Cone beam CT verification for oesophageal cancer - impact of volume selected for image registration

Evaluation of the system accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using a combination of cone beam CT, six degrees of freedom couch, and surface image-guided systems

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the frameless linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) system incorporating cone-beam CT (CBCT), six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) couch, room laser, and surface image-guided (SG) systems. It focuses on assessing the FSRS system's accuracy and ability to detect position errors using head phantoms at different couch angles. Turntables were used to simulate the couch rotation to overcome the limitation of the available couch rotation angles for a 360° CBCT scan.

METHODS

Two head phantoms, each positioned on its respective turntable, were used for measurements, with the turntables placed on the couch. Factors affecting the evaluations of the FSRS system's accuracy were analyzed, including quality assurance (QA) procedures for the SG system, the automatic CBCT-CT registration method, the CBCT clip box volume, and the selected region of interest (ROI) size in the SG system. Discrepancies in isocenter shifts between CBCT and SG systems were measured to evaluate the FSRS system's accuracy and its ability to correct isocenter shifts at different turntable angles. The FSRS system's ability to detect position errors at different turntable angles was also evaluated by introducing ± 2.0 mm translational errors.

RESULTS

With the appropriate CBCT-CT registration method and ROI size of the SG system, the accuracy evaluations of the FSRS system indicated average discrepancies between the readouts from the CBCT and the SG system ≤ 0.9 mm/0.8° for the head phantoms. Error simulation demonstrated that the FSRS system was able to detect position errors when 2 mm translational errors were intentionally introduced, with most average discrepancies < 1 mm/1°.

CONCLUSION

This study introduces an innovative approach to quantifying the impact of couch rotation on the FSRS system using head phantoms with turntables. The overall accuracy of the FSRS system was on the order of 1.1 mm/1°.

Oesophageal IGRT considerations for SBRT of LA-NSCLC: barium-enhanced CBCT and interfraction motion

Background

To determine the optimal volume of barium for oesophageal localisation on cone-beam CT (CBCT) for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and quantify the interfraction oesophageal movement relative to tumour.

Methods

Twenty NSCLC patients with mediastinal and/or hilar disease receiving radical radiotherapy were recruited. The first five patients received 25 ml of barium prior to their planning CT and alternate CBCTs during treatment. Subsequent five patient cohorts, received 15 ml, 10 ml and 5 ml. Six observers contoured the oesophagus on each of the 107 datasets and consensus contours were created. Overall 642 observer contours were generated and interobserver contouring reproducibility was assessed. The kappa statistic, dice coefficient and Hausdorff Distance (HD) were used to compare barium-enhanced CBCTs and non-enhanced CBCTs. Oesophageal displacement was assessed using the HD between consensus contours of barium-enhanced CBCTs and planning CTs.

Results

Interobserver contouring reproducibility was significantly improved in barium-enhanced CBCTs compared to non-contrast CBCTs with minimal difference between barium dose levels. Only 10 mL produced a significantly higher kappa (0.814, p = 0.008) and dice (0.895, p = 0.001). The poorer the reproducibility without barium, the greater the improvement barium provided. The median interfraction HD between consensus contours was 4 mm, with 95% of the oesophageal displacement within 15 mm.

Conclusions

10 mL of barium significantly improves oesophageal localisation on CBCT with minimal image artifact. The oesophagus moves substantially and unpredictably over a course of treatment, requiring close daily monitoring in the context of hypofractionation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01946-8.

Diaphragm-Based Position Verification to Improve Daily Target Dose Coverage in Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy Treatment of Distal Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

In modern conformal radiation therapy of distal esophageal cancer, target coverage can be affected by variations in the diaphragm position. We investigated if daily position verification (PV) extended by a diaphragm position correction would optimize target dose coverage for esophageal cancer treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 15 esophageal cancer patients, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were computed. Displacements of the target volume were correlated with diaphragm displacements using repeated 4-dimensional computed tomography images to determine the correction needed to account for diaphragm variations. Afterwards, target coverage was evaluated for 3 PV approaches based on: (1) bony anatomy (PV_B), (2) bony anatomy corrected for the diaphragm position (PV_BD) and (3) target volume (PV_T).

