Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for salvage in relapsed squamous cell head and neck cancer

Long-term outcomes of a phase II randomized controlled trial comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without weekly cisplatin for the treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Salvage treatment for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is complicated and relatively limited. Radiotherapy, combined with effective concomitant chemotherapy, may improve clinical treatment outcomes. We conducted a phase II randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant weekly cisplatin on locally recurrent NPC.

Methods

Between April 2002 and January 2008, 69 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic locally recurrent NPC were randomly assigned to either concomitant chemoradiotherapy group (n = 34) or radiotherapy alone group (n = 35). All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiotherapy dose for both groups was 60 Gy in 27 fractions for 37 days (range 23–53 days). The concomitant chemotherapy schedule was cisplatin 30 mg/m² by intravenous infusion weekly during radiotherapy.

Results

The median follow-up period of all patients was 35 months (range 2–112 months). Between concomitant chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy groups, there was only significant difference in the 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (68.7% vs. 42.2%, P = 0.016 and 41.8% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.049, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that concomitant chemoradiotherapy significantly improved the 5-year OS rate especially for patients in stage rT3–4 (33.0% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.009), stages III–IV (34.3% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.006), recurrence interval >30 months (49.0% vs. 20.6%, P = 0.017), and tumor volume >26 cm³ (37.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Compared with radiotherapy alone, concomitant chemoradiotherapy can improve OS of the patients with locally recurrent NPC, especially those with advanced T category (rT3–4) and stage (III–IV) diseases, recurrence intervals >30 months, and tumor volume >26 cm³.

Salvage re-irradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To present a retrospective review of treatment outcomes for recurrent head and neck (HN) cancer patients treated with re-irradiation (re-RT) at a single medical center.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 1996-September 2005, 105 patients with recurrent HN cancer underwent re-RT at our institution. Sites included were: the neck (n = 21), nasopharynx (n = 21), paranasal sinus (n = 18), oropharynx (n = 16), oral cavity (n = 9), larynx (n = 10), parotid (n = 6), and hypopharynx (n = 4). The median prior RT dose was 62 Gy. Seventy-five patients received chemotherapy with their re-RT (platinum-based in the majority of cases). The median re-RT dose was 59.4 Gy. In 74 (70%), re-RT utilized intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 35 months, 18 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. The 2-year loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival rates were 42% and 37%, respectively. Patients who underwent IMRT, compared to those who did not, had a better 2-year LRPF (52% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, non-nasopharynx and non-IMRT were associated with an increased risk of loco-regional (LR) failure. Patients with LR progression-free disease had better 2-year overall survival vs. those with LR failure (56% vs. 21%, p < 0.001). Acute and late Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 23% and 15% of patients. Severe Grade 3-4 late complications were observed in 12 patients, with a median time to development of 6 months after re-RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our data, achieving LR control is crucial for improved overall survival in this patient population. The use of IMRT predicted better LR tumor control. Future aggressive efforts in maximizing tumor control in the recurrent setting, including dose escalation with IMRT and improved chemotherapy, are warranted.

Mitochondria as a critical target of the chemotheraputic agent cisplatin in head and neck cancer

Cisplatin is among the most important chemotherapeutic agents ever developed. It is a critical component of therapeutic regimens in a broad range of malignancies. However, more than a generation after its clinical introduction, the exact mechanism of cisplatin action on tumor cells is not fully defined. The preponderance of research over the last three decades has focused on cisplatin interactions with nuclear DNA which are felt to lead to apoptotic cell death in sensitive cells. However, recent data have shown that cisplatin may have important direct interactions with mitochondria which can induce apoptosis and may account for a significant portion of the clinical activity associated with this drug. These direct interactions between cisplatin and mitochondria may have critical implications for our understanding of this class of drugs and the development of new therapeutic agents.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 35 patients with locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma referred to our department between March 1994 and November 2002. Most patients were male (77%), Chinese (97%), and had undifferentiated carcinoma (89%). Most had extensive locally recurrent Stage rT3-T4 disease (66%) with a median age at recurrence of 49 years (range, 35-69 years). A repeat course of radiotherapy was given concurrently with cisplatin, with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil as consolidation treatment. Significant morbidities were present, including cranial nerve palsies due to extensive recurrent local disease before treatment of the recurrence.

