MR imaging of pituitary macroadenomas before and after transsphenoidal surgery

Imaging of pituitary pathology

Modern imaging techniques play a vital role in the diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment monitoring of patients with pituitary disease. For its high soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides detailed information about the localization and extent of a lesion. It is thus, to date, the most important imaging technique for documenting or ruling out structural lesions. It is usually the first and only imaging procedure to be employed in pituitary pathology. While large pituitary adenomas are reliably depicted in standard T1-weighted sequences, small microadenomas, such as in Cushing's disease, may only become visible if repeat studies, sophisticated techniques and high-field scanners are employed. For monitoring treatment effects after surgical procedures, drug applications, or irradiation, follow-up studies with identical parameters should be employed, preferably at the same investigation site. Some space is devoted to intraoperative imaging, which not only allows assessment of how radical tumor resection needs to be during pituitary tumor surgery, but also provides extremely accurate structural data for neuronavigation. Less frequent lesions, such as craniopharyngiomas, meningiomas, germ cell tumors, gliomas, skull base tumors, hypothalamic hamartomas, vascular malformations, inflammatory and developmental lesions and other, even less frequent pathologies should be considered in the differential diagnosis. The particular strength of computed tomography (CT) is the direct depiction of calcification, a weakness of MRI, and the high resolution of bone structures at the skull base. This chapter presents the characteristics of both frequent and less commonly encountered tumoral lesions, with an emphasis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Intra-operative MR guidance during trans-sphenoidal pituitary resection: preliminary results

The use of intra-operative MR image guidance has the potential to improve the precision, extent, and safety of trans-sphenoidal pituitary resections. The trans-sphenoidal approach to pituitary surgery has been performed for some time (1--3). Until now these surgeries have relied on direct visualization without the aid of image guidance. An open-bore configuration 0.5T SIGNA SP MR system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) has been used to provide image guidance for seventeen trans-sphenoidal pituitary adenoma resections (4). The intra-operative MRI system allowed the radiologist to successfully direct the surgeon toward the sella turcica while avoiding the cavernous sinus, optic chiasm and other critical structures. Imaging performed during the surgery monitored the extent of resection and allowed for removal of tumor beyond the surgeon's view in seven cases. Dynamic MR imaging was used to distinguish residual tumor from normal gland and postoperative changes, permitting more precise tumor localization. A heme-sensitive long TE gradient echo sequence was used to find the presence of hemorrhagic debris. All patients tolerated the procedure well without significant complications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:136-141.

Preliminary comparison of the endoscopic transnasal vs the sublabial transseptal approach for clinically nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the advantages and disadvantages of an endoscopic transnasal approach to pituitary surgery for a select group of clinically nonfunctioning macroadenomas and to compare results of this approach with the sublabial transseptal approach at a single institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 patients with clinically nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas approached endoscopically and 44 matched control patients with the same tumors approached sublabially between January 1, 1995, and October 31, 1997.

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups were not significantly different for age, sex distribution, number of comorbid conditions, visual field defects, degree of anterior pituitary insufficiency, or preoperative assessment of tumor volume or invasiveness. Mean (SD) operative times were significantly reduced in the endoscopic group vs the sublabial group: 2.7 (0.7) hours vs 3.4 (0.9) hours (P < .001). Postoperative assessment of surgical resection and postoperative alterations of anterior pituitary function or visual fields were not significantly different between groups, and complication rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This endoscopic transnasal approach to pituitary resection results in significantly shorter operative time without compromising the extent of tumor resection. The distinct disadvantage of this approach is an off-center view of the sella and a diminished working channel to the sella turcica. For these reasons, the endoscopic approach or its variation is an alternative to the sublabial approach but should be considered only by experienced pituitary neurosurgeons.

The use of intravenous contrast in postoperative MR imaging of pituitary macroadenomas

In this study we reviewed 23 postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations of patients with pituitary macroadenomas to determine if intravenous contrast is of value in this setting. The addition of contrast enhanced images to noncontrast T1-weighted images changed the radiologist's assessment in 4/5 early postoperative examinations and in 0/18 late postoperative examinations. Intravenous contrast is of value in distinguishing residual tumor from packing material on early postoperative MR examinations but is less useful in later postoperative examinations.