Inhomogeneous dose escalation increases expected local control for NSCLC patients with lymph node involvement without increased mean lung dose

Toxicity Within 6 Months of Heterogeneous Fluorodeoxyglucose-Guided Radiotherapy Dose Escalation for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Scandinavian Randomized Phase III NARLAL2 Trial

PURPOSE

Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been challenged by toxicity concerns. The Scandinavian phase III multicenter dose-escalation trial NARLAL2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02354274) used a novel approach to dose escalation: heterogeneous escalation driven by the fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-avid region, with strict normal tissue dose constraints. We report early toxicity within 6 months of random assignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were recruited from seven institutions in Scandinavia. Eligibility criteria included performance status 0-1, NSCLC stage IIB-IIIB, and feasibility of delivering 66 Gy/33 fraction treatment plan. Patients were randomly assigned between standard (66 Gy) and heterogeneously dose-escalated radiotherapy. Two treatment plans were made for each patient before random assignment with matched mean lung dose and V20Gy, and strict dose constraints for all normal tissues. Toxicity was evaluated weekly during radiotherapy, and every 3 months after random assignment. Concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/carboplatin and Navelbine.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and March 2023, 350 patients were randomly assigned. The as-treated analysis included 178 patients in the standard and 172 in dose-escalated (mean tumor dose 88 Gy) arms. Median gross tumor and planning target volumes were, respectively, 54 cm3 and 321 cm3 (standard arm) and 61 cm3 and 339 cm3 (escalated arm). No difference in early toxicity between the two arms was observed. Grade 2 esophagitis during radiotherapy was 28.1% and 25.6%, grade 3 esophagitis 7.3% and 4.1%, grade 2 pneumonitis 15.7% and 20.3%, and grade 3 pneumonitis 3.9% and 5.8% in standard and escalated arms, respectively. For both arms, the maximum grade of early toxicity aggregated over all toxicities was 35% and 1% for grades ≥3 and 5, respectively. Four patients died from potential treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneous dose escalation did not increase early toxicity despite delivery of 88 Gy mean dose to the primary tumor, demonstrating this as an attractive strategy for LA-NSCLC radiotherapy dose escalation.

Plan quality in radiotherapy treatment planning - Review of the factors and challenges

A high-quality treatment plan aims to best achieve the clinical prescription, balancing high target dose to maximise tumour control against sufficiently low organ-at-risk dose for acceptably low toxicity. Treatment planning (TP) includes multiple steps from simulation/imaging and segmentation to technical plan production and reporting. Consistent quality across this process requires close collaboration and communication between clinical and technical experts, to clearly understand clinical requirements and priorities and also practical uncertainties, limitations and compromises. TP quality depends on many aspects, starting from commissioning and quality management of the treatment planning system (TPS), including its measured input data and detailed understanding of TPS models and limitations. It requires rigorous quality assurance of the whole planning process and it links to plan deliverability, assessable by measurement-based verification. This review highlights some factors influencing plan quality, for consideration for optimal plan construction and hence optimal outcomes for each patient. It also indicates some challenges, sources of difference and current developments. The topics considered include: the evolution of TP techniques; dose prescription issues; tools and methods to evaluate plan quality; and some aspects of practical TP. The understanding of what constitutes a high-quality treatment plan continues to evolve with new techniques, delivery methods and related evidence-based science. This review summarises the current position, noting developments in the concept and the need for further robust tools to help achieve it.

Predicting personalised and progressive adaptive dose escalation to gross tumour volume using knowledge-based planning models for inoperable advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVES

Increased radiation doses could improve local control and overall survival of lung cancer patients, however, this could be challenging without exceeding organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints especially for patients with advanced-stage disease. Increasing OAR doses could reduce the therapeutic ratio and quality of life. It is therefore important to investigate methods to increase the dose to target volume without exceeding OAR dose constraints.

