Prevalence and prognostic impact of comorbidity in soft tissue sarcoma: a population-based cohort study

The Relationship Between Area-Level Marginalization and Overall Survival of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Ontario: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status and community marginalization can impact overall survival and functional outcome in patients with cancer. However, this association has not been determined in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) within Canada. The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact of marginalization on STS 5-year overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with primary or locally recurrent STS who underwent surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2021. Marginalization was determined using the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-Marg), with subdomains including Ethnic Concentration, Material Resources, Household Dwelling, and Labor Dependency, and patients were stratified into quintiles (Q1 = least marginalized; Q5 = most marginalized). The association between marginalization and overall survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

When adjusted for age and grade of disease, 5-year overall survival was not impacted by Ethnic Concentration (75.2% Q1 vs. 80.5% Q5). However, 5-year overall survival was significantly affected by increasing marginalization within Material Resources (81.9% Q1 vs. 69% Q5), Household Dwelling (82.2% Q1 vs. 69.6% Q5), and Labor Dependency (75.4% Q1 vs. 67.3% Q5). Significant differences across quintiles with regard to 1-year functional outcomes were noted with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, while nonsignificant changes were noted with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score-93.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to demonstrate marginalization as an independent risk factor adversely impacting 5-year overall survival of STS in Canada's single-payer universal healthcare system.

Therapy adherence after interdisciplinary tumour board discussion is associated with improved outcome in soft tissue sarcoma: A Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre analysis

Centralising soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment in expert centres and implementing comprehensive therapy concepts through interdisciplinary tumour boards (ITB) has led to significant treatment progress. However, our knowledge on the implementation of the ITB recommendations and its impact on patient outcome is limited. In this retrospective analysis, we examined a cohort of 222 adult patients (pts) with primary STS who were presented to the ITB of the Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre between 2015 and 2020. In localised disease (n = 188), resection was recommended in 71% (n = 134) of pts. The treatment modalities chemotherapy with or without regional deep hyperthermia, and radiotherapy were recommended in 37% (n = 69), 26% (n = 48) and 52% (n = 97), respectively. Complex multidisciplinary concepts were established in 29% (n = 54) including ≥3 treatment modalities. Only partial adherence, either by choice of patient or treating physician, was associated with a higher risk of both progression (HR 4.0 95%-CI 1.6-9.7 p < .01) and mortality (HR 5.3 95%-CI 1.7-16.4 p < .01). Pts inable to follow the ITB recommendations due to complications or rapid progression showed a high-risk profile with increased mortality and progression rates (HR 18.1 95%-CI 8.5-38.2 p < .001; HR 21.5 95%-CI 8.5-54.7 p < .001). To our knowledge, this represents the first German Comprehensive Cancer Centre analysis of therapy adherence in STS. It provides further real-world evidence that full adherence to ITB recommendations and the ability to adhere to them are of prognostic value for patient outcome and underlines the importance of interdisciplinary decision-making and treatment planning for STS patients.

Evaluation of Two Different Approaches for Selecting Patients for Postoperative Radiotherapy in Deep-Seated High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the Extremities and Trunk Wall

Two national sarcoma centers have had different approaches for selecting patients with grade 2-3 deep-seated soft tissue sarcomas (STS) for postoperative radiotherapy (RT). We evaluated potential differences in local recurrence in patients treated at the two centers. At Sarcoma Center 1 (SC1), RT was the standard treatment for all tumors except certain small tumors excised with a margin wider than 1 cm. Sarcoma Center 2 (SC2) avoided RT for tumors regardless of tumor size if removed with a margin wider than 1 cm and/or a solid barrier. We included 386 patients (SC1/SC2 = 196/190) over 18 years of age diagnosed with a non-metastatic grade 2-3, deep-seated STS of the extremities or trunk wall, who underwent primary surgical treatment (only tumors excised with a negative margin) from 1 January 2000, to 31 December 2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, competing risk analysis, and cause-specific Cox regression were applied. A total of 284 patients received primary RT, 163 (83%) at SC1 and 121 (64%) at SC2 (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of local recurrence at five years was 15% (95% CI: 10-19%) at SC1 and 14% (95% CI: 9-19%) at SC2. Multivariate analysis showed no significant differences in local recurrence between the centers. We concluded that when entering all available patients into the analysis using an intention-to-treat principle, a more selective approach to postoperative RT in patients with grade 2-3 deep-seated STS did not lead to a higher local recurrence rate. However, with this study design, we cannot rule out if the local recurrence rate could have been lower if RT was administered to all tumors removed with a margin wider than 1 cm and/or a solid barrier.

