Interaction between ionizing radiation, estrogens and antiestrogens in the modification of tumor microenvironment in estrogen dependent multicellular spheroids

Sex steroid hormones and DNA repair regulation: Implications on cancer treatment responses

The role of sex steroid hormones (SSHs) has been shown to modulate cancer cytotoxic treatment sensitivity. Dysregulation of DNA repair associated with genomic instability, abnormal cell survival and not only promotes cancer progression but also resistance to cancer treatment. The three major SSHs, androgen, estrogen, and progesterone, have been shown to interact with several essential DNA repair components. The presence of androgens directly regulates key molecules in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Estrogen can promote cell proliferation and DNA repair, allowing cancer cells to tolerate chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Information on the role of progesterone in DNA repair is limited: progesterone interaction with some DNA repair components has been identified, but the biological significance is still unknown. Here, we review the roles of how each SSH affects DNA repair regulation and modulates response to genotoxic therapies and discuss future research that can be beneficial when combining SSHs with cancer therapy. We also provide preliminary analysis from publicly available databases defining the link between progesterone/PR and DDRs & DNA repair regulation that plausibly contribute to chemotherapy response and breast cancer patient survival.

Androgen and oestrogen receptor co-expression determines the efficacy of hormone receptor-mediated radiosensitisation in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) and hormone receptor (HR) inhibition are used for the treatment of HR-positive breast cancers; however, little is known about the interaction of the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) in response to RT in AR-positive, ER-positive (AR+/ER+) breast cancers. Here we assessed radiosensitisation of AR+/ER+ cell lines using pharmacologic or genetic inhibition/degradation of AR and/or ER.

METHODS

Radiosensitisation was assessed with AR antagonists (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, seviteronel, ARD-61), ER antagonists (tamoxifen, fulvestrant) or using knockout of AR.

RESULTS

Treatment with AR antagonists or ER antagonists in combination with RT did not result in radiosensitisation changes (radiation enhancement ratios [rER]: 0.76-1.21). Fulvestrant treatment provided significant radiosensitisation of CAMA-1 and BT-474 cells (rER: 1.06-2.0) but not ZR-75-1 cells (rER: 0.9-1.11). Combining tamoxifen with enzalutamide did not alter radiosensitivity using a 1 h or 1-week pretreatment (rER: 0.95-1.14). Radiosensitivity was unchanged in AR knockout compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 1.07 ± 0.11), and no additional radiosensitisation was achieved with tamoxifen or fulvestrant compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 0.84-1.19).

CONCLUSION

While radiosensitising in AR + TNBC, AR inhibition does not modulate radiation sensitivity in AR+/ER+ breast cancer. The efficacy of ER antagonists in combination with RT may also be dependent on AR expression.

Estrogen receptor inhibition mediates radiosensitization of ER-positive breast cancer models

Endocrine therapy (ET) is an effective first-line therapy for women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER + ) breast cancers. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and ET are used for the treatment of women with ER+ breast cancer, the most effective sequencing of therapy and the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear. Here we sought to understand the effects of inhibiting estrogen receptor (ER) signaling in combination with RT in multiple preclinical ER+ breast cancer models. Clonogenic survival assays were performed using variable pre- and post-treatment conditions to assess radiosensitization with estradiol, estrogen deprivation, tamoxifen, fulvestrant, or AZD9496 in ER+ breast cancer cell lines. Estrogen stimulation was radioprotective (radiation enhancement ratios [rER]: 0.51–0.82). Conversely, when given one hour prior to RT, ER inhibition or estrogen depletion radiosensitized ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells (tamoxifen rER: 1.50–1.60, fulvestrant rER: 1.76–2.81, AZD9496 rER: 1.33–1.48, estrogen depletion rER: 1.47–1.51). Combination treatment resulted in an increase in double-strand DNA (dsDNA) breaks as a result of inhibition of non-homologous end joining-mediated dsDNA break repair with no effect on homologous recombination. Treatment with tamoxifen or fulvestrant in combination with RT also increased the number of senescent cells but did not affect apoptosis or cell cycle distribution. Using an MCF-7 xenograft model, concurrent treatment with tamoxifen and RT was synergistic and resulted in a significant decrease in tumor volume and a delay in time to tumor doubling without significant toxicity. These findings provide preclinical evidence that concurrent treatment with ET and RT may be an effective radiosensitization strategy.

