Early results of reconstruction of the dorsal scapholunate ligament

Comparison of Outcomes of Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Introduction  Injury to the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) is a common cause of carpal instability, yet surgical management of chronic SLIL disruption remains challenging with no optimal technique identified. Purpose  The purpose of this meta-analysis was to comparatively review the available evidence of clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measures among popular techniques of SLIL reconstruction (capsulodesis, tenodesis, and bone-tissue-bone graft) to better guide management of SLIL injuries. Methods  A total of 1,172 patients from 42 included studies were assessed. Standardized data extraction and analysis were performed. The mean of postoperative outcome assessments with standard deviation was used to calculate pooled standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval. Results  Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for postoperative pain was lowest in bone-tissue-bone patients at 0.9 ( p  = 0.0360). Bone-tissue-bone patients had the highest percentage of "excellent" functional outcomes at 64.5% ( p  < 0.0001). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)/QuickDASH score was best in bone-tissue-bone patients at 9.7 ( p  < 0.0001). Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was best in tenodesis patients at 37.8 ( p  = 0.0255). There were no statistically significant differences in grip strength, range of motion, or radiographic outcomes among the techniques. Conclusion  Existing data demonstrate some benefit of bone-tissue-bone reconstruction over capsulodesis and tenodesis in pain reduction and functional improvement of the injured wrist. No statistically significant differences among radiographic outcomes could be ascertained, possibly attributable to the heterogeneity of procedures. This review provides an updated reference and highlights the need for multicenter trials with longer term follow-up and more standardized outcome measures.

Management of chronic scapholunate ligament injury

Scapholunate ligament is the most commonly injured ligament in the wrist and requires accurate diagnosis and treatment. It presents with pain, stiffness and can lead to carpal instability as well as degenerative arthritis if left untreated, with subsequent loss of function and disability. There are several management options currently available but there is no consensus on how best to manage a wrist with chronic sequelae of scapholunate ligament injury. This review explores available evidence in the literature on optimal treatment options including non-operative and operative procedures, relevant surgical techniques and their associated outcomes. A summary of the current concepts in the management of Chronic Scapholunate ligament injury is presented.

Surgical outcomes of chronic isolated scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries: a systematic review of 805 wrists

Background

Management of chronic isolated scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injuries has generated a substantial volume of low-quality literature with descriptions of multiple new surgical techniques, and the impact of instability pattern and the optimal surgical technique remain unclear. The primary goal of this review was to compare clinical, radiographic and patient-rated outcomes between current surgical techniques.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search using multiple databases. We analyzed clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. We used a fixed-effects model weighted by sample size with combined outcomes estimated via least squares means with 95% confidence intervals. We also performed a subgroup analysis of static versus dynamic instability.

Results

We assessed 805 procedures from 37 study groups, with 429 procedures used in subgroup analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between surgical techniques or in subgroup analysis. Overall, postoperative wrist flexion and pain scores decreased, and grip strength and patient-rated outcomes improved.

Conclusion

Compared to overall preoperative values, modest improvements in pain score, grip strength and functional outcome scores were obtained from a range of reconstructive procedures performed for chronic isolated SLIL injuries. No significant differences could be ascertained between surgical techniques, potentially owing to the low quality of evidence and procedure heterogeneity. This study provides accurate preoperative reference values for future studies, highlights the controversial clinical impact of instability classification, and the need for higher-quality multicentre or collaborative trials to improve our understanding and management of this common injury.

Scapholunate Dissociation

Wrist injuries are a common complaint in the emergency setting. Any disruption of the anatomy of the carpal bones can impair hand function, leading to pain, weakness, and complications. One of the most common forms of carpal bone instability is scapholunate dissociation. This injury can lead to significant morbidity including avascular necrosis, impaired healing, limited function, and arthritis. These diagnostic findings may be subtle, thus identifying high-risk mechanisms of injury, and clinical manifestations will assist the emergency practitioner with early diagnosis and treatment of this high-risk injury.

Assessment of scapholunate instability and review of evidence for management in the absence of arthritis

Scapholunate ligament tear is a common wrist injury and may lead to degenerative arthritis of the wrist in the long term. We review the assessment and classification of scapholunate instability and discuss the findings from our search for evidence for the management of scapholunate instability in the absence of arthritis. Strong evidence (level 1 or 2) for management is lacking and published recommendations are largely experience-based. The choice of procedure in the absence of arthritis depends on the extent of the tear, quality of the ligament remnants, and reducibility of the joint. Prospective, randomized studies with validated outcome measures are needed to establish the efficacy of intervention on symptoms and function and its effect on the risk of future arthritis.