Clinical characteristics of sarcoma patients: a population-based data analysis from a German clinical cancer registry

PURPOSE

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms with a wide range of histological types and occur in almost any anatomic site and side. This study evaluated the prognostic factors in sarcoma patients based on German clinical cancer registry data.

METHODS

The German clinical cancer register of Saxony-Anhalt was used for all data analyses. Sarcoma cases of all clinical or pathological T-stages (T1a-T4c), all N-stages (N0-3) and M-stages (0-1b) corresponding to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages I to IVB were considered. In our analyses, 787 cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2022 were included. Further, we assessed the association of cancer-related parameters with mortality and hazard ratios (HR) from the Cox proportional hazard models. We included sex, age at diagnosis, histological grade, T-, N- and M-stages, tumor size, tumor localization and tumor side as parameters in our regression models.

RESULTS

The majority of sarcoma patients were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (12%), liposarcoma (11%), angiosarcoma (5.3%) and myxofibrosarcoma (2.7%). In our univariate regression models, tumors localized in more than one location, head, face and neck region as well as the pelvis and lower extremity were associated with increased mortality risk (more than one location: HR 7.10, 95% CI 2.20-22.9; head, face and neck: HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.89-2.06; pelvis: HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.86-1.89; lower extremity: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.96). Higher histological grades, UICC-grades and TNM-stages were related to a higher mortality risk. Differing histological subtypes had significant influence on overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients diagnosed with fibromyxoid sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma were related to higher mortality risk compared to other histological subtypes (fibromyxoid sarcoma: HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.71-38.1; rhabdomyosarcoma: HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.44-6.00; angiosarcoma: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological grade, tumor size, nodal and distant metastasis, tumor localization and histological subtype were determined as prognostic factors in terms of survival.

Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index is a valuable prognostic tool in operable soft tissue sarcoma of trunk and extremities

BACKGROUND

Advanced age and presence of comorbidities affect prognosis and treatment decisions in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, coeffect of age and comorbidities is still unknown. We aimed to investigate prognostic value of age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) in trunk and extremity STS operated with curative intent.

HYPOTHESIS

Preoperative ACCI might predict survival outcomes independently in patients with STS of trunk and extremities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 151 patients and ACCI was calculated for each patient. We categorized the patients into two groups according to median ACCI. We retrospectively collected data about clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors, and evaluated potential prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median age was 50 (18-86) years. There were 89 male and 62 female patients. Lower extremities were the most common tumor sites (73.5%). Most of the patients had high grade tumors (84.1%) and stage 3 disease (66.9%). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were carried out in 106 and 58 patients, respectively. Overall prevalence of comorbidity was 29.1%. Median ACCI was 3 (2-9). Older age (p<0.001), worse performance status (p<0.001), larger tumor size (p=0.03), higher grade tumors (p=0.03) and advanced stage (p=0.04) were associated with higher ACCI (≥3). Median follow-up time was 32 months, 50.3% of patients had disease recurrence, and 35.8% died. Median DFS (p=0.001) and OS (p=0.001) of patients with low ACCI (<3) were significantly longer than patients with high ACCI. Multivariate analysis determined ACCI as an independent prognostic indicator for both DFS (HR 1.72, p=0.02) and OS (HR 2.02, p=0.04).

