Revascularization of traumatic renal artery dissection by endoluminal stenting: three cases

Bilateral traumatic renal artery dissection managed by endovascular therapy

We present the case of post-traumatic bilateral renal artery injury with renal perfusion disorder, successfully treated by endovascular treatment. This therapeutic approach avoided the need for long-term dialysis by maintaining a sufficient renal function. This case is an illustration of the feasibility and the efficiency of endovascular treatment in severe post-traumatic renal artery lesions.

Traumatic renal artery dissection: from imaging to management

Injury to the renal artery following blunt trauma is detected increasingly due to widespread and early use of multidetector computed tomography (CT), but optimal treatment remains controversial as no guidelines are available. This review illustrates the spectrum of imaging findings of traumatic renal artery dissection based on our experience, with the aim of understanding the physiopathology of ischaemic damage to the kidney, and the process of choosing the best therapeutic strategy (conservative, endovascular, surgical). Five main patterns of traumatic renal artery dissection are described: avulsion of renal hilum; dissection of the segmental renal branches; preocclusive main renal artery dissection; renal artery stenosis without flow limitation; thrombogenic renal artery intimal tear. In the polytrauma patient, management depends on various factors (haemodynamic status, associated lesions, time of diagnosis) rather than on the degree of renal artery stenosis. Non-operative management (NOM) is the preferred option in case of non-flow-limiting dissection of the renal artery and angio-embolisation is an important adjunct to NOM in cases of active bleeding. Embolisation of the renal artery stump may be the best option in cases of occlusive dissection, as catheter manipulation carries a high risk of vessel rupture. The therapeutic window for kidney revascularisation in cases of flow-limiting dissection of main renal artery may be variable. Endovascular stenting >4 h after trauma should be performed only if residual flow with preserved parenchymal perfusion is detected at angiography. Antiplatelet therapy administration is recommended in cases of stenting, but conditioned by the bleeding risk of the patient.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Stenting for Blunt Renal Artery Injuries with Stenosis: A Report of Five Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Renal artery stenting is performed for renal artery injuries to preserve renal function and prevent renovascular hypertension. However, its indications are controversial and its long-term prognosis remains unknown. Here, we evaluate the characteristics and long-term outcomes of renal artery stenting for blunt renal artery injuries at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with blunt renal artery injuries who had been treated with stenting over a 12-year period at our institution. Five patients (three men and two women) were included.

RESULTS

Trauma resulted from falls in three patients and motor vehicle accidents in two. All patients had experienced multiple injuries (median injury severity score, 24 [range, 16-48]; median revised trauma score, 5.9672 [4.0936-7.8408]; and median probability of survival, 0.689 [0.533-0.980]). All renal artery injuries involved stenosis because of traumatic arterial dissection or intimal tear; no cases of total occlusion were observed. No complications due to the intervention itself were observed. Although two patients developed reversible acute renal failure, none required long-term hemodialysis. One patient with renovascular hypertension was treated with antihypertensive agents for a month and subsequently became normotensive without further medication. All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography, which revealed no stent occlusion or renal atrophy. Renal scintigraphy for three patients demonstrated preserved differential renal function. All five patients survived.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal artery stenting for hemodynamically stable blunt renal artery injuries with stenosis is suggested to be safe and helps in avoiding long-term hemodialysis and renovascular hypertension.

Clinical Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Patients with Symptomatic Isolated Spontaneous Renal Artery Dissection and Comparison with Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to report the clinical outcomes of conservative medical treatment in patients with symptomatic isolated spontaneous renal artery dissection (SRAD) and compare them with those of spontaneous superior mesenteric artery dissection (SSMAD).

METHODS

This was a single centre, observational comparative study between SRAD and SSMAD. Data from a prospective visceral artery dissection registry were analysed retrospectively. Between June 2010 and December 2016, 23 consecutive patients with symptomatic isolated SRAD who initially received conservative medical treatment were included. The primary outcomes were the aggravation of dissection requiring intervention and dissection related mortality. To evaluate the prognosis of symptomatic isolated SRAD, the clinical outcomes of isolated SRAD were compared with those of symptomatic isolated SSMAD (n = 40) during the same study period.