METHODS

Gross tumour volume (GTV) was contoured on synthetic computerised tomography (sCT) datasets produced using the Velocity adaptive radiotherapy software for eleven patients. The fractions where GTV volume decreased compared to that prior to radiotherapy (reference plan) were considered for personalised progressive dose escalation. The dose to the adapted GTV (GTVAdaptive) was increased until OAR doses were affected (as compared to the original clinical plan). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was maintained for all plans. Doses were also escalated to the reference plan (GTVClinical) using the same method. Adapted, dose-escalated, plans were combined to estimate accumulated dose, D99 (dose to 99%) of GTVAdapted, PTV D99 and OAR doses and compared with those in the original clinical plans. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) model was developed to predict D99 of the adapted GTV with OAR doses and PTV coverage kept similar to the original clinical plans; prediction accuracy and model verification were performed using further data sets.

RESULTS

Compared to the original clinical plan, dose to GTV was significantly increased without exceeding OAR doses. Adaptive dose-escalation increased the average D99 to GTVAdaptive by 15.1Gy and 8.7Gy compared to the clinical plans. The KBP models were verified and demonstrated prediction accuracy of 0.4% and 0.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Progressive adaptive dose escalation can significantly increase the dose to GTV without increasing OAR doses or compromising dose to microscopic disease. This may increase overall survival without increasing toxicities.

Improving organ at risk sparing in oropharyngeal treatment planning by increasing target dose heterogeneity: A feasibility study

Target dose homogeneity has historically been a priority in radiotherapy treatment planning. However, in an era of more advanced modulated techniques, there is now greater flexibility in shaping dose distributions suggesting that allowing controlled target dose heterogeneity may consequently improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing. This study sought to determine the feasibility of allowing an increase in target dose heterogeneity in oropharyngeal VMAT plans, and to examine the dosimetric impact this has on target coverage and OARs such as the parotid glands, spinal cord, brainstem and mandible. Nineteen oropharyngeal patients' plans were created with homogeneous dose distributions specified in the London Cancer Head and Neck Radiotherapy Protocol. The upper dose constraint (UDC) objective of the primary planning target volumes (PTV) for each plan were increased in increments of 10% until a maximum of 150% of the prescribed dose was reached. These plans were dosimetrically compared to plans with a uniform dose distribution in terms of OAR sparing and target coverage. Minimal coverage was not compromised, with the largest median changes being a 0.81% decrease [98.6 to 97.8%] to the PTV_70Gy D98% and a 2.86% decrease [99.81 to 96.96%] to the PTV_54Gy D98% at a UDC of 150% of the prescription dose. An OAR sparing effect was observed for the parotid glands, spinal cord and oral cavity sub PTV. Mandible and brainstem Dmax values increased as the PTV UDC increased. Changes in brainstem dose were not statistically significant. All other differences were statistically significant for UDC's above 130%. Target coverage was not compromised as a result of increased target dose heterogeneity. The OAR sparing effect was promising for most organs, however further research with a larger dataset is necessary surrounding the effect on organs that overlap with the PTV.

Isotoxic dose prescription level strategies for stereotactic liver radiotherapy: the price of dose uniformity