Enhanced radiotherapy efficacy of breast cancer multi cellular tumor spheroids through in-situ fabricated chitosan-zinc oxide bio-nanocomposites as radio-sensitizing agents

Overwhelming evidence has shown that three-dimensional multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs) as a mimic of in-vivo tumor can accurately exhibit cellular responses to treatments. So, we compared the capability of pure zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) and chitosan-ZnO bio-nanocomposites (CS-ZnO BNCs) for enhancing the radiosensitization of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (BCCs) in the 3D-MCTSs model. ZnO-NPs and CS-ZnO BNCs were synthesized by a facile co-precipitation method. FE-SEM images revealed that the uniform spherical ZnO-NPs with an average diameter of 35 nm were successfully dispersed on chitosan. MDA-MB-231 MCTSs which were formed in a non-adherent culture plate, possessed functional features of in-vivo tumor. The priority of such culture method to conventionally used 2D monolayer (or parental) cell culture is the mimicking of tumor microenvironment. The toxicity of CS-ZnO BNCs and ZnO-NPs against the MDA-M-231 BCCs was evaluated using MTT-colorimetric assay, which demonstrated superior biocompatibility of CS-ZnO BNCs compared to pure ZnO-NPs (even at high concentration of 100 μg/mL). Survival fraction analysis of cells under clinical X-ray irradiation (6 MV) showed that MCTSs had a higher radioresistance compared to parental cells. Besides, the clonogenic potential of irradiated MCTSs was significantly decreased by the addition of CS-ZnO BNCs similar to that of monolayer cells. The sensitivity enhancement ratios (SER) for MCTSs and monolayer cells were calculated 1.5 and 1.63, respectively. Further, tracking of radiobiological properties and apoptosis induction of MCTSs showed that CS-ZnO BNCs not only could lead to the creation of higher radiation-induced complex DNA break and apoptosis death in MCTSs, but also weakened DNA repair mechanisms. It was found that non-toxic concentration of CS-ZnO BNCs has promising potential to enhance radiosensitivity of resistant-MCTSs as a superior in-vitro tumor model. So, CS-ZnO BNCs can be a prominent candidate for overcoming the resistance of BCCs to radiotherapy.

Advanced co-culture 3D breast cancer model for investigation of fibrosis induced by external stimuli: optimization study

Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) is the main late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients. Most of the current 3D in vitro breast cancer models are composed by cancer cells only and are unable to reproduce the complex cellular homeostasis within the tumor microenvironment to study RIF mechanisms. In order to account complex cellular interactions within the tumor microenvironment, an advanced 3D spheroid model, consisting of the luminal breast cancer MCF-7 cells and MRC-5 fibroblasts, was developed. The spheroids were generated using the liquid overlay technique in culture media into 96-well plates previously coated with 1% agarose (m/v, in water). In total, 21 experimental setups were tested during the optimization of the model. The generated spheroids were characterized using fluorescence imaging, immunohistology and immunohistochemistry. The expression of ECM components was confirmed in co-culture spheroids. Using α-SMA staining, we confirmed the differentiation of healthy fibroblasts into myofibroblasts upon the co-culturing with cancer cells. The induction of fibrosis was studied in spheroids treated 24 h with 10 ng/mL TGF-β and/or 2 Gy irradiation. Overall, the developed advanced 3D stroma-rich in vitro model of breast cancer provides a possibility to study fibrosis mechanisms taking into account 3D arrangement of the complex tumor microenvironment.

Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Radiotherapy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Studies

Numerous studies have established a proof of concept that abnormal expression and function of estrogen receptors (ER) are crucial processes in initiation and development of hormone-related cancers and also affect the efficacy of anti-cancer therapy. Radiotherapy has been applied as one of the most common and potent therapeutic strategies, which is synergistic with surgical excision, chemotherapy and targeted therapy for treating malignant tumors. However, the impact of ionizing radiation on ER expression and ER-related signaling in cancer tissue, as well as the interaction between endocrine and irradiation therapy remains largely elusive. This review will discuss recent findings on ER and ER-related signaling, which are relevant for cancer radiotherapy. In addition, we will summarize pre-clinical and clinical studies that evaluate the consequences of anti-estrogen and irradiation therapy in cancer, including emerging studies on head and neck cancer, which might improve the understanding and development of novel therapeutic strategies for estrogen-related cancers.

Radiotherapy concurrent versus sequential with endocrine therapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study compared treatment outcomes of radiotherapy concurrent with endocrine therapy and radiotherapy sequential with endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible studies of radiotherapy concurrent and sequential with endocrine therapy in breast cancer were retrieved through extensive searches of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, FEBM, FMJS, Web of science, Wiley, CBM, CNKI, Wang fang, Cqvip databases from 2000 to 2014. Original English and Chinese publications of radiotherapy concurrent and sequential with endocrine therapy in breast cancer were included. The primary endpoint was radiation-induced toxicity including upper than grade 2 skin related toxicity, radiation pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis; the second endpoint was survival date, including local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year OS, 10-year OS.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible trials were identified, six in English and five in Chinese. Totally, there were 1291 women in concurrent groups, and 1179 in sequential groups. Statistical analysis showed that there was no statistical difference between concurrent and sequential groups in skin related toxicity (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.92-1.56, P = 0.17), radiation pneumonia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.46-2.70, P = 0.81) and pulmonary fibrosis (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.75-2.41, P = 0.32). Meanwhile, no statistical difference was found in survival data, (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79-1.28, P = 0.26), (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.12, P = 0.27) in local recurrence and distant metastasis respectively, (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.06, P = 0.65), (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.02, P = 0.32) in 5-year and 10-year overall survival respectively. Stratification analysis was proceeded, grouped by tamoxifen and AI in different treatment timing, however, no statistical difference was found in radiation-induced toxicity and survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy concurrent with endocrine therapy didn't increase or decrease neither the incidence of radiation-induced toxicity nor the survival rate compared with that of sequential group; Endocrine therapy drugs didn't influence outcomes in different treatment timing.

Low-dose radiation hyper-radiosensitivity in multicellular tumour spheroids

OBJECTIVE

We propose and study a new model aimed at describing the low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity phenomenon appearing in the survival curves of different cell lines.

METHODS

The model uses the induced repair assumption, considering that the critical dose at which this mechanism begins to act varies from cell to cell in a given population. The model proposed is compared with the linear-quadratic model and the modified linear-quadratic model, which is commonly used in literature and in which the induced repair is taken into account in a heuristic way. The survival curve for the MCF-7 line of human breast cancer is measured at low absorbed doses and the uncertainties in these doses are estimated using thermoluminiscent dosemeters.

RESULTS

It is shown that these multicellular spheroids present low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. The new model permits an accurate description of the data of two human cell lines (previously published) and of the multicellular spheroids of the MCF-7 line here measured.

CONCLUSION

The model shows enough flexibility to account for data with very different characteristics and considers in a faithful way the hypothesis of the repair induction.

