Regional variation in use of exogenous and endogenous glomerular filtration rate (GFR) markers in Sweden

Estimation of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam clearance with iohexol-based glomerular filtration rate in paediatric patients

PURPOSE

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations reflect kidney function imprecisely. We aimed to describe whether iohexol-based GFR or eGFRs predict clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in pharmacokinetic (PK) models in this population and its clinical significance.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients (0.5-25 years) with haemato-oncological disease and infection receiving cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam were included. PK samples were collected at a steady state concomitantly with samples for iohexol-based GFR. PK models were developed in NONMEM. Weight, postmenstrual age, iohexol-based GFR, different eGFR equations (Schwartz updated, Lund-Malmö revised, CKD-EPI, Bouvet, Schwartz cystatin C-based) were tested as covariates. Probabilities of neurotoxic/therapeutic concentrations were assessed by simulations.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients receiving cefepime and 17 piperacillin/tazobactam were included (median (range) age 16.2 (1.9-26.0) and 10.5 (0.8-25.6) years, iohexol-based GFR 102 (68-140) and 116 (74-137) mL/min/1.73 m², respectively). Two-compartment model provided the best fit for all drugs. Weight was covariate for central and peripheral compartment, clearance and intercompartmental clearance (only tazobactam), and postmenstrual age for clearance (excluding cefepime). Iohexol-based GFR was the best predictor of clearance. The model of cefepime without vs with iohexol-based GFR underestimated the probability of neurotoxic concentrations (28.3-28.6% vs 52.1-69.3%) and overestimated the probability of therapeutic concentrations (> 90% vs 81.9-87.1%) in the case of iohexol-based GFR 70-80 and 130-140 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively.

CONCLUSION

Iohexol-based GFR can predict better than eGFRs the clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, warranting further investigation as an indicator of renal function to improve targeting of therapeutic window.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION

EudraCT 2015-000,631-32, EudraCT 2016-003,374-40 (24.10.2016).

Lower creatinine concentration values and lower inter-laboratory variation among Swedish hospital laboratories in 2014 compared to 1996: results from the Equalis external quality assessment program

Background

Creatinine measurement for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a frequently used laboratory test. Differences in analytic creatinine methods have caused large inter-laboratory variation. International and national standardization efforts have been made in the last decade.

Methods

This study describes the results of the standardization efforts in Sweden by summarizing data for creatinine concentration in blood plasma in the Equalis quality assessment program during 1996–2014.

Results

Non-compensated Jaffe methods dominated in 1996–2001 (91 of 103 laboratories; 90%) and were then gradually replaced by either compensated Jaffe methods or enzymatic creatinine methods. In 2014 a majority of Swedish hospital laboratories (139 of 159; 87%) used enzymatic methods. The reported mean creatinine value by the Swedish laboratories was about 10 μmol/L higher than the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) assured reference value in 2003, but consistent with the reference value from 2009 to 2014. The inter-laboratory CV was 7%–9% for creatinine values until 2007, and thereafter gradually decreased to about 4%–5% in 2014.

Conclusions

The introduction of enzymatic methods in Swedish laboratories has contributed to achieving a low inter-laboratory variation. Also, the reported values are lower for enzymatic methods compared to Jaffe methods, and the values obtained with enzymatic methods were consistent with IDMS certified values established at reference laboratories. Thus, many Swedish hospital laboratories reported 10 μmol/L lower, and more true, creatinine concentrations in 2012 than in 2003, which may cause bias in longitudinal studies.

The Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements (SCREAM) project: protocol overview and regional representativeness

BACKGROUND

We here describe the construction of the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurement (SCREAM) cohort and assess its coverage/representativeness of the Stockholm county in Sweden. SCREAM has the principal aims to estimate the burden and consequences of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and to identify inappropriate drug use (prescription of nephrotoxic, contraindicated or ill-dosed drugs).

METHODS

SCREAM is a repository of laboratory data of individuals, residing or accessing healthcare in the region of Stockholm, who underwent creatinine assessments between 2006-11. Laboratory tests were linked to administrative databases with complete information on socioeconomic status, demographic data, healthcare utilization, diagnoses, vital status and dispensed prescription medicines.

RESULTS

SCREAM identified 1 118 507 adult Stockholm citizens with available creatinine tests between 2006-11. This corresponded to 66% of the complete population in the region. Geographical coverage was uniform, ranging between 62 and 72% throughout its 26 municipalities. Population coverage was higher across older age strata (50% coverage for age range 18-44 years, >75% for 45-64 years and >90% coverage for ≥65 years). Of note, 97 and 98% of all individuals with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease, respectively, were captured by SCREAM. Further, 89% of all deaths registered in the period occurred in individuals with a creatinine test undertaken.

CONCLUSION

SCREAM represents the largest cohort to estimate the burden and healthcare implications of CKD in Sweden. The coverage and representativeness of the region of Stockholm was high and in accordance to both the commonness of creatinine assessment, and the medical indications for creatinine testing. The inclusion of individuals who sought medical care and had a creatinine test undertaken resulted in a slight over-representation of elderly and comorbid patients.

Measuring GFR: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

No comprehensive systematic review of the accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement methods using renal inulin clearance as reference has been published.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis of cross-sectional diagnostic studies.

SETTING & POPULATION

Published original studies and systematic reviews in any population.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Index and reference measurements conducted within 48 hours; at least 15 participants studied; GFR markers measured in plasma or urine; plasma clearance calculation algorithm verified in another study; tubular secretion of creatinine had not been blocked by medicines.

INDEX TESTS

Endogenous creatinine clearance; renal or plasma clearance of chromium 51-labeled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), iohexol, and iothalamate; and plasma clearance of inulin.

REFERENCE TEST

Renal inulin clearance measured under continuous inulin infusion and urine collection.

RESULTS

Mean bias <10%, median bias <5%, the proportion of errors in the index measurements that did not exceed 30% (P30) ≥80%, and P10 ≥50% were set as requirements for sufficient accuracy. Based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, the quality of evidence across studies was rated for each index method. Renal clearance of iothalamate measured GFR with sufficient accuracy (strong evidence). Renal and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA and plasma clearance of iohexol were sufficiently accurate to measure GFR (moderately strong evidence). Renal clearance of DTPA, renal clearance of iohexol, and plasma clearance of inulin had sufficient accuracy (limited evidence). Endogenous creatinine clearance was an inaccurate method (strong evidence), as was plasma clearance of DTPA (limited evidence). The evidence to determine the accuracy of plasma iothalamate clearance was insufficient. With the exception of plasma clearance of inulin, only renal clearance methods had P30 >90%.

LIMITATIONS

The included studies were few and most were old and small, which may limit generalizability. Requirements for sufficient accuracy may depend on clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

At least moderately strong evidence suggests that renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA or iothalamate and plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA or iohexol are sufficiently accurate methods to measure GFR.