Introduction: To find the optimal dose prescription strategy for liver SBRT, this study investigated the tradeoffs between achievable target dose and healthy liver dose for a range of isotoxic uniform and non-uniform prescription level strategies.Material and methods: Nine patients received ten liver SBRT courses with intrafraction motion monitoring during treatment. After treatment, five VMAT treatment plans were made for each treatment course. The PTV margin was 5 mm (left-right, anterior-posterior) and 10 mm (cranio-caudal). All plans had a mean CTV dose of 56.25 Gy in three fractions, while the PTV was covered by 50%, 67%, 67 s% (steep dose gradient outside CTV), 80%, and 95% of this dose, respectively. The 50%, 67 s%, 80%, and 95% plans were then renormalized to be isotoxic with the standard 67% plan according to a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model for radiation induced liver disease. The CTV D98 and mean dose of the iso-toxic plans were calculated both without and with the observed intrafraction motion, using a validated method for motion-including dose reconstruction.Results: Under isotoxic conditions, the average [range] mean CTV dose per fraction decreased gradually from 21.2 [20.5-22.7] Gy to 15.5 [15.0-16.6] Gy and the D98 dose per fraction decreased from 20.4 [19.7-21.7] Gy to 15.0 [14.5-15.5] Gy, as the prescription level to the PTV rim was increased from 50% to 95%. With inclusion of target motion the mean CTV dose was 20.5 [16.5-22.5] Gy (50% PTV rim dose) and 15.4 [13.9-16.7] Gy (95% rim dose) while D98 was 17.8 [7.4-20.6] Gy (50% rim dose) and 14.6 [8.8-15.7] Gy (95% rim dose).Conclusion: Requirements of a uniform PTV dose come at the price of excess normal tissue dose. A non-uniform PTV dose allows increased CTV mean dose at the cost of robustness toward intrafraction motion. The increase in planned CTV dose by non-uniform prescription outbalanced the dose deterioration caused by motion.

Trade-off between the conflicting planning goals in correlation with patient’s anatomical parameters for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients

Aim

To quantify the relationship between the planning target volume (PTV) dose homogeneity and organs at risk (OARs) sparing in correlation with anatomical parameters in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods

Nine IMRT plans with various target dose constraints’ priorities were created for 15 prostate cancer patients. Selected PTV and OARs parameters were calculated for the patients. A trade-off was assessed between homogeneity index (HI) and OAR sparing. Several anatomical parameters were evaluated to investigate their effects on the OAR sparing and HI.

Results

Inverse exponential relationships were found between the OAR sparing and HI (average R 2 of 0·983 and 0·994 for bladder and rectum, respectively). Decreasing the priority led to more OARs sparing (normal tissue complication probability reduction: 97·6 and 74·5%; mean dose reduction: 16·3 and 11·3% for bladder and rectum, respectively) and worsening of the HI (0·095–0·322) but with no significant effect on tumour control probability. Furthermore, OARs volumes, distances between OARs and PTV and their joint volumes had stronger correlations with OARs’ mean doses.

Conclusion

Enforcement of target dose constraints was more effective on the improvement of HIs for the patients with initial high HI values at low dose constraints’ priorities. Reducing the priority had more effects on the OARs sparing compared to HI, especially for the patients with high OAR doses in high priority plans. This can be attributed to smaller distances or greater joint volumes between the OARs and PTV.

The acute and late toxicity results of a randomized phase II dose-escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer (PET-boost trial)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The PET-boost randomized phase II trial (NCT01024829) investigated dose-escalation to the entire primary tumour or redistributed to regions of high pre-treatment FDG-uptake in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We present a toxicity analysis of the 107 patients randomized in the study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage II-III NSCLC were treated with an isotoxic integrated boost of ≥72 Gy in 24 fractions, with/without chemotherapy and strict dose limits. Toxicity was scored until death according to the CTCAEv3.0.

RESULTS

77 (72%) patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Acute and late ≥G3 occurred in 41% and 25%. For concurrent (C) and sequential or radiotherapy alone (S), the most common acute ≥G3 toxicities were: dysphagia in 14.3% (C) and 3.3% (S), dyspnoea in 2.6% (C) and 6.7% (S), pneumonitis in 0% (C) and 6.7% (S), cardiac toxicity in 6.5% (C) and 3.3% (S). Seventeen patients died of which in 13 patients a possible relation to treatment could not be excluded. In 10 of these 13 patients progressive disease was scored. Fatal pulmonary haemorrhages and oesophageal fistulae were observed in 9 patients.

CONCLUSION

Personalized dose-escalation in inoperable NSCLC patients results in higher acute and late toxicity compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. The toxicity, however, was within the boundaries of the pre-defined stopping rules.