RESULTS

The cranial-caudal mean target displacement was congruent with almost half of the diaphragm displacement (y = 0.459x), which was used for the diaphragm correction in PV_BD. Target dose coverage using PV_B was adequate for most patients with diaphragm displacements up till 10 mm (≥94% of the dose in 98% of the volume [D_98%]). For larger displacements, the target coverage was better maintained by PV_T and PV_BD. Overall, PV_BD accounted best for target displacements, especially in combination with tissue density variations (D_98%: IMPT 94% ± 5%, VMAT 96% ± 5%). Diaphragm displacements of more than 10 mm were observed in 22% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PV_B was sufficient to achieve adequate target dose coverage in case of small deviations in diaphragm position. However, large deviations of the diaphragm were best mitigated by PV_BD. To detect the cases where target dose coverage could be compromised due to diaphragm position variations, we recommend monitoring of the diaphragm position before treatment through online imaging.

Comparison of the Gross Target Volumes Based on Diagnostic PET/CT for Primary Esophageal Cancer

Background

Clinically, many esophageal cancer patients who planned for radiation therapy have already undergone diagnostic Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging, but it remains unclear whether these imaging results can be used to delineate the gross target volume (GTV) of the primary tumor for thoracic esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Seventy-two patients diagnosed with thoracic EC had undergone prior PET/CT for diagnosis and three-dimensional CT (3DCT) for simulation. The GTV_3D was contoured on the 3DCT image without referencing the PET/CT image. The GTV_PET-ref was contoured on the 3DCT image referencing the PET/CT image. The GTV_PET-reg was contoured on the deformed registration image derived from 3DCT and PET/CT. Differences in the position, volume, length, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) among the target volumes were determined.

Results

The centroid distance in the three directions between two different GTVs showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found among the groups in the tumor volume (P > 0.05). The median DI values of the GTV_PET-reg and GTV_PET-ref in the GTV_3D were 0.82 and 0.86, respectively (P = 0.006). The median CI values of the GTV_3D in the GTV_PET-reg and GTV_PET-ref were 0.68 and 0.72, respectively (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

PET/CT can be used to optimize the definition of the target volume in EC. However, no significant difference was found between the GTVs delineated based on visual referencing or deformable registration whether using the volume or position. So, in the absence of planning PET–CT images, it is also feasible to delineate the GTV of primary thoracic EC with reference to the diagnostic PET–CT image.

IMPACT OF THREE DIFFERENT MATCHING METHODS ON PATIENT SET-UP ERROR IN X-RAY VOLUMETRIC IMAGING FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER

Impact of three different matching methods for delivery of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on patient set-up error. As per institutional imaging protocol, 300 CBCT scans of 20 VMAT head and neck cancer patients treated with 60 Gy/30 fractions were chosen for the present study. Approved CT images of the plan were registered as a reference with the CBCT images on board. Grey-scale matching (GM), manual matching (MM), and bone matching (BM) between on-board CBCT and reference CT images were used to assess patient translation errors. Patient positioning verification was evaluated using the Clip-box registration in all three matching methods. Using the GM approach as a reference point, two additional matchings were rendered in offline mode using BM and MM. For analysis, random error (σ), systematic error (∑), maximum error (E) mean set-up error (M), mean displacement vector (R), matching time (Mt), and multiple comparisons using Post hoc Tukey's HSD test were performed. In MM, less random and systematic errors were found than in GM and BM with an insignificant difference (p > 0.05) Compared to BM and GM, the maximum error, mean set-up error, and displacement vector were marginally less in MM (p > 0.05). In MM, an increased Mt relative to BM and GM was observed (p > 0.05). Furthermore, an insignificant difference in set-up error was revealed in a multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). Any of the three matching methods can be used during CBCT to check patient translation errors for the delivery of the VMAT head and neck patients.

