An assessment of clinicians' and patients' experiences in the management of bladder pain syndrome

Cytokines in Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is poorly understood with both the aetiology and pathophysiology being unknown. Symptoms overlap with other disorders, such as overactive bladder (OAB) and chronic pelvic pain disorders such as endometriosis, making a consensus on how to diagnosis and manage patients challenging. The development of biomarkers for BPS may be the key to understanding more about its pathophysiology, as well as aiding diagnosis, subclassification, and discovering new drug targets for its management. As inflammation is widely understood to hold a central role in BPS, the evaluation of cytokines has gained interest. This article summarises the current literature and understanding of urinary, serum, and bladder tissue cytokines found elevated in patients with bladder pain syndrome.

METHODS

literature search using Pub Med with the keywords "bladder pain syndrome", "painful bladder syndrome", "bladder pain", "Interstitial cystitis" AND "cytokines" or "inflammation". This study was except from institutional approval.

RESULTS

Thirty-six cytokines have been identified as being statistically significantly elevated in either the serum, urine, or bladder tissue of patients with bladder pain syndrome in the 22 studies identified in this review of the literature. These cytokines include those from the interleukin group (n = 14), the CXC chemokine group (n = 5), and the C-C chemokine group (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

CXCL-1, CXCL-8, CXCL-9, CXCL-10, CXCL-11 from the CXC chemokine group, and CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, CCL7, and CCL11 from the C-C chemokine group have been found to be significantly elevated in patients with bladder pain in the literature. Many of these analytes also have supporting evidence for their roles in bladder pain from animal models and studies in other chronic inflammatory conditions. It is likely that a single cytokine will not serve as an adequate biomarker of disease in bladder pain syndrome for either diagnosis or disease severity. Instead, panels of inflammatory mediators may reveal more about the different pathways of inflammation leading to similar presentations of bladder pain in patients.

Optimising the management of bladder pain syndrome

Objective:

Clinicians have shown variable practice in the diagnosis and management of bladder pain syndrome (BPS). This study assessed pain localisation sites, common co-morbidities, investigations and treatment patterns in clinical practice.

Patients and methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 412 patients attending our pelvic pain clinic between 2004 and 2016. Frequency counts were used to summarise findings.

Results:

Pain in women ( N=388) was localised to the lower abdomen (92.0%), lower back (71.1%) and vagina (60.8%). Men ( N=24) typically presented with testicular pain with painful ejaculation (70.8%). Nearly all (95.4%) patients reported sexual dysfunction. Visceral neuropathic pain and autoimmune co-morbidities, such as irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches or migraines and skin lesions, were more prevalent in our cohort than in the general population. All patients had urine culture and sensitivities and flexible cystoscopy. Laparoscopy, urodynamic studies and bladder biopsies were mostly normal, but were essential in excluding other pathologies. Good pain control was achieved on amitriptyline (83.0%). Hydro-distension and benign bladder ulcer cauterisation provided temporary symptomatic relief.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that patient expectation management and education is essential in BPS, with most achieving good pain control with conservative measures and amitriptyline. Those receiving intravesical treatments will most likely require subsequent revisions.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this single-centre audit.

Variations in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (IC) definitions, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment: a systematic review and evaluation of national and international guidelines

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Interstitial cystitis (IC) and bladder pain syndrome (BPS) are challenging and encompassing hypersensitivity disorders of the lower urinary tract. A variety of national and international guidelines have been published including guidance on nomenclature, definitions, etiopathology, diagnostics and treatment. A lack of universally established clinical guidance is apparent. The aim of this review is to evaluate key guidelines on this area of practice, identify variations, compare their recommendations and grade them using AGREE II.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed using the PUBMED and CINAHL database from January 1, 1983, to December 1, 2018, referring to the search strategy of AUA. Ten national and international guidelines were included into the analysis. We assessed the guidelines with the updated AGREE II.

RESULTS

Symptoms congruent in all guidelines are: pain, pressure, discomfort and frequency, urgency and nocturia. Urinalysis is a prerequisite for diagnostics, cystoscopy for most and urodynamics not part of the routine assessment. Treatment options are recommended stepwise. The highest level of evidence and consensus was identified for oral therapies. Nine guidelines had an overall quality score ≥ 50% and three scored ≥ 70% (AUA, GG, RCOG).

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines are congruent in symptom reporting, quite congruent in diagnostics and vary to a high degree on treatment recommendations. The complexity of BPS and emerging evidence indicate the need for regular updating of the guidelines and a wider consensus.