DISCUSSION

ACCI is a valuable prognostic tool to be used in the preoperative setting of patients with STS. Higher ACCI was found to be independently associated with worse survival outcomes. For each patient with STS, evaluating comorbidities and combining them with age appears to be a critical step in modifying therapy options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational study.

Clinical outcomes of brain metastasectomy from soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis in sarcomas is associated with a poor prognosis. Data regarding prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of surgical resection of brain metastasis from sarcomas are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate survival outcomes post-brain metastasectomy for patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted examining survival outcomes among adults and children with soft tissue and bone sarcoma undergoing brain metastasectomy, in the English language from inception up to May 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently evaluated and screened the literature, extracted the data, and graded the included studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the low quality and heterogeneity of studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies published between 1994 and 2020 were included: three were retrospective cohort studies and seven were case series. 507 patients were included, of whom 269 underwent brain metastasectomy. The median follow-up period ranged between 14 and 29 months. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 7 to 25 months. The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included presenting performance status, age, number of brain metastases, presence of lung metastases, and peri-operative radiation therapy administration.

DISCUSSION

Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support that brain metastasectomy can be performed with reasonable post-operative survival in selected individuals.

Impact of location of inpatient cancer care on patients with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma-A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Ewing sarcoma (EWS) and osteosarcoma (OS) require multidisciplinary treatment. Care at specialized cancer centers (SCC: Children's Oncology Group affiliated and/or National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center) has been found to improve outcomes in patients with leukemia, but studies have not considered location of care and outcomes in EWS and OS patients, an ideal group to evaluate given their specialized multidisciplinary treatment needs.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with primary EWS and OS (2000-2014) were identified using the California Cancer Registry linked with hospitalization data. Patients were divided into age groups (0-18, 19-39, ≥40 years), and classified on whether they received all versus part/none of their inpatient treatment at a SCC within 1 year of diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

There were 531 ES and 959 OS patients. Five-year overall survival was better for patients with EWS (all: 63% vs. part/none: 42%) and OS (all: 64% vs. part/none: 47%) who received all of their treatment at a SCC. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, receiving all inpatient cancer treatment at a SCC was associated with superior overall survival (EWS HR: 0.49, CI 0.37-0.67; OS HR: 0.78, CI 0.63-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that treatment for EWS and OS at a SCC is associated with significantly improved survival even after adjustment for known prognostic factors. The superior survival among those treated at SCCs may be due to having greater access to clinical trials and services at SCCs.

Prediction of Soft Tissue Sarcoma from Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Data

The accurate diagnosis of soft tissue tumors may be difficult. Simple clinical characteristics or laboratory data that can predict tumor malignancy can be useful tools for diagnosing soft tissue tumors. Between 2003 and 2018, 588 patients with primary soft tissue tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical characteristics and laboratory data were evaluated to determine their association with the diagnosis of benign, intermediate, or malignant tumor. Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor size ≥ 5.6 cm (odds ratio (OR), 6.15; p < 0.001), white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 5700/µL (OR, 2.49; p = 0.002), hemoglobin (Hb) count ≤ 12.4 g/dL (OR, 2.56; p = 0.004), C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥ 0.17 mg/dL (OR, 2.64; p < 0.001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥ 240 IU/L (OR, 4.94; p < 0.001) were significant predictive factors for sarcoma. The sensitivity and specificity in the presence of three or more predictive factors for detecting malignant tumors were 0.58 and 0.90 respectively, and it was an appropriate threshold with the maximum Youden's index of 0.49. Simple clinical and laboratory data were useful tools for predicting whether the tumor is malignant. Patients with soft tissue tumors that meet any three or more predictive factors should be referred to a specialist.