Density override in treatment planning to mitigate the dosimetric effect induced by gastrointestinal gas in esophageal cancer radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the dosimetric effect of variable gas volume in esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT) and whether a density override (DO) in treatment planning can effectively mitigate this dosimetric effect.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine patients with gastrointestinal gas pockets in the planning computed tomography (pCT) were retrospectively included. Per patient, the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans associated with no DO, DO = 0.5, and DO = 1 in the gas pockets were made. Initial and follow-up gas volumes were assessed from the pCTs and cone-beam CTs (CBCTs), respectively. Fractional CTs were created based on the pCT and CBCTs to calculate the fractional doses using all six plans. We then investigated for all six plans the correlation between the gas volume difference (relative to initial gas volume) and the dose difference (relative to planned dose). We also calculated and compared the accumulated dose by summing the fractional doses using two strategies: single-plan strategy (i.e. using each of the six plans separately) and plan-selection strategy (i.e. selecting one of the three plans depending on the fractional gas volume for IMRT and VMAT planning separately).

RESULTS

The dose difference was approximately linearly correlated to the gas volume difference. Underdoses of >3.5% and overdoses of >7% were found for gas volume decreases >160 mL/330 mL and increases >260 mL/370 mL for IMRT/VMAT planning, respectively. Moreover, for most patients, the single-plan strategy with the use of DO = 0.5 resulted in neither undesired underdose nor much overdose. The plan-selection strategy, however, can always ensure sufficient target coverage and minimize high dose regions to the most extent.

CONCLUSIONS

The variation in gas volume during the treatment course can result in clinically undesired underdose or overdose. The DO-based plan-selection strategy can effectively mitigate the gas-induced underdose and minimize the overdose for esophageal cancer RT.

Study to Compare the Effect of Different Registration Methods on Patient Setup Uncertainties in Cone-beam Computed Tomography during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

This study compared three different methods used in registering cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image set with planning CT image set for determining patient setup uncertainties during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions using VMAT technique were chosen for this study. A total of 105 CBCT scans were acquired by image guidance protocol for patient setup verification. Approved plans' CT images were used as the reference image sets for registration with their corresponding CBCT image sets. Setup errors in mediolateral, craniocaudal, and anteroposterior direction were determined using gray-scale matching between the reference CT images and onboard CBCT images. Patient setup verification was performed using clip-box registration (CBR) method during online imaging. Considering the CBR method as the reference, two more registrations were performed using mask registration (MR) method and dual registration (DR) (CBR + MR) method in the offline mode. For comparison, systematic error (∑), random error (σ), mean displacement vector (R), mean setup error (M), and registration time (R t) were analyzed. Post hoc Tukey's honest significant difference test was performed for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Systematic and random errors were less in CBR as compared to MR and DR (P > 0.05). The mean displacement error and mean setup errors were less in CBR as compared to MR and DR (P > 0.05). Increased R t was observed in DR as compared to CBR and MR (P < 0.05). In addition, multiple comparisons did not show any significant difference in patient setup error (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For breast VMAT plan delivery, all three registration methods show insignificant variation in patient setup error. One can use any of the three registration methods for patient setup verification.

Comparison of carina-based versus bony anatomy-based registration for setup verification in esophageal cancer radiotherapy

Background

To investigate the feasibility and geometric accuracy of carina-based registration for CBCT-guided setup verification in esophageal cancer IGRT, compared with current practice bony anatomy-based registration.

Methods

Included were 24 esophageal cancer patients with 65 implanted fiducial markers, visible on planning CTs and follow-up CBCTs. All available CBCT scans (n = 236) were rigidly registered to the planning CT with respect to the bony anatomy and the carina. Target coverage was visually inspected and marker position variation was quantified relative to both registration approaches; the variation of systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) was estimated.