RESULTS

The response rate to concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 58% (29% complete response and 29% partial response). The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rate, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 15% and 26%, respectively. Only 3 patients developed systemic metastases. Grade 3-4 acute toxicities included emesis (9%) and neutropenia (14%), and Grade 3-4 late toxicities consisted of temporal lobe necrosis (3%), cranial neuropathy (6%), and endocrine abnormalities (14%).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is feasible in a selected group of patients with locoregional recurrent NPC, but the risk of major late toxicities is significant.

The role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the value of interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (iBT) with regard to local control and the incidence of side effects in patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From October 1997 to September 2001, 43 patients with head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated area (31 patients with recurrent cancer) were treated with iBT alone or in combination with external beam radiation. Thirty-four of 43 patients received interstitial PDR brachytherapy (DREF=20-60 Gy) as part of their curative treatment regimen alone or in combination with external radiation. Nine patients were implanted for palliative purposes. The pulses were delivered 24 h/day with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses. The dose per pulse (dp) ranged from 0.4-0.7 Gy. Sixteen of 43 (37%) patients also received cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-fluorouracil during the time of the iBT. Additionally 20/43 (47%) patients were treated with interstitial hyperthermia. Thirteen of 43 (30%) patients received external beam radiation in a dose range from 20-67 Gy. A follow-up of all patients was done to analyze local control and survival, and acute and delayed toxicity. This analysis was performed after a median follow-up of 24 months (6-48 months).

RESULTS

Local tumor control was achieved in 34 of a total of 43 patients (79%) and in 30/34 patients (88%) treated for curative intention. Distant metastases were observed in 5/43 (12%) patients. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rates, disease-free survival rates, and overall survival rates according to the Kaplan-Meier method for all patients were 68%, 62%, and 49%, respectively, and for patients treated with curative intention they were 80%, 77% and 66%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the probability of local recurrence in patients subgrouped by recurrent tumor vs. secondary primary, tumor size, grading and lymphangiosis. The application of chemotherapy or hyperthermia did not have significant influence on the therapy results. Soft tissue necrosis was the only serious side effect seen in 2/43 patients (4.7%). No other serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer is an effective therapy with minimal toxicity. The role of chemotherapy and hyperthermia in these patients remains unclear. Further randomized studies with larger patient numbers are necessary to draw a definite conclusion.

Chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is challenging because of prior radiotherapy, morbidities from disease recurrence, and limited therapeutic options available.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with locoregionally recurrent NPC.

RESULT

Between March 1994 and December 1999, there were 42 patients; most were Chinese (98%) men (81%) with undifferentiated NPC (86%). A repeat course of radiotherapy was feasible in 20 patients and given concurrently with cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (PF) (group 1). The remaining 22 (group 2) received palliative chemotherapy (PF) with a response rate of 50%. Significant morbidities resulted from cranial nerve palsies. The 2-year progression-free survival of patients in group 1 was expectedly better (58% vs 38%). Six (14%) developed systemic metastases at 12 months (median) from first recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregional recurrent NPC seems promising. The morbidity experienced resulted from locoregional disease with few progressing to develop systemic involvement.

Conformal re-irradiation of recurrent and new primary head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

To review the outcome of head-and-neck cancer patients re-irradiated using conformal radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1983 to 1999, 60 patients with recurrent or new primary head-and-neck cancer received re-irradiation at the University of Michigan. Twenty patients were excluded due to the planned cumulative radiation dose being less than 100 Gy (18) and absence of prior radiation details (2), leaving 40 patients. Thirty-five patients were re-irradiated for unresectable disease, while 4 patients received adjuvant re-irradiation for high-risk disease. Thirty-eight patients had recurrences from previously treated cancer (19 regional, 14 local, 5 regional and local), and 2 patients had new primary tumors. The median time from the first course of radiation to re-irradiation was 21 months. Thirty-one patients (78%) were re-irradiated with curative intent, whereas 9 were treated with palliative intent. Re-irradiation was delivered using conformal techniques in the majority of patients and with concurrent chemotherapy in 14 patients. The median re-irradiation dose was 60 Gy. The median cumulative dose received was 121 Gy. Five patients (13%) did not complete their prescribed course of re-irradiation.

RESULTS

The median survival following completion of re-irradiation was 12.5 months. The 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 51.1% and 32.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, palliative intent of treatment, tumor bulk, and tumor site other than nasopharynx or larynx were associated with worse survival. The patients treated for unresectable disease did no worse than those treated adjuvantly. The median times to relapse-free survival, local-regional recurrence (LRR)-free survival, and ultimate LRR-free survival (allowing for surgical salvage) were 3.9 months, 7.8 months, and 8.7 months, respectively. Seven patients (18%) are presently alive with no evidence of disease, with a median follow-up of 49.9 months (range 3.3-78.9). Severe radiation-induced complications were seen in 7 patients (18%). Two other patients developed orocutaneous fistulas in the presence of tumor recurrence. Moderate fibrosis and trismus were common.

