite, randomized clinical trial at six academic EDs in the United States and leveraged a variety of methods to successfully recruit and retain study participants throughout the 12-month study course. Recruitment and retention success is attributed to appropriate site selection, leveraging technology, and gathering adequate contact information from participants at their initial study visit. RESULTS The SMART-ED recruited 1,285 adult ED patients and attained follow-up rates of 88%, 86%, and 81% at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods, respectively. Participant retention protocols and practices were key tools in this longitudinal study that required continuous monitoring, innovation, and adaptation to ensure strategies remained culturally sensitive and context appropriate through the duration of the study. CONCLUSION Tailored strategies that consider the demographic characteristics and region of recruitment and retention are necessary for ED-based longitudinal studies involving patients with substance use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Worth
- University of New Mexico, Department of Psychiatric Research, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Cameron Crandall
- University of New Mexico, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Roberta Chavez
- University of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Use Disorder and Addictions, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | - Raul Mandler
- National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Young AM, Lancaster KE, Bielavitz S, Elman MR, Cook RR, Leichtling G, Freeman E, Estadt AT, Brown M, Alexander R, Barrie C, Conn K, Elzaghal R, Maybrier L, McDowell R, Neal C, Lapidus J, Waddell EN, Korthuis PT. Peer-based Retention Of people who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R 2): a multisite, randomised, 12-month trial to compare efficacy of standard versus peer-based approaches to retain rural people who use drugs in research. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064400. [PMID: 35705346 PMCID: PMC9204453 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rural communities bear a disproportionate share of the opioid and methamphetamine use disorder epidemics. Yet, rural people who use drugs (PWUD) are rarely included in trials testing new drug use prevention and treatment strategies. Numerous barriers impede rural PWUD trial engagement and advancing research methods to better retain rural PWUD in clinical trials is needed. This paper describes the Peer-based Retention Of people who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R2) study protocol to test the effectiveness of a peer-driven intervention to improve study retention among rural PWUD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The PROUD-R2 study is being implemented in 21 rural counties in three states (Kentucky, Ohio and Oregon). People who are 18 years or older, reside in the study area and either used opioids or injected any drug to get high in the past 30 days are eligible for study inclusion. Participants are allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two arms, stratified by site to assure balance at each geographical location. The trial compares the effectiveness of two retention strategies. Participants randomised to the control arm provide detailed contact information and receive standard retention outreach by study staff (ie, contacts for locator information updates, appointment reminders). Participants randomised to the intervention arm are asked to recruit a 'study buddy' in addition to receiving standard retention outreach. Study buddies are invited to participate in a video training and instructed to remind their intervention participant of follow-up appointments and encourage retention. Assessments are completed by intervention, control and study buddy participants at 6 and 12 months after enrolment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol was approved by a central Institutional Review Board (University of Utah). Results of the study will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals, online and print media, and in meetings with community stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03885024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April M Young
- Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Kathryn E Lancaster
- Division of Epidemiology, Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Miriam R Elman
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ryan R Cook
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Edward Freeman
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | | | | - Rhonda Alexander
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Caiti Barrie
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kandi Conn
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rhody Elzaghal
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Lisa Maybrier
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Cathy Neal
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jodi Lapidus
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth N Waddell
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hetrick AT, Young AM, Elman MR, Bielavitz S, Alexander RL, Brown M, Waddell EN, Korthuis PT, Lancaster KE. A cross-sectional survey of potential factors, motivations, and barriers influencing research participation and retention among people who use drugs in the rural USA. Trials 2021; 22:948. [PMID: 34930410 PMCID: PMC8690874 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05919-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high morbidity and mortality among people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural America, most research is conducted within urban areas. Our objective was to describe influencing factors, motivations, and barriers to research participation and retention among rural PWUD. METHODS We recruited 255 eligible participants from community outreach and community-based, epidemiologic research cohorts from April to July 2019 to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Eligible participants reported opioid or injection drug use to get high within 30 days and resided in high-needs rural counties in Oregon, Kentucky, and Ohio. We aggregated response rankings to identify salient influences, motivations, and barriers. We estimated prevalence ratios to assess for gender, preferred drug use, and geographic differences using log-binomial models. RESULTS Most participants were male (55%) and preferred methamphetamine (36%) over heroin (35%). Participants reported confidentiality, amount of financial compensation, and time required as primary influential factors for research participation. Primary motivations for participation include financial compensation, free HIV/HCV testing, and contribution to research. Changed or false participant contact information and transportation are principal barriers to retention. Respondents who prefer methamphetamines over heroin reported being influenced by the purpose and use of their information (PR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26). Females and Oregonians (versus Appalachians) reported knowing and wanting to help the research team as participation motivation (PR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.26 and PR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.99). CONCLUSIONS Beyond financial compensation, researchers should emphasize confidentiality, offer testing and linkage with care, use several contact methods, aid transportation, and accommodate demographic differences to improve research participation and retention among rural PWUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela T Hetrick