The association between socioeconomic position and tumour size, grade, stage, and mortality in Danish sarcoma patients - A national, observational study from 2000 to 2013

Background: Survival in sarcoma patients depends on a range of prognostic factors. An association between cancer survival and socioeconomic position is known for several other cancers. We therefore examined the relations between three socioeconomic factors and risk of presenting with known tumour related prognostic factors, and the overall mortality of the different socioeconomic and prognostic factors in 1919 patients diagnosed with sarcoma in Denmark 2000-2013.Material and methods: Patients with sarcoma in extremities or trunk wall aged 30 years or more at diagnosis were identified in the Danish Sarcoma Registry and linked on an individual level to Danish national registries. We obtained data on educational level, disposable income and cohabitation status. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for the association between the socioeconomic factors and grade, stage and tumour size. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.Results: In adjusted analyses, educational level, income and cohabitation status were not associated with high grade or dissiminated stage at time of diagnosis. However, living alone was statistically significantly associated with having a large soft tissue sarcoma (≥5 cm) at time of diagnosis (OR 1.51; CI1.12-2.03). The overall mortality was statistically significantly increased in the group of patients with ≤10 years of education (HR 1.27; CI 1.02-1.57), in patients with the 20% lowest income (HR 1.30; CI 1.00-1.67) and nearly in patients living alone (HR 1.16; CI 0.99-1.36).Conclusion: In this nationwide, multicentre, population-based study, soft tissue sarcoma patients living alone had greater risk of having a large tumour at time of diagnosis. Soft tissue and bone sarcoma patients with a short education, low income, or living alone, had a higher mortality. This might indicate that the social differences in mortality might be related to treatment aspects and the biology of the disease rather that the diagnostic process.

Efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in elderly patients with sarcoma: subgroup analysis from a phase III, randomized controlled study of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma

Background

Treatment options for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients aged ≥65 years (elderly) can be limited by concerns regarding the increased risk of toxicity associated with standard systemic therapies. Trabectedin has demonstrated improved disease control in a phase III trial (ET743-SAR-3007) of patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Since previous retrospective analyses have suggested that trabectedin has similar safety and efficacy outcomes regardless of patient age, we carried out a subgroup analysis of the safety and efficacy observed in elderly patients enrolled in this trial.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to trabectedin (n = 384) or dacarbazine (n = 193) administered intravenously every-3-weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, symptom severity, and safety. A post hoc analysis was conducted in the elderly patient subgroup.

Results

Among 131 (trabectedin = 94; dacarbazine = 37) elderly patients, disease characteristics were well-balanced and consistent with those of the total study population. Treatment exposure was longer in patients treated with trabectedin versus dacarbazine (median four versus two cycles, respectively), with a significantly higher proportion receiving prolonged therapy (≥6 cycles) in the trabectedin arm (43% versus 23%, respectively; P = 0.04). Elderly patients treated with trabectedin showed significantly improved PFS [4.9 versus 1.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR)=0.40; P = 0.0002] but no statistically significant improvement in OS (15.1 versus 8.0 months, respectively; HR = 0.72; P = 0.18) or ORR (9% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.43). The safety profile for elderly trabectedin-treated patients was comparable to that of the overall trabectedin-treated study population.

Conclusions

This subgroup analysis of the elderly population of ET743-SAR-3007 suggests that elderly patients with STS and good performance status can expect clinical benefit from trabectedin similar to that observed in younger patients.

Trial registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01343277.

Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Korea

PURPOSE

A soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare type of cancer, accounting for 1% of adult solid cancers. The aim of the present study is to determine the incidence of localized and advanced STS in Korean patients, their treatment patterns, and the survival of patients by disease status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The STS patient cohort was defined using National Health Insurance Service medical data from 2002 to 2015. Incidence, distribution, anatomical location of tumors, survival rates (Kaplan-Meyer survival function) and treatment patterns were analyzed by applying different algorithms to the STS cohort containing localized and advanced STS cases.