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of conformal techniques, the prognosis of patients treated with re-irradiation is poor, and complications are not infrequent. A subset of patients is salvageable, and high-dose re-irradiation should be considered in selected patients.

Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES

Salvage surgery is widely viewed as a "double-edged sword." It is the best option for many patients with recurrent cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract, especially when original therapy included irradiation, yet it may provide only modest benefit at high personal cost to the patient. The stakes are high because alternatives are of limited value. The primary objective of this study was to fully assess the value of salvage surgical procedures in the treatment of local and regional recurrence. The following hypotheses were developed to focus the study design and data analysis. 1) The efficacy of salvage surgery correlates recurrent stage, recurrent site, and time to presalvage recurrence. 2) The economic and noneconomic costs of salvage surgery increase with higher recurrent stage. 3) Information relating the value of salvage surgery to recurrent stage and recurrent site will be useful to these patients and the physicians who treat them.

STUDY DESIGN

Two complimentary methods of investigation were used: a meta-analysis of the published literature and a prospective observational study of patients undergoing salvage surgery for recurrent cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract.

METHODS

The meta-analysis combined 32 published reports to obtain an estimate of average treatment effect for salvage surgery with regard to survival, disease-free survival, surgical complications, and operative mortality. The prospective observational study included detailed data in 109 patients who underwent salvage surgery. In addition to parameters studied in the meta-analysis, we obtained baseline and interval quality of life data (Functional Living Index for Cancer [FLIC] scores), baseline and interval performance status evaluations (Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients [PSS head and neck scores]), length of hospital stay, and hospital and physician charges, and related this data primarily to recurrent stage, recurrent site, and time to presalvage recurrence.

RESULTS

The weighted average of 5-year survival in the meta-analysis was 39% in 1,080 patients from 28 different institutions. In the prospective study, median disease-free survival was 17.9 months in 109 patients, and this correlated strongly with recurrent stage, weakly with recurrent site, and not at all with time to presalvage recurrence. Noneconomic costs for patients and economic costs correlated with recurrent stage, but not with site. Baseline FLIC and PSS head and neck scores correlated with recurrent stage, but not with site. After salvage surgery the percentage of patients reaching or exceeding baseline was 51% for FLIC scores, and this differed significantly with recurrent stage. Postoperative interval "success" in PSS head and neck subscale scores for diet and eating in public also correlated with recurrent stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the expected efficacy for salvage surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer was surprisingly good, but success was limited and costs were great in stage III and, especially, in stage IV recurrences. A strong correlation of efficacy and noneconomic costs with recurrent stage allowed the creation of expectation profiles that may be useful to patients. Additional systematic clinical research is needed to improve results. In the end, the decision to undergo salvage surgery should be a personal choice made by the patient after honest and compassionate discussion with his or her surgeon.

Re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Benefits and toxicities

Most patients with head and neck cancer that recurs after irradiation should be treated with curative surgery. In patients whose tumors are nonresectable, or if surgery would cause unacceptable morbidity, a trial of curative re-irradiation may be considered. Taking into account the overall poor prognosis of these patients and the high rate of late tissue toxicity, especially soft tissue necrosis, fistula formation, and potential nerve damage, patients should be carefully selected. Several sites, notably the larynx and nasopharynx, can be re-irradiated with a relatively high rate of locoregional tumor control. In other sites, several criteria may be used to select patients for curative re-irradiation: limited tumor size, a relatively long period since previous irradiation (a suitable, though arbitrary, minimal time period may be 1 year), good performance status, and lack of evidence of skin or soft tissue damage (skin fibrosis, atrophy or telangiectasis) by the previous irradiation course. Even when these selection criteria are used, the prognosis is poor, and long-term survival rates are low even if locoregional tumor control is achieved. Innovative strategies and techniques, including aggressive combined chemoradiation, hyperfractionation, and limiting the extent of irradiated tissues by using conformal irradiation, may improve locoregional control rates. It should be emphasized, however, that the only chance for achieving locoregional control and cure is through the delivery of a full dose of radiation, similar to the dose required for primary tumors. The delivery of a low radiation dose, commonly practiced to avoid complications, is expected to achieve palliation only.