Combined modality therapy increasing local control of pancreatic cancer

Neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a highly malignant disease. Curative treatment is only possible for patients diagnosed at a very early stage. Therefore, the vast majority of pancreatic cancer patients receive palliative treatment. Surgical palliation is offered to patients who are found not to have a resectable tumor. The treatment of obstructive jaundice is managed by stenting of the common bile duct or by a surgical bypass. The best possible surgical procedure should be based on the factors that influence hospital mortality, length of survival, and quality of life. In patients with a life expectancy of longer than 3 months, surgical bypass is recommended, with hepaticojejunostomy the treatment of choice. In the same surgical procedure, the relief of duodenal obstruction with a gastroenteric bypass should be achieved. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both is employed as a neoadjuvant measure, as an adjuvant treatment, or, in most patients, as palliation. As palliative chemotherapy alone, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid is still the treatment of choice; however, newer drugs, such as gemcitabine, seem to have similar or marginally better results. Palliative radiochemotherapy with external-beam radiation plus 5-FU and folinic acid seems to lead to better local control of tumor progression but not to better survival, for which distant metastases are the limiting factor.

Chemoradiation for pancreatic and biliary cancer: current status of RTOG studies

Chemoradiation for gastrointestinal cancers is actively under study in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and consists of external irradiation combined with simultaneously administered chemotherapy given to provide radiation sensitization and to attack micro metastatic disease. Two national protocols for the treatment of patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers are now active. RTOG 97-04 is a phase III post-operative combined modality program for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. All patients receive protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with 50.4 Gy given in 28 fractions. Prior to and after chemoradiation all patients are randomized to receive multiple cycles of either infusional 5-FU or Gemcitabine to determine the effect on survival. In the other study (RTOG 98-12) patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer are given 50.4 Gy combined with weekly Paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) to examine the efficacy of this active combination in a phase II trial in a multi-institutional setting. Both of these trials have recently been opened to accrual. A third RTOG study for patients with biliary cancer will examine the efficacy of giving pre-operative chronomodulated infusional 5-FU chemoradiation. The background and the rationale for these studies is based on the long history of 5-FU radiation sensitization in the treatment of cancers of these anatomic sites and will be summarized. A brief review of recently published trials using chemoradiation in conjunction with new irradiation treatment techniques "3D" conformal therapy for these diseases will be discussed.

Tumor response and patterns of failure following intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer--evaluation by computed tomography

Tumor response and patterns of failure following intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of 42 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancers were evaluated by computed tomography (CT). At the time of maximum tumor regression, the tumor response rate following IORT was 52%, with three tumors showing CR. The median time of maximum tumor regression was 3 months after IORT. When tumor response was evaluated within 2 months of IORT, no significant difference in survival rate between responders and non-responders was noted. However, when tumor response was evaluated 3-6 months after IORT, the responders showed a significantly better survival rate than the non-responders. Local tumor recurrence, liver metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination were major causes of failure after IORT for unresectable pancreatic cancers. In addition, the median time of detection of these findings by CT was 2-3 months after IORT. Thus, our results indicate that CT performed 3-4 months after IORT is most important for predicting clinical outcome.

Review article: current treatment and optimal patient management in pancreatic cancer

This review analyses the current state of knowledge and understanding concerning the optimum treatment and therapeutic management of patients who suffer from pancreatic cancer. It outlines recent advances in scientific understanding and assesses their potential future value to clinicians in confronting this disease. Despite a significant expansion in scientific knowledge relating to factors underlying the early development of pancreatic carcinoma, the clinician continues to be restricted to a severely limited therapeutic armoury for this disease. Local therapies (surgery and radiation) are inevitably of limited value in the face of a disease that is normally encountered at a stage where metastasis is already highly developed. Despite such limitations, however, surgery performed in specialist units may be of value for 10-20% of patients, with a 5-year survival rate in such units of between 10 and 24%. This may be improved even further by appropriate use of adjuvant treatment. The advanced stage of the disease when normally encountered emphasizes the potential value of systemic treatment in this therapeutic area. Unfortunately systemic treatment (chemotherapy) has been found to be ineffective to date in significantly extending survival, with a low rate and duration of remission being identified in most trials. The challenge for both the health service and the pharmaceutical industry is to harness recent and future developments in scientific knowledge to the practical benefit of clinicians. Where cure is possible it should be vigorously pursued; where it is not, in this field above all others, clinicians have a duty of care. To achieve this it is necessary to abandon the therapeutic nihilism that has characterized the attitudes of clinicians towards this disease in the past. It is time that such nihilism was replaced by a recognition of the challenges and the opportunities available to clinicians in enhancing the quantity and quality of life available to patients. The dictum of 'curing whenever possible but caring always' should be the future therapeutic philosophy used to guide clinicians in this important and rapidly changing therapeutic area.