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
| | - April M Young
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| | - Miriam R Elman
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, USA
| | - Sarann Bielavitz
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | | | - Morgan Brown
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Elizabeth Needham Waddell
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Kathryn E Lancaster
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greer TL, Walker R, Rethorst CD, Northrup TF, Warden D, Horigian VE, Silverstein M, Shores-Wilson K, Stotts AL, Trivedi MH. Identifying and responding to trial implementation challenges during multisite clinical trials. J Subst Abuse Treat 2020; 112S:63-72. [PMID: 32220413 PMCID: PMC9746284 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) was initiated by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) in 2000 with the aim of improving substance use treatment and reducing the time between the discovery of effective treatments and their implementation into clinical practice. While initial trials were conducted almost exclusively in specialty addiction treatment settings, the CTN began evolving strategically in 2010 to conduct research in general medical settings, including healthcare systems, primary care settings, emergency departments, and pharmacies, to broaden impact. The advantages of a research network like the CTN is not only the collective content expertise that investigators contribute to the network, but the collective experience gained by conducting studies in the network and then applying those lessons to future studies. OBJECTIVE To summarize trial implementation challenges encountered, and the process by which solutions were identified and implemented, within one of the last early-phase CTN Stage II behavioral intervention studies conducted in a specialty addiction treatment setting. METHOD AND RESULTS We describe the implementation of the CTN-0037 STimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise (STRIDE) trial. Issues encountered during study implementation are categorized into four major areas, described in terms useful to future study teams: 1) study team infrastructure challenges, 2) participant- and site- level challenges, 3) intervention-related challenges, and 4) longitudinal study design challenges. Potential consequences of identified problems and the solutions developed to manage these problems are discussed within the context of these four areas. We propose how to extend these implementation lessons and apply them in other healthcare settings to expand the CTN. CONCLUSIONS Effective study management allows for flexible, collaborative solutions to expected and unexpected obstacles to study success. Implementation strategies derived from the first 15 to 20 years of CTN studies are a result of working with providers and participants, and the ongoing collaboration among CTN investigators and network staff. Timely identification and response to problems during study implementation are critical to the success of a trial, regardless of its design. We believe a collaborative approach to identifying and responding to study implementation challenges will increase the likelihood of successful adoption of relevant, efficacious interventions. As the CTN continues to expand, the wealth of successful trial implementation strategies developed during the first 20 years of the CTN need to be applied and adapted to studies in broader network settings, and considered in conjunction with more formalized implementation science processes that are currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L. Greer
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| | - Robrina Walker
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| | - Chad D. Rethorst
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| | - Thomas F. Northrup
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Diane Warden
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| | - Viviana E. Horigian
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 33136, USA
| | | | - Kathy Shores-Wilson
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| | - Angela L. Stotts
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Madhukar H. Trivedi
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9119, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Woodford J, Wikman A, Einhorn K, Cernvall M, Grönqvist H, Romppala A, von Essen L. Attitudes and Preferences Toward a Hypothetical Trial of an Internet-Administered Psychological Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Web-Based Survey. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5:e10085. [PMID: 30563814 PMCID: PMC6318150 DOI: 10.2196/10085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials are often challenged with issues of recruitment and retention. Little is known concerning general attitudes and preferences toward trial design and willingness to participate among parents of children treated for cancer. Furthermore, willingness to participate in internet-administered psychological interventions remains unexplored. In this study, we examined attitudes and preferences of the population regarding study procedures for a hypothetical trial of an internet-administered psychological intervention. In addition, differences in the response rate between modes of study invitation and willingness to engage in internet-administered interventions were examined. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to examine attitudes and preferences toward participating in an internet-administrated psychological intervention. The secondary objective was to examine the response rates and help-seeking behavior among parents of children treated for cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional, Web-based survey was conducted with parents of children who had completed cancer treatment. This Web-based survey examined self-reported emotional distress, prior help-seeking and receipt of psychological support, past research participation, attitudes toward research, preferences concerning recruitment procedures, and attitudes toward different types of trial design. RESULTS Of all the parents invited, 32.0% (112/350) completed the survey, with no difference in response rate between modes of study invitation (χ21=0.6, P=.45). The majority (80/112, 71.4%) of parents responded that they had experienced past emotional distress. Responses indicated high (56/112, 50.0%) or somewhat high trust in research (51/112, 45.5%), and the majority of parents would accept, or maybe accept, internet-administered psychological support if offered (83/112, 74.1%). In addition, responses showed a preference for postal study invitation letters (86/112, 76.8%), sent by a researcher (84/112, 75.0%) with additional study information provided on the Web via text (81/112, 72.3%) and video (66/112, 58.9%). Overall, parents responded that trials utilizing a waiting list control, active alternative treatment control, or a patient-preference design were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS Parents of children treated for cancer appear willing to participate in trials examining internet-administered psychological support. Findings of this study will inform the design of a feasibility trial examining internet-administered psychological support for the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Woodford
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Wikman
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kim Einhorn
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Cernvall
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Grönqvist
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Amanda Romppala
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Louise von Essen
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Herbert LJ, Gillespie C, Monaghan M, Holmes C, Streisand R. Factors Associated with Recruitment and Retention in Randomized Controlled Trials of Behavioral Interventions for Patients with Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2015; 23:112-25. [DOI: 10.1007/s10880-015-9448-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Korte JE, Rosa CL, Wakim PG, Perl HI. Addiction treatment trials: how gender, race/ethnicity, and age relate to ongoing participation and retention in clinical trials. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2011; 2:205-18. [PMID: 24474858 PMCID: PMC3846502 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s23796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Historically, racial and ethnic minority populations have been underrepresented in clinical research, and the recruitment and retention of women and ethnic minorities in clinical trials has been a significant challenge for investigators. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) conducts clinical trials in real-life settings and regularly monitors a number of variables critical to clinical trial implementation, including the retention and demographics of participants. Purpose The examination of gender, race/ethnicity, and age group differences with respect to retention characteristics in CTN trials. Methods Reports for 24 completed trials that recruited over 11,000 participants were reviewed, and associations of gender, race/ethnicity, and age group characteristics were examined along with the rate of treatment exposure, the proportion of follow-up assessments obtained, and the availability of primary outcome measure(s). Results Analysis of the CTN data did not indicate statistical differences in retention across gender or race/ethnicity groups; however, retention rates increased for older participants. Conclusion These results are based on a large sample of patients with substance use disorders recruited from a treatment-seeking population. The findings demonstrate that younger participants are less likely than older adults to be retained in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey E Korte
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Carmen L Rosa
- Center for the Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul G Wakim
- Center for the Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Harold I Perl
- Center for the Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Potter JS, Donovan DM, Weiss RD, Gardin J, Lindblad R, Wakim P, Dodd D. Site selection in community-based clinical trials for substance use disorders: strategies for effective site selection. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2011; 37:400-7. [PMID: 21854283 PMCID: PMC3160724 DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.596975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of conducting substance use disorder treatment research in real-world settings is now well recognized. While this approach to clinical trials research offers a variety of benefits, challenges also arise. Selecting high-quality sites to participate is critical to recruitment, retention, and overall trial performance when conducting multi-site, community-based clinical trials of treatments for substance use disorders. OBJECTIVES Over the past 10 years, the National Institute on Drug Abuse-sponsored National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) has strived to conduct high-quality, well-managed clinical trials. This includes developing methods for site selection to be used by investigators conducting CTN trials. METHODS We review site selection strategies from two community-based multi-site clinical trials conducted under the auspices of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. RESULTS Issues relevant to site selection include the clinical trial design, availability of appropriate clinical population, and organizational attributes of potential clinical research sites. Site selection strategies include reviewing regional epidemiologic data, collecting standard site selection surveys, evaluating clinic data on existing patient populations, and site selection interviews and visits. CONCLUSION This article describes considerations for selecting research sites and identifies specific strategies to employ when selecting community-based sites for participation in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Sharpe Potter
- Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, 78232, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nunes EV. The design and analysis of multisite effectiveness trials: a decade of progress in the National Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2011; 37:269-72. [PMID: 21854267 PMCID: PMC3232468 DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.604109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Edward V Nunes
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|