Results

Automatic carina-based registration was feasible in 94.9% of the CBCT scans, with an adequate target coverage in 91.1% compared to 100% after bony anatomy-based registration. Overall, Σ (σ) in the LR/CC/AP direction was 2.9(2.4)/4.1(2.4)/2.2(1.8) mm using the bony anatomy registration compared to 3.3(3.0)/3.6(2.6)/3.9(3.1) mm for the carina. Mid-thoracic placed markers showed a non-significant but smaller Σ in CC and AP direction when using the carina-based registration.

Conclusions

Compared with a bony anatomy-based registration, carina-based registration for esophageal cancer IGRT results in inadequate target coverage in 8.9% of cases. Furthermore, large Σ and σ, requiring larger anisotropic margins, were seen after carina-based registration. Only for tumors entirely confined to the mid-thoracic region the carina-based registration might be slightly favorable.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0986-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Dual-Registration Image-Guided Radiotherapy in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article was to determine the impact of Dual Registration (DR) image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) on clinical judgement and treatment delivery for patients with oropharyngeal cancer before implementation.

METHODS

Ninety cone beam computed tomography images from 10 retrospective patients were matched using standard clipbox registration (SCR) and DR. Three IGRT specialist radiographers performed all registrations and evaluated by intraclass correlation to determine inter-rater agreement, Bland-Altman with 95% limits of agreement to determine differences between SCR and DR procedures, changes in clinical judgment, time taken to perform registrations, and radiographer satisfaction.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement between radiographers using both SCR and DR was high (0.867 and 0.917, P ≤ .0001). The 95% limits of agreement between SCR and DR procedures in the mediolateral, cranial-caudal, and ventrodorsal translational directions were -6.40 to +4.91, -7.49 to +6.05, and -7.00 to +5.44 mm, respectively. The mediolateral direction demonstrated significant proportional bias (P ≤ .001) suggesting non-agreement between SCR and DR. Eighty percent of DR matches resulted in a change in clinical judgement to ensure maximum target coverage. Mean registration times for SCR and DR were 94 and 115 seconds, respectively, and radiographers found DR feasible and satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

The standard method using SCR in patients with oropharyngeal cancer underestimates the deviation in the lower neck. In these patients, DR is an effective IGRT tool to ensure target coverage of the inferior neck nodes and has demonstrated acceptability to radiotherapy clinical practice.

Comparison of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional and four-dimensional CT imaging of thoracic esophageal cancer

Background and purpose

To investigate the definition of planning target volumes (PTVs) based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) compared with conventional PTV definition and PTV definition using asymmetrical margins for thoracic primary esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

Forty-three patients with esophageal cancer underwent 3DCT and 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The motions of primary tumors located in the proximal (group A), middle (group B), and distal (group C) thoracic esophagus were obtained from the 4DCT scans. PTV_3D was defined on 3DCT using the tumor motion measured based on 4DCT, PTV conventional (PTV_conv) was defined on 3DCT by adding a 1.0 cm margin to the clinical target volume, and PTV_4D was defined as the union of the target volumes contoured on the ten phases of the 4DCT images. The centroid positions, volumetric differences, and dice similarity coefficients were evaluated for all PTVs.

Results

The median centroid shifts between PTV_3D and PTV_4D and between PTV_conv and PTV_4D in all three dimensions were <0.3 cm for the three groups. The median size ratios of PTV_4D to PTV_3D were 0.80, 0.88, and 0.71, and PTV_4D to PTV_conv were 0.67, 0.73, and 0.76 (χ²=−3.18, −2.98, and −3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The dice similarity coefficients were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.81 between PTV_4D and PTV_3D and 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83 between PTV_4D and PTV_conv (χ² =−3.18, −2.98, and −3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The difference between the degree of inclusion of PTV_4D in PTV_3D and that of PTV_4D in PTV_conv was <2% for all groups. Compared with PTV_conv, the amount of irradiated normal tissue for PTV_3D was decreased by 11.81% and 11.86% in groups A and B, respectively, but was increased by 2.93% in group C.