RESULTS

A total of 7,813 patients were diagnosed with STS from 2007 to 2014, 4,307 were localized STS and 3,506 advanced STS cases. The total incidence of STS was 2.49 per 100,000 person- years: 1.37 per 100,000 person-years for localized STS and 1.12 per 100,000 person-years for advanced STS. The 5-year survival rate after diagnosis was 56.4% for all STS, 82.4% for localized, and 27.2% for advanced STS. Half of the advanced STS patients (49.98%) received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy as initial treatment after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into localized and advanced STS epidemiology, treatment patterns and outcomes in Korea, which could be used as fundamental data in improving clinical outcomes of STS patients in the future.

Use of Healthcare Services Two Years before Diagnosis in Danish Sarcoma Patients, 2000-2013

Background

Sarcoma is a rare type of cancer with nonspecific symptoms and uncertain aetiology. Thus, timely diagnosis of sarcomas is a clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of healthcare services 24 months preceding a sarcoma diagnosis compared to a matched cohort.

Materials and Methods

The study was a retrospective, population-based, matched cohort registry-study. Patients with sarcoma in Denmark in 2000–2013 were identified in the Danish Sarcoma Registry (n = 2167) and matched 1 : 10 on gender, age, and listed general practice. Using a binomial regression model, incidence rate ratios were calculated for face-to-face contacts in general practice, inpatient and outpatient visits, surgery, paraclinical examinations, and diagnostic imaging. Analyses were stratified for sarcoma subtypes, grade, stage, gender, and presence of comorbidity.

Results

The sarcoma patients had significantly increased incidence rate ratios in use of healthcare services compared to the matched cohort a year before their diagnoses. An increase in consultation rates was seen 11 months before diagnosis for inpatient visits, 9 months before diagnosis in general practice and outpatient visits, 8 months before diagnosis for paraclinical examinations, and 4 and 3 months before diagnosis for diagnostic imaging and surgery, respectively. There were no clinical significant differences in length of increased consultation rates between sarcoma type, stage, and grade. Sarcoma patients with comorbidity had persistently higher consultation rates compared to patients without comorbidity.

Conclusions

The use of healthcare services among sarcoma patients increased several months before diagnosis in all healthcare sectors. The results reveal a diagnostic time window and a potential to refer, diagnose, and treat sarcoma patients in a timelier manner.

Age-related sarcoma patient experience: results from a national survey in England

Background

Sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumours affecting patients of any age. Previous surveys describe that sarcoma patients report a significantly worse experience than those with common cancers. Consequently, Sarcoma UK conducted a national survey and these data were examined for age- and tumour-related differences in patients’ experiences.

Methods

Patients were randomly selected from respondents to National Cancer Patient Experience Surveys (n = 900). Differences between patient groups according to age (Adolescents and Young Adults [AYA] 18–39 years, middle-aged 40–64 years, elderly 65 + years) and tumour type (soft-tissue [STS] vs. bone]) were analysed with t-tests or chi-square tests.

Results

Survey response rate was 62% (n = 558; STS 75%, bone sarcoma 25%). Delay in diagnosis was reported; 27% patients (n = 150) waited > 3 months and initial symptoms were incorrectly interpreted; AYA STS patients were significantly more likely to be treated for another condition, or advised that their symptoms were not serious, than older STS patients. Clinical trial participation was low (6%, n = 35). Symptom burden was high, most commonly daytime fatigue (48%, n = 277) and pain (44%, n = 248). AYAs were significantly more likely to report most side-effects and post-treatment concerns than older patients. Elderly patients were more satisfied with the information and emotional support provided than younger patients, however were significantly less likely to be referred to rehabilitation services.

