1
|
Jenkin T, D'Cruz K, Botchway E, Muscara F, Anderson V, Scheinberg A, Knight S. Family involvement in rehabilitation programmes for children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A scoping literature review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2024:1-54. [PMID: 38518075 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2330141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Paediatric acquired brain injury (ABI) can adversely impact families, and it is widely accepted that families should be involved in the rehabilitation of children/adolescents with ABI. However, there is limited guidance about how to best involve families in paediatric ABI rehabilitation. Several programmes involving the families of children/adolescents with ABI have been developed, but there are no published reviews outlining their characteristics. This scoping literature review aimed to synthesize information about these programmes and develop an understanding of how families are involved in them. Four databases were systematically searched to identify sources of evidence that described programmes in paediatric ABI rehabilitation that involve family members. One hundred and eight sources of evidence describing 42 programmes were included. Programmes were categorized as: service coordination (n = 11), psychosocial (n = 17), support groups (n = 4), training/instruction (n = 9), and education (n = 1). Families' involvement in these programmes varied across programme development, delivery, and evaluation stages. The findings of this scoping literature review outline how families can be involved in paediatric ABI rehabilitation. While this review outlines many approaches to supporting families, it also highlights the need for models of family-centred care to better articulate how clinicians and services can involve families in paediatric ABI rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Jenkin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Edith Botchway
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Frank Muscara
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Psychology Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vicki Anderson
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adam Scheinberg
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Knight
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hurl K, Wightman J, Haynes SN, Virues-Ortega J. Does a pre-intervention functional assessment increase intervention effectiveness? A meta-analysis of within-subject interrupted time-series studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2016; 47:71-84. [PMID: 27372279 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This study examined the relative effectiveness of interventions based on a pre-intervention functional behavioral assessment (FBA), compared to interventions not based on a pre-intervention FBA. We examined 19 studies that included a direct comparison between the effects of FBA- and non-FBA-based interventions with the same participants. A random effects meta-analysis of effect sizes indicated that FBA-based interventions were associated with large reductions in problem behaviors when using non-FBA-based interventions as a reference intervention (Effect size=0.85, 95% CI [0.42, 1.27], p<0.001). In addition, non-FBA based interventions had no effect on problem behavior when compared to no intervention (0.06, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.33], p=0.664). Interestingly, both FBA-based and non-FBA-based interventions had significant effects on appropriate behavior relative to no intervention, albeit the overall effect size was much larger for FBA-based interventions (FBA-based: 1.27, 95% CI [0.89, 1.66], p<0.001 vs. non-FBA-based: 0.35, 95% CI [0.14, 0.56], p=0.001). In spite of the evidence in favor of FBA-based interventions, the limited number of comparative studies with high methodological standards underlines the need for further comparisons of FBA-based versus non-FBA-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee Hurl
- Department of Psychology, 190 Dysart Rd, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
| | - Jade Wightman
- Department of Psychology, 190 Dysart Rd, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
| | - Stephen N Haynes
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 2530 Dole St, Sakamaki Honolulu, HI 96822, United States
| | - Javier Virues-Ortega
- School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, 261 Morrin Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1072, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicholas L, Feeney J. What are “Complex Case Discussions” and how do they impact on key-workers? EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY IN PRACTICE 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2015.1082459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
4
|
Walker VL, Snell ME. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: a meta-analysis. Augment Altern Commun 2014; 29:117-31. [PMID: 23705814 DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2013.785020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The purposes of this review were to (a) use meta-analytic procedures to examine the effectiveness of single-case AAC intervention research on challenging behaviors exhibited by individuals with disabilities, (b) identify study characteristics that moderate intervention effects, and (c) evaluate the quality of research. The authors provided inferential and descriptive analyses of 54 studies representing 111 participants and estimated effect sizes using the Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP) method. Overall, AAC interventions were found to be equally effective across a broad spectrum of participants and interventions. AAC interventions were more effective with younger children than with adults. Interventions in which functional behavior assessments (FBA) were used had significantly larger effect sizes than those that did not use FBAs. Further, functional communication training interventions resulted in larger effect sizes than Picture Exchange Communication System interventions. Descriptive analysis revealed that (a) interventions often occurred in atypical environments (e.g., therapy room, experimental room) and with atypical interventionists (e.g., therapists, researchers), and (b) numerous studies did not exhibit quality characteristics of single-case research.
Collapse
|