Conclusion

For proximal and middle esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using asymmetrical margins provides good coverage of PTV_4D; however, for distal esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using conventional margins provides ideal conformity with PTV_4D.

High FDG uptake areas on pre-radiotherapy PET/CT identify preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The high failure rates in the radiotherapy (RT) target volume suggest that patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAOC) would benefit from increased total RT doses. High 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) uptake (hotspot) on pre-RT FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT has been reported to identify intra-tumour sites at increased risk of relapse after RT in non-small cell lung cancer and in rectal cancer. Our aim was to confirm these observations in patients with LAOC and to determine the optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) threshold to delineate smaller RT target volumes that would facilitate RT dose escalation without impaired tolerance.

METHODS

The study included 98 consecutive patients with LAOC treated by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). All patients underwent FDG PET/CT at initial staging and during systematic follow-up in a single institution. FDG PET/CT acquisitions were coregistered on the initial CT scan. Various subvolumes within the initial tumour (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% SUVmax thresholds) and in the subsequent local recurrence (LR, 40 and 90% SUVmax thresholds) were pasted on the initial CT scan and compared[Dice, Jaccard, overlap fraction (OF), common volume/baseline volume, common volume/recurrent volume].

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients had LR. The initial metabolic tumour volume was significantly higher in LR tumours than in the locally controlled tumours (mean 25.4 vs 14.2 cc; p = 0.002). The subvolumes delineated on initial PET/CT with a 30-60% SUVmax threshold were in good agreement with the recurrent volume at 40% SUVmax (OF = 0.60-0.80). The subvolumes delineated on initial PET/CT with a 30-60% SUVmax threshold were in good to excellent agreement with the core volume (90% SUVmax) of the relapse (common volume/recurrent volume and OF indices 0.61-0.89).

CONCLUSION

High FDG uptake on pretreatment PET/CT identifies tumour subvolumes that are at greater risk of recurrence after CRT in patients with LAOC. We propose a 60% SUVmax threshold to delineate high FDG uptake areas on initial PET/CT as reduced target volumes for RT dose escalation.

Oesophageal Chemoradiotherapy in the UK--current practice and future directions

The SCOPE 1 trial closed to recruitment in early 2012 and has demonstrably improved the quality of UK radiotherapy. It has also shown that there is an enthusiastic upper gastrointestinal clinical oncology community that can successfully complete trials and deliver high-quality radiotherapy. Following on from SCOPE 1, this paper, authored by a consensus of leading UK upper gastrointestinal radiotherapy specialists, attempts to define current best practice and the questions to be answered by future clinical studies. The two main roles for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the management of potentially curable oesophageal cancer are definitive (dCRT) and neoadjuvant (naCRT). The rates of local failure after dCRT are consistently high, showing the need to evaluate more effective treatments, both in terms of optimal local and systemic therapeutic components. This will be the primary objective of the next planned UK dCRT trial and here we discuss the role of dose escalation and systemic therapeutic options that will form the basis of that trial. The publication of the Dutch 'CROSS' trial of naCRT has shown that this pre-operative approach can both be given safely and offer a significant survival benefit over surgery alone. This has led to the development of the UK NeoSCOPE trial, due to open in 2013. There will be a translational substudy to this trial and currently available data on the role of biomarkers in predicting response to therapy are discussed. Postoperative reporting of the pathology specimen is discussed, with recommendations for the NeoSCOPE trial. Both of these CRT approaches may benefit from recent developments, such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography for target volume delineation, planning techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 'type b' algorithms and new treatment verification methods, such as cone-beam computed tomography. These are discussed here and recommendations made for their use.