Conclusions

This study identifies significant age-related differences in the sarcoma patient journey, which are not only related to variation in tumour-types. These results provide rationale for adopting an age-specific approach to the management of sarcoma patients in order to improve overall patient experience.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4866-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of comorbidity on mortality in Danish sarcoma patients from 2000-2013: A nationwide population-based multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoma is a rare type of cancer. The incidence increases with age and elderly patients may have comorbidity that affects the prognosis. The aim of this study was to describe the type and prevalence of comorbidity in a nationwide population-based study in Denmark from 2000-2013 and to analyse the impact of the different comorbidities on mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Danish Sarcoma Registry is a national clinical database containing all patients with sarcoma in the extremities or trunk wall from 2000 and onwards. By linking data to other registries, we were able to get patient information on an individual level including date and cause of death as well as the comorbidity type up to 10 years prior to the sarcoma diagnosis. Based on diseases in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, we pooled the patients into six categories: no comorbidity, cardiopulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disease, neurovascular disease, malignant neoplasms, and miscellaneous (diabetes, renal and connective tissue diseases). 2167 patients were included.

RESULTS

The prevalence of comorbidity was 20%. For patients with localized disease, comorbidity increased the disease-specific mortality significantly (HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.36-2.13)). For patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, comorbidity did not affect the disease-specific mortality (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.78-1.42)). The presence of another cancer diagnosis within 10 years prior to the sarcoma diagnosis was the only significant independent prognostic factor of disease-specific mortality with an increase of 66% in mortality rate compared to patients with no comorbidity (HR 1,66 (95% CI 1.22-2.25)).

CONCLUSION

Comorbidity is a strong independent prognostic factor of mortality in patients with localized disease. This study emphasizes the need for optimizing the general health of comorbid patients in order to achieve a survival benefit from treatment of patients with localized disease, as this is potentially modifiable.

A Validated Prognostic Biomarker Score for Adult Patients with Nonmetastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Trunk and Extremities

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of serum biomarkers in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited, and its clinical applicability is compromised by a common inability to adjust for important confounders. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of pretreatment biomarkers on disease-specific survival (DSS) adjusted for confounders. METHODS: The study included 818 patients with localized STS. Pretreatment levels of albumin, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, neutrophils, and lymphocytes were tested individually and combined in prognostic scores: neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), and Aarhus Composite Biomarker Score (ACBS) which includes all five biomarkers. Patients were randomly split into a test cohort and a validation cohort. The prognostic value of biomarkers on DSS was estimated using crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. The different biomarker scores were compared using Akaike's information criteria. RESULTS: In the test cohort of 403 patients, all biomarkers except lymphocyte count were significant prognostic factors for DSS also after adjusting for confounders. NLR, GPS, and ACBS were independently associated with decreased survival; however, ACBS was significantly superior to NLR (P = .02) and GPS (P = .002). These findings were validated in the randomly assigned validation cohort of 415 patients. In the pooled data of 818 patients, the ACBS performed better than GPS and NLR. ACBS 2 was independently associated with decreased DSS compared to ACBS 0, hazard ratio 2.3[95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.5], P < .001. CONCLUSION: Patients with abnormal values in more than one serum biomarkers had a significant additional risk of dying compared to patients with only one abnormal value. ACBS was validated as an independent prognostic factor that is superior to both NLR and GPS.

Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Stage 2A and Stages 2B and 3 Extremity and Superficial Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has instituted treatment guidelines for stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas (ETSTS). This study examined adherence to the NCCN guidelines and factors associated with nonadherent treatment and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 ETSTS (n = 15,957) were categorized as undergoing adherent or nonadherent treatment based on the 2014 NCCN guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with nonadherent treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated, and Cox models were used to generate adjusted survival curves and hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

The findings showed that 87.2% of the patients with stage 2A disease and 58.3% of the patients with stage 2B or 3 disease received adherent treatment. Community treatment facilities and uninsured or unknown insurance status were associated with nonadherent treatment for both stage groups. Adherent treatment was associated with higher 5-year adjusted OS and DSS for stage 2A and stage 2B or 3 patients. In Cox models, nonadherent treatment was associated with worse survival for both stage 2A disease (HR, 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.63) and stages 2B and 3 disease (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.53-1.73). Increasing age and non-private insurance were associated with poorer outcomes. For stages 2B and 3 disease, treatment at a community center and African American race were associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to NCCN guidelines is excellent for stage 2A and poor for stages 2B and 3 ETSTS. Adherent treatment was associated with improved survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of adherence to NCCN guidelines.