Combining systemic therapies with radiation in breast cancer

Over the last years, significant survival benefits for breast cancer were derived from the use of postoperative systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Although these two modalities have been extensively used, the optimal strategies of their combining remain debatable. There have been few randomized studies addressing this issue and their results are generally inconclusive. This article reviews combining systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and trastuzumab) with radiation in breast cancer patients. In clinical practice, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are most commonly used sequentially but this strategy is not based on level 1 evidence. Increased cardiotoxicity and skin reactions preclude the concomitant radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted to determine the safety of taxane-based schedules used concomitantly with radiotherapy, particularly with regard to pneumotoxicity. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with the use of selected schemes may be considered in patients with locally advanced cancer but this strategy still needs to be verified in large randomized studies. The optimal combination of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors with radiotherapy has also not been determined in randomized trials and the results of retrospective studies are inconsistent. Finally, the data on combining targeted therapies with radiation are still scarce and do not allow for meaningful conclusions.

Combination of anti-estrogenic therapy with radiation in breast cancer: simultaneous or sequential treatment?

Adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy are commonly given to patients with invasive breast cancer or with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although both therapies have been well established through a number of randomized studies, little is known about a possible interaction of both treatment modalities if they are given simultaneously. A number of in vitro studies indicated that tamoxifen treatment might reduce the intrinsic radiosensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Conversely, estradiol treatment increased the intrinsic radiosensitivity of MCF-7 cells. This phenomenon has not been found in clinical studies. Retrospective analyses of prospectively randomized clinical studies did not indicate an antagonistic effect of tamoxifen on the effectiveness of ionizing radiation (XRT), since local control has been consistently higher when XRT was combined with tamoxifen, compared to treatment with XRT alone, regardless of whether tamoxifen was started simultaneously with radiotherapy or after completion of radiotherapy. Currently there are no clinical data available that would suggest an adverse effect of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment started prior to or simultaneously with radiotherapy in breast cancer or DCIS. However, since an antagonistic effect of tamoxifen and simultaneous chemotherapy has been reported recently, the issue of simultaneous.

Sequencing of Tamoxifen and Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Purpose

Tamoxifen (TAM) is thought to exert a cytostatic effect on hormone-sensitive breast cancer cells. Some preclinical studies show reduced radiosensitivity in irradiated malignant mammary epithelial cells when pretreated with TAM; other studies refute these results. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest an antagonistic effect of TAM on cytotoxic therapy, with improved disease-free survival (DFS) with sequential versus concurrent TAM. An exploratory analysis was undertaken to evaluate the optimal sequencing of TAM and radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery.

Patients and Methods

Southwest Oncology Group trial 8897 (Intergroup 0102) randomly assigned node-negative women with T1-3 breast cancers to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil (CAF); CAF → TAM; cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF); and CMF → TAM. For this analysis, data are reported only in the TAM groups. RT was allowed either before adjuvant therapy (sequential [SEQ] RT; 107 patients) or after chemotherapy but concurrent with TAM (concurrent [CONC] RT; 202 patients). Survival data were adjusted for receptor status, age, and tumor size.

Results

With a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 10-year DFS values were 83% and 83% for CONC versus SEQ RT groups (log-rank P = .73; P = .76 adjusted for patient characteristics), and 10-year overall survivals were 88% and 90%, respectively (log-rank P = .59; adjusted P = .65). Patterns of failure showed no increase in in-breast recurrence rates between CONC RT and SEQ RT groups, with 10-year local recurrence rates of 7% for CONC RT and 5% for SEQ RT (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.04; P = .54).

Conclusion

The current analysis does not suggest an adverse effect on local or systemic control with CONC versus SEQ TAM and RT in node-negative breast cancer. A randomized trial is encouraged to validate these results.

Sequence of radiotherapy with tamoxifen in conservatively managed breast cancer does not affect local relapse rates

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the sequencing of tamoxifen (TAM) relative to radiation (RT) affects outcome in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery (CS) plus RT (lumpectomy with RT).