Clinical, dosimetric, and position factors for radiation-induced acute esophagitis in intensity-modulated (chemo)radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to estimate the relation between acute esophagitis (AE) and clinical, dosimetric, and position factors in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intensity-modulated (chemo)radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to identify factors associated with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2 or worse AE (AE2+). A multivariable model was established including patient- and treatment-related variables and esophageal dose–volume histogram parameters. The esophagus was divided according to physiological anatomy, and logistic regression was used to analyze the position parameter for its correlation with AE2+.

Results

The incidence of AE2+ was 27.5%. All models included gender, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT), position parameter, and one of the dosimetric variables. The model with mean dose showed the best goodness of fit. Gender (OR=2.47, P=0.014), CCRT (OR=3.67, P=0.015), mean dose (OR=1.33, P<0.001), and maximum radiation position (OR=1.65, P=0.016) were significantly related to AE2+.

Conclusion

Gender, concurrent chemotherapy, maximum radiation position, and mean dose were independent risk factors for AE2+. The upper part of the esophagus showed a higher sensitivity to radiation toxicity.

A quantitative assessment of the consequences of allowing dose heterogeneity in prostate radiation therapy planning

Target dose uniformity has been historically an aim of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning. However, for some sites, this may not be strictly necessary and removing this constraint could theoretically improve organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing and tumor control probability (TCP). This study systematically investigates the consequences of PTV dose uniformity that results from the application or removal of an upper dose constraint (UDC) in the inverse planning process for prostate VMAT treatments. OAR sparing, target coverage, hotspots, and plan complexity were compared between prostate VMAT plans with and without the PTV UDC optimized using the progressive resolution optimizer (PRO, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Removing the PTV UDC, the median D1cc reached 144.6% for the CTV and the PTV, and an average increase of 3.2% TCP was demonstrated, while CTV and PTV coverage evaluated by D99% was decreased by less than 0.6% with statistical significance. Moreover, systematic improvement in the rectum dose volume histograms was shown (a 5–10% decrease in the volume receiving 50% to 75% prescribed dose), resulting in an average decrease of 1.3% (P < 0.01) in the rectum normal tissue complication probability. Additional consequences included potentially increased dose to the urethra as evaluated by PTV D0.035cc (median: 153.4%), delivering 283 extra monitor units (MUs), and slightly higher degrees of modulation. In general, the results were consistent when a different optimizer (Photon Optimizer, Varian Medical Systems) was used. In conclusion, removing the PTV UDC is acceptable for localized prostate cases given the systematic improvement of rectal dose and TCP. It can be particularly useful for cases that do not meet the rectum dose constraints with the PTV UDC on. This comes with the foreseeable consequences of increased dose heterogeneity in the PTV and an increase in MUs and plan complexity. It also has a higher requirement for reproducing the position and size of the target and OARs during treatment. Finally, with the PTV UDC completely removed, in some cases the maximum doses within the PTV did approach levels that may be of concern for urethral toxicity and therefore in clinical implementation it may still be necessary to include a PTV UDC, but one based on limiting toxicity rather than enforcing dose homogeneity.

Reducing dose to the lungs through loosing target dose homogeneity requirement for radiotherapy of non small cell lung cancer

It is important to minimize lung dose during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, an approach was proposed to reduce lung dose by relaxing the constraint of target dose homogeneity during treatment planning of IMRT. Ten NSCLC patients with lung tumor on the right side were selected. The total dose for planning target volume (PTV) was 60 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). For each patient, two IMRT plans with six beams were created in Pinnacle treatment planning system. The dose homogeneity of target was controlled by constraints on the maximum and uniform doses of target volume. One IMRT plan was made with homogeneous target dose (the resulting target dose was within 95%-107% of the prescribed dose), while another IMRT plan was made with inhomogeneous target dose (the resulting target dose was more than 95% of the prescribed dose). During plan optimization, the dose of cord and heart in two types of IMRT plans were kept nearly the same. The doses of lungs, PTV and organs at risk (OARs) between two types of IMRT plans were compared and analyzed quantitatively. For all patients, the lung dose was decreased in the IMRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose. On average, the mean dose, V5, V20, and V30 of lung were reduced by 1.4 Gy, 4.8%, 3.7%, and 1.7%, respectively, and the dose to normal tissue was also reduced. These reductions in DVH values were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two IMRT plans on V25, V30, V40, V50 and mean dose for heart. The maximum doses of cords in two type IMRT plans were nearly the same. IMRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose could protect lungs better and may be considered as a choice for treating NSCLC.

Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has been integrated into daily clinical routine and can today be considered the standard especially with high-dose radiotherapy. Currently imaging is based on MV- or kV-CT, which has clear limitations especially in soft-tissue contrast. Thus, combination of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-end radiotherapy opens a new horizon. The intricate technical properties of MR imagers pose a challenge to technology when combined with radiation technology. Several solutions that are almost ready for routine clinical application have been developed. The clinical questions include dose-escalation strategies, monitoring of changes during treatment as well as imaging without additional radiation exposure during treatment.

Acute esophagitis for patients with local-regional advanced non small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Esophagitis is common in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for local-regional advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to estimate the dose-effect relationship using clinical and dosimetric parameters in patients receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CCT).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2013, 117 patients with stages IIB-IIIB NSCLC were treated in a multicenter randomized phase II trial with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by IMRT and CCT. The esophagitis was prospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0. Clinical and dosimetric variables were analyzed for the correlation with grade ⩾2 esophagitis through logistic regression.

RESULTS

Grade 2 esophagitis was experienced by 31 (27%). All models including gender, institution, a dosimetric parameter and a position parameter were significantly associated with esophagitis. The two models using the relative esophagus volume irradiated above 40 Gy (V40, OR=2.18/10% volume) or the length of esophagus irradiated above 40 Gy (L40, OR=4.03/5 cm) were optimal. The upper part of esophagus was more sensitive and females experienced more toxicity than men.

CONCLUSION

V40 and L40 were most effective dosimetric predictors of grade ⩾2 esophagitis. The upper part of esophagus was more sensitive.

Clinical outcome of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Adaptive strategy with daily online tumour match is a treatment option when treating locally advanced lung cancer patients with curative intended radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive lung cancer patients treated with soft tissue match, adaptive RT and small planning target volumes (PTV) margins were analysed. A control group of 52 consecutive patients treated with bone match, no adaptive strategy and larger margins was included. Patients were followed with computed tomography (CT) scans every third month. CT-images showing loco-regional recurrences were identified. The recurrence gross tumour volume was delineated and registered with the original radiation treatment plan to identify site of failure. All patients were toxicity-scored using CTCAE 4.03 grading scale. Data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 16 months (3-35). Within a year, 35% of the patients in the adaptive group (ART-group) and 53% in the control group (No-ART-group) experienced loco-regional failure, showing improved loco-regional control in the ART group (p = 0.05). One patient in the ART-group and four patients in the No-ART-group showed marginal failure. Median overall progression-free survival time for the ART-group was 10 months (95% CI 8-12), and 8 months (95% CI 6-9) for the No-ART-group. Severe pneumonitis (grade 3-5) decreased from 22% in the No-ART-group to 18% in the ART-group (non-significant, p = 0.6). No significant difference in severe dysphagia was found between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the first small cohort of patients investigated, implementation of soft-tissue tumour match and adaptive strategies for locally advanced lung cancer patients increased the loco-regional control rate without increasing treatment-related toxicity.

A new method to validate thoracic CT-CT deformable image registration using auto-segmented 3D anatomical landmarks

BACKGROUND

Deformable image registrations are prone to errors in aligning reliable anatomically features. Consequently, identification of registration inaccuracies is important. Particularly thoracic three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-CT image registration is challenging due to lack of contrast in lung tissue. This study aims for validation of thoracic CT-CT image registration using auto-segmented anatomically landmarks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five lymphoma patients were CT scanned three times within a period of 18 months, with the initial CT defined as the reference scan. For each patient the two successive CT scans were registered to the reference CT using three different image registration algorithms (Demons, B-spline and Affine). The image registrations were evaluated using auto-segmented anatomical landmarks (bronchial branch points) and Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Deviation of corresponding bronchial landmarks were used to quantify inaccuracies in respect of both misalignment and geometric location within lungs.