RESULTS

The primary outcome incidence was 39% (9/23) in patients with symptomatic isolated SRAD during the median follow up period of 20 months (range 0-63 months). The dissection related mortality rate was 17% (4/23), and the cause of death in all cases was an abrupt rupture of the dissecting aneurysm with significant true lumen stenosis. None of the patients without aneurysm or with true lumen occlusion had dissection related mortality. During the same study period, compared with the patients with symptomatic isolated SSMAD who initially received conservative medical treatment, the primary outcome incidence (39% vs. 10%, p = .009) and dissection related mortality rate (17% vs. 0%, p = .016) were statistically significantly higher in patients with symptomatic isolated SRAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present analysis involved only a small number of patients, it revealed that symptomatic isolated SRAD with dissection related aneurysm and true lumen stenosis is a potentially life threatening condition and that aggressive surgical or endovascular interventions should be considered in these patients, who are refractory to conservative medical treatment.

Percutaneous renal artery revascularization after prolonged ischemia secondary to blunt trauma: pooled cohort analysis

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify factors related to technical and clinical success of percutaneous revascularization for blunt renal arterial trauma.

METHODS

All cases of percutaneous revascularization for blunt renal arterial trauma were searched in the available literature. We included a case of iatrogenic renal artery occlusion at our institution treated by percutaneous stenting 20 hours after injury. A pooled cohort analysis of percutaneous revascularization for blunt renal artery injury was then performed to analyze factors related to technical and clinical success. Clinical failure was defined as development of new hypertension, serum creatinine rise, or significant asymmetry in split renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 53 cases have been reported, and 54 cases were analyzed including our case. Median follow-up was 6 months. Technical success was 88.9% and clinical success was 75%. Of 12 treatment failures (25%), 66.7% occurred during the first postprocedure month. Time from injury to revascularization was not a predictor of clinical success (OR=1.00, P = 0.681). Renal artery occlusion was significantly associated with clinical failure (OR=7.50, P = 0.017) and postintervention antiplatelet therapy was significantly associated with treatment success (OR=0.16, P = 0.043). At 37-month follow-up, the stented renal artery in our case remained patent and the patient was normotensive with preserved glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous revascularization for blunt renal arterial injury resulted in relatively high technical and clinical success. Time-to-revascularization was independent of successful outcomes. Clinical success was significantly associated with a patent renal artery at the time of intervention and with postprocedure antiplatelet therapy.

Contemporary Strategies in the Management of Civilian Abdominal Vascular Trauma

The evaluation and management of patients with abdominal vascular trauma or injury requires immediate and effective decision-making in these unfavorable circumstances. The majority of these patients arrive at trauma centers in profound shock, secondary to massive blood loss, which is often unrelenting. Moreover, ischemia, compartment syndrome, thrombosis, and embolization may also be life threatening and require immediate intervention. To minimize the risk of these potentially lethal complications, early understanding of the disease process and emergent therapeutic intervention are necessary. In the literature, the management of acute traumatic vascular injuries is restricted to traditional open surgical techniques. However, in penetrating injuries surgeons often face a potentially contaminated field, which renders the placement of prosthetic grafts inappropriate. Currently, however, there are sparse data on the management of vascular trauma with endovascular techniques. The role of endovascular technique in penetrating abdominal vascular trauma, which is almost always associated with severe active bleeding, is limited. It is worth mentioning that hybrid operating rooms with angiographic radiology capabilities offer more opportunities for the management of this kind of injuries by either temporary control of the devastating bleeding using endovascular balloon tamponade or with embolization and stenting. On the other hand, blunt abdominal injuries are less dangerous and they could be treated at most times by endovascular means. Since surgeons continue to encounter abdominal vascular trauma, open and endovascular techniques will evolve constantly giving us encouraging messages for the near future.

