Serological assessment of acyclovir treatment of herpes genitalis

Oral Manifestations in Monkeypox: A Scoping Review on Implications for Oral Health

BACKGROUND

The monkeypox outbreak in 2022 caused concern in the public. Infected patients usually present prodromal symptoms, such as lesions on their skin and mucous membranes, including the oral cavity. The current study aims to review the most common oral/perioral manifestations reported to date.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Research Gate, and Wiley Online Library databases, as well as in the Google search engine, using keywords related to the condition. Of the 56 publications identified, 30 were selected, including 27 case reports, two case series types, and one cross-sectional study published from 2003 to 2023 in endemic and non-endemic countries. Of the 54 patients in these studies, data on the oral symptoms and sites of monkeypox were interpreted from 47 patients.

RESULTS

Oral/perioral signs as one of the initial manifestations were reported in 23 out of 47 patients (48.93%). Out of the 47 patients with oral/perioral involvement, the most common signs/symptoms were sore throat, followed by ulcers, vesicles, dysphagia and odynophagia, and erythema.

CONCLUSION

The most common oral symptom of monkeypox is sore throat, followed by ulcers. The symptoms usually occur in the pharynx/oropharynx, followed by the tonsils and tongue. Adequate knowledge about the characteristics of this virus and their association with the oral cavity is necessary, and could help oral health professionals to distinguish between different infections.

Acyclovir treatment of skin lesions results in immune deviation in mice infected cutaneously with herpes simplex virus

Clinical observations indicate that the antibody response to herpes simplex virus (HSV) in patients undergoing acyclovir treatment is reduced and, although the exact mechanism is not clear, some authors interpret it as immunosuppression. In order to clarify the mechanism, we cutaneously infected mice with HSV-1 and treated the resulting skin lesions with acyclovir. The immune response to infection and treatment in these mice was then analysed. Acyclovir treatment was given orally (20 mg/kg, three times daily), starting on day 0 (D0), 2 (D2) or 4 (D4) after infection and continuing until day 10. The serum antibody titre and the severity of skin lesions were significantly higher in the shortest treatment group (D4) than in the longer treatment groups (D0 and D2). In contrast, a skin test analysing delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to HSV antigen showed that the D0 and D2 groups exhibited stronger DTH than the D4 group. Acyclovir treatment failed to cause a dissociation between DTH and antibody production in mice immunized with inactivated HSV antigen. However, acyclovir treatment in infected mice suppressed the development of skin lesions and resulted in a dissociation between DTH response and antibody production, indicating a typical immune deviation. This was supported by a change in the ratio of the isotype antibody IgG2a to IgG1. The treatment of skin lesions with acyclovir reduced the level of antibody response, as observed clinically. This indicates that the reduced antibody response in patients treated with acyclovir may be, at least in part, due to immune deviation and not immunosuppression.