Celiac axis infusion chemotherapy in advanced nonresectable pancreatic cancer

CONCLUSION

Based on these data we suggest that regional intra-arterial chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer seems not to be superior to common treatment modalities, such as combined radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for advanced pancreatic cancer is very poor. No standard treatment is available. Recently, better survival and quality of life was reported from regional cancer treatment via celiac axis infusion. In an attempt to confirm these results we conducted a phase II study of intra-arterial chemotherapy for nonresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1994 to February 1995, 12 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven advanced ductal carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas were given intra-arterial infusions consisting of Mitoxantrone, 5-FU + folinic acid, and Cisplatin via a transfemorally placed catheter in the celiac axis. Six patients were classified as UICC stage III and six as stage IV with the liver as the sole site of distant metastasis. Nine patients had primary and three had recurrent pancreatic carcinoma after a Whipple procedure. Nonresectability of primary tumors was assessed in all patients by laparotomy or laparoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 31 cycles of chemotherapy (mean 2.6 cycles/patient) was administered. Catheter placement was technically feasible in all cycles. A groin hematoma was the only catheter complication. The follow-up by CT scans at 2-mo intervals revealed partial remission in 1 patient (8%), temporary stable disease in 4 patients (33%), and disease progression in 7 patients (58%). The same response was obtained after analyzing the CA 19-9 course. Median survival in stage III patients was 8.5 mo (3-12 mo) and in stage IV patients 5 mo (2-11 mo). Toxicity according to WHO criteria consisted of grade III (4 events), grade II (10 events), and grade I (17 events), mainly resulting from leucopenia and diarrhea/vomiting. Nine of 11 patients experienced temporary relief of pain immediately after regional treatment.

[Therapeutic approaches of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. Trends in 1997]

The prognosis for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains poor. Besides surgical treatment of operable localised tumours, many questions are raised: what is the role of adjuvant therapies, chemo-radiotherapy, pre-operative or post-operative combinations, and what is the role of radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy during surgery? In the case of inoperable tumours, there is no consensus on the role and the value of various protocols whose toxicity is generally high. Improvements in treatment must come from a better understanding of the role of various prognostic factors (biological markers in particular).

Palliative and adjuvant regional chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

To improve the dismal prognosis of patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer we treated 32 patients with non-resectable (UICC III, 17 pts; UICC IV, 15 pts--group 1) and 20 patients with resected (UICC I, 1 pt; UICC II, 3 pts; UICC III, 16 pts--group 2) pancreatic cancer with palliative (group I) and adjuvant post-operative (group II) coeliac axis intra-arterial cyclic infusions (CAI). CAI consisted of mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1, folinic acid 170 mg/m2 and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 during days 2-4, and cis-platinum 60 mg/m2 on day 5 for up to 11 (group I) or six (group II) cycles. In a total of 211 cycles toxicities at the level of WHO III occurred in 0-6% and of WHO IV in 0%. The median survival times, compared with institutional historical controls (treated vs controls), were 12 vs 4.8 months in UICC III (P < 0.006) and 4 vs 2.9 months in UICC IV (P < 0.05) group I pts, and 21 vs 9.3 months in group II (P < 0.0003). Hepatic disease progression appeared to be suppressed with CAI, which also appears to be effective for palliative and adjuvant treatment in non-resectable and resected pancreatic cancer.

Aspects of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Morphologic verification of malignancy is usually a prerequisite before initiating nonsurgical therapy for pancreatic carcinoma. Fine-needle biopsy has been widely used, but the method has also been criticized because of inadequate sampling material and the risk of intra-abdominal seeding.

METHODS

Cytologic material from 334 patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy was evaluated with regard to the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the technique. The outcome (positive versus negative yield of cancer cells) was also entered in a Cox bivariate regression analysis and tested against multiple prognostic variables.

RESULTS

In all, 270 patients had malignant disease, which was verified cytologically in 187. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69%, 100%, and 75%, respectively. Statistically significant prognostic factors with regard to patient survival time were type of therapy (P <0.001), tumor location (P <0.001), jaundice (P <0.001), pain (P <0.001), and palpable mass (P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is still found to be a safe and feasible method for diagnosing pancreatic cancer, providing the requisite diagnostic information before initiating nonsurgical therapy.

Multimodal therapies in ductal pancreatic cancer. The future

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy via the celiac axis combined with external beam radiotherapy might be an effective method for palliative and perioperative multimodal treatment in pancreatic cancer. To improve the dismal prognosis in resectable and nonresectable pancreatic cancer, the results of multimodal palliative, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant therapies were reviewed and put into perspective with the results of two intra-arterial palliative and adjuvant treatment studies conducted at our department. The benefits and pitfalls of each method were outweighed, resulting in a concept for performing intra-arterial chemotherapy with radiotherapy in nonresectable stage UICC-III pancreatic cancer that eventually will be developed as a combined neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment of all potentially resectable ductal pancreatic carcinomas.

