Chemotherapy with high-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone for poor-prognosis myeloid leukemias

A randomized trial of continuous infusion versus bolus mitoxantrone in combination with cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia

Mitoxantrone (MTZ) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). The objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the impact of mode of administration of MTZ on the response and recurrence rates in newly diagnosed patients with AML and to compare the toxicity patterns associated with bolus and continuous infusion (CI) of MTZ. From March 1987 to March 1994, 40 newly diagnosed patients with AML were randomized to receive either bolus or CI-MTZ, administered for 3 days at 10 mg/m2/day in combination with CI-cytarabine for 7 days at 100 mg/m2/day. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two consolidation cycles followed by monthly maintenance cycles, aiming a total of 12 cycles of chemotherapy. Fifteen patients (75%) in the bolus arm and 16 patients (80%) in the CI arm achieved CR. There were no significant differences in rates of early death and time to myeloid recovery between the two groups. After 11 years from the initiation of the study, median disease-free survival (DFS) in bolus and CI groups were 19 and 29 months after a median follow-up of 10 and 14 months, respectively. DFS rates at 10 years were 16.7% in the bolus group and 28.6% in the CI group (p = 0.36). Overall survival (OS) rates during the same period were 10.7 and 21.3% in the bolus and CI groups, respectively (p = 0.26). No relapse was observed in either group after 4 years. In patients younger than 40 years of age, DFS and OS were found to be significantly longer in the CI arm (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Mild asymptomatic cardiotoxicity associated with a decrease of 10 to 20% in the ejection fraction occurred in a patient in CI-MTZ arm and in two patients in the bolus arm. None of these patients showed any evidence of cardiac failure during their subsequent follow-up. Grade III-IV alopecia (p = 0.05) and grade I-II hepatotoxicity (p = 0.01) were more frequent in the CI arm. A tendency for higher frequency of grade III-IV nausea was observed in the bolus arm (9 vs. 3%, p = 0.10). As a conclusion, bolus and CI administration of MTZ were equally effective and tolerated well. Development of new anti-leukemia agents with novel treatment approaches is still needed to improve the high relapse rates in patients with AML who do not have an HLA-matched donor.

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse: a comprehensive review of the literature

Twenty years of published literature was reviewed for chemotherapy regimens used to treat patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse. Thirty-one trials containing at least 20 patients in first relapse and information on patient age, duration of first complete remission (CR1), and rate of second complete remission (CR2) were analyzed. These trials included 10 retrospective studies with CR2 rates ranging from 30 to 64%, two phase II single-agent studies with CR2 rates of 8 and 25%, 15 phase II combination-agent studies with CR2 rates ranging from 14 to 87%, and four phase III randomized studies with CR2 rates ranging from 40 to 89%. When reported, median duration of CR2 was < or = 14 months and overall median survival was < or = 12 months. The probability of 3-year survival ranged from 8 to 29%. Combination therapies resulted in higher CR2 rates but were associated with longer duration of myelosuppression and greater incidence of mucositis. None of the reviewed regimens provided durable remissions for the majority of AML patients in first relapse. The CR2 rates were closely associated with age and duration of CR1. Therefore, considering the poor clinical outcomes of patients with AML in first relapse, improved therapies need to be developed.

Timed sequential chemotherapy with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia: a single arm clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The timed-sequential chemotherapy regimen consisting of etoposide, mitoxantrone and cytarabine (EMA) is an effective therapy for relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We postulated that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might enhance the cytotoxicity of EMA by increasing the proportion of leukemic blasts in S-phase. We added G-CSF to EMA (EMA-G) for therapy of advanced high-risk AML patients.

METHODS

High-risk AML was defined as refractory, relapsed or secondary to either an antecedent hematologic disorder or exposure to cytotoxic agents. The patients were treated with one course of EMA-G consisting of mitoxantrone and cytarabine on days 1-3, and etoposide and cytarabine on days 8-10. G-CSF was started on day 4 and continued until absolute neutrophil count recovered.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 51 years (range, 25-75). Seventeen (61%) patients had unfavorable cytogenetic karyotypes. Twenty (69%) patients had secondary AML. Ten (34%) had relapsed disease. Four (14%) had refractory AML. Three (10%) patients died from febrile neutropenia and sepsis. Major non-hematologic toxicity included hyperbilirubimenia, renal insufficiency, mucositis, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, skin rash. A complete remission was achieved in 13 (46%) patients. Median overall survival was 9 months (range, 0.5-66). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) for those who had a CR was 3 months (range, 0.5-63) with RFS censored at the time of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or peripheral stem cell transplantation for 6 of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EMA-G is a safe and efficacious option for induction chemotherapy in advanced, high-risk AML patients. The activity of EMA may be increased if applied in patients with less advanced disease.

Acute monocytic leukemia: a single institution experience

Using strict FAB criteria, 39 cases of monocytic leukemia were identified in 463 consecutive cases of AML. Patients had a median age of 49 with no sex predominance. Extramedullary disease and hyperleukocytosis were common (54% and 36% of patients respectively). Cytogenetic analysis was successful in 38 of 39 patients; 71% had a cytogenetic abnormality and 42% of these involved chromosome 11; 14 of 16 chromosome 11 abnormalities involved the region of 11q23. Non-chromosome 11 abnormalities tended to occur in older patients and to be associated with a lower platelet count; patients with the translocation 9;11 tended to have a lower white count and a higher incidence of therapy-related leukemia. 35 patients were treated with induction therapy including intensive chemotherapy (n = 33) and allogeneic BMT at presentation (n = 2). Patients who entered remission underwent consolidation chemotherapy, autologous BMT, or allogeneic BMT depending on policies at the time of diagnosis. Of 6 patients who underwent further intensive chemotherapy there is 1 long-term disease-free survivor. 3 of 8 patients undergoing autologous BMT and 2 of 3 patients undergoing allogeneic BMT are long-term disease-free survivors. We conclude that this specific subtype of AML, relatively rare when strict criteria are applied, is associated with unique biologic and clinical features and that the high relapse rate associated with conventional therapy makes new treatment approaches involving stem cell transplantation or immunomodulation necessary.