METHODS

Between 1976 and 1999, 1,649 patients with stage I or II breast cancer were treated with CS plus RT at Yale-New Haven Hospital (New Haven, CT). TAM was administered to 500 patients. The timing of TAM relative to RT was documented for each patient. Of the 500 patients, the timing of TAM was unclear in five patients, was administered concurrently with RT in 254 patients (CON-TAM), and was administered sequentially after completion of RT in 241 patients (SEQ-TAM).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the CON-TAM and SEQ-TAM group in T stage, estrogen and progesterone status, nodal status, histology, or margin status. The CON-TAM group was slightly older than the SEQ-TAM group (62 v 58 years) and received chemotherapy in addition to TAM less frequently (14% v 38%). As of September 2002, with a median follow-up of 10.0 years, there were no significant differences between the CON-TAM and SEQ-TAM groups in overall survival (84% v 82%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.234; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.05; P = .45), distant-metastasis-free rate (82% v 78%; HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.68; P = .12), ipsilateral breast-relapse-free rate (90% v 86%; HR, 0.932; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.05; P = .86), or contralateral breast-relapse-free rate (95% v 93%; HR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.48; P = .66).

CONCLUSION

Although the concurrent use of TAM with RT may theoretically render cancer cells less responsive to RT, this retrospective study suggests that in practical application, concurrent administration of TAM with RT does not compromise local control.

Use of three-dimensional basement membrane cultures to model oncogene-induced changes in mammary epithelial morphogenesis

The development of breast carcinomas involves a complex set of phenotypic alterations in breast epithelial cells and the surrounding microenvironment. While traditional transformation assays provide models for investigating certain aspects of the cellular processes associated with tumor initiation and progression, they do not model alterations in tissue architecture that are critically involved in tumor development. In this review, we provide examples of how three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models can be utilized to dissect the pathways involved in the development of mammary epithelial structures and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for oncogene-induced phenotypic alterations in epithelial behavior and architecture. Many normal mammary epithelial cell lines undergo a stereotypic morphogenetic process when grown in the presence of exogenous matrix proteins. This 3D morphogenesis culminates in the formation of well-organized, polarized spheroids, and/or tubules that are highly reminiscent of normal glandular architecture. In contrast, transformed cell lines isolated from mammary tumors exhibit significant deviations from normal epithelial behavior in 3D culture. We describe the use of 3D models as a method for both reconstructing and deconstructing the cell biological and biochemical events involved in mammary neoplasia.

Dose dependence of the growth rate of multicellular tumour spheroids after irradiation

The present study investigated differences in the growth rate of multicellular tumour spheroids of the MCF-7 line of human breast cancer before and after their irradiation. Growth of the spheroids was analysed according to a model based on a Gompertz function. In this model, normalization to a common initial volume is achieved in a way that enables meaningful comparisons to be made between the results obtained for each spheroid. For irradiated spheroids the model includes an additional term to take account of sterilized cells. We found that the growth rate observed before irradiation is not fully recovered by irradiated spheroids and that growth recovery reduces with higher irradiation doses. Surviving fractions obtained at doses below 3 Gy are comparable with those found in clonogenic assays on spheroids of the same cellular line. At larger doses, discrepancies between the different studies are considerable.

Spheroids in radiobiology and photodynamic therapy

Spheroids are tridimensional aggregates of tumor cells coming from one or several cell clones. This model, which mimics the micro-tumors structure and some of their properties, shows oxygen, pH and nutrient gradients inducing a necrotic area in the center of the spheroid. Analysis of spheroids, cultured under static or stirred conditions, can be performed on whole spheroids or dissociated spheroids. The spheroids sensitivity to ionizing radiation and photodynamic therapy can be altered by oxygen status, damage repair, intercellular commmunications and apoptosis induction, as in experimental tumor models. In radiobiology, the similarity of radiation response between spheroids and tumor xenograft bearing mice makes the spheroids to be a good alternative model to in vivo irradiation studies. In photodynamic therapy, spheroids lead to a better understanding of the own tumor response without interactions with vascular system. Finally, despite the quality of spheroid model, only the use of new technology for analysis of spheroid populations will help to increase their experimental use, particularly in preclinical oncology.