Treatment of primary or metastatic pleural effusion with intracavitary cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin. A phase II study

A case of successful intrapleural chemotherapy with Cisplatin plus cytarabine for intractable malignant pleural effusion

When conventional treatments of malignant pleural effusion, such as repeated thoracentesis, closed thoracotomy and pleurodesis by instilled sclerosing agents, are ineffective, there are few alternative therapies available. Our case involves a 47-year-old woman with uterine cervical carcinoma suffering from malignant pleural effusion. She presented with a chief complaint of severe dyspnea, and was classified as an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 4. Her underlying cervical carcinoma progressed despite various systemic chemotherapy regimens. In addition, pleural effusion persisted in spite of 4 weeks of drainage through the thoracotomy tube and talc pleurodesis. Under such circumstances, we attempted intrapleural chemotherapy with cisplatin plus cytarabine, which resulted in significant decrease of the pleural effusion. No serious systemic toxicities, including myelosuppression, were observed. As a result, the patient's dyspnea was relieved, and her ECOG performance status improved from 4 to 2. However, the thoracotomy tube was not removed due to subsequent iatrogenic pneumothorax. Pleural effusion did not recur for the 4 weeks leading up to her death.

Randomized phase II trial of three intrapleural therapy regimens for the management of malignant pleural effusion in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9515

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of three intrapleural therapy regimens consisting of bleomycin (BLM), OK-432 (a pulverized product of heat-killed Streptococcus pyogenes) or cisplatin plus etoposide (PE) for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to the BLM arm: BLM 1mg/kg (maximum 60mg/body), the OK-432 arm: OK-432 0.2 Klinische Einheit units (KE)/kg (maximum 10KE/body), or the PE arm: cisplatin (80mg/m(2)) and etoposide (80mg/m(2)). Pleural response was evaluated every 4 weeks according to the study-specific criteria. All responders received systemic chemotherapy consisting of PE every 3-4 weeks for two or more courses. Pleural progression-free survival (PPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of pleural progression or death due to any cause. The primary endpoint was the 4-week PPFS rate. Of 105 patients enrolled, 102 were assessed for response. The 4-week PPFS rate for the BLM arm was 68.6%, 75.8% for the OK-432 arm, and 70.6% for PE arm. Median survival time (MST) for the BLM arm was 32.1 weeks, 48.1 weeks for the OK-432 arm, and 45.7 weeks for the PE arm. However, the outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Toxicity was tolerable in all arms except for one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia induced by BLM. We will select intrapleural treatment using OK-432 in the management of MPE in NSCLC for further investigation because it had the highest 4-week PPFS rate.

Intrapleural chemotherapy with cisplatin and cytarabine in the management of malignant pleural effusion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrapleural chemotherapy (IPC) with cisplatin and cytarabine in the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was carried out on 40 patients with pathologically proven MPE from NSCLC who had received IPC. A single dose of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) plus cytarabine 1200 mg/m(2) in 250 ml normal saline was instilled into the pleural space via a chest tube and drained 4 hours later. Patients were evaluated for toxicities and responses at 1, 2, & 3 weeks and then at monthly intervals if possible. Systemic chemotherapy was administered, if the patient agreed to receive it, after achieving complete control (CC) of MPE.

RESULTS

The median duration of chest tube insertion for drainage was 7 (3 approximately 32) days. Among the assessable 37 patients, CC and partial control (PC) were 32 (86.5%) and 4 (10.8%) patients, respectively (overall response rate 97.3%). The median duration of response was 12 months (2 approximately 23) and there were only two relapses of IPC after achieving CC. Among the 35 patients who were assessable until they died, 28 patients (80.0%) maintained CC until the last follow-up. There was only one toxic death and the toxicities of IPC, versus the results obtained, were deemed acceptable.

CONCLUSION

The procedures were tolerable to the patients and chemotherapy-induced complications were at an acceptable level. The outcome of this trial indicates that IPC has a superior and long lasting treatment response in the management of patients with MPE from NSCLC.

Intracavitary therapies for mesothelioma

The diagnosis of mesothelioma needs to be defined histologically. The staging system has been recently redefined anatomically, but may not be applicable to extrapleural mesothelioma. Further clinicopathologic studies need to be performed to molecularly classify the disease further, according to prognosis. Intracavitary therapy has a definite role in the treatment of mesothelioma. Randomized studies of intracavitary therapies are needed to define the best treatment option. The role of complementary therapeutic modalities such as surgery and radiotherapy needs to be defined by randomized studies. There is an urgent need to better understand the biology of mesothelioma, which may lead to more focus on molecularly relevant therapies.