Patients with soft tissue sarcoma comprise a higher probability of comorbidities than cancer-free individuals. A secondary data analysis

Soft tissue sarcoma comprises a heterogeneous group of solid malignant tumours. Comorbidities are important prognostic factors for survival and adversely impact quality of life. We examined the complex relationship between soft tissue sarcoma and comorbidities over time in a large population-based sample. The study uses routine data from the German statutory healthcare system (n = 2,615,865). Case identification of soft tissue sarcoma and comorbid diseases was based on ICD-10 codes and diagnostic modifiers. Uni- and multivariate regression models were used to obtain risk estimates for chronic somatic and mental comorbidities in soft tissue sarcoma patients compared to a cancer-free control group. At diagnosis, patients with soft tissue sarcoma were significantly more likely to be affected with prevalent bronchial asthma, ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension, angina pectoris, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease and thrombosis), back pain, depression, anxiety disorder and adjustment disorder than cancer-free controls. During the course of disease, sarcoma patients were at a significantly higher risk to develop incident depression, anxiety disorder and adjustment disorder. Comorbidities need to be considered in clinical decision making regarding the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma patients. Psycho-oncological treatment should be incorporated into medical care of patients with sarcoma.

Primary breast sarcoma: A retrospective study over 35 years from a single institution

AIM

The aim of this study was to contribute to the collected knowledge of prognostic factors in primary breast sarcomas (PBS) to the benefit of possible future prospective studies and therapeutic guidelines.

METHOD

All patients with pathologically verified PBS in the period of 1979-2014 were extracted from a hospital-based database at Aarhus University Hospital. All records were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics. Primary endpoints were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Adjustments were made for age, tumor location, surgical strategy, size, histological classification, prior radiation and grade. Prognostic factors were determined by the use of Cox proportional hazard ratio.

RESULTS

In total 42 patients were identified. Surgical resection was the main method of treatment. Nineteen (45%) patients were initially selected for lumpectomy, of these 68% needed at least one re-excision to attain wide margins. In total 55% experienced recurrence, loco regional in 43%. Five-years overall survival was 49%, five-year DFS was 48% and five-year DSS was 40%. Significant prognostic factors were size and grade. A trend towards better survival in those with superficial tumors was observed as well as an increased incidence in radiation-induced angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast, however, prognosis was no different from non-radiation-induced AS.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors in PBS patients were size and grade with a trend towards better survival in those with superficial tumors. There was no difference in survival between radiation-induced and spontaneous breast sarcomas. High rate of local recurrence suggests the need for aggressive surgical approach or the routine addition of postoperative radiotherapy in those selected for breast conserving surgery (BCS).

Unplanned Excision of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Korea: A Nationwide Study Based on a Claims Registry

Unplanned excision of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is common and has detrimental effects not only on patients’ oncologic outcomes but also on functional and economic issues. However, no study has analyzed a nationwide population-based database. To estimate the incidence and treatment pattern of unplanned excision in extremity STS in the Korean population, a nationwide epidemiologic study was performed using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, a centralized nationwide healthcare claims registry of Korea that covers the entire Korean population. Among 1,517 patients with extremity STS in the 4-year study period, 553 (36.5%) underwent unplanned excision (unplanned group). About 80% of unplanned excisions were performed in tertiary or general hospitals. Of the unplanned group, 240 (43.4%) underwent re-excision with or without radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy, and 51 (9.2%) did not undergo re-excision but were treated with radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy; whereas, 262 (47.4%) did not undergo any further treatment following unplanned excision. This study is the first nationwide population-based study on the unplanned excision of extremity STS. The results may have implications in establishing preventive or therapeutic measures to reduce the burden of unplanned excision of extremity STS.