Evaluation of characteristics, associations and clinical course of isolated spontaneous renal artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous renal artery dissection (SRAD) is a rare entity of unknown etiology. We aimed to study the clinical course and outcomes and compare the characteristics of patients with SRAD with those of the general population.

METHODS

All cases of isolated renal artery dissection diagnosed at the University of Michigan Hospitals between January 2000 and July 2012 were identified by the ICD-9 code. Cases were matched by age, gender and race with individuals from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Characteristics and awareness of comorbid conditions were compared. Information about the clinical course after diagnosis was retrieved from the case group to ascertain their outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 patients with SRAD with a mean age of 38.6 years (SD = 8.3) were identified. Eleven patients were male and 14 were white. The most common presenting symptom was excruciating sudden-onset flank pain ipsilateral to the site of dissection. Fibromuscular dysplasia, Ehlers-Danlos and polyarteritis nodosa were present in 4, 4 and 1 patients, respectively. After adjusting in a multivariable model, the case group was more likely to report history of hypertension, cancer and connective tissue disorders (P < 0.001), and less likely to have obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) compared with the general population. Supportive medical treatment, endovascular intervention and surgery were required in 8, 5 and 4 cases, respectively. After discharge from the hospital, hypertension was adequately controlled in all the patients but one.

CONCLUSION

SRAD may be part of a syndrome having multi-organ involvement. With appropriate medical or surgical management, long-term clinical outcome appears favorable.

Percutaneous repair of a disrupted left renal artery after rapid stabilization

Fortunately, acute renal artery injuries occur infrequently in blunt trauma patients. Renal salvage in the multi-trauma patient is a daunting task. If after judicious consideration, intervention is warranted, then expeditious repair should follow. Rapid control of exanguinating injuries should be accomplished and the patient stabilized for further intervention - surgical or endovascular. We present the case of a patent who presented with left pneumothorax, multiple bilateral rib, scapula, long bone fractures, hypotension, hemoperitoneum, non perfusion of the left kidney, and a shattered spleen. She underwent emergent splenectomy and stabilization of her pressure. The left renal artery was evaluated and repaired with a covered stent. This approach might be beneficial in highly selected patients with favorable physiologic and anatomical presentations.

[Vascular ischemic lesions of the kidney in multiple trauma patients: incidence and management, a report of 7 cases]

AIMS

Study the incidence, type and outcome of traumatic ischemic arterial lesions of the kidney in multiple trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 500 multiple trauma patients who underwent whole body 64 slice CT Scan (mean age 34 years old, sex ratio 4M/1W, mean ISS 29).

RESULTS

There were seven cases of vascular lesions of the left kidney 1.4% of patients (men, median age 25 years old, mean ISS43.9). These were closed traumas with sudden deceleration and dissection of the renal artery trunk in three cases and injury to its branches in four cases with preserved excretion. Three patients died of associated injuries, including one patient who received a stent on D0. One patient underwent a nephrectomy and the three other patients were not treated which did not affect renal function or pressure (follow-up 19 months).

CONCLUSION

We found a high incidence of traumatic renal dissection in multiple trauma patients. Multidetector scan appears to provide the best results for the diagnosis of these lesions as well as the many associated lesions resulting in a very poor prognosis for these patients. Treatment is not well defined and management of these lesions is often of secondary importance because of the severity of associated injuries.

Angiography and embolisation for solid abdominal organ injury in adults - a current perspective

Over the past twenty years there has been a shift towards non-operative management (NOM) for haemodynamically stable patients with abdominal trauma. Embolisation can achieve haemostasis and salvage organs without the morbidity of surgery, and the development and refinement of embolisation techniques has widened the indications for NOM in the management of solid organ injury. Advances in computed tomography (CT) technology allow faster scanning times with improved image quality. These improvements mean that whilst surgery is still usually recommended for patients with penetrating injuries, multiple bleeding sites or haemodynamic instability, the indications for NOM are expanding.

We present a current perspective on angiography and embolisation in adults with blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma with illustrative examples from our practice including technical advice.