RESULTS

The median bronchial branch point deviations were 1.6, 1.1 and 4.2 (mm) for the three tested algorithms (Demons, B-spline and Affine). The maximum deviations (> 15 mm) were found within both Demons and B-spline image registrations. In the upper part of the lungs the median deviation of 1.7 (mm) was significantly different (p < 0.02) relative to the median deviations of 2.0 (mm), found in the middle and lower parts of the lungs. The DSC revealed similar registration discrepancies among the three tested algorithms, with DSC values of 0.96, 0.97 and 0.91, for respectively Demons, B-spline and the Affine algorithms.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial branch points were found useful to validate thoracic CT-CT image registration. Bronchial branch points identified local registration errors > 15 mm in both Demons and B-spline deformable algorithms.

Pattern of loco-regional failure after definitive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with poor survival even though patients are treated with curatively intended radiotherapy. Survival is affected negatively by lack of loco-regional tumour control, but survival is also influenced by comorbidity caused by age and smoking, and occurrence of distant metastasis. It is challenging to evaluate loco-regional control after definitive radiotherapy for NSCLC since it is difficult to distinguish between radiation-induced damage to the lung tissue and tumour progression/recurrence. In addition it may be useful to distinguish between intrapulmonary failure and mediastinal failure to be able to optimize radiotherapy in order to improve loco-regional control even though it is not easy to discriminate between the two sites of failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 331 NSCLC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy from 2002 to 2011. The patients were treated consecutively at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark with at least 60 Gy. All patients were followed in a planned follow-up schedule and no patients were lost for follow-up.

RESULTS

At the time of the analysis 93 patients had loco-regional failure only. Of these patients, 68 had intrapulmonary failure only, one patient had failure in mediastinum only, and 24 patients had intrapulmonary failure as well as mediastinal failure. Of the patients which had lung failure only, 78% had mediastinal involvement at treatment start. The only covariate with significant impact on developing intrapulmonary failure only was gross tumour volume. Median survival for the total group of 331 patients was 19 months. The median survival for patients with intrapulmonary failure only was 19 months, and it was 20 months for the patients with mediastinal relapse.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that focus should be on increasing doses to intrapulmonary tumour volume, when dose escalation is applied to improve local tumour control in NSCLC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy, since most recurrences are located here.

Predictive treatment management: incorporating a predictive tumor response model into robust prospective treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that a treatment planning technique that incorporates predicted lung tumor regression into optimization, predictive treatment planning (PTP), could allow dose escalation to the residual tumor while maintaining coverage of the initial target without increasing dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We created a model to estimate the geometric presence of residual tumors after radiation therapy using planning computed tomography (CT) and weekly cone beam CT scans of 5 lung cancer patients. For planning purposes, we modeled the dynamic process of tumor shrinkage by morphing the original planning target volume (PTVorig) in 3 equispaced steps to the predicted residue (PTVpred). Patients were treated with a uniform prescription dose to PTVorig. By contrast, PTP optimization started with the same prescription dose to PTVorig but linearly increased the dose at each step, until reaching the highest dose achievable to PTVpred consistent with OAR limits. This method is compared with midcourse adaptive replanning.

RESULTS

Initial parenchymal gross tumor volume (GTV) ranged from 3.6 to 186.5 cm(3). On average, the primary GTV and PTV decreased by 39% and 27%, respectively, at the end of treatment. The PTP approach gave PTVorig at least the prescription dose, and it increased the mean dose of the true residual tumor by an average of 6.0 Gy above the adaptive approach.

CONCLUSIONS

PTP, incorporating a tumor regression model from the start, represents a new approach to increase tumor dose without increasing toxicities, and reduce clinical workload compared with the adaptive approach, although model verification using per-patient midcourse imaging would be prudent.