Tumor markers in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor markers are putative prognostic indicators for patients with carcinoma, but have not heretofore been evaluated in patients with Stage II and III pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with Stage II (n=9) and Stage III (n=25) unresectable regional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with combined modality therapy. Treatment consisted of split course radiotherapy and simultaneous combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil infusion, streptozotocin, and cisplatin. Prior to treatment, patients free of both infection and jaundice provided blood for CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 125 assays.

RESULTS

The overall median survival of Stage II patients was 21.1 months. Due to the small number of Stage II patients with markedly abnormal assays, it was not possible to test for a statistically significant association between pretreatment tumor assays and survival. Among patients with Stage III pancreatic carcinoma, a CA 19-9 assay of 2000 u/ML or less identified a group of 16 patients with a median survival of 12.8 months. In contrast, 8 Stage III patients with a CA 19-9 assay of greater than 2000 u/mL had a median survival of 8 months and only 1 patient survived for 1 year (P=0.020, log rank test; P=0.010, Wilcoxon test). Among Stage III patients, a comparison of those with a normal assay versus any degree of abnormal assay failed to provide prognostic information. Analyses based on a combination of CA 19-9 and CA 125 assays provided additional powerful prognostic information: (P=0.002, log rank test; P=0.005, Wilcoxon test). CEA assays failed to provide information alone or in combination with the CA 19-9 assay. After adjusting for the CA 19-9 assay in multivariate analyses, neither performance status nor tumor size were significant prognostic variables for patients with Stage III cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment CA 19-9 assays provide powerful independent and objective prognostic information.

An assessment of intraoperative radiotherapy

An assessment of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) was undertaken to inform a decision on whether this technology should be introduced into the state of New South Wales. On the basis of a literature review, IORT appeared to be essentially an experimental technology, with limited data to demonstrate its comparative advantage over other treatments. Introduction of a dedicated IORT facility was technically feasible, but there appeared to be major uncertainties regarding selection and referral of suitable patients on a state-wide basis. The results of the assessment suggested that introduction of an IORT facility might have limited advantage for routine health services. A decision was subsequently taken not to support the introduction of this technology.

Preoperative chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: excessive toxicity of prophylactic hepatic irradiation

PURPOSE

In an effort to reduce relapse in the liver and improve survival in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, we combined whole-liver irradiation with our standard preoperative chemoradiation regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven patients with biopsy-proven, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were treated with 50.4 Gy of external beam irradiation to the pancreas (1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week) and concurrent continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day). The liver was treated with 23.4 Gy on Days 8 through 21 (13 fractions; 1.8 Gy/fraction). Patients, who upon restaging with radiography and computed tomography were considered to have resectable tumors, were subsequently taken to surgery. If, at surgery, tumors were resectable, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and 10 Gy of intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy was delivered to the bed of the resected pancreas.

RESULTS

All 11 patients completed chemoradiation. Two treatment-related deaths occurred following chemoradiation, prompting premature termination of the study. Of seven patients taken to surgery, four underwent resection. Seven patients have died of disease, five with liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic hepatic chemoradiation, as given in this study, was associated with two treatment-related deaths and a higher than expected incidence of subsequent liver metastases. Our data do not support the use of this treatment program in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Preoperative combined modality therapy for pancreatic cancer

Combined modality therapy can be administered prior to surgical resection for patients with operable pancreatic cancer. One important criteria used to select patients for this treatment sequence is the absence of arterial vascular encasement by tumor on thin-section CT scanning; the absence of peritoneal seeding on surgical staging or laparoscopy has been another important parameter used in identifying patients with "localized" disease. Preoperative treatment with infusional chemoradiation uses multiple fields of irradiation delivering a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5 1/2 weeks. This is done in conjunction with a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil intravenously at a dosage of 300 mg/m2/day with each day of radiotherapy treatment. The initial results of this protocol indicate acceptable toxicity and no evidence of increased perioperative morbidity or mortality compared to series using operation alone. We conclude that nearly all patients eligible for this combined modality treatment approach complete therapy as prescribed with acceptable toxicity.

Circulating pancreatic polypeptide in patients with adenocarcinoma of the bile duct

Using radioimmunoassay methods, the blood of patients with pancreatic tumors was screened for circulating polypeptide hormones. This screening discovered pancreatic polypeptide in abnormally high concentration in the serum of six of seven patients with adenocarcinomas of the bile duct. The assay appears to be very sensitive finding excessive residual pancreatic polypeptide production after palliative resections. Serum pancreatic polypeptide assays warrant evaluation as an aid in the diagnosis and management